Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21

Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Classical philology 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216
1. Verfasser: Gibson, Craig A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 2
container_start_page 213
container_title Classical philology
container_volume 105
creator Gibson, Craig A.
description Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21
doi_str_mv 10.1086/655631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_655631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2092380261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-588c413bfb7f37af69b33a5d246254e7165042052eb8f02aaaa3c8ecfc76201b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rfoYgIl5a80568LCsT1gfB4W9hTRNtEu3qUl78NtbqejVucwM_JiBPwDHGOUYKXEhOBcU74AZ5kxkSJL1LpghhIpMUbneBwcpbcaVK1bMwOVj6F2CoYUPJtohwUXbh7Yeh-fQuG2AV842Zmv6OrQJ4hzzDEto2gqSnOBDsOdNk9zRT5-D15vrl-Vdtnq6vV8uVpklkvcZV8oyTEtfSk-l8aIoKTW8IkwQzpzEgiNGECeuVB4RMxa1yllvpSAIl3QOTqa7XQwfg0u93oQhtuNLLQlhBaaUjehsQjaGlKLzuov11sRPjZH-TkZPyYzwdIKDfa-teQtddCn9nfxl5_9guqs8_QJ_BWyu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>722491334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Gibson, Craig A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><description>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-837X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-072X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/655631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLPLA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Literary criticism ; Polemo, Marcus Antonius ; Speech</subject><ispartof>Classical philology, 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><title>Classical philology</title><description>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</description><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Polemo, Marcus Antonius</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0009-837X</issn><issn>1546-072X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rfoYgIl5a80568LCsT1gfB4W9hTRNtEu3qUl78NtbqejVucwM_JiBPwDHGOUYKXEhOBcU74AZ5kxkSJL1LpghhIpMUbneBwcpbcaVK1bMwOVj6F2CoYUPJtohwUXbh7Yeh-fQuG2AV842Zmv6OrQJ4hzzDEto2gqSnOBDsOdNk9zRT5-D15vrl-Vdtnq6vV8uVpklkvcZV8oyTEtfSk-l8aIoKTW8IkwQzpzEgiNGECeuVB4RMxa1yllvpSAIl3QOTqa7XQwfg0u93oQhtuNLLQlhBaaUjehsQjaGlKLzuov11sRPjZH-TkZPyYzwdIKDfa-teQtddCn9nfxl5_9guqs8_QJ_BWyu</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Gibson, Craig A.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><author>Gibson, Craig A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-588c413bfb7f37af69b33a5d246254e7165042052eb8f02aaaa3c8ecfc76201b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Polemo, Marcus Antonius</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Classical philology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Craig A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</atitle><jtitle>Classical philology</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>213-216</pages><issn>0009-837X</issn><eissn>1546-072X</eissn><coden>CLPLA5</coden><abstract>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/655631</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-837X
ispartof Classical philology, 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216
issn 0009-837X
1546-072X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_655631
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Literary criticism
Polemo, Marcus Antonius
Speech
title Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Notes%20on%20Marcus%20Antonius%20Polemo%20Declamations%201.15-17%20and%202.21&rft.jtitle=Classical%20philology&rft.au=Gibson,%20Craig%20A.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=213-216&rft.issn=0009-837X&rft.eissn=1546-072X&rft.coden=CLPLA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/655631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2092380261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=722491334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true