Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data
The ecological vulnerability of global protected areas (PAs) is linked to the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We developed a novel degree of ecological vulnerability (DEV) index based on Big Earth Data to assess the ecological vulnerability of PAs. This is a transparent, repeatabl...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of digital earth 2021-11, Vol.14 (11), p.1624-1637 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1637 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1624 |
| container_title | International journal of digital earth |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Zheng, Yaomin Wang, Shudong Cao, Yue Shi, Jinlian Qu, Yi Li, Liping Zhao, Tianjie Niu, Zhenguo Yang, Rui Gong, Peng |
| description | The ecological vulnerability of global protected areas (PAs) is linked to the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We developed a novel degree of ecological vulnerability (DEV) index based on Big Earth Data to assess the ecological vulnerability of PAs. This is a transparent, repeatable, large-scale and rapid assessment method. We applied the method to case studies of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) PAs in the basins of the Aral Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Black Sea and the Lake Baikal. Between 2001 and 2015, the spatial pattern of ecological vulnerability in the study area was relatively stable. The Caspian Sea basin and protected landscape/seascape (category V) showed high ecological vulnerability, while the Black Sea basin and wilderness areas (category I
b
) showed low ecological vulnerability. Big Earth Data shows great vitality in PAs ecological vulnerability assessment. Strengthening international cooperation is an important means to break the bottleneck of ecological environment and resource endowment in these important international basins. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17538947.2021.1962995 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17538947_2021_1962995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f3e301cf93854b46a78d8e66a1c58f0a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2592820544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a3be5d862d2d16932a523029b6ba3fb2b3b2fb2f84bb00c48888928768bca7223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1rGzEQFaWFum5-QkCQs119rLTSLW6aNoZACSRnMdJKjsxm5Upyi_995DjJsXOZYZj33sw8hM4pWVKiyDfaC6501y8ZYXRJtWRaiw9oduwvlBbi43vd9Z_Rl1K2hEjSdXyG7lal-FLitMH10WPv0pg20cGI_-7HyWewcYz1gFPAu5yqd9UPGLKHgu0B71-A3-MGX0Ouj_gHVPiKPgUYiz97zXP08PP6_upmcfv71_pqdbtwgvZ1Adx6MSjJBjZQqTkDwThh2koLPFhmuWUtBdVZS4jrVAvNVC-VddAzxudofeIdEmzNLscnyAeTIJqXRsob03aKbvQmcM8JdUFzJTrbSejVoLyUQJ1QgUDjujhxtRv_7H2pZpv2eWrrGyaaKiOifWuOxGnK5VRK9uFdlRJzdMK8OWGOTphXJxru8oSLU0j5Cf6lPA6mwmFMOWSYXCyG_5_iGdKXjsU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592820544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zheng, Yaomin ; Wang, Shudong ; Cao, Yue ; Shi, Jinlian ; Qu, Yi ; Li, Liping ; Zhao, Tianjie ; Niu, Zhenguo ; Yang, Rui ; Gong, Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yaomin ; Wang, Shudong ; Cao, Yue ; Shi, Jinlian ; Qu, Yi ; Li, Liping ; Zhao, Tianjie ; Niu, Zhenguo ; Yang, Rui ; Gong, Peng</creatorcontrib><description>The ecological vulnerability of global protected areas (PAs) is linked to the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We developed a novel degree of ecological vulnerability (DEV) index based on Big Earth Data to assess the ecological vulnerability of PAs. This is a transparent, repeatable, large-scale and rapid assessment method. We applied the method to case studies of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) PAs in the basins of the Aