Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea

Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic development and cultural change 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Sunwoong, Lee, Ju-ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
container_title Economic development and cultural change
container_volume 58
creator Kim, Sunwoong
Lee, Ju-ho
description Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/648186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_648186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/648186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/648186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pP8CroiLeVJOcNkkvZfiFAwX1OmRJOjO2piat4L83o8JAEA0Hzs3Dm5MThA4JviBYsEtWCCLYFhqREqqcVkJsoxHGBHKMebWL9mJc4HQAYITEU3AfqrNZ13c-uGaeqcZkxq7WrfYhs6bXqnO-yVyTPfu-e8sefLBqH-3UahntwXcfo9eb65fJXT59vL2fXE1zXRZVl4uZIZwRS_mMGygE40JwTrFlwHhdEj3DTKjaMqwF5ZwTrVOVhuKKKFFqGKOzIbcN_r23sZMrF7VdLlVjfR9lyQFKIuifEDjlBaQao-MfcOH70KRHSAqsqIBUsEnTwccYbC3b4FYqfEqC5XrNclhzgucD7PWb02ru22Bj3EQOTLamTvT0HzSxk4EtYvqS3-89GpRx7WY4kaYvCHwBM7uazw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236493193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><description>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/648186</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDCCAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Access to education ; Ausgaben ; Bildung ; Bildungskosten ; Bildungsverhalten ; Bildungswesen ; Children ; College entrance examinations ; Demand ; Economic growth ; Education ; Education policy ; Elementary schools ; Equalization ; High school students ; High schools ; Households ; Human capital ; Income ; Pedagogy ; Peer tutoring ; Prevalence ; Private schools ; Schule ; Schulpolitik ; Self study ; Socioeconomic development ; South Korea ; State-society relations ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Südkorea ; Tutoring ; Universities ; Öffentliche Ausgaben</subject><ispartof>Economic development and cultural change, 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296</ispartof><rights>2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,4010,27904,27905,27906,30980,30981,33755</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=893141$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><title>Economic development and cultural change</title><description>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</description><subject>Access to education</subject><subject>Ausgaben</subject><subject>Bildung</subject><subject>Bildungskosten</subject><subject>Bildungsverhalten</subject><subject>Bildungswesen</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>College entrance examinations</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Equalization</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Peer tutoring</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Schule</subject><subject>Schulpolitik</subject><subject>Self study</subject><subject>Socioeconomic development</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Südkorea</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Öffentliche Ausgaben</subject><issn>0013-0079</issn><issn>1539-2988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pP8CroiLeVJOcNkkvZfiFAwX1OmRJOjO2piat4L83o8JAEA0Hzs3Dm5MThA4JviBYsEtWCCLYFhqREqqcVkJsoxHGBHKMebWL9mJc4HQAYITEU3AfqrNZ13c-uGaeqcZkxq7WrfYhs6bXqnO-yVyTPfu-e8sefLBqH-3UahntwXcfo9eb65fJXT59vL2fXE1zXRZVl4uZIZwRS_mMGygE40JwTrFlwHhdEj3DTKjaMqwF5ZwTrVOVhuKKKFFqGKOzIbcN_r23sZMrF7VdLlVjfR9lyQFKIuifEDjlBaQao-MfcOH70KRHSAqsqIBUsEnTwccYbC3b4FYqfEqC5XrNclhzgucD7PWb02ru22Bj3EQOTLamTvT0HzSxk4EtYvqS3-89GpRx7WY4kaYvCHwBM7uazw</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Kim, Sunwoong</creator><creator>Lee, Ju-ho</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</title><author>Kim, Sunwoong ; Lee, Ju-ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-8bd1761e27b7d34867887720e6367f51cb068afe60c827771cc1cc5d2091a85c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Access to education</topic><topic>Ausgaben</topic><topic>Bildung</topic><topic>Bildungskosten</topic><topic>Bildungsverhalten</topic><topic>Bildungswesen</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>College entrance examinations</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Equalization</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Peer tutoring</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Schule</topic><topic>Schulpolitik</topic><topic>Self study</topic><topic>Socioeconomic development</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Südkorea</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Öffentliche Ausgaben</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunwoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ju-ho</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Economic development and cultural change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sunwoong</au><au>Lee, Ju-ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Economic development and cultural change</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>259-296</pages><issn>0013-0079</issn><eissn>1539-2988</eissn><coden>EDCCAF</coden><abstract>Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation’s GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government’s rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/648186</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0079
ispartof Economic development and cultural change, 2010-01, Vol.58 (2), p.259-296
issn 0013-0079
1539-2988
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_648186
source Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Access to education
Ausgaben
Bildung
Bildungskosten
Bildungsverhalten
Bildungswesen
Children
College entrance examinations
Demand
Economic growth
Education
Education policy
Elementary schools
Equalization
High school students
High schools
Households
Human capital
Income
Pedagogy
Peer tutoring
Prevalence
Private schools
Schule
Schulpolitik
Self study
Socioeconomic development
South Korea
State-society relations
Studies
Sustainable development
Südkorea
Tutoring
Universities
Öffentliche Ausgaben
title Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Private%20tutoring%20and%20demand%20for%20education%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Economic%20development%20and%20cultural%20change&rft.au=Kim,%20Sunwoong&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=259-296&rft.issn=0013-0079&rft.eissn=1539-2988&rft.coden=EDCCAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/648186&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.1086/648186%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236493193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/648186&rfr_iscdi=true