Observations of the X-ray Nova GRO J0422+32. 1: Outburst and the decay to quiescence
We present optical photometry and spectroscopy and Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) observations of the X-ray nova GRO J0422+32, obtained during outburst and its subsequent decay to quiescence. Although the X-ray and optical properties of GRO J0422+32 are broadly similar to those of oth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Astrophysical journal 1995-03, Vol.441 (2), p.786 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We present optical photometry and spectroscopy and Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) observations of the X-ray nova GRO J0422+32, obtained during outburst and its subsequent decay to quiescence. Although the X-ray and optical properties of GRO J0422+32 are broadly similar to those of other X-ray novae, it is unique in several respects. The unusually protracted decay to quiescence of the optical light curve has been punctuated by at least two minioutbursts of approximately 4 mag. The BATSE and optical outbursts are each separated by approximately 120 days. We find that the optical luminosity of GRO J0422+32 during the primary outburst is dominated by reprocessing of E greater than 10 keV X-rays. In contrast, the optical minioutbursts are most likely generated by an intrinsically bright disk rather than X-ray reprocessing: they do not appear to have any X-ray counterparts. Extremely broad (up to 6000 km/s FWZI) absorption lines have also been observed during both primary outbursts and minioutbursts. During the second minioutburst, H-alpha and H-beta emission was observed superposed on redshifted absorption features. We find that the interoutburst light curve of GRO J0422+32 may be inconsistent with an accretion disk instability as the origin of the minioutbursts. Finally, a transient 5.1/10.2 hr modulation, which may be related to the orbital period, has been observed during roughly half of our observations. However, confirmation of the orbital period must await observations in quiescence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.1086/175402 |