Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy
Transnational standard-setting bodies, which guide the conduct of states and non-state actors in multiple fields of global governance, affect the content of domestic law in a manner that may reduce domestic input. This journal symposium approaches the evolving interactions between transnational stan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transnational legal theory 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.177-180 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | Transnational legal theory |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Kanetake, Machiko |
description | Transnational standard-setting bodies, which guide the conduct of states and non-state actors in multiple fields of global governance, affect the content of domestic law in a manner that may reduce domestic input. This journal symposium approaches the evolving interactions between transnational standards and domestic legal orders through questions of authority and legitimacy. Jaye Ellis' piece sheds light on the role of law in mediating democratic legitimation and scientific rationales. Vesco Paskale examines how food safety standard-setting advances the notion of epistemic subsidiarity, and thereby leaves autonomous decision-making space for state authorities. Finally, Ka Lok Yip's article highlights variables in the field of humanitarian law which facilitate and hinder the domestic acceptance of guidance and standards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/20414005.2017.1365568 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_20414005_2017_1365568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2571599572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2488-938d73807a1487528bfed24c98a02fb6db4edbc4ec1928fafc9e3e5d48250b9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_grDgeeskm-xmPSnFL6h4qeeQzYdN2W5qkiL7701p9ehcZph552XmQegawxwDh1sCFFMANieAmzmuasZqfoYmh35JAVfnfzWwSzSLcQM5WI054Al6WwU5xEEm5wfZFzHJQcugY-GGIq1Nof3WxORU0ZvPPPdBm3BXyH1a--DSWGT5YeSS20o1XqELK_toZqc8RR9Pj6vFS7l8f35dPCxLRSjnZVtx3VQcGokpbxjhnTWaUNVyCcR2te6o0Z2iRuGWcCutak1lmKacMOjarpqim6PvLvivfT5QbPw-5AeiIKzBrG1ZQ7KKHVUq-BiDsWIX8plhFBjEAZ74hScO8MQJXt67P-65wfqwld8-9FokOfY-2IxLuSiq_y1-AL69deU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571599572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Kanetake, Machiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanetake, Machiko</creatorcontrib><description>Transnational standard-setting bodies, which guide the conduct of states and non-state actors in multiple fields of global governance, affect the content of domestic law in a manner that may reduce domestic input. This journal symposium approaches the evolving interactions between transnational standards and domestic legal orders through questions of authority and legitimacy. Jaye Ellis' piece sheds light on the role of law in mediating democratic legitimation and scientific rationales. Vesco Paskale examines how food safety standard-setting advances the notion of epistemic subsidiarity, and thereby leaves autonomous decision-making space for state authorities. Finally, Ka Lok Yip's article highlights variables in the field of humanitarian law which facilitate and hinder the domestic acceptance of guidance and standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-4013</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/20414005.2017.1365568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Authority ; Decision making ; domestic law ; expertise ; Food safety ; Governance ; Legitimacy ; Legitimation ; Subsidiarity ; Transnational standards ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Transnational legal theory, 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.177-180</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanetake, Machiko</creatorcontrib><title>Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy</title><title>Transnational legal theory</title><description>Transnational standard-setting bodies, which guide the conduct of states and non-state actors in multiple fields of global governance, affect the content of domestic law in a manner that may reduce domestic input. This journal symposium approaches the evolving interactions between transnational standards and domestic legal orders through questions of authority and legitimacy. Jaye Ellis' piece sheds light on the role of law in mediating democratic legitimation and scientific rationales. Vesco Paskale examines how food safety standard-setting advances the notion of epistemic subsidiarity, and thereby leaves autonomous decision-making space for state authorities. Finally, Ka Lok Yip's article highlights variables in the field of humanitarian law which facilitate and hinder the domestic acceptance of guidance and standards.</description><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>domestic law</subject><subject>expertise</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Legitimation</subject><subject>Subsidiarity</subject><subject>Transnational standards</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>2041-4005</issn><issn>2041-4013</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_grDgeeskm-xmPSnFL6h4qeeQzYdN2W5qkiL7701p9ehcZph552XmQegawxwDh1sCFFMANieAmzmuasZqfoYmh35JAVfnfzWwSzSLcQM5WI054Al6WwU5xEEm5wfZFzHJQcugY-GGIq1Nof3WxORU0ZvPPPdBm3BXyH1a--DSWGT5YeSS20o1XqELK_toZqc8RR9Pj6vFS7l8f35dPCxLRSjnZVtx3VQcGokpbxjhnTWaUNVyCcR2te6o0Z2iRuGWcCutak1lmKacMOjarpqim6PvLvivfT5QbPw-5AeiIKzBrG1ZQ7KKHVUq-BiDsWIX8plhFBjEAZ74hScO8MQJXt67P-65wfqwld8-9FokOfY-2IxLuSiq_y1-AL69deU</recordid><startdate>20170403</startdate><enddate>20170403</enddate><creator>Kanetake, Machiko</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170403</creationdate><title>Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy</title><author>Kanetake, Machiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2488-938d73807a1487528bfed24c98a02fb6db4edbc4ec1928fafc9e3e5d48250b9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>domestic law</topic><topic>expertise</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Legitimation</topic><topic>Subsidiarity</topic><topic>Transnational standards</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanetake, Machiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Transnational legal theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanetake, Machiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy</atitle><jtitle>Transnational legal theory</jtitle><date>2017-04-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>177-180</pages><issn>2041-4005</issn><eissn>2041-4013</eissn><abstract>Transnational standard-setting bodies, which guide the conduct of states and non-state actors in multiple fields of global governance, affect the content of domestic law in a manner that may reduce domestic input. This journal symposium approaches the evolving interactions between transnational standards and domestic legal orders through questions of authority and legitimacy. Jaye Ellis' piece sheds light on the role of law in mediating democratic legitimation and scientific rationales. Vesco Paskale examines how food safety standard-setting advances the notion of epistemic subsidiarity, and thereby leaves autonomous decision-making space for state authorities. Finally, Ka Lok Yip's article highlights variables in the field of humanitarian law which facilitate and hinder the domestic acceptance of guidance and standards.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/20414005.2017.1365568</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-4005 |
ispartof | Transnational legal theory, 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.177-180 |
issn | 2041-4005 2041-4013 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_20414005_2017_1365568 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Authority Decision making domestic law expertise Food safety Governance Legitimacy Legitimation Subsidiarity Transnational standards Transnationalism |
title | Transnational standards in the domestic legal order: authority and legitimacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transnational%20standards%20in%20the%20domestic%20legal%20order:%20authority%20and%20legitimacy&rft.jtitle=Transnational%20legal%20theory&rft.au=Kanetake,%20Machiko&rft.date=2017-04-03&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=177-180&rft.issn=2041-4005&rft.eissn=2041-4013&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/20414005.2017.1365568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2571599572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571599572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |