Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the intensity, perceived exertion and enjoyment of participation in walking football (WF) for elderly men and women compared to traditional small-sided running football (RF) and walking (W). Methods: 32 men and women aged 60-83 from recreational...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Managing leisure 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.259-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Managing leisure |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Madsen, Mads Krustrup, Peter Larsen, Malte Nejst |
description | Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the intensity, perceived exertion and enjoyment of participation in walking football (WF) for elderly men and women compared to traditional small-sided running football (RF) and walking (W).
Methods: 32 men and women aged 60-83 from recreational football teams performed a 5-min W, followed by 10-min WF and RF games in a counterbalanced order, separated by an 8-10 min break. The men and women played 5v5 and 6v6, respectively, on small-sided football pitches (men: 40 × 16.5 m; women 40 × 30 m) with medium-sized goals (3 × 1.5 m). Heart rate (HR) and locomotor activities were monitored throughout sessions and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) scores were determined immediately after sessions.
Results: During RF, mean HR was higher (P 0.05) compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (126 ± 23 vs 112 ± 19 and 98 ± 19 beats/min) and women aged 60+ (144 ± 24 vs 133 ± 30 and 112 ± 20 beats/min), and higher (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23750472.2020.1762508 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_23750472_2020_1762508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2806480775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ea3d5a2a6aeaca7ee67a0df2d2c934882af82bd95bb08e4235d49f8024c8d26e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhQdRsNQ-ghBwKVNvMz9Jd0qpP1Bwo-twO8mU1JlkTFLqPIGvbcbWLl3dw-Gcw-VLkusZTGfA4Y5mrICc0SkFGi1W0gL4WTIa_BRyDucnzehlMvF-CwCznJVlXoyS7-WXcpX2imgTlPE69ETunDYbssfmY7i1tWGNTROFI60yBI0ke_urNkqSEm5jmVS27dBpbw0JlgSHUgdtDTbEt7Gdei1j-DSWEiSdbmwgPuxkf5Vc1Nh4NTnecfL-uHxbPKer16eXxcMqrbKMh1RhJgukWKLCCplSJUOQNZW0mmc55xRrTtdyXqzXwFVOs0Lm85oDzSsuaamycXJz2O2c_dwpH8TW7lz80gvKoYy8GCtiqjikKme9d6oWndMtul7MQAzYxR92MWAXR-yxd3_oaRNhtbi3rpEiYN9YVzs0EbTI_p_4AbJHiws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806480775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Madsen, Mads ; Krustrup, Peter ; Larsen, Malte Nejst</creator><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads ; Krustrup, Peter ; Larsen, Malte Nejst</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the intensity, perceived exertion and enjoyment of participation in walking football (WF) for elderly men and women compared to traditional small-sided running football (RF) and walking (W).
Methods: 32 men and women aged 60-83 from recreational football teams performed a 5-min W, followed by 10-min WF and RF games in a counterbalanced order, separated by an 8-10 min break. The men and women played 5v5 and 6v6, respectively, on small-sided football pitches (men: 40 × 16.5 m; women 40 × 30 m) with medium-sized goals (3 × 1.5 m). Heart rate (HR) and locomotor activities were monitored throughout sessions and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) scores were determined immediately after sessions.
Results: During RF, mean HR was higher (P 0.05) compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (126 ± 23 vs 112 ± 19 and 98 ± 19 beats/min) and women aged 60+ (144 ± 24 vs 133 ± 30 and 112 ± 20 beats/min), and higher (P < 0.05) during WF than W. During RF, more distance (P < 0.05) was covered at >8 km/h compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (134 ± 73 vs 36 ± 27 and 6 ± 7 m) and women aged 60+ (119 ± 89 vs 39 ± 38 and 1 ± 1 m), with more distance (p < 0.05) during WF compared to W. Both men and women had higher PACES and RPE scores (P < 0.05) for RF compared to WF.
Conclusion: WF for elderly men and women results in higher heart rates and more distance covered in more intense speed zones than W, but less than in traditional small-sided football. Future studies should elucidate the hypothesis that WF is more effective in relation to fitness and health benefits compared to W, but less effective compared to small-sided traditional football.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2375-0472</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1360-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1762508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Football ; health ; older adults ; Older people ; soccer ; walking ; Women</subject><ispartof>Managing leisure, 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.259-267</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ea3d5a2a6aeaca7ee67a0df2d2c934882af82bd95bb08e4235d49f8024c8d26e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ea3d5a2a6aeaca7ee67a0df2d2c934882af82bd95bb08e4235d49f8024c8d26e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2600-7126 ; 0000-0002-1461-9838 ; 0000-0003-2188-0302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krustrup, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Malte Nejst</creatorcontrib><title>Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study</title><title>Managing leisure</title><description>Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the intensity, perceived exertion and enjoyment of participation in walking football (WF) for elderly men and women compared to traditional small-sided running football (RF) and walking (W).
Methods: 32 men and women aged 60-83 from recreational football teams performed a 5-min W, followed by 10-min WF and RF games in a counterbalanced order, separated by an 8-10 min break. The men and women played 5v5 and 6v6, respectively, on small-sided football pitches (men: 40 × 16.5 m; women 40 × 30 m) with medium-sized goals (3 × 1.5 m). Heart rate (HR) and locomotor activities were monitored throughout sessions and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) scores were determined immediately after sessions.
Results: During RF, mean HR was higher (P 0.05) compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (126 ± 23 vs 112 ± 19 and 98 ± 19 beats/min) and women aged 60+ (144 ± 24 vs 133 ± 30 and 112 ± 20 beats/min), and higher (P < 0.05) during WF than W. During RF, more distance (P < 0.05) was covered at >8 km/h compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (134 ± 73 vs 36 ± 27 and 6 ± 7 m) and women aged 60+ (119 ± 89 vs 39 ± 38 and 1 ± 1 m), with more distance (p < 0.05) during WF compared to W. Both men and women had higher PACES and RPE scores (P < 0.05) for RF compared to WF.
Conclusion: WF for elderly men and women results in higher heart rates and more distance covered in more intense speed zones than W, but less than in traditional small-sided football. Future studies should elucidate the hypothesis that WF is more effective in relation to fitness and health benefits compared to W, but less effective compared to small-sided traditional football.</description><subject>Football</subject><subject>health</subject><subject>older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>soccer</subject><subject>walking</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2375-0472</issn><issn>1360-6719</issn><issn>2375-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhQdRsNQ-ghBwKVNvMz9Jd0qpP1Bwo-twO8mU1JlkTFLqPIGvbcbWLl3dw-Gcw-VLkusZTGfA4Y5mrICc0SkFGi1W0gL4WTIa_BRyDucnzehlMvF-CwCznJVlXoyS7-WXcpX2imgTlPE69ETunDYbssfmY7i1tWGNTROFI60yBI0ke_urNkqSEm5jmVS27dBpbw0JlgSHUgdtDTbEt7Gdei1j-DSWEiSdbmwgPuxkf5Vc1Nh4NTnecfL-uHxbPKer16eXxcMqrbKMh1RhJgukWKLCCplSJUOQNZW0mmc55xRrTtdyXqzXwFVOs0Lm85oDzSsuaamycXJz2O2c_dwpH8TW7lz80gvKoYy8GCtiqjikKme9d6oWndMtul7MQAzYxR92MWAXR-yxd3_oaRNhtbi3rpEiYN9YVzs0EbTI_p_4AbJHiws</recordid><startdate>20210704</startdate><enddate>20210704</enddate><creator>Madsen, Mads</creator><creator>Krustrup, Peter</creator><creator>Larsen, Malte Nejst</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-7126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1461-9838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-0302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210704</creationdate><title>Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study</title><author>Madsen, Mads ; Krustrup, Peter ; Larsen, Malte Nejst</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ea3d5a2a6aeaca7ee67a0df2d2c934882af82bd95bb08e4235d49f8024c8d26e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Football</topic><topic>health</topic><topic>older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>soccer</topic><topic>walking</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krustrup, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Malte Nejst</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Managing leisure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madsen, Mads</au><au>Krustrup, Peter</au><au>Larsen, Malte Nejst</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Managing leisure</jtitle><date>2021-07-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>259-267</pages><issn>2375-0472</issn><issn>1360-6719</issn><eissn>2375-0480</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the intensity, perceived exertion and enjoyment of participation in walking football (WF) for elderly men and women compared to traditional small-sided running football (RF) and walking (W).
Methods: 32 men and women aged 60-83 from recreational football teams performed a 5-min W, followed by 10-min WF and RF games in a counterbalanced order, separated by an 8-10 min break. The men and women played 5v5 and 6v6, respectively, on small-sided football pitches (men: 40 × 16.5 m; women 40 × 30 m) with medium-sized goals (3 × 1.5 m). Heart rate (HR) and locomotor activities were monitored throughout sessions and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) scores were determined immediately after sessions.
Results: During RF, mean HR was higher (P 0.05) compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (126 ± 23 vs 112 ± 19 and 98 ± 19 beats/min) and women aged 60+ (144 ± 24 vs 133 ± 30 and 112 ± 20 beats/min), and higher (P < 0.05) during WF than W. During RF, more distance (P < 0.05) was covered at >8 km/h compared to WF and W for both men aged 60+ (134 ± 73 vs 36 ± 27 and 6 ± 7 m) and women aged 60+ (119 ± 89 vs 39 ± 38 and 1 ± 1 m), with more distance (p < 0.05) during WF compared to W. Both men and women had higher PACES and RPE scores (P < 0.05) for RF compared to WF.
Conclusion: WF for elderly men and women results in higher heart rates and more distance covered in more intense speed zones than W, but less than in traditional small-sided football. Future studies should elucidate the hypothesis that WF is more effective in relation to fitness and health benefits compared to W, but less effective compared to small-sided traditional football.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/23750472.2020.1762508</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-7126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1461-9838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-0302</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2375-0472 |
ispartof | Managing leisure, 2021-07, Vol.26 (4), p.259-267 |
issn | 2375-0472 1360-6719 2375-0480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_23750472_2020_1762508 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Football health older adults Older people soccer walking Women |
title | Exercise intensity during walking football for men and women aged 60+ in comparison to traditional small-sided football - a pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exercise%20intensity%20during%20walking%20football%20for%20men%20and%20women%20aged%2060+%20in%20comparison%20to%20traditional%20small-sided%20football%20-%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Managing%20leisure&rft.au=Madsen,%20Mads&rft.date=2021-07-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=259-267&rft.issn=2375-0472&rft.eissn=2375-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23750472.2020.1762508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2806480775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806480775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |