Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea
Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic development and cultural change 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Economic development and cultural change |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Kim, Sunwoong Lee, Ju-ho |
description | Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/648186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_648186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/648186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/648186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pP8CroiLeVJOcNkkvZfiFAwX1OmRJOjO2piat4L83o8JAEA0Hzs3Dm5MThA4JviBYsEtWCCLYFhqREqqcVkJsoxHGBHKMebWL9mJc4HQAYITEU3AfqrNZ13c-uGaeqcZkxq7WrfYhs6bXqnO-yVyTPfu-e8sefLBqH-3UahntwXcfo9eb65fJXT59vL2fXE1zXRZVl4uZIZwRS_mMGygE40JwTrFlwHhdEj3DTKjaMqwF5ZwTrVOVhuKKKFFqGKOzIbcN_r23sZMrF7VdLlVjfR9lyQFKIuifEDjlBaQao-MfcOH70KRHSAqsqIBUsEnTwccYbC3b4FYqfEqC5XrNclhzgucD7PWb02ru22Bj3EQOTLamTvT0HzSxk4EtYvqS3-89GpRx7WY4kaYvCHwBM7uazw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236493193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><description>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/648186</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDCCAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Access to education ; Ausgaben ; Bildung ; Bildungskosten ; Bildungsverhalten ; Bildungswesen ; Children ; College entrance examinations ; Demand ; Economic growth ; Education ; Education policy ; Elementary schools ; Equalization ; High school students ; High schools ; Households ; Human capital ; Income ; Pedagogy ; Peer tutoring ; Prevalence ; Private schools ; Schule ; Schulpolitik ; Self study ; Socioeconomic development ; South Korea ; State-society relations ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Südkorea ; Tutoring ; Universities ; Öffentliche Ausgaben</subject><ispartof>Economic development and cultural change, 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981,33755</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=893141$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><title>Economic development and cultural change</title><description>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</description><subject>Access to education</subject><subject>Ausgaben</subject><subject>Bildung</subject><subject>Bildungskosten</subject><subject>Bildungsverhalten</subject><subject>Bildungswesen</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>College entrance examinations</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Equalization</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Peer tutoring</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Schule</subject><subject>Schulpolitik</subject><subject>Self study</subject><subject>Socioeconomic development</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Südkorea</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Öffentliche Ausgaben</subject><issn>0013-0079</issn><issn>1539-2988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pP8CroiLeVJOcNkkvZfiFAwX1OmRJOjO2piat4L83o8JAEA0Hzs3Dm5MThA4JviBYsEtWCCLYFhqREqqcVkJsoxHGBHKMebWL9mJc4HQAYITEU3AfqrNZ13c-uGaeqcZkxq7WrfYhs6bXqnO-yVyTPfu-e8sefLBqH-3UahntwXcfo9eb65fJXT59vL2fXE1zXRZVl4uZIZwRS_mMGygE40JwTrFlwHhdEj3DTKjaMqwF5ZwTrVOVhuKKKFFqGKOzIbcN_r23sZMrF7VdLlVjfR9lyQFKIuifEDjlBaQao-MfcOH70KRHSAqsqIBUsEnTwccYbC3b4FYqfEqC5XrNclhzgucD7PWb02ru22Bj3EQOTLamTvT0HzSxk4EtYvqS3-89GpRx7WY4kaYvCHwBM7uazw</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Kim, Sunwoong</creator><creator>Lee, Ju-ho</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><author>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Access to education</topic><topic>Ausgaben</topic><topic>Bildung</topic><topic>Bildungskosten</topic><topic>Bildungsverhalten</topic><topic>Bildungswesen</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>College entrance examinations</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Equalization</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Peer tutoring</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Schule</topic><topic>Schulpolitik</topic><topic>Self study</topic><topic>Socioeconomic development</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Südkorea</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Öffentliche Ausgaben</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Economic development and cultural change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sunwoong</au><au>Lee, Ju-ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Economic development and cultural change</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>259-296</pages><issn>0013-0079</issn><eissn>1539-2988</eissn><coden>EDCCAF</coden><abstract>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/648186</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0079 |
ispartof | Economic development and cultural change, 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296 |
issn | 0013-0079 1539-2988 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_648186 |
source | Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Access to education Ausgaben Bildung Bildungskosten Bildungsverhalten Bildungswesen Children College entrance examinations Demand Economic growth Education Education policy Elementary schools Equalization High school students High schools Households Human capital Income Pedagogy Peer tutoring Prevalence Private schools Schule Schulpolitik Self study Socioeconomic development South Korea State-society relations Studies Sustainable development Südkorea Tutoring Universities Öffentliche Ausgaben |
title | Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Private%20tutoring%20and%20demand%20for%20education%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Economic%20development%20and%20cultural%20change&rft.au=Kim,%20Sunwoong&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=259-296&rft.issn=0013-0079&rft.eissn=1539-2988&rft.coden=EDCCAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/648186&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/648186%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236493193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/648186&rfr_iscdi=true |