Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]

A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311
Hauptverfasser: Marshack, Alexander, H.-G. Bandi, Christensen, Jesper, Gallus, Alexander, Gunn, Joel, Johansen, Arne B., Kobyliński, Zbigniew, Kobylińska, Urszula, Murray, William Breen, Odak, Osaga
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 2
container_start_page 271
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 20
creator Marshack, Alexander
H.-G. Bandi
Christensen, Jesper
Gallus, Alexander
Gunn, Joel
Johansen, Arne B.
Kobyliński, Zbigniew
Kobylińska, Urszula
Murray, William Breen
Odak, Osaga
description A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/202268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2741928</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2741928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKAzEARYMoWKt-gYus3I3mMckk7kqxKhQs1a5EhkwmsSmZB0kU5u8d2-LqcLmHu7gAXGN0h5Hg9wQRwsUJmGBGi4xRQU7BBCGMM0pQfg4uYtwhhCTDxQSETd-bAFfKm867tHUavg1N1fkRMZkmws7CtDVw_R2jUy1ceeXaBzjvvlqX3I-Bqq3H1PQqqH2etcoP0UX4cWwa06a419am98PnJTizykdzdeQUbBaP7_PnbPn69DKfLTONizxl0nCEJapHIMs401haU5m64jUXoqKitlZQzhgjurKUVJJzTfJaalGLgiI6BbeHXR26GIOxZR9co8JQYlT-PVUenhrFm4O4i6kL_xYpciyJoL_WLWUZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><description>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/202268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Bones ; Caves ; Engraving ; Fishing lines ; Ivory ; Motifs ; Paleoanthropology ; Prehistoric art ; Symbolism</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2741928$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2741928$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H.-G. Bandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Arne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobylińska, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, William Breen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Caves</subject><subject>Engraving</subject><subject>Fishing lines</subject><subject>Ivory</subject><subject>Motifs</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Prehistoric art</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtKAzEARYMoWKt-gYus3I3mMckk7kqxKhQs1a5EhkwmsSmZB0kU5u8d2-LqcLmHu7gAXGN0h5Hg9wQRwsUJmGBGi4xRQU7BBCGMM0pQfg4uYtwhhCTDxQSETd-bAFfKm867tHUavg1N1fkRMZkmws7CtDVw_R2jUy1ceeXaBzjvvlqX3I-Bqq3H1PQqqH2etcoP0UX4cWwa06a419am98PnJTizykdzdeQUbBaP7_PnbPn69DKfLTONizxl0nCEJapHIMs401haU5m64jUXoqKitlZQzhgjurKUVJJzTfJaalGLgiI6BbeHXR26GIOxZR9co8JQYlT-PVUenhrFm4O4i6kL_xYpciyJoL_WLWUZ</recordid><startdate>19790601</startdate><enddate>19790601</enddate><creator>Marshack, Alexander</creator><creator>H.-G. Bandi</creator><creator>Christensen, Jesper</creator><creator>Gallus, Alexander</creator><creator>Gunn, Joel</creator><creator>Johansen, Arne B.</creator><creator>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creator><creator>Kobylińska, Urszula</creator><creator>Murray, William Breen</creator><creator>Odak, Osaga</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790601</creationdate><title>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</title><author>Marshack, Alexander ; H.-G. Bandi ; Christensen, Jesper ; Gallus, Alexander ; Gunn, Joel ; Johansen, Arne B. ; Kobyliński, Zbigniew ; Kobylińska, Urszula ; Murray, William Breen ; Odak, Osaga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-9e60190de600f565c19febedb6d688b38dff8365552cbf32b966c24d9c8d87303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Caves</topic><topic>Engraving</topic><topic>Fishing lines</topic><topic>Ivory</topic><topic>Motifs</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Prehistoric art</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H.-G. Bandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallus, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Arne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobylińska, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, William Breen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odak, Osaga</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshack, Alexander</au><au>H.-G. Bandi</au><au>Christensen, Jesper</au><au>Gallus, Alexander</au><au>Gunn, Joel</au><au>Johansen, Arne B.</au><au>Kobyliński, Zbigniew</au><au>Kobylińska, Urszula</au><au>Murray, William Breen</au><au>Odak, Osaga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>1979-06-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>271-311</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><abstract>A microscopic examination of the engraved and carved artifacts from the Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain in Soviet collections has revealed the presence of a number of complex symbol systems and modes of symbol use. These systems have not previously been noted or studied. The iconography has been found to be different from that in contemporaneous symbol systems in the Western European Upper Paleolithic, but the basic modes and strategies of symbol use were nevertheless comparable or similar. The data raise a number of profound questions concerning (a) the origin or origins of early Homo sapiens sapiens symbol usage and the possible early dispersal or diffusion of certain cognitive and cultural modes of symbol use, (b) the possible near-iconic nature of the earliest H. sapiens sapiens symbol systems, and (c) the relevance of these evolving systems for those symbolic traditions that persisted and developed in the post-Wurm. It seems that at least some of these systems in the Eastern and Western Upper Paleolithic were aspects of a water-related symbolism and therefore referred to a phenomenological reality as valid and persistent as the realities referred to in Upper Paleolithic images of animals and females.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/202268</doi><tpages>41</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 1979-06, Vol.20 (2), p.271-311
issn 0011-3204
1537-5382
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1086_202268
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal behavior
Bones
Caves
Engraving
Fishing lines
Ivory
Motifs
Paleoanthropology
Prehistoric art
Symbolism
title Upper Paleolithic Symbol Systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and Comparative Analysis [and Comments and Reply]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20Paleolithic%20Symbol%20Systems%20of%20the%20Russian%20Plain:%20Cognitive%20and%20Comparative%20Analysis%20%5Band%20Comments%20and%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Marshack,%20Alexander&rft.date=1979-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=271-311&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/202268&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E2741928%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2741928&rfr_iscdi=true