Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review

Ventricular septal rupture remains a rare, but most often lethal, complication of acute myocardial infarction. Current guidelines recommend emergent surgical repair of post-myocardial ventricular septal rupture, with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting as indicated. Though surgery provides i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Structural heart (Online) 2018-03, Vol.2 (2), p.121-126
Hauptverfasser: Andersen, Mousumi M., Zhao, David X. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
container_title Structural heart (Online)
container_volume 2
creator Andersen, Mousumi M.
Zhao, David X. M.
description Ventricular septal rupture remains a rare, but most often lethal, complication of acute myocardial infarction. Current guidelines recommend emergent surgical repair of post-myocardial ventricular septal rupture, with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting as indicated. Though surgery provides improved survival over medical management alone, mortality rates remain up to 60%. With technological advances, percutaneous closure has emerged as an alternative management option. In this review, we address patient selection, timing, success, mortality, and complications of transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Current data reveal a lower mortality as compared to surgical management. The optimal device for closure remains uncertain. Timing of closure >14 days after myocardial infarction appears to be associated with greater procedural success; however, delaying repair introduces a selection bias. Complications include device embolization, arrhythmia, residual shunting, and left ventricular rupture. Overall, a Heart Team approach should be taken when possible before proceeding with transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Emergent percutaneous closure should be considered in patients with large shunt or hemodynamic instability. In relatively stable patients, urgent percutaneous closure should be considered if patients are rendered unsuitable for surgical closure.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/24748706.2017.1421799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24748706_2017_1421799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_24748706_2017_1421799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-572131daba66f9bde5305587247ca64063335b2e16458b5bf3bdf7b2d4c1493e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKAzEYhIMoWGofQdgX2Jpzdr2yFA-FiqVWb0OSTSCy3ZQka-nbu6XVS6_mZ35mGD4AbhGcIljBO0wFrQTkUwyRmCKKkajrCzA6-mUlEL38uyG_BpOUviCEmCHEORyBzcpG02fV2dCnYhVSLl8PwajYeNUWi86paLIPXfFpuxy96VsVi3e7y8N33e9yH20xb0Ma9L6YFWv77e3-Blw51SY7OesYfDw9buYv5fLteTGfLUuDK5FLJjAiqFFace5q3VhGIGOVGOYaxSnkhBCmsUWcskoz7YhunNC4oQbRmlgyBuzUa2JIKVond9FvVTxIBOWRjvylI4905JnOkHs45XznQtyqfYhtI7M6tCG6qDrjkyT_V_wA_RpsGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Andersen, Mousumi M. ; Zhao, David X. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Mousumi M. ; Zhao, David X. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Ventricular septal rupture remains a rare, but most often lethal, complication of acute myocardial infarction. Current guidelines recommend emergent surgical repair of post-myocardial ventricular septal rupture, with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting as indicated. Though surgery provides improved survival over medical management alone, mortality rates remain up to 60%. With technological advances, percutaneous closure has emerged as an alternative management option. In this review, we address patient selection, timing, success, mortality, and complications of transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Current data reveal a lower mortality as compared to surgical management. The optimal device for closure remains uncertain. Timing of closure &gt;14 days after myocardial infarction appears to be associated with greater procedural success; however, delaying repair introduces a selection bias. Complications include device embolization, arrhythmia, residual shunting, and left ventricular rupture. Overall, a Heart Team approach should be taken when possible before proceeding with transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Emergent percutaneous closure should be considered in patients with large shunt or hemodynamic instability. In relatively stable patients, urgent percutaneous closure should be considered if patients are rendered unsuitable for surgical closure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2474-8706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-8714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2017.1421799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture ; ventricular septal rupture ; ventricular septal rupture occluder</subject><ispartof>Structural heart (Online), 2018-03, Vol.2 (2), p.121-126</ispartof><rights>2018 Cardiovascular Research Foundation 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-572131daba66f9bde5305587247ca64063335b2e16458b5bf3bdf7b2d4c1493e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-572131daba66f9bde5305587247ca64063335b2e16458b5bf3bdf7b2d4c1493e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6348-0732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Mousumi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, David X. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review</title><title>Structural heart (Online)</title><description>Ventricular septal rupture remains a rare, but most often lethal, complication of acute myocardial infarction. Current guidelines recommend emergent surgical repair of post-myocardial ventricular septal rupture, with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting as indicated. Though surgery provides improved survival over medical management alone, mortality rates remain up to 60%. With technological advances, percutaneous closure has emerged as an alternative management option. In this review, we address patient selection, timing, success, mortality, and complications of transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Current data reveal a lower mortality as compared to surgical management. The optimal device for closure remains uncertain. Timing of closure &gt;14 days after myocardial infarction appears to be associated with greater procedural success; however, delaying repair introduces a selection bias. Complications include device embolization, arrhythmia, residual shunting, and left ventricular rupture. Overall, a Heart Team approach should be taken when possible before proceeding with transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Emergent percutaneous closure should be considered in patients with large shunt or hemodynamic instability. In relatively stable patients, urgent percutaneous closure should be considered if patients are rendered unsuitable for surgical closure.</description><subject>Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture</subject><subject>ventricular septal rupture</subject><subject>ventricular septal rupture occluder</subject><issn>2474-8706</issn><issn>2474-8714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKAzEYhIMoWGofQdgX2Jpzdr2yFA-FiqVWb0OSTSCy3ZQka-nbu6XVS6_mZ35mGD4AbhGcIljBO0wFrQTkUwyRmCKKkajrCzA6-mUlEL38uyG_BpOUviCEmCHEORyBzcpG02fV2dCnYhVSLl8PwajYeNUWi86paLIPXfFpuxy96VsVi3e7y8N33e9yH20xb0Ma9L6YFWv77e3-Blw51SY7OesYfDw9buYv5fLteTGfLUuDK5FLJjAiqFFace5q3VhGIGOVGOYaxSnkhBCmsUWcskoz7YhunNC4oQbRmlgyBuzUa2JIKVond9FvVTxIBOWRjvylI4905JnOkHs45XznQtyqfYhtI7M6tCG6qDrjkyT_V_wA_RpsGg</recordid><startdate>20180304</startdate><enddate>20180304</enddate><creator>Andersen, Mousumi M.</creator><creator>Zhao, David X. M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-0732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180304</creationdate><title>Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review</title><author>Andersen, Mousumi M. ; Zhao, David X. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-572131daba66f9bde5305587247ca64063335b2e16458b5bf3bdf7b2d4c1493e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture</topic><topic>ventricular septal rupture</topic><topic>ventricular septal rupture occluder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Mousumi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, David X. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Structural heart (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Mousumi M.</au><au>Zhao, David X. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Structural heart (Online)</jtitle><date>2018-03-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>121-126</pages><issn>2474-8706</issn><eissn>2474-8714</eissn><abstract>Ventricular septal rupture remains a rare, but most often lethal, complication of acute myocardial infarction. Current guidelines recommend emergent surgical repair of post-myocardial ventricular septal rupture, with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting as indicated. Though surgery provides improved survival over medical management alone, mortality rates remain up to 60%. With technological advances, percutaneous closure has emerged as an alternative management option. In this review, we address patient selection, timing, success, mortality, and complications of transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Current data reveal a lower mortality as compared to surgical management. The optimal device for closure remains uncertain. Timing of closure &gt;14 days after myocardial infarction appears to be associated with greater procedural success; however, delaying repair introduces a selection bias. Complications include device embolization, arrhythmia, residual shunting, and left ventricular rupture. Overall, a Heart Team approach should be taken when possible before proceeding with transcatheter post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture closure. Emergent percutaneous closure should be considered in patients with large shunt or hemodynamic instability. In relatively stable patients, urgent percutaneous closure should be considered if patients are rendered unsuitable for surgical closure.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/24748706.2017.1421799</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-0732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2474-8706
ispartof Structural heart (Online), 2018-03, Vol.2 (2), p.121-126
issn 2474-8706
2474-8714
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_24748706_2017_1421799
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture
ventricular septal rupture
ventricular septal rupture occluder
title Percutaneous Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Closure: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A42%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20Post-Myocardial%20Infarction%20Ventricular%20Septal%20Rupture%20Closure:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Structural%20heart%20(Online)&rft.au=Andersen,%20Mousumi%20M.&rft.date=2018-03-04&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=121-126&rft.issn=2474-8706&rft.eissn=2474-8714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24748706.2017.1421799&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_24748706_2017_1421799%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true