Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs
Exotherms and lethal low temperatures were examined in four species of chaparral shrubs that co-occur in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California: Rhus laurina, Rhus ovata, Ceanothus megacarpus, and Ceanothus spinosus. For all but R. ovata, excised leaves froze at significantly lower temperat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of plant sciences 1998-05, Vol.159 (3), p.513-521 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 521 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 513 |
container_title | International journal of plant sciences |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Boorse, G.C Bosma, T.L Meyer, A.C Ewers, F.W Davis, S.D |
description | Exotherms and lethal low temperatures were examined in four species of chaparral shrubs that co-occur in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California: Rhus laurina, Rhus ovata, Ceanothus megacarpus, and Ceanothus spinosus. For all but R. ovata, excised leaves froze at significantly lower temperatures than leaves on intact branches (range 4.3⚬-6.9⚬C lower), indicating that only intact shoots should be used for studies of leaf supercooling. Of the four species, only R. laurina showed no leaf supercooling on intact branches. On excised leaves artificially seeded with ice crystals to remove supercooling, the lethal temperature for 50% change in activity or cell death (LT50) was determined by measuring (1) electrical conductivity into a bathing solution (electrolyte leakage), (2) photosynthetic fluorescent capacity (Fv/Fm), (3) the percentage of palisade mesophyll cells stained by fluorescein diacetate (vital stain), and (4) visual score of leaf color (Munsell color chart). In every case, the estimate of LT50by the electrical conductivity method was significantly higher (less negative) by 2⚬-5⚬C than the other three methods, and electrical conductivity results did not correspond with field observations of dieback. Based on the photosynthetic fluorescent technique, which is both reliable and nondestructive, the LT50ranged from -5.6⚬C for R. laurina to about -8.5⚬C for the other three species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/297568 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_297568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2475236</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2475236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-67a966d272572e61bc624eb6dd58a7ce271eccc2e9db2d6a81d60a1c7a77e2c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKf-BQp58q2ajyZpHmX4BQMfdM_lNrndOtZ1JO1g_vVmVvTpHO75ceAeQq45u-es0A_CGqWLEzLhSppMSa5Ok2eqyFRh5Tm5iHHNGLNK2AlpZl27gwB9s0faYr_qfKRdTTH2TZuu2yWtA-LX0fTY7jChQ8BIYev_k2a7HsIhCd0g7PGnwa0gFQfY0LgKQxUvyVkNm4hXvzoli-enz9lrNn9_eZs9zjMndN5n2oDV2gsjlBGoeeW0yLHS3qsCjENhODrnBFpfCa-h4F4z4M6AMShcLqfkbux1oYsxYF3uQnolHErOyuNA5ThQAm9GcB37LvxRIjdKSJ3i2zGuoSthGZpYLj64tYYZIRmX34Y6bJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Boorse, G.C ; Bosma, T.L ; Meyer, A.C ; Ewers, F.W ; Davis, S.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Boorse, G.C ; Bosma, T.L ; Meyer, A.C ; Ewers, F.W ; Davis, S.D</creatorcontrib><description>Exotherms and lethal low temperatures were examined in four species of chaparral shrubs that co-occur in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California: Rhus laurina, Rhus ovata, Ceanothus megacarpus, and Ceanothus spinosus. For all but R. ovata, excised leaves froze at significantly lower temperatures than leaves on intact branches (range 4.3⚬-6.9⚬C lower), indicating that only intact shoots should be used for studies of leaf supercooling. Of the four species, only R. laurina showed no leaf supercooling on intact branches. On excised leaves artificially seeded with ice crystals to remove supercooling, the lethal temperature for 50% change in activity or cell death (LT50) was determined by measuring (1) electrical conductivity into a bathing solution (electrolyte leakage), (2) photosynthetic fluorescent capacity (Fv/Fm), (3) the percentage of palisade mesophyll cells stained by fluorescein diacetate (vital stain), and (4) visual score of leaf color (Munsell color chart). In every case, the estimate of LT50by the electrical conductivity method was significantly higher (less negative) by 2⚬-5⚬C than the other three methods, and electrical conductivity results did not correspond with field observations of dieback. Based on the photosynthetic fluorescent technique, which is both reliable and nondestructive, the LT50ranged from -5.6⚬C for R. laurina to about -8.5⚬C for the other three species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/297568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES ; BRANCHE ; BRANCHES ; CALIFORNIA ; CALIFORNIE ; CEANOTHUS ; CEANOTHUS MEGACARPUS ; CEANOTHUS SPINOSUS ; Chaparral ; COLOR ; COLOUR ; COMPARISONS ; CONDUCTIVIDAD ELECTRICA ; CONDUCTIVITE ELECTRIQUE ; CONGELACION ; CONGELATION ; Cooling ; COULEUR ; DANOS POR LA HELADA ; DEGAT DU AU GEL ; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY ; Electrical resistivity ; ENSAYO ; FEUILLE ; FLUORESCENCE ; FLUORESCENCIA ; FOTOSINTESIS ; FREEZING ; FREEZING POINT ; FROST DAMAGE ; HOJAS ; Ice ; LEAVES ; MESOFILO ; MESOPHYLL ; Mesophyll cells ; MESOPHYLLE ; MORTALIDAD ; MORTALITE ; MORTALITY ; NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING ; PHOTOSYNTHESE ; PHOTOSYNTHESIS ; Physiology ; Plants ; POINT DE CONGELATION ; PUNTO DE CONGELACION ; RAMAS ; RHAMNACEAE ; RHUS ; RHUS LAURINA ; RHUS OVINA ; Shrubs ; STEMS ; Supercooling ; TALLO ; TESTAGE ; TESTING ; TIGE</subject><ispartof>International journal of plant sciences, 1998-05, Vol.159 (3), p.513-521</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 University of Chicago</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-67a966d272572e61bc624eb6dd58a7ce271eccc2e9db2d6a81d60a1c7a77e2c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-67a966d272572e61bc624eb6dd58a7ce271eccc2e9db2d6a81d60a1c7a77e2c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2475236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2475236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boorse, G.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosma, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewers, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, S.D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs</title><title>International journal of plant sciences</title><description>Exotherms and lethal low temperatures were examined in four species of chaparral shrubs that co-occur in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California: Rhus laurina, Rhus ovata, Ceanothus megacarpus, and Ceanothus spinosus. For all but R. ovata, excised leaves froze at significantly lower temperatures than leaves on intact branches (range 4.3⚬-6.9⚬C lower), indicating that only intact shoots should be used for studies of leaf supercooling. Of the four species, only R. laurina showed no leaf supercooling on intact branches. On excised leaves artificially seeded with ice crystals to remove supercooling, the lethal temperature for 50% change in activity or cell death (LT50) was determined by measuring (1) electrical conductivity into a bathing solution (electrolyte leakage), (2) photosynthetic fluorescent capacity (Fv/Fm), (3) the percentage of palisade mesophyll cells stained by fluorescein diacetate (vital stain), and (4) visual score of leaf color (Munsell color chart). In every case, the estimate of LT50by the electrical conductivity method was significantly higher (less negative) by 2⚬-5⚬C than the other three methods, and electrical conductivity results did not correspond with field observations of dieback. Based on the photosynthetic fluorescent technique, which is both reliable and nondestructive, the LT50ranged from -5.6⚬C for R. laurina to about -8.5⚬C for the other three species.</description><subject>BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>BRANCHE</subject><subject>BRANCHES</subject><subject>CALIFORNIA</subject><subject>CALIFORNIE</subject><subject>CEANOTHUS</subject><subject>CEANOTHUS MEGACARPUS</subject><subject>CEANOTHUS SPINOSUS</subject><subject>Chaparral</subject><subject>COLOR</subject><subject>COLOUR</subject><subject>COMPARISONS</subject><subject>CONDUCTIVIDAD ELECTRICA</subject><subject>CONDUCTIVITE ELECTRIQUE</subject><subject>CONGELACION</subject><subject>CONGELATION</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>COULEUR</subject><subject>DANOS POR LA HELADA</subject><subject>DEGAT DU AU GEL</subject><subject>ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>ENSAYO</subject><subject>FEUILLE</subject><subject>FLUORESCENCE</subject><subject>FLUORESCENCIA</subject><subject>FOTOSINTESIS</subject><subject>FREEZING</subject><subject>FREEZING POINT</subject><subject>FROST DAMAGE</subject><subject>HOJAS</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>LEAVES</subject><subject>MESOFILO</subject><subject>MESOPHYLL</subject><subject>Mesophyll cells</subject><subject>MESOPHYLLE</subject><subject>MORTALIDAD</subject><subject>MORTALITE</subject><subject>MORTALITY</subject><subject>NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING</subject><subject>PHOTOSYNTHESE</subject><subject>PHOTOSYNTHESIS</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>POINT DE CONGELATION</subject><subject>PUNTO DE CONGELACION</subject><subject>RAMAS</subject><subject>RHAMNACEAE</subject><subject>RHUS</subject><subject>RHUS LAURINA</subject><subject>RHUS OVINA</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>STEMS</subject><subject>Supercooling</subject><subject>TALLO</subject><subject>TESTAGE</subject><subject>TESTING</subject><subject>TIGE</subject><issn>1058-5893</issn><issn>1537-5315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKf-BQp58q2ajyZpHmX4BQMfdM_lNrndOtZ1JO1g_vVmVvTpHO75ceAeQq45u-es0A_CGqWLEzLhSppMSa5Ok2eqyFRh5Tm5iHHNGLNK2AlpZl27gwB9s0faYr_qfKRdTTH2TZuu2yWtA-LX0fTY7jChQ8BIYev_k2a7HsIhCd0g7PGnwa0gFQfY0LgKQxUvyVkNm4hXvzoli-enz9lrNn9_eZs9zjMndN5n2oDV2gsjlBGoeeW0yLHS3qsCjENhODrnBFpfCa-h4F4z4M6AMShcLqfkbux1oYsxYF3uQnolHErOyuNA5ThQAm9GcB37LvxRIjdKSJ3i2zGuoSthGZpYLj64tYYZIRmX34Y6bJ0</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Boorse, G.C</creator><creator>Bosma, T.L</creator><creator>Meyer, A.C</creator><creator>Ewers, F.W</creator><creator>Davis, S.D</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs</title><author>Boorse, G.C ; Bosma, T.L ; Meyer, A.C ; Ewers, F.W ; Davis, S.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-67a966d272572e61bc624eb6dd58a7ce271eccc2e9db2d6a81d60a1c7a77e2c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>BRANCHE</topic><topic>BRANCHES</topic><topic>CALIFORNIA</topic><topic>CALIFORNIE</topic><topic>CEANOTHUS</topic><topic>CEANOTHUS MEGACARPUS</topic><topic>CEANOTHUS SPINOSUS</topic><topic>Chaparral</topic><topic>COLOR</topic><topic>COLOUR</topic><topic>COMPARISONS</topic><topic>CONDUCTIVIDAD ELECTRICA</topic><topic>CONDUCTIVITE ELECTRIQUE</topic><topic>CONGELACION</topic><topic>CONGELATION</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>COULEUR</topic><topic>DANOS POR LA HELADA</topic><topic>DEGAT DU AU GEL</topic><topic>ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>ENSAYO</topic><topic>FEUILLE</topic><topic>FLUORESCENCE</topic><topic>FLUORESCENCIA</topic><topic>FOTOSINTESIS</topic><topic>FREEZING</topic><topic>FREEZING POINT</topic><topic>FROST DAMAGE</topic><topic>HOJAS</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>LEAVES</topic><topic>MESOFILO</topic><topic>MESOPHYLL</topic><topic>Mesophyll cells</topic><topic>MESOPHYLLE</topic><topic>MORTALIDAD</topic><topic>MORTALITE</topic><topic>MORTALITY</topic><topic>NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING</topic><topic>PHOTOSYNTHESE</topic><topic>PHOTOSYNTHESIS</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>POINT DE CONGELATION</topic><topic>PUNTO DE CONGELACION</topic><topic>RAMAS</topic><topic>RHAMNACEAE</topic><topic>RHUS</topic><topic>RHUS LAURINA</topic><topic>RHUS OVINA</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>STEMS</topic><topic>Supercooling</topic><topic>TALLO</topic><topic>TESTAGE</topic><topic>TESTING</topic><topic>TIGE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boorse, G.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosma, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewers, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, S.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of plant sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boorse, G.C</au><au>Bosma, T.L</au><au>Meyer, A.C</au><au>Ewers, F.W</au><au>Davis, S.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs</atitle><jtitle>International journal of plant sciences</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>521</epage><pages>513-521</pages><issn>1058-5893</issn><eissn>1537-5315</eissn><abstract>Exotherms and lethal low temperatures were examined in four species of chaparral shrubs that co-occur in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California: Rhus laurina, Rhus ovata, Ceanothus megacarpus, and Ceanothus spinosus. For all but R. ovata, excised leaves froze at significantly lower temperatures than leaves on intact branches (range 4.3⚬-6.9⚬C lower), indicating that only intact shoots should be used for studies of leaf supercooling. Of the four species, only R. laurina showed no leaf supercooling on intact branches. On excised leaves artificially seeded with ice crystals to remove supercooling, the lethal temperature for 50% change in activity or cell death (LT50) was determined by measuring (1) electrical conductivity into a bathing solution (electrolyte leakage), (2) photosynthetic fluorescent capacity (Fv/Fm), (3) the percentage of palisade mesophyll cells stained by fluorescein diacetate (vital stain), and (4) visual score of leaf color (Munsell color chart). In every case, the estimate of LT50by the electrical conductivity method was significantly higher (less negative) by 2⚬-5⚬C than the other three methods, and electrical conductivity results did not correspond with field observations of dieback. Based on the photosynthetic fluorescent technique, which is both reliable and nondestructive, the LT50ranged from -5.6⚬C for R. laurina to about -8.5⚬C for the other three species.</abstract><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/297568</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-5893 |
ispartof | International journal of plant sciences, 1998-05, Vol.159 (3), p.513-521 |
issn | 1058-5893 1537-5315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_297568 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES BRANCHE BRANCHES CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIE CEANOTHUS CEANOTHUS MEGACARPUS CEANOTHUS SPINOSUS Chaparral COLOR COLOUR COMPARISONS CONDUCTIVIDAD ELECTRICA CONDUCTIVITE ELECTRIQUE CONGELACION CONGELATION Cooling COULEUR DANOS POR LA HELADA DEGAT DU AU GEL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY Electrical resistivity ENSAYO FEUILLE FLUORESCENCE FLUORESCENCIA FOTOSINTESIS FREEZING FREEZING POINT FROST DAMAGE HOJAS Ice LEAVES MESOFILO MESOPHYLL Mesophyll cells MESOPHYLLE MORTALIDAD MORTALITE MORTALITY NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING PHOTOSYNTHESE PHOTOSYNTHESIS Physiology Plants POINT DE CONGELATION PUNTO DE CONGELACION RAMAS RHAMNACEAE RHUS RHUS LAURINA RHUS OVINA Shrubs STEMS Supercooling TALLO TESTAGE TESTING TIGE |
title | Comparative methods of estimating freezing temperatures and freezing injury in leaves of chaparral shrubs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20methods%20of%20estimating%20freezing%20temperatures%20and%20freezing%20injury%20in%20leaves%20of%20chaparral%20shrubs&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20plant%20sciences&rft.au=Boorse,%20G.C&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=521&rft.pages=513-521&rft.issn=1058-5893&rft.eissn=1537-5315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/297568&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E2475236%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2475236&rfr_iscdi=true |