Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment
Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater science 2014-03, Vol.33 (1), p.338-348 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 348 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 338 |
container_title | Freshwater science |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | White, Bryan P. Pilgrim, Erik M. Boykin, Laura M. Stein, Eric D. Mazor, Raphael D. |
description | Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments to assign specimens to putative species, but no method for delimiting DNA barcodes into species-level entities is universally accepted. We investigated the effect of delimitation methods on outcomes of bioassessments based on DNA barcodes. We used 2 tree-construction methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML]) and 4 classes of species-delimitation criteria (distance-based, bootstrap support, reciprocal monophyly, and coalescentbased) with a DNA barcode data set consisting of 3 genera and 2202 COI sequences. We compared species delimitations for Baetis (Ephemeroptera:Baetidae), Eukiefferiella (Diptera:Chironomidae), and Simulium (Diptera: Simuliidae) from different streams. We assessed congruence among trees and compared species abundances and estimated species richness among methods. NJ followed by use of a standard barcoding distance cutoff (2%) yielded the greatest number of putative species. All other delimitation methods yielded similar, but lower, richness. Differences in species delimitations produced by various methods might have been caused by confounding factors, such as possible parthenogenesis in Baetis and rare haplotypes in abundant species of Baetis and Simulium. Eukiefferiella presented the fewest discrepancies among delimitations. Each method can be regarded as producing a separate line of evidence contributing to the delimitation of separately evolving lineages. The increased resolution offered by DNA barcoding can yield important insights into the natural history of organisms, but the power of these observations is limited without the use of multigene and multilocus data sets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/674982 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_674982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/674982</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/674982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-29f8f4fb92f3f4fb7c116d2e9c6c7d9ff12f46ba29beacd6f29a9d609d0e70293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFrFDEQxxexYKn1KxhQpC9rk-xu7vJ4vbO2cFXwvOcwm0zaHLubNckKffaLm2NF-1JwXmZgfvxn5j9F8YbRj4wuxaVY1HLJXxSnnAlWykY0L__WtXxVnMd4oDkEZVUjTotfa9-PEFz0A_GWXPspkN2I2mEsN9i53iVILjfvMD14E8lqHDuHhiRPgGy-rMgVBO0Nkg0kIDtMR5nbIaJOZAvhJyCxPpB9ROIG8s1PyQ1IrpyHGDHGHof0ujix0EU8_5PPiv31p-_rm3L79fPterUt20rKVHJpl7a2reS2OuaFZkwYjlILvTDSWsZtLVrgskXQRlguQRpBpaG4oFxWZ8XFrDsG_2PCmFTvosaugwH9FBVrWLaPLwXL6IcZ1cHHGNCqMbgewqNiVB2NVrPRGXw_g5N-cBru_RjyVeqQfRzyLf-wi__A1GhsRt_N6CEmH56f-3amLHgF9_mBar_jlDWUcsaq-slmrfN-wOeEfgMxi6sW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516742861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>White, Bryan P. ; Pilgrim, Erik M. ; Boykin, Laura M. ; Stein, Eric D. ; Mazor, Raphael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Bryan P. ; Pilgrim, Erik M. ; Boykin, Laura M. ; Stein, Eric D. ; Mazor, Raphael D.</creatorcontrib><description>Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments to assign specimens to putative species, but no method for delimiting DNA barcodes into species-level entities is universally accepted. We investigated the effect of delimitation methods on outcomes of bioassessments based on DNA barcodes. We used 2 tree-construction methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML]) and 4 classes of species-delimitation criteria (distance-based, bootstrap support, reciprocal monophyly, and coalescentbased) with a DNA barcode data set consisting of 3 genera and 2202 COI sequences. We compared species delimitations for Baetis (Ephemeroptera:Baetidae), Eukiefferiella (Diptera:Chironomidae), and Simulium (Diptera: Simuliidae) from different streams. We assessed congruence among trees and compared species abundances and estimated species richness among methods. NJ followed by use of a standard barcoding distance cutoff (2%) yielded the greatest number of putative species. All other delimitation methods yielded similar, but lower, richness. Differences in species delimitations produced by various methods might have been caused by confounding factors, such as possible parthenogenesis in Baetis and rare haplotypes in abundant species of Baetis and Simulium. Eukiefferiella presented the fewest discrepancies among delimitations. Each method can be regarded as producing a separate line of evidence contributing to the delimitation of separately evolving lineages. The increased resolution offered by DNA barcoding can yield important insights into the natural history of organisms, but the power of these observations is limited without the use of multigene and multilocus data sets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2161-9549</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2161-9565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-9565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/674982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>North