A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment
In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography educa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.) Pa.), 2013-01, Vol.10 (1), p.15-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Wertheim, Jill A. Edelson, Daniel C. The Road Map Project Assessment Committee |
description | In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography education, and the latter, a route to coordinating reform efforts to realize those goals. A central premise of the Road Map Project reports is that reform must be implemented comprehensively across each facet of education. This will require a more robust foundation of research about teaching and learning around the geography learning objectives, developing high-quality instructional materials that move students toward those goals, preparing geography teachers to facilitate learning them, and creating assessments that validly and reliably assess them. The Road Map Project assessment report describes a process for creating assessments, from describing best practices for design and use of assessments, to describing a system for articulating what should be assessed, and how it should be assessed. In this article, the authors highlight five central components of the report, including: (1) areas identified as high priorities for geography assessments; (2) a clarification of the goals to be assessed; (3) an examination of how well existing assessments meet those goals; (4) a framework for creating a new generation of assessments that can support reform efforts; and (5) recommendations for where efforts should be focused to implement these changes. (Contains 2 figures and 1 footnote.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19338341.2012.758044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19338341_2012_758044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ995370</ericid><sourcerecordid>2892628821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cc4173efe36dfee092ea6b1608196129eaa090e64b1fc444510d928afd00bb393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffYA8Fnztv_rXJk4wx52QiiD6HtE1mx9rUpHPs25tR9dGne-Gcc8_lh9AEwxSDgDssKRWU4SkBTKY5F8DYGRrhnJM0E4Kdxz1a0pPnEl2FsAXgGeNihNJZ8up0lTzrLrHOJ6um8-6rbjfJ0riN193HMZmFYEJoTNtfowurd8Hc_Mwxen9YvM0f0_XLcjWfrdOS5LhPy5LhnBpraFZZY0ASo7MCZyCwzDCRRmuQYDJWYFsyxjiGShKhbQVQFFTSMbod7sZnPvcm9Grr9r6NlQoTkUtJOfDoYoOr9C4Eb6zqfN1of1QY1AmM-gWjTmDUACbGJkPM-Lr8iyyepOQ0hyjfD3LdRiCNPji_q1SvjzvnrddtWQdF_y34BumHcNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287993505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wertheim, Jill A. ; Edelson, Daniel C. ; The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</creator><creatorcontrib>Wertheim, Jill A. ; Edelson, Daniel C. ; The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</creatorcontrib><description>In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography education, and the latter, a route to coordinating reform efforts to realize those goals. A central premise of the Road Map Project reports is that reform must be implemented comprehensively across each facet of education. This will require a more robust foundation of research about teaching and learning around the geography learning objectives, developing high-quality instructional materials that move students toward those goals, preparing geography teachers to facilitate learning them, and creating assessments that validly and reliably assess them. The Road Map Project assessment report describes a process for creating assessments, from describing best practices for design and use of assessments, to describing a system for articulating what should be assessed, and how it should be assessed. In this article, the authors highlight five central components of the report, including: (1) areas identified as high priorities for geography assessments; (2) a clarification of the goals to be assessed; (3) an examination of how well existing assessments meet those goals; (4) a framework for creating a new generation of assessments that can support reform efforts; and (5) recommendations for where efforts should be focused to implement these changes. (Contains 2 figures and 1 footnote.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-8341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-6884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19338341.2012.758044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Alignment (Education) ; Behavioral Objectives ; Best Practices ; Change Strategies ; Educational Change ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Objectives ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Evaluation Methods ; Evaluation Needs ; Evaluation Research ; Geography ; Geography Instruction ; Improvement Programs ; Instructional Materials ; Needs Assessment ; Program Effectiveness</subject><ispartof>Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.), 2013-01, Vol.10 (1), p.15-21</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Council for Geographic Education 2013</rights><rights>Copyright National Council for Geographic Education</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cc4173efe36dfee092ea6b1608196129eaa090e64b1fc444510d928afd00bb393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cc4173efe36dfee092ea6b1608196129eaa090e64b1fc444510d928afd00bb393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ995370$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wertheim, Jill A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelson, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</creatorcontrib><title>A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment</title><title>Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.)</title><description>In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography education, and the latter, a route to coordinating reform efforts to realize those goals. A central premise of the Road Map Project reports is that reform must be implemented comprehensively across each facet of education. This will require a more robust foundation of research about teaching and learning around the geography learning objectives, developing high-quality instructional materials that move students toward those goals, preparing geography teachers to facilitate learning them, and creating assessments that validly and reliably assess them. The Road Map Project assessment report describes a process for creating assessments, from describing best practices for design and use of assessments, to describing a system for articulating what should be assessed, and how it should be assessed. In this article, the authors highlight five central components of the report, including: (1) areas identified as high priorities for geography assessments; (2) a clarification of the goals to be assessed; (3) an examination of how well existing assessments meet those goals; (4) a framework for creating a new generation of assessments that can support reform efforts; and (5) recommendations for where efforts should be focused to implement these changes. (Contains 2 figures and 1 footnote.)</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Alignment (Education)</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Needs</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geography Instruction</subject><subject>Improvement Programs</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><issn>1933-8341</issn><issn>1752-6884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffYA8Fnztv_rXJk4wx52QiiD6HtE1mx9rUpHPs25tR9dGne-Gcc8_lh9AEwxSDgDssKRWU4SkBTKY5F8DYGRrhnJM0E4Kdxz1a0pPnEl2FsAXgGeNihNJZ8up0lTzrLrHOJ6um8-6rbjfJ0riN193HMZmFYEJoTNtfowurd8Hc_Mwxen9YvM0f0_XLcjWfrdOS5LhPy5LhnBpraFZZY0ASo7MCZyCwzDCRRmuQYDJWYFsyxjiGShKhbQVQFFTSMbod7sZnPvcm9Grr9r6NlQoTkUtJOfDoYoOr9C4Eb6zqfN1of1QY1AmM-gWjTmDUACbGJkPM-Lr8iyyepOQ0hyjfD3LdRiCNPji_q1SvjzvnrddtWQdF_y34BumHcNk</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Wertheim, Jill A.</creator><creator>Edelson, Daniel C.</creator><creator>The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment</title><author>Wertheim, Jill A. ; Edelson, Daniel C. ; The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cc4173efe36dfee092ea6b1608196129eaa090e64b1fc444510d928afd00bb393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Alignment (Education)</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Needs</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geography Instruction</topic><topic>Improvement Programs</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wertheim, Jill A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelson, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wertheim, Jill A.</au><au>Edelson, Daniel C.</au><au>The Road Map Project Assessment Committee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ995370</ericid><atitle>A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>15-21</pages><issn>1933-8341</issn><eissn>1752-6884</eissn><abstract>In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography education, and the latter, a route to coordinating reform efforts to realize those goals. A central premise of the Road Map Project reports is that reform must be implemented comprehensively across each facet of education. This will require a more robust foundation of research about teaching and learning around the geography learning objectives, developing high-quality instructional materials that move students toward those goals, preparing geography teachers to facilitate learning them, and creating assessments that validly and reliably assess them. The Road Map Project assessment report describes a process for creating assessments, from describing best practices for design and use of assessments, to describing a system for articulating what should be assessed, and how it should be assessed. In this article, the authors highlight five central components of the report, including: (1) areas identified as high priorities for geography assessments; (2) a clarification of the goals to be assessed; (3) an examination of how well existing assessments meet those goals; (4) a framework for creating a new generation of assessments that can support reform efforts; and (5) recommendations for where efforts should be focused to implement these changes. (Contains 2 figures and 1 footnote.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/19338341.2012.758044</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1933-8341 |
ispartof | Geography teacher (Erie, Pa.), 2013-01, Vol.10 (1), p.15-21 |
issn | 1933-8341 1752-6884 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19338341_2012_758044 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Academic Standards Alignment (Education) Behavioral Objectives Best Practices Change Strategies Educational Change Educational Improvement Educational Objectives Elementary Secondary Education Evaluation Methods Evaluation Needs Evaluation Research Geography Geography Instruction Improvement Programs Instructional Materials Needs Assessment Program Effectiveness |
title | A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Road%20Map%20for%20Improving%20Geography%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Geography%20teacher%20(Erie,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Wertheim,%20Jill%20A.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=15-21&rft.issn=1933-8341&rft.eissn=1752-6884&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19338341.2012.758044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892628821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287993505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ995370&rfr_iscdi=true |