Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours
Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of urology 2021-09, Vol.55 (5), p.366-371 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 371 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 366 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of urology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian Kingo, Pernille Skjold Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard |
description | Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the tumour violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. En bloc resection (EBR) could potentially overcome these flaws by improving pathological quality and thereby reducing the need for re-resections and could potentially also lower the risk of tumour seeding leading to early recurrences. With this study, we aimed to evaluate tumour characteristics in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing conventional TURB in order to estimate the proportion of procedures eligible for EBR, findings at re-resection, and early recurrence rate.
All TURBs performed at a single large University Hospital in a 12 month period were manually reviewed. Based on tumour size and appearance, patients were registered as candidates or non-candidate for EBR.
A total of 600 TURBs were reviewed. Overall, 25% of procedures were found to be eligible for EBR. The most frequent reason for not being a candidate was tumour diameter |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21681805.2021.1954686 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21681805_2021_1954686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553236414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-15b4e54ba9453856f5e426016f164af1abb9dad7a54ff2a023a1fe475e7250b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOBCEQRYnRqFE_QcPSzYwUj37sNMZXYqILXZPqBhTT3YxAx_j3MpnRpWwgxblVqUPIKbAlsIZdcKgaaJhacsZhCa2SVVPtkMN1fQENiN2_N1MH5CSlD1ZOU0qt2icHQvK6hbo5JOY5ZDtljwPtcTLeYLaJuhCpnWg3hJ5Gm2yffZgojmF6oyvMviQS_fL5na6iHzF-05ItZD_HWP5KEI2xkeZ5DHNMx2TP4ZDsyfY-Iq-3Ny_X94vHp7uH66vHRS9A5gWoTlolO2ylEo2qnLKSVwwqB5VEB9h1rUFTo5LOcWRcIDgra2VrrlgnxRE53_RdxfA525T16FNvhwEnG-akuVKCi0rCGlUbtI8hpWid3m6igem1Y_3rWK8d663jkjvbjpi70Zq_1K_RAlxuAD8ViyN-hTgYnfF7CNFFnHqftPh_xg-Ep4wu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553236414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer ; Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian ; Kingo, Pernille Skjold ; Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</creator><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer ; Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian ; Kingo, Pernille Skjold ; Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</creatorcontrib><description>Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the tumour violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. En bloc resection (EBR) could potentially overcome these flaws by improving pathological quality and thereby reducing the need for re-resections and could potentially also lower the risk of tumour seeding leading to early recurrences. With this study, we aimed to evaluate tumour characteristics in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing conventional TURB in order to estimate the proportion of procedures eligible for EBR, findings at re-resection, and early recurrence rate.
All TURBs performed at a single large University Hospital in a 12 month period were manually reviewed. Based on tumour size and appearance, patients were registered as candidates or non-candidate for EBR.
A total of 600 TURBs were reviewed. Overall, 25% of procedures were found to be eligible for EBR. The most frequent reason for not being a candidate was tumour diameter <1 cm. Re-resections were done after 10.5% of the procedures, where the residual tumour was found in 28.6% of these. Within 6 months, 21.2% had a recurrence.
We found approximately 25% of all TURBs to be eligible for EBR. Based on a relatively low recurrence rate, we conclude that future studies on EBR with recurrence rate as the primary endpoint will require large patient cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-1805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-1813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1954686</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34279178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>En bloc resection ; Humans ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm, Residual ; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer ; TURB ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of urology, 2021-09, Vol.55 (5), p.366-371</ispartof><rights>2021 Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-15b4e54ba9453856f5e426016f164af1abb9dad7a54ff2a023a1fe475e7250b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4347-739X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingo, Pernille Skjold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</creatorcontrib><title>Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours</title><title>Scandinavian journal of urology</title><addtitle>Scand J Urol</addtitle><description>Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the tumour violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. En bloc resection (EBR) could potentially overcome these flaws by improving pathological quality and thereby reducing the need for re-resections and could potentially also lower the risk of tumour seeding leading to early recurrences. With this study, we aimed to evaluate tumour characteristics in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing conventional TURB in order to estimate the proportion of procedures eligible for EBR, findings at re-resection, and early recurrence rate.
All TURBs performed at a single large University Hospital in a 12 month period were manually reviewed. Based on tumour size and appearance, patients were registered as candidates or non-candidate for EBR.
A total of 600 TURBs were reviewed. Overall, 25% of procedures were found to be eligible for EBR. The most frequent reason for not being a candidate was tumour diameter <1 cm. Re-resections were done after 10.5% of the procedures, where the residual tumour was found in 28.6% of these. Within 6 months, 21.2% had a recurrence.
We found approximately 25% of all TURBs to be eligible for EBR. Based on a relatively low recurrence rate, we conclude that future studies on EBR with recurrence rate as the primary endpoint will require large patient cohorts.</description><subject>En bloc resection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual</subject><subject>non-muscle invasive bladder cancer</subject><subject>TURB</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures</subject><issn>2168-1805</issn><issn>2168-1813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOBCEQRYnRqFE_QcPSzYwUj37sNMZXYqILXZPqBhTT3YxAx_j3MpnRpWwgxblVqUPIKbAlsIZdcKgaaJhacsZhCa2SVVPtkMN1fQENiN2_N1MH5CSlD1ZOU0qt2icHQvK6hbo5JOY5ZDtljwPtcTLeYLaJuhCpnWg3hJ5Gm2yffZgojmF6oyvMviQS_fL5na6iHzF-05ItZD_HWP5KEI2xkeZ5DHNMx2TP4ZDsyfY-Iq-3Ny_X94vHp7uH66vHRS9A5gWoTlolO2ylEo2qnLKSVwwqB5VEB9h1rUFTo5LOcWRcIDgra2VrrlgnxRE53_RdxfA525T16FNvhwEnG-akuVKCi0rCGlUbtI8hpWid3m6igem1Y_3rWK8d663jkjvbjpi70Zq_1K_RAlxuAD8ViyN-hTgYnfF7CNFFnHqftPh_xg-Ep4wu</recordid><startdate>20210903</startdate><enddate>20210903</enddate><creator>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer</creator><creator>Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian</creator><creator>Kingo, Pernille Skjold</creator><creator>Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-739X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210903</creationdate><title>Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours</title><author>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer ; Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian ; Kingo, Pernille Skjold ; Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-15b4e54ba9453856f5e426016f164af1abb9dad7a54ff2a023a1fe475e7250b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>En bloc resection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual</topic><topic>non-muscle invasive bladder cancer</topic><topic>TURB</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingo, Pernille Skjold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nielsen, Ninna Kjaer</au><au>Jakobsen, Jakob Kristian</au><au>Kingo, Pernille Skjold</au><au>Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Urol</addtitle><date>2021-09-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>366-371</pages><issn>2168-1805</issn><eissn>2168-1813</eissn><abstract>Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the tumour violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. En bloc resection (EBR) could potentially overcome these flaws by improving pathological quality and thereby reducing the need for re-resections and could potentially also lower the risk of tumour seeding leading to early recurrences. With this study, we aimed to evaluate tumour characteristics in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing conventional TURB in order to estimate the proportion of procedures eligible for EBR, findings at re-resection, and early recurrence rate.
All TURBs performed at a single large University Hospital in a 12 month period were manually reviewed. Based on tumour size and appearance, patients were registered as candidates or non-candidate for EBR.
A total of 600 TURBs were reviewed. Overall, 25% of procedures were found to be eligible for EBR. The most frequent reason for not being a candidate was tumour diameter <1 cm. Re-resections were done after 10.5% of the procedures, where the residual tumour was found in 28.6% of these. Within 6 months, 21.2% had a recurrence.
We found approximately 25% of all TURBs to be eligible for EBR. Based on a relatively low recurrence rate, we conclude that future studies on EBR with recurrence rate as the primary endpoint will require large patient cohorts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>34279178</pmid><doi>10.1080/21681805.2021.1954686</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-739X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-1805 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of urology, 2021-09, Vol.55 (5), p.366-371 |
issn | 2168-1805 2168-1813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21681805_2021_1954686 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | En bloc resection Humans Neoplasm Invasiveness Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm, Residual non-muscle invasive bladder cancer TURB Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urologic Surgical Procedures |
title | Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20candidates%20for%20en%20bloc%20resection%20among%20patients%20with%20primary%20and%20recurrent%20bladder%20tumours&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Nielsen,%20Ninna%20Kjaer&rft.date=2021-09-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=366-371&rft.issn=2168-1805&rft.eissn=2168-1813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21681805.2021.1954686&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553236414%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553236414&rft_id=info:pmid/34279178&rfr_iscdi=true |