American Benthological Society</publisher><subject>Baetis ; Bar codes ; barcoding ; benthic macroinvertebrates ; bioassessment ; Biological assessment ; Biological taxonomies ; biomonitoring ; coalescent theory ; COI ; cytochrome oxidase I ; cytochrome-c oxidase ; data collection ; Datasets ; Diptera ; DNA ; DNA barcoding ; Eukiefferiella ; Freshwater ; genes ; GMYC ; Haplotypes ; insect larvae ; interspecific variation ; MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN FRESHWATER ECOLOGY ; monophyly ; natural history ; Nuclear models ; Nucleotides ; parthenogenesis ; Simuliidae ; Simulium ; Species ; species delimitation ; species diversity ; streams ; Taxa ; trees</subject><ispartof>Freshwater science, 2014-03, Vol.33 (1), p.338-348</ispartof><rights>2014 by The Society for Freshwater</rights><rights>2014 by The Society for Freshwater Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-29f8f4fb92f3f4fb7c116d2e9c6c7d9ff12f46ba29beacd6f29a9d609d0e70293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-29f8f4fb92f3f4fb7c116d2e9c6c7d9ff12f46ba29beacd6f29a9d609d0e70293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Bryan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilgrim, Erik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boykin, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazor, Raphael D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment</title><title>Freshwater science</title><description>Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments to assign specimens to putative species, but no method for delimiting DNA barcodes into species-level entities is universally accepted. We investigated the effect of delimitation methods on outcomes of bioassessments based on DNA barcodes. We used 2 tree-construction methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML]) and 4 classes of species-delimitation criteria (distance-based, bootstrap support, reciprocal monophyly, and coalescentbased) with a DNA barcode data set consisting of 3 genera and 2202 COI sequences. We compared species delimitations for Baetis (Ephemeroptera:Baetidae), Eukiefferiella (Diptera:Chironomidae), and Simulium (Diptera: Simuliidae) from different streams. We assessed congruence among trees and compared species abundances and estimated species richness among methods. NJ followed by use of a standard barcoding distance cutoff (2%) yielded the greatest number of putative species. All other delimitation methods yielded similar, but lower, richness. Differences in species delimitations produced by various methods might have been caused by confounding factors, such as possible parthenogenesis in Baetis and rare haplotypes in abundant species of Baetis and Simulium. Eukiefferiella presented the fewest discrepancies among delimitations. Each method can be regarded as producing a separate line of evidence contributing to the delimitation of separately evolving lineages. The increased resolution offered by DNA barcoding can yield important insights into the natural history of organisms, but the power of these observations is limited without the use of multigene and multilocus data sets.</description><subject>Baetis</subject><subject>Bar codes</subject><subject>barcoding</subject><subject>benthic macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>bioassessment</subject><subject>Biological assessment</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>biomonitoring</subject><subject>coalescent theory</subject><subject>COI</subject><subject>cytochrome oxidase I</subject><subject>cytochrome-c oxidase</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>Eukiefferiella</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>GMYC</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>insect larvae</subject><subject>interspecific variation</subject><subject>MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN FRESHWATER ECOLOGY</subject><subject>monophyly</subject><subject>natural history</subject><subject>Nuclear models</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>parthenogenesis</subject><subject>Simuliidae</subject><subject>Simulium</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species delimitation</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>trees</subject><issn>2161-9549</issn><issn>2161-9565</issn><issn>2161-9565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkVFrFDEQxxexYKn1KxhQpC9rk-xu7vJ4vbO2cFXwvOcwm0zaHLubNckKffaLm2NF-1JwXmZgfvxn5j9F8YbRj4wuxaVY1HLJXxSnnAlWykY0L__WtXxVnMd4oDkEZVUjTotfa9-PEFz0A_GWXPspkN2I2mEsN9i53iVILjfvMD14E8lqHDuHhiRPgGy-rMgVBO0Nkg0kIDtMR5nbIaJOZAvhJyCxPpB9ROIG8s1PyQ1IrpyHGDHGHof0ujix0EU8_5PPiv31p-_rm3L79fPterUt20rKVHJpl7a2reS2OuaFZkwYjlILvTDSWsZtLVrgskXQRlguQRpBpaG4oFxWZ8XFrDsG_2PCmFTvosaugwH9FBVrWLaPLwXL6IcZ1cHHGNCqMbgewqNiVB2NVrPRGXw_g5N-cBru_RjyVeqQfRzyLf-wi__A1GhsRt_N6CEmH56f-3amLHgF9_mBar_jlDWUcsaq-slmrfN-wOeEfgMxi6sW</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>White, Bryan P.</creator><creator>Pilgrim, Erik M.</creator><creator>Boykin, Laura M.</creator><creator>Stein, Eric D.</creator><creator>Mazor, Raphael D.