Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize

Numerous proximal and remote soil and plant-testing methods are available to guide variable-rate N management in maize production. These include preseason and late spring soil nitrate tests, late season stalk nitrate tests, handheld chlorophyll meter readings, remote sensing of soil and crop canopy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications in soil science and plant analysis 2005, Vol.36 (1-3), p.23-32
1. Verfasser: Doerge, T.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 23
container_title Communications in soil science and plant analysis
container_volume 36
creator Doerge, T.A
description Numerous proximal and remote soil and plant-testing methods are available to guide variable-rate N management in maize production. These include preseason and late spring soil nitrate tests, late season stalk nitrate tests, handheld chlorophyll meter readings, remote sensing of soil and crop canopy properties, site-specific data from yield monitors and soil electrical conductivity maps. Field applicators have even been equipped to sense the N status of a crop and direct the application of any needed N on-the-go. However, the adoption rates of variable-rate N management are low worldwide despite the potential economic and environmental benefits of this practice and the availability of variable-rate application technology in key areas of maize production. A major obstacle is the finding that recommended N fertilizer rates based on yield goal are often poorly correlated with actual economically optimum N rates. Nitrogen response patterns are often field and season specific and can vary widely within the same field, further complicating adoption. Paired field comparisons of uniform- and variable-rate N management have revealed no consistent advantages for either strategy in yields achieved, whole-field N usage or N use efficiency by plants. Research with other agronomic crops also indicates that the scale for determining crop N need may be as low as 1 m2. An additional constraint is that growers implementing variable-rate N techniques often are required to install several adequately fertilized N reference strips in their fields that have proven to be both hybrid and season specific. In addition to these agronomic and logistical challenges, the maximum potential benefit of a variable N strategy vs. a conventional uniform-rate N strategy is typically between 12 and 37 USD($)/ha. When the cost of developing and executing the variable-rate strategy is considered, the practice shows a low economic return. In the future, innovations in N soil testing, better crop simulation models, and improved N sensing and application equipment may assist growers in capturing the benefits of site-specific N management in maize production.
doi_str_mv 10.1081/CSS-200042960
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1081_CSS_200042960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201300993054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7402fd1b190d179e7d1d76e6452291c72de010163b8267986ccd9299b41d085d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j8tPwzAMhyMEEmNw5EwvHAN2kiWNxAVNvKRpHMbOldukU1EfU1JA46-nU3mcOFmWv5_tj7FzhCuEFK_nqxUXAKCE1XDAJjiTgguF-pBNABC41EIds5MYX4fWGhATdrOs-tBtfJs0nuJb8I1v-6TsQvJOoaK89jxQ75Nl0lBLm3FcDTRVn_6UHZVUR3_2XadsfX_3Mn_ki-eHp_ntghdSQc-NAlE6zNGCQ2O9ceiM9lrNhLBYGOH88B1qmadCG5vqonBWWJsrdJDOnJwyPu4tQhdj8GW2DVVDYZchZHv1bFDPftUH_nLktxQLqstAbVHFv5A2QinYc-nIVe1g3NBHF2qX9bSru_ATkv-duBijJXUZbcJArlcCUAJYK2Gm5BctoXKl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Current Content Access</source><creator>Doerge, T.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Doerge, T.A</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous proximal and remote soil and plant-testing methods are available to guide variable-rate N management in maize production. These include preseason and late spring soil nitrate tests, late season stalk nitrate tests, handheld chlorophyll meter readings, remote sensing of soil and crop canopy properties, site-specific data from yield monitors and soil electrical conductivity maps. Field applicators have even been equipped to sense the N status of a crop and direct the application of any needed N on-the-go. However, the adoption rates of variable-rate N management are low worldwide despite the potential economic and environmental benefits of this practice and the availability of variable-rate application technology in key areas of maize production. A major obstacle is the finding that recommended N fertilizer rates based on yield goal are often poorly correlated with actual economically optimum N rates. Nitrogen response patterns are often field and season specific and can vary widely within the same field, further complicating adoption. Paired field comparisons of uniform- and variable-rate N management have revealed no consistent advantages for either strategy in yields achieved, whole-field N usage or N use efficiency by plants. Research with other agronomic crops also indicates that the scale for determining crop N need may be as low as 1 m2. An additional constraint is that growers implementing variable-rate N techniques often are required to install several adequately fertilized N reference strips in their fields that have proven to be both hybrid and season specific. In addition to these agronomic and logistical challenges, the maximum potential benefit of a variable N strategy vs. a conventional uniform-rate N strategy is typically between 12 and 37 USD($)/ha. When the cost of developing and executing the variable-rate strategy is considered, the practice shows a low economic return. In the future, innovations in N soil testing, better crop simulation models, and improved N sensing and application equipment may assist growers in capturing the benefits of site-specific N management in maize production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1081/CSS-200042960</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; corn ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; measurement ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen fertilization ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutrient management ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; variable rate application ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2005, Vol.36 (1-3), p.23-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7402fd1b190d179e7d1d76e6452291c72de010163b8267986ccd9299b41d085d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7402fd1b190d179e7d1d76e6452291c72de010163b8267986ccd9299b41d085d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/CSS-200042960$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/CSS-200042960$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,4014,4040,4041,23921,23922,25131,27914,27915,27916,59636,60425</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16724400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doerge, T.A</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize</title><title>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</title><description>Numerous proximal and remote soil and plant-testing methods are available to guide variable-rate N management in maize production. These include preseason and late spring soil nitrate tests, late season stalk nitrate tests, handheld chlorophyll meter readings, remote sensing of soil and crop canopy properties, site-specific data from yield monitors and soil electrical conductivity maps. Field applicators have even been equipped to sense the N status of a crop and direct the application of any needed N on-the-go. However, the adoption rates of variable-rate N management are low worldwide despite the potential economic and environmental benefits of this practice and the availability of variable-rate application technology in key areas of maize production. A major obstacle is the finding that recommended N fertilizer rates based on yield goal are often poorly correlated with actual economically optimum N rates. Nitrogen response patterns are often field and season specific and can vary widely within the same field, further complicating adoption. Paired field comparisons of uniform- and variable-rate N management have revealed no consistent advantages for either strategy in yields achieved, whole-field N usage or N use efficiency by plants. Research with other agronomic crops also indicates that the scale for determining crop N need may be as low as 1 m2. An additional constraint is that growers implementing variable-rate N techniques often are required to install several adequately fertilized N reference strips in their fields that have proven to be both hybrid and season specific. In addition to these agronomic and logistical challenges, the maximum potential benefit of a variable N strategy vs. a conventional uniform-rate N strategy is typically between 12 and 37 USD($)/ha. When the cost of developing and executing the variable-rate strategy is considered, the practice shows a low economic return. In the future, innovations in N soil testing, better crop simulation models, and improved N sensing and application equipment may assist growers in capturing the benefits of site-specific N management in maize production.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutrient management</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>variable rate application</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j8tPwzAMhyMEEmNw5EwvHAN2kiWNxAVNvKRpHMbOldukU1EfU1JA46-nU3mcOFmWv5_tj7FzhCuEFK_nqxUXAKCE1XDAJjiTgguF-pBNABC41EIds5MYX4fWGhATdrOs-tBtfJs0nuJb8I1v-6TsQvJOoaK89jxQ75Nl0lBLm3FcDTRVn_6UHZVUR3_2XadsfX_3Mn_ki-eHp_ntghdSQc-NAlE6zNGCQ2O9ceiM9lrNhLBYGOH88B1qmadCG5vqonBWWJsrdJDOnJwyPu4tQhdj8GW2DVVDYZchZHv1bFDPftUH_nLktxQLqstAbVHFv5A2QinYc-nIVe1g3NBHF2qX9bSru_ATkv-duBijJXUZbcJArlcCUAJYK2Gm5BctoXKl</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Doerge, T.A</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize</title><author>Doerge, T.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7402fd1b190d179e7d1d76e6452291c72de010163b8267986ccd9299b41d085d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutrient management</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>variable rate application</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doerge, T.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doerge, T.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize</atitle><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>23-32</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>Numerous proximal and remote soil and plant-testing methods are available to guide variable-rate N management in maize production. These include preseason and late spring soil nitrate tests, late season stalk nitrate tests, handheld chlorophyll meter readings, remote sensing of soil and crop canopy properties, site-specific data from yield monitors and soil electrical conductivity maps. Field applicators have even been equipped to sense the N status of a crop and direct the application of any needed N on-the-go. However, the adoption rates of variable-rate N management are low worldwide despite the potential economic and environmental benefits of this practice and the availability of variable-rate application technology in key areas of maize production. A major obstacle is the finding that recommended N fertilizer rates based on yield goal are often poorly correlated with actual economically optimum N rates. Nitrogen response patterns are often field and season specific and can vary widely within the same field, further complicating adoption. Paired field comparisons of uniform- and variable-rate N management have revealed no consistent advantages for either strategy in yields achieved, whole-field N usage or N use efficiency by plants. Research with other agronomic crops also indicates that the scale for determining crop N need may be as low as 1 m2. An additional constraint is that growers implementing variable-rate N techniques often are required to install several adequately fertilized N reference strips in their fields that have proven to be both hybrid and season specific. In addition to these agronomic and logistical challenges, the maximum potential benefit of a variable N strategy vs. a conventional uniform-rate N strategy is typically between 12 and 37 USD($)/ha. When the cost of developing and executing the variable-rate strategy is considered, the practice shows a low economic return. In the future, innovations in N soil testing, better crop simulation models, and improved N sensing and application equipment may assist growers in capturing the benefits of site-specific N management in maize production.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1081/CSS-200042960</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-3624
ispartof Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2005, Vol.36 (1-3), p.23-32
issn 0010-3624
1532-2416
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1081_CSS_200042960
source Taylor & Francis Current Content Access
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
corn
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
measurement
nitrogen
Nitrogen fertilization
nitrogen fertilizers
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
nutrient management
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
variable rate application
Zea mays
title Nitrogen measurement for variable-rate N management in maize
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20measurement%20for%20variable-rate%20N%20management%20in%20maize&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20soil%20science%20and%20plant%20analysis&rft.au=Doerge,%20T.A&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=23-32&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1081/CSS-200042960&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201300993054%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true