Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]

Does the occasional find of a Roman, Greek, or Hebrew coin in America indicate ancient transoceanic contact? In this study, 40 reports of such coins are analyzed in order to determine whether any can support the diffusionist position. Discovery dates, minting periods, geographical distribution, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 1980-02, Vol.21 (1), p.1-20
Hauptverfasser: Epstein, Jeremiah F., Buchanan, Donal B., Buttrey, T. V., Carter, George F., Cook, Warren L., Covey, Cyclone, Jett, Stephen C., Lee, Thomas A., Mundkur, Balaji, Paulsen, Allison C., Prem, Hanns J., Reyman, Jonathan E., Dorado, Miguel Rivera, Totten, Norman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 21
creator Epstein, Jeremiah F.
Buchanan, Donal B.
Buttrey, T. V.
Carter, George F.
Cook, Warren L.
Covey, Cyclone
Jett, Stephen C.
Lee, Thomas A.
Mundkur, Balaji
Paulsen, Allison C.
Prem, Hanns J.
Reyman, Jonathan E.
Dorado, Miguel Rivera
Totten, Norman
description Does the occasional find of a Roman, Greek, or Hebrew coin in America indicate ancient transoceanic contact? In this study, 40 reports of such coins are analyzed in order to determine whether any can support the diffusionist position. Discovery dates, minting periods, geographical distribution, and the absence of prehistoric context all suggest that the coins were lost very recently. For those who argue that coins found in fields and farmyards may have special significance, an examination of counterfeits reveals that frauds and their prototypes have similar distributions. The data indicate also that Roman coins are far from rare in the United States today and that they are lost frequently. A number of well-publiced claims are given careful scrutiny and in all cases found to be highly suspect if not downright fraudulent. It is concluded, therefore, that as of this writing no single report of a classical-period coin in America can be used as evidence of pre-Columbian trans-Atlantic contact.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/202398
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2741739</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2741739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-7e6bfe05d30c4b53c3597a5dc752389ff470925f3e96f36537095ebcb93ae1d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOL5-gYus3FWT3KZp3A1lfMDAiCguREqa3mCGNh2SKs6_t8OIm3u48J0D5xBywdk1Z2VxI5gAXR6QGZegMgmlOCQzxjjPQLD8mJyktGaMacnVjJiniFk1dF99402gq66lb0OcbjX4kKgPdN5j9Nbc0nmgix_T-2BGPwQ6ODp-Il18-xaDRfpuws7V9xjGRHfPM2667ccZOXKmS3j-p6fk9W7xUj1ky9X9YzVfZparfMwUFo1DJltgNm8kWJBaGdlaJQWU2rlcMS2kA9SFg2KqNjXAxjYaDPK2gFNytc-1cUgpoqs30fcmbmvO6t0w9X6YCbzcg-s0DvGfEirnCjT8AuvAXUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Epstein, Jeremiah F. ; Buchanan, Donal B. ; Buttrey, T. V. ; Carter, George F. ; Cook, Warren L. ; Covey, Cyclone ; Jett, Stephen C. ; Lee, Thomas A. ; Mundkur, Balaji ; Paulsen, Allison C. ; Prem, Hanns J. ; Reyman, Jonathan E. ; Dorado, Miguel Rivera ; Totten, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Jeremiah F. ; Buchanan, Donal B. ; Buttrey, T. V. ; Carter, George F. ; Cook, Warren L. ; Covey, Cyclone ; Jett, Stephen C. ; Lee, Thomas A. ; Mundkur, Balaji ; Paulsen, Allison C. ; Prem, Hanns J. ; Reyman, Jonathan E. ; Dorado, Miguel Rivera ; Totten, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>Does the occasional find of a Roman, Greek, or Hebrew coin in America indicate ancient transoceanic contact? In this study, 40 reports of such coins are analyzed in order to determine whether any can support the diffusionist position. Discovery dates, minting periods, geographical distribution, and the absence of prehistoric context all suggest that the coins were lost very recently. For those who argue that coins found in fields and farmyards may have special significance, an examination of counterfeits reveals that frauds and their prototypes have similar distributions. The data indicate also that Roman coins are far from rare in the United States today and that they are lost frequently. A number of well-publiced claims are given careful scrutiny and in all cases found to be highly suspect if not downright fraudulent. It is concluded, therefore, that as of this writing no single report of a classical-period coin in America can be used as evidence of pre-Columbian trans-Atlantic contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/202398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Coinage ; Counterfeiting ; Forgery ; Fraud ; Mound sites ; Numismatics ; Precolumbian era ; World wars</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 1980-02, Vol.21 (1), p.1-20</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1980 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-7e6bfe05d30c4b53c3597a5dc752389ff470925f3e96f36537095ebcb93ae1d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2741739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2741739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Jeremiah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Donal B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttrey, T. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, George F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covey, Cyclone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jett, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundkur, Balaji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Allison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prem, Hanns J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyman, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorado, Miguel Rivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totten, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>Does the occasional find of a Roman, Greek, or Hebrew coin in America indicate ancient transoceanic contact? In this study, 40 reports of such coins are analyzed in order to determine whether any can support the diffusionist position. Discovery dates, minting periods, geographical distribution, and the absence of prehistoric context all suggest that the coins were lost very recently. For those who argue that coins found in fields and farmyards may have special significance, an examination of counterfeits reveals that frauds and their prototypes have similar distributions. The data indicate also that Roman coins are far from rare in the United States today and that they are lost frequently. A number of well-publiced claims are given careful scrutiny and in all cases found to be highly suspect if not downright fraudulent. It is concluded, therefore, that as of this writing no single report of a classical-period coin in America can be used as evidence of pre-Columbian trans-Atlantic contact.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Coinage</subject><subject>Counterfeiting</subject><subject>Forgery</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Mound sites</subject><subject>Numismatics</subject><subject>Precolumbian era</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoOL5-gYus3FWT3KZp3A1lfMDAiCguREqa3mCGNh2SKs6_t8OIm3u48J0D5xBywdk1Z2VxI5gAXR6QGZegMgmlOCQzxjjPQLD8mJyktGaMacnVjJiniFk1dF99402gq66lb0OcbjX4kKgPdN5j9Nbc0nmgix_T-2BGPwQ6ODp-Il18-xaDRfpuws7V9xjGRHfPM2667ccZOXKmS3j-p6fk9W7xUj1ky9X9YzVfZparfMwUFo1DJltgNm8kWJBaGdlaJQWU2rlcMS2kA9SFg2KqNjXAxjYaDPK2gFNytc-1cUgpoqs30fcmbmvO6t0w9X6YCbzcg-s0DvGfEirnCjT8AuvAXUg</recordid><startdate>19800201</startdate><enddate>19800201</enddate><creator>Epstein, Jeremiah F.</creator><creator>Buchanan, Donal B.</creator><creator>Buttrey, T. V.</creator><creator>Carter, George F.</creator><creator>Cook, Warren L.</creator><creator>Covey, Cyclone</creator><creator>Jett, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Lee, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Mundkur, Balaji</creator><creator>Paulsen, Allison C.</creator><creator>Prem, Hanns J.</creator><creator>Reyman, Jonathan E.</creator><creator>Dorado, Miguel Rivera</creator><creator>Totten, Norman</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800201</creationdate><title>Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]</title><author>Epstein, Jeremiah F. ; Buchanan, Donal B. ; Buttrey, T. V. ; Carter, George F. ; Cook, Warren L. ; Covey, Cyclone ; Jett, Stephen C. ; Lee, Thomas A. ; Mundkur, Balaji ; Paulsen, Allison C. ; Prem, Hanns J. ; Reyman, Jonathan E. ; Dorado, Miguel Rivera ; Totten, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-7e6bfe05d30c4b53c3597a5dc752389ff470925f3e96f36537095ebcb93ae1d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Coinage</topic><topic>Counterfeiting</topic><topic>Forgery</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Mound sites</topic><topic>Numismatics</topic><topic>Precolumbian era</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Jeremiah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Donal B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttrey, T. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, George F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covey, Cyclone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jett, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundkur, Balaji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Allison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prem, Hanns J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyman, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorado, Miguel Rivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totten, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Epstein, Jeremiah F.</au><au>Buchanan, Donal B.</au><au>Buttrey, T. V.</au><au>Carter, George F.</au><au>Cook, Warren L.</au><au>Covey, Cyclone</au><au>Jett, Stephen C.</au><au>Lee, Thomas A.</au><au>Mundkur, Balaji</au><au>Paulsen, Allison C.</au><au>Prem, Hanns J.</au><au>Reyman, Jonathan E.</au><au>Dorado, Miguel Rivera</au><au>Totten, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>1980-02-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>1-20</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><abstract>Does the occasional find of a Roman, Greek, or Hebrew coin in America indicate ancient transoceanic contact? In this study, 40 reports of such coins are analyzed in order to determine whether any can support the diffusionist position. Discovery dates, minting periods, geographical distribution, and the absence of prehistoric context all suggest that the coins were lost very recently. For those who argue that coins found in fields and farmyards may have special significance, an examination of counterfeits reveals that frauds and their prototypes have similar distributions. The data indicate also that Roman coins are far from rare in the United States today and that they are lost frequently. A number of well-publiced claims are given careful scrutiny and in all cases found to be highly suspect if not downright fraudulent. It is concluded, therefore, that as of this writing no single report of a classical-period coin in America can be used as evidence of pre-Columbian trans-Atlantic contact.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/202398</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 1980-02, Vol.21 (1), p.1-20
issn 0011-3204
1537-5382
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202398
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Archaeology
Coinage
Counterfeiting
Forgery
Fraud
Mound sites
Numismatics
Precolumbian era
World wars
title Pre-Columbian Old World Coins in America: An Examination of the Evidence [and Comments and Reply]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-Columbian%20Old%20World%20Coins%20in%20America:%20An%20Examination%20of%20the%20Evidence%20%5Band%20Comments%20and%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Epstein,%20Jeremiah%20F.&rft.date=1980-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=1-20&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/202398&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E2741739%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2741739&rfr_iscdi=true