</creator><general>North American Benthological Society</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment</title><author>White, Bryan P. ; Pilgrim, Erik M. ; Boykin, Laura M. ; Stein, Eric D. ; Mazor, Raphael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-29f8f4fb92f3f4fb7c116d2e9c6c7d9ff12f46ba29beacd6f29a9d609d0e70293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Baetis</topic><topic>Bar codes</topic><topic>barcoding</topic><topic>benthic macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>bioassessment</topic><topic>Biological assessment</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>biomonitoring</topic><topic>coalescent theory</topic><topic>COI</topic><topic>cytochrome oxidase I</topic><topic>cytochrome-c oxidase</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>Eukiefferiella</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>GMYC</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>insect larvae</topic><topic>interspecific variation</topic><topic>MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN FRESHWATER ECOLOGY</topic><topic>monophyly</topic><topic>natural history</topic><topic>Nuclear models</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>parthenogenesis</topic><topic>Simuliidae</topic><topic>Simulium</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species delimitation</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Bryan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilgrim, Erik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boykin, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazor, Raphael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Freshwater science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Bryan P.</au><au>Pilgrim, Erik M.</au><au>Boykin, Laura M.</au><au>Stein, Eric D.</au><au>Mazor, Raphael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater science</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>338-348</pages><issn>2161-9549</issn><issn>2161-9565</issn><eissn>2161-9565</eissn><abstract>Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments to assign specimens to putative species, but no method for delimiting DNA barcodes into species-level entities is universally accepted. We investigated the effect of delimitation methods on outcomes of bioassessments based on DNA barcodes. We used 2 tree-construction methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML]) and 4 classes of species-delimitation criteria (distance-based, bootstrap support, reciprocal monophyly, and coalescentbased) with a DNA barcode data set consisting of 3 genera and 2202 COI sequences. We compared species delimitations for Baetis (Ephemeroptera:Baetidae), Eukiefferiella (Diptera:Chironomidae), and Simulium (Diptera: Simuliidae) from different streams. We assessed congruence among trees and compared species abundances and estimated species richness among methods. NJ followed by use of a standard barcoding distance cutoff (2%) yielded the greatest number of putative species. All other delimitation methods yielded similar, but lower, richness. Differences in species delimitations produced by various methods might have been caused by confounding factors, such as possible parthenogenesis in Baetis and rare haplotypes in abundant species of Baetis and Simulium. Eukiefferiella presented the fewest discrepancies among delimitations. Each method can be regarded as producing a separate line of evidence contributing to the delimitation of separately evolving lineages. The increased resolution offered by DNA barcoding can yield important insights into the natural history of organisms, but the power of these observations is limited without the use of multigene and multilocus data sets.</abstract><pub>North American Benthological Society</pub><doi>10.1086/674982</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2161-9549 |
ispartof | Freshwater science, 2014-03, Vol.33 (1), p.338-348 |
issn | 2161-9549 2161-9565 2161-9565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_674982 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Baetis Bar codes barcoding benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessment Biological assessment Biological taxonomies biomonitoring coalescent theory COI cytochrome oxidase I cytochrome-c oxidase data collection Datasets Diptera DNA DNA barcoding Eukiefferiella Freshwater genes GMYC Haplotypes insect larvae interspecific variation MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN FRESHWATER ECOLOGY monophyly natural history Nuclear models Nucleotides parthenogenesis Simuliidae Simulium Species species delimitation species diversity streams Taxa trees |
title | Comparison of Four Species-Delimitation Methods Applied to a DNA Barcode Data Set of Insect Larvae for Use in Routine Bioassessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Four%20Species-Delimitation%20Methods%20Applied%20to%20a%20DNA%20Barcode%20Data%20Set%20of%20Insect%20Larvae%20for%20Use%20in%20Routine%20Bioassessment&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20science&rft.au=White,%20Bryan%20P.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=338-348&rft.issn=2161-9549&rft.eissn=2161-9565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/674982&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/674982%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516742861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/674982&rfr_iscdi=true |