Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21
Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Classical philology 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 216 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Classical philology |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Gibson, Craig A. |
description | Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/655631 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_655631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2092380261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-588c413bfb7f37af69b33a5d246254e7165042052eb8f02aaaa3c8ecfc76201b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rfoYgIl5a80568LCsT1gfB4W9hTRNtEu3qUl78NtbqejVucwM_JiBPwDHGOUYKXEhOBcU74AZ5kxkSJL1LpghhIpMUbneBwcpbcaVK1bMwOVj6F2CoYUPJtohwUXbh7Yeh-fQuG2AV842Zmv6OrQJ4hzzDEto2gqSnOBDsOdNk9zRT5-D15vrl-Vdtnq6vV8uVpklkvcZV8oyTEtfSk-l8aIoKTW8IkwQzpzEgiNGECeuVB4RMxa1yllvpSAIl3QOTqa7XQwfg0u93oQhtuNLLQlhBaaUjehsQjaGlKLzuov11sRPjZH-TkZPyYzwdIKDfa-teQtddCn9nfxl5_9guqs8_QJ_BWyu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>722491334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Gibson, Craig A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><description>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-837X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-072X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/655631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLPLA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Literary criticism ; Polemo, Marcus Antonius ; Speech</subject><ispartof>Classical philology, 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><title>Classical philology</title><description>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</description><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Polemo, Marcus Antonius</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0009-837X</issn><issn>1546-072X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rfoYgIl5a80568LCsT1gfB4W9hTRNtEu3qUl78NtbqejVucwM_JiBPwDHGOUYKXEhOBcU74AZ5kxkSJL1LpghhIpMUbneBwcpbcaVK1bMwOVj6F2CoYUPJtohwUXbh7Yeh-fQuG2AV842Zmv6OrQJ4hzzDEto2gqSnOBDsOdNk9zRT5-D15vrl-Vdtnq6vV8uVpklkvcZV8oyTEtfSk-l8aIoKTW8IkwQzpzEgiNGECeuVB4RMxa1yllvpSAIl3QOTqa7XQwfg0u93oQhtuNLLQlhBaaUjehsQjaGlKLzuov11sRPjZH-TkZPyYzwdIKDfa-teQtddCn9nfxl5_9guqs8_QJ_BWyu</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Gibson, Craig A.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</title><author>Gibson, Craig A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-588c413bfb7f37af69b33a5d246254e7165042052eb8f02aaaa3c8ecfc76201b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Polemo, Marcus Antonius</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Classical philology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Craig A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21</atitle><jtitle>Classical philology</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>213-216</pages><issn>0009-837X</issn><eissn>1546-072X</eissn><coden>CLPLA5</coden><abstract>Among the few preserved writings of the famous second-century C.E. sophist Marcus Antonius Polemo is a pair of declamations in which the fathers of two Athenians killed in the battle of Marathon compete for the right to deliver the state funeral oration over the dead. In Declamation 1, Euphorion, the father of Cynegirus, argues that he deserves to deliver the speech because his son died when the Persians whose ship he was trying to prevent from fleeing the battle cut off his hands. In Declamation 2, the unnamed father of the polemarch Callimachus argues that, in addition to considerations of his son's superior rank, he is entitled to deliver the speech because his son died after being shot by so many arrows that his corpse remained standing. Here, Gibson offers a new interpretation of the argument about rank and privilege in Declamation 1.15-17 which he argues has been misunderstood by previous translators and commentators. He also clarifies the argument intended to counter in Declamation 2.21</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/655631</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-837X |
ispartof | Classical philology, 2010-04, Vol.105 (2), p.213-216 |
issn | 0009-837X 1546-072X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_655631 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Literary criticism Polemo, Marcus Antonius Speech |
title | Notes on Marcus Antonius Polemo Declamations 1.15-17 and 2.21 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Notes%20on%20Marcus%20Antonius%20Polemo%20Declamations%201.15-17%20and%202.21&rft.jtitle=Classical%20philology&rft.au=Gibson,%20Craig%20A.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=213-216&rft.issn=0009-837X&rft.eissn=1546-072X&rft.coden=CLPLA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/655631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2092380261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=722491334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |