Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins

The use of the soil conservation service (SCS) curve number (CN) model for estimation of the rainfall excess and the SCS-unit hydrograph (UH) model are common tools for flood studies in arid regions. In this research, we are investigating the capability of these models to simulate flood events in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomatics, natural hazards and risk natural hazards and risk, 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.1482-1509
Hauptverfasser: Niyazi, Burhan, Khan, Abdul A., Masoud, Milad, Elfeki, Amro, Basahi, Jalal, Zaidi, Syed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1509
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1482
container_title Geomatics, natural hazards and risk
container_volume 13
creator Niyazi, Burhan
Khan, Abdul A.
Masoud, Milad
Elfeki, Amro
Basahi, Jalal
Zaidi, Syed
description The use of the soil conservation service (SCS) curve number (CN) model for estimation of the rainfall excess and the SCS-unit hydrograph (UH) model are common tools for flood studies in arid regions. In this research, we are investigating the capability of these models to simulate flood events in the arid region under the common parametrization provided by the SCS model (SCS-CN, the initial abstraction ratio, λ, and UH theory) and the optimum parameterization for best simulating the hydrologic response. A case study is performed in Al-Lith basin in the west of Saudi Arabia (SA). The study simulates measured rainfall-runoff events in the area using seven scenarios (various SCS-CN estimation methods: least-squares method (CN LSM ), asymptotic fitting method (CN ∞ ), SCS-CN tables (CN design ), and antecedent moisture content CN (CN I, CN II , and CN III ), λ = 0.2 and 0.01, and SCS-UH and UH derived from streamflow data) and a comparison is made between the observations and model results under the common parameterization of the SCS model and parameterization estimated from the Saudi arid environment. The comparison between simulated and observed peak flow and runoff volume of the studied events shows high scatter which is a common feature in arid regions due to the inherent uncertainties in the hydrological processes which are not yet resolved due to the lack of detailed measurements of the rainfall-runoff processes. Statistical analysis showed that λ = 0.01 provides a minimum root mean square error (RMSE) in the peak flow (24.8 m 3 /s) and the runoff volume (0.31 million m 3 ) with CN LSM obtained by LSM. CN ∞ is bad to simulate the hydrologic response. The SCS-CN Tables cannot be used for hydrological simulation. They can rather be used for the design purposes of mitigation structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19475705_2022_2080005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_422c358d81c24728a7932d05abe961c6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2890236271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-d045f07f4ced5125223570fc498f60aaa5ee834053929056e17c0275fcc053173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EEtXQn4BkiQ0splzbcezsQCMelSp1UVhbt37MeJTEwc6ABon_jtOULtnYV8f3fLbvIeQ1gysGGt6zrlFSgbziwHldNADIZ-Ri0bdSMfH8qQb5klyWcqwdILhW0FyQP7fTHIfTQCfMOPg5x984xzTSFOh88LSk2FObxuLzz_VgqaL19O3d7u4drZZDcjSkTEvl9LVn3D84D2eXU5_20WJPsy_TAqFxpJijo_dY4lhekRcB--IvH_cN-f7507fd1-3N7Zfr3cebrRVtK7cOGhlAhcZ6JxmXnIv6m2CbTocWEFF6r0UDUnS8A9l6pixwJYO1VWNKbMj1ynUJj2bKccB8NgmjeRBS3hvMc7S9Nw3nVkjtNLO8UVyj6gR3IPHedy2zbWW9WVlTTj9OvszmmE55rM83XHfARcvr1DdErl02p1KyD0-3MjBLcOZfcGYJzjwGV30fVl8c60wH_JVy78yM5z7lkHG0sRjxf8Rf-r2eeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890236271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Niyazi, Burhan ; Khan, Abdul A. ; Masoud, Milad ; Elfeki, Amro ; Basahi, Jalal ; Zaidi, Syed</creator><creatorcontrib>Niyazi, Burhan ; Khan, Abdul A. ; Masoud, Milad ; Elfeki, Amro ; Basahi, Jalal ; Zaidi, Syed</creatorcontrib><description>The use of the soil conservation service (SCS) curve number (CN) model for estimation of the rainfall excess and the SCS-unit hydrograph (UH) model are common tools for flood studies in arid regions. In this research, we are investigating the capability of these models to simulate flood events in the arid region under the common parametrization provided by the SCS model (SCS-CN, the initial abstraction ratio, λ, and UH theory) and the optimum parameterization for best simulating the hydrologic response. A case study is performed in Al-Lith basin in the west of Saudi Arabia (SA). The study simulates measured rainfall-runoff events in the area using seven scenarios (various SCS-CN estimation methods: least-squares method (CN LSM ), asymptotic fitting method (CN ∞ ), SCS-CN tables (CN design ), and antecedent moisture content CN (CN I, CN II , and CN III ), λ = 0.2 and 0.01, and SCS-UH and UH derived from streamflow data) and a comparison is made between the observations and model results under the common parameterization of the SCS model and parameterization estimated from the Saudi arid environment. The comparison between simulated and observed peak flow and runoff volume of the studied events shows high scatter which is a common feature in arid regions due to the inherent uncertainties in the hydrological processes which are not yet resolved due to the lack of detailed measurements of the rainfall-runoff processes. Statistical analysis showed that λ = 0.01 provides a minimum root mean square error (RMSE) in the peak flow (24.8 m 3 /s) and the runoff volume (0.31 million m 3 ) with CN LSM obtained by LSM. CN ∞ is bad to simulate the hydrologic response. The SCS-CN Tables cannot be used for hydrological simulation. They can rather be used for the design purposes of mitigation structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-5705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-5713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Al-Lith basin ; Antecedent moisture ; Arid environments ; Arid regions ; arid zone hydrology ; Arid zones ; Asymptotic methods ; Floods ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrologic processes ; Hydrology ; Least squares method ; Mitigation ; Modelling ; Moisture content ; Parameterization ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; Rainfall runoff ; Rainfall simulators ; Rainfall-runoff modeling ; Rainfall-runoff relationships ; Root-mean-square errors ; Runoff ; Runoff volume ; Saudi Arabia ; SCS-CN method ; Simulation ; Soil conservation ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow data ; unit hydrograph theory ; Unit hydrographs ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.1482-1509</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-d045f07f4ced5125223570fc498f60aaa5ee834053929056e17c0275fcc053173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-d045f07f4ced5125223570fc498f60aaa5ee834053929056e17c0275fcc053173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4359-3160 ; 0000-0002-6175-6712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27502,27924,27925,59143,59144</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niyazi, Burhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Abdul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoud, Milad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfeki, Amro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basahi, Jalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Syed</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins</title><title>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</title><description>The use of the soil conservation service (SCS) curve number (CN) model for estimation of the rainfall excess and the SCS-unit hydrograph (UH) model are common tools for flood studies in arid regions. In this research, we are investigating the capability of these models to simulate flood events in the arid region under the common parametrization provided by the SCS model (SCS-CN, the initial abstraction ratio, λ, and UH theory) and the optimum parameterization for best simulating the hydrologic response. A case study is performed in Al-Lith basin in the west of Saudi Arabia (SA). The study simulates measured rainfall-runoff events in the area using seven scenarios (various SCS-CN estimation methods: least-squares method (CN LSM ), asymptotic fitting method (CN ∞ ), SCS-CN tables (CN design ), and antecedent moisture content CN (CN I, CN II , and CN III ), λ = 0.2 and 0.01, and SCS-UH and UH derived from streamflow data) and a comparison is made between the observations and model results under the common parameterization of the SCS model and parameterization estimated from the Saudi arid environment. The comparison between simulated and observed peak flow and runoff volume of the studied events shows high scatter which is a common feature in arid regions due to the inherent uncertainties in the hydrological processes which are not yet resolved due to the lack of detailed measurements of the rainfall-runoff processes. Statistical analysis showed that λ = 0.01 provides a minimum root mean square error (RMSE) in the peak flow (24.8 m 3 /s) and the runoff volume (0.31 million m 3 ) with CN LSM obtained by LSM. CN ∞ is bad to simulate the hydrologic response. The SCS-CN Tables cannot be used for hydrological simulation. They can rather be used for the design purposes of mitigation structures.</description><subject>Al-Lith basin</subject><subject>Antecedent moisture</subject><subject>Arid environments</subject><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>arid zone hydrology</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Asymptotic methods</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrologic processes</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall runoff</subject><subject>Rainfall simulators</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff modeling</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff relationships</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff volume</subject><subject>Saudi Arabia</subject><subject>SCS-CN method</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow data</subject><subject>unit hydrograph theory</subject><subject>Unit hydrographs</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>1947-5705</issn><issn>1947-5713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EEtXQn4BkiQ0splzbcezsQCMelSp1UVhbt37MeJTEwc6ABon_jtOULtnYV8f3fLbvIeQ1gysGGt6zrlFSgbziwHldNADIZ-Ri0bdSMfH8qQb5klyWcqwdILhW0FyQP7fTHIfTQCfMOPg5x984xzTSFOh88LSk2FObxuLzz_VgqaL19O3d7u4drZZDcjSkTEvl9LVn3D84D2eXU5_20WJPsy_TAqFxpJijo_dY4lhekRcB--IvH_cN-f7507fd1-3N7Zfr3cebrRVtK7cOGhlAhcZ6JxmXnIv6m2CbTocWEFF6r0UDUnS8A9l6pixwJYO1VWNKbMj1ynUJj2bKccB8NgmjeRBS3hvMc7S9Nw3nVkjtNLO8UVyj6gR3IPHedy2zbWW9WVlTTj9OvszmmE55rM83XHfARcvr1DdErl02p1KyD0-3MjBLcOZfcGYJzjwGV30fVl8c60wH_JVy78yM5z7lkHG0sRjxf8Rf-r2eeg</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Niyazi, Burhan</creator><creator>Khan, Abdul A.</creator><creator>Masoud, Milad</creator><creator>Elfeki, Amro</creator><creator>Basahi, Jalal</creator><creator>Zaidi, Syed</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-3160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-6712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins</title><author>Niyazi, Burhan ; Khan, Abdul A. ; Masoud, Milad ; Elfeki, Amro ; Basahi, Jalal ; Zaidi, Syed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-d045f07f4ced5125223570fc498f60aaa5ee834053929056e17c0275fcc053173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Al-Lith basin</topic><topic>Antecedent moisture</topic><topic>Arid environments</topic><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>arid zone hydrology</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Asymptotic methods</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrologic processes</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall runoff</topic><topic>Rainfall simulators</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff modeling</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff relationships</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff volume</topic><topic>Saudi Arabia</topic><topic>SCS-CN method</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow data</topic><topic>unit hydrograph theory</topic><topic>Unit hydrographs</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niyazi, Burhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Abdul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoud, Milad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfeki, Amro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basahi, Jalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Syed</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niyazi, Burhan</au><au>Khan, Abdul A.</au><au>Masoud, Milad</au><au>Elfeki, Amro</au><au>Basahi, Jalal</au><au>Zaidi, Syed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins</atitle><jtitle>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1482</spage><epage>1509</epage><pages>1482-1509</pages><issn>1947-5705</issn><eissn>1947-5713</eissn><abstract>The use of the soil conservation service (SCS) curve number (CN) model for estimation of the rainfall excess and the SCS-unit hydrograph (UH) model are common tools for flood studies in arid regions. In this research, we are investigating the capability of these models to simulate flood events in the arid region under the common parametrization provided by the SCS model (SCS-CN, the initial abstraction ratio, λ, and UH theory) and the optimum parameterization for best simulating the hydrologic response. A case study is performed in Al-Lith basin in the west of Saudi Arabia (SA). The study simulates measured rainfall-runoff events in the area using seven scenarios (various SCS-CN estimation methods: least-squares method (CN LSM ), asymptotic fitting method (CN ∞ ), SCS-CN tables (CN design ), and antecedent moisture content CN (CN I, CN II , and CN III ), λ = 0.2 and 0.01, and SCS-UH and UH derived from streamflow data) and a comparison is made between the observations and model results under the common parameterization of the SCS model and parameterization estimated from the Saudi arid environment. The comparison between simulated and observed peak flow and runoff volume of the studied events shows high scatter which is a common feature in arid regions due to the inherent uncertainties in the hydrological processes which are not yet resolved due to the lack of detailed measurements of the rainfall-runoff processes. Statistical analysis showed that λ = 0.01 provides a minimum root mean square error (RMSE) in the peak flow (24.8 m 3 /s) and the runoff volume (0.31 million m 3 ) with CN LSM obtained by LSM. CN ∞ is bad to simulate the hydrologic response. The SCS-CN Tables cannot be used for hydrological simulation. They can rather be used for the design purposes of mitigation structures.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-3160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-6712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1947-5705
ispartof Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2022-12, Vol.13 (1), p.1482-1509
issn 1947-5705
1947-5713
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19475705_2022_2080005
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Al-Lith basin
Antecedent moisture
Arid environments
Arid regions
arid zone hydrology
Arid zones
Asymptotic methods
Floods
Hydrologic data
Hydrologic processes
Hydrology
Least squares method
Mitigation
Modelling
Moisture content
Parameterization
Precipitation
Rainfall
Rainfall runoff
Rainfall simulators
Rainfall-runoff modeling
Rainfall-runoff relationships
Root-mean-square errors
Runoff
Runoff volume
Saudi Arabia
SCS-CN method
Simulation
Soil conservation
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streamflow data
unit hydrograph theory
Unit hydrographs
Water content
title Optimum parametrization of the soil conservation service (SCS) method for simulating the hydrological response in arid basins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A57%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20parametrization%20of%20the%20soil%20conservation%20service%20(SCS)%20method%20for%20simulating%20the%20hydrological%20response%20in%20arid%20basins&rft.jtitle=Geomatics,%20natural%20hazards%20and%20risk&rft.au=Niyazi,%20Burhan&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1482&rft.epage=1509&rft.pages=1482-1509&rft.issn=1947-5705&rft.eissn=1947-5713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19475705.2022.2080005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2890236271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890236271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_422c358d81c24728a7932d05abe961c6&rfr_iscdi=true