Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]
A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current anthropology 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | Current anthropology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Marshack, Alexander H.-G. Bandi Christensen, Jesper Gallus, Alexander Gunn, Joel Johansen, Arne B. Kobyliński, Zbigniew Kobylińska, Urszula Murray, William Breen Odak, Osaga |
description | A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/202268 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2741928</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2741928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKAzEARYMoWKt-gYus3I3mMckk7kqxKhQs1a5EhkwmsSmZB0kU5u8d2-LqcLmHu7gAXGN0h5Hg9wQRwsUJmGBGi4xRQU7BBCGMM0pQfg4uYtwhhCTDxQSETd-bAFfKm867tHUavg1N1fkRMZkmws7CtDVw_R2jUy1ceeXaBzjvvlqX3I-Bqq3H1PQqqH2etcoP0UX4cWwa06a419am98PnJTizykdzdeQUbBaP7_PnbPn69DKfLTONizxl0nCEJapHIMs401haU5m64jUXoqKitlZQzhgjurKUVJJzTfJaalGLgiI6BbeHXR26GIOxZR9co8JQYlT-PVUenhrFm4O4i6kL_xYpciyJoL_WLWUZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><description>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/202268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Bones ; Caves ; Engraving ; Fishing lines ; Ivory ; Motifs ; Paleoanthropology ; Prehistoric art ; Symbolism</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2741928$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2741928$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H.-G. Bandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Arne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobylińska, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, William Breen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Caves</subject><subject>Engraving</subject><subject>Fishing lines</subject><subject>Ivory</subject><subject>Motifs</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Prehistoric art</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtKAzEARYMoWKt-gYus3I3mMckk7kqxKhQs1a5EhkwmsSmZB0kU5u8d2-LqcLmHu7gAXGN0h5Hg9wQRwsUJmGBGi4xRQU7BBCGMM0pQfg4uYtwhhCTDxQSETd-bAFfKm867tHUavg1N1fkRMZkmws7CtDVw_R2jUy1ceeXaBzjvvlqX3I-Bqq3H1PQqqH2etcoP0UX4cWwa06a419am98PnJTizykdzdeQUbBaP7_PnbPn69DKfLTONizxl0nCEJapHIMs401haU5m64jUXoqKitlZQzhgjurKUVJJzTfJaalGLgiI6BbeHXR26GIOxZR9co8JQYlT-PVUenhrFm4O4i6kL_xYpciyJoL_WLWUZ</recordid><startdate>19790601</startdate><enddate>19790601</enddate><creator>Marshack, Alexander</creator><creator>H.-G. Bandi</creator><creator>Christensen, Jesper</creator><creator>Gallus, Alexander</creator><creator>Gunn, Joel</creator><creator>Johansen, Arne B.</creator><creator>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creator><creator>Kobylińska, Urszula</creator><creator>Murray, William Breen</creator><creator>Odak, Osaga</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790601</creationdate><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><author>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Caves</topic><topic>Engraving</topic><topic>Fishing lines</topic><topic>Ivory</topic><topic>Motifs</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Prehistoric art</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H.-G. Bandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Arne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobylińska, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, William Breen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshack, Alexander</au><au>H.-G. Bandi</au><au>Christensen, Jesper</au><au>Gallus, Alexander</au><au>Gunn, Joel</au><au>Johansen, Arne B.</au><au>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</au><au>Kobylińska, Urszula</au><au>Murray, William Breen</au><au>Odak, Osaga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>1979-06-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>271-311</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><abstract>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/202268</doi><tpages>41</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-3204 |
ispartof | Current anthropology, 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311 |
issn | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202268 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animal behavior Bones Caves Engraving Fishing lines Ivory Motifs Paleoanthropology Prehistoric art Symbolism |
title | Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20Paleolithic%20Symbol%20Systems%20of%20the%20Russian%20Plain:%20Cognitive%20and%20Comparative%20Analysis%20%5Band%20Comments%20and%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Marshack,%20Alexander&rft.date=1979-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=271-311&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/202268&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E2741928%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2741928&rfr_iscdi=true |