Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts

Text messaging is by now a ubiquitous form of computer-mediated communication, especially among university students. An increasing body of research has examined the written language used in text messaging, but little or no data exist regarding how the use of non-conventional spellings, or 'text...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Writing systems research 2015-07, Vol.7 (2), p.220-234
Hauptverfasser: Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 2
container_start_page 220
container_title Writing systems research
container_volume 7
creator Grace, Abbie
Kemp, Nenagh
description Text messaging is by now a ubiquitous form of computer-mediated communication, especially among university students. An increasing body of research has examined the written language used in text messaging, but little or no data exist regarding how the use of non-conventional spellings, or 'textisms', may change over time as people adapt their written language to fit with advances in communication technology. This study reports on naturalistic messages gathered in four consecutive years from four cohorts of Australian first-year undergraduates. Textism use (in particular, 'contractives' such as for ) decreased during this time period, in step with the use of newer text-entry systems (e.g., predictive software). Compared to males, females used significantly more textisms in general, and more expressive textisms (letters added for expressive intent, such as for ) in particular. Overall, our results suggest that textism use may continue to decrease as abbreviated language loses its practicality in a landscape of improved technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17586801_2014_898575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_17586801_2014_898575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e44b97afea968d9114744a311234296e2e21d4538c0aaa4e866d453f03ca2b083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpP2DwxpTiryQOC6oqvqRKLEVis66JHYwSu7IdoP-eRAVGbrn3Tnqf4UHokpIlJZJc0zKXhSR0yQgVS1nJvMxP0Gx6Z4Wkr6d_mdBztIjxnYzDWVkSPkP9Vn8l3OsYobWuxR24doBW3-AVrn2_h2Cjd9gbPLhGhzZAM0DS8Qo7SEOAzsZka5xGio09HqLG1mHjhzDWXdT1kOyHHvObDyleoDMDXdSLnz1HL_d32_Vjtnl-eFqvNlnNKpYyLcSuKsFoqArZVJSKUgjglDIuWFVophltRM5lTQBAaFkU02kIr4HtiORzJI7cOvgYgzZqH2wP4aAoUZM19WtNTdbU0dpYuz3WrDM-9PDpQ9eoBIfOBxPA1TYq_i_hG552dYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Grace, Abbie ; Kemp, Nenagh</creator><creatorcontrib>Grace, Abbie ; Kemp, Nenagh</creatorcontrib><description>Text messaging is by now a ubiquitous form of computer-mediated communication, especially among university students. An increasing body of research has examined the written language used in text messaging, but little or no data exist regarding how the use of non-conventional spellings, or 'textisms', may change over time as people adapt their written language to fit with advances in communication technology. This study reports on naturalistic messages gathered in four consecutive years from four cohorts of Australian first-year undergraduates. Textism use (in particular, 'contractives' such as for ) decreased during this time period, in step with the use of newer text-entry systems (e.g., predictive software). Compared to males, females used significantly more textisms in general, and more expressive textisms (letters added for expressive intent, such as &lt;whaaat?!!&gt; for ) in particular. Overall, our results suggest that textism use may continue to decrease as abbreviated language loses its practicality in a landscape of improved technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-6801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-681X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17586801.2014.898575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Communication ; Mobile phones ; SMS language ; Texting ; Textisms ; University students</subject><ispartof>Writing systems research, 2015-07, Vol.7 (2), p.220-234</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e44b97afea968d9114744a311234296e2e21d4538c0aaa4e866d453f03ca2b083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e44b97afea968d9114744a311234296e2e21d4538c0aaa4e866d453f03ca2b083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grace, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Nenagh</creatorcontrib><title>Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts</title><title>Writing systems research</title><description>Text messaging is by now a ubiquitous form of computer-mediated communication, especially among university students. An increasing body of research has examined the written language used in text messaging, but little or no data exist regarding how the use of non-conventional spellings, or 'textisms', may change over time as people adapt their written language to fit with advances in communication technology. This study reports on naturalistic messages gathered in four consecutive years from four cohorts of Australian first-year undergraduates. Textism use (in particular, 'contractives' such as for ) decreased during this time period, in step with the use of newer text-entry systems (e.g., predictive software). Compared to males, females used significantly more textisms in general, and more expressive textisms (letters added for expressive intent, such as &lt;whaaat?!!&gt; for ) in particular. Overall, our results suggest that textism use may continue to decrease as abbreviated language loses its practicality in a landscape of improved technology.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>SMS language</subject><subject>Texting</subject><subject>Textisms</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>1758-6801</issn><issn>1758-681X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpP2DwxpTiryQOC6oqvqRKLEVis66JHYwSu7IdoP-eRAVGbrn3Tnqf4UHokpIlJZJc0zKXhSR0yQgVS1nJvMxP0Gx6Z4Wkr6d_mdBztIjxnYzDWVkSPkP9Vn8l3OsYobWuxR24doBW3-AVrn2_h2Cjd9gbPLhGhzZAM0DS8Qo7SEOAzsZka5xGio09HqLG1mHjhzDWXdT1kOyHHvObDyleoDMDXdSLnz1HL_d32_Vjtnl-eFqvNlnNKpYyLcSuKsFoqArZVJSKUgjglDIuWFVophltRM5lTQBAaFkU02kIr4HtiORzJI7cOvgYgzZqH2wP4aAoUZM19WtNTdbU0dpYuz3WrDM-9PDpQ9eoBIfOBxPA1TYq_i_hG552dYA</recordid><startdate>20150703</startdate><enddate>20150703</enddate><creator>Grace, Abbie</creator><creator>Kemp, Nenagh</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150703</creationdate><title>Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts</title><author>Grace, Abbie ; Kemp, Nenagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e44b97afea968d9114744a311234296e2e21d4538c0aaa4e866d453f03ca2b083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>SMS language</topic><topic>Texting</topic><topic>Textisms</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grace, Abbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Nenagh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Writing systems research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grace, Abbie</au><au>Kemp, Nenagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts</atitle><jtitle>Writing systems research</jtitle><date>2015-07-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>220-234</pages><issn>1758-6801</issn><eissn>1758-681X</eissn><abstract>Text messaging is by now a ubiquitous form of computer-mediated communication, especially among university students. An increasing body of research has examined the written language used in text messaging, but little or no data exist regarding how the use of non-conventional spellings, or 'textisms', may change over time as people adapt their written language to fit with advances in communication technology. This study reports on naturalistic messages gathered in four consecutive years from four cohorts of Australian first-year undergraduates. Textism use (in particular, 'contractives' such as for ) decreased during this time period, in step with the use of newer text-entry systems (e.g., predictive software). Compared to males, females used significantly more textisms in general, and more expressive textisms (letters added for expressive intent, such as &lt;whaaat?!!&gt; for ) in particular. Overall, our results suggest that textism use may continue to decrease as abbreviated language loses its practicality in a landscape of improved technology.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17586801.2014.898575</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-6801
ispartof Writing systems research, 2015-07, Vol.7 (2), p.220-234
issn 1758-6801
1758-681X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17586801_2014_898575
source Taylor & Francis
subjects Communication
Mobile phones
SMS language
Texting
Textisms
University students
title Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A29%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Text%20messaging%20language:%20A%20comparison%20of%20undergraduates'%20naturalistic%20textism%20use%20in%20four%20consecutive%20cohorts&rft.jtitle=Writing%20systems%20research&rft.au=Grace,%20Abbie&rft.date=2015-07-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=220-234&rft.issn=1758-6801&rft.eissn=1758-681X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_17586801_2014_898575%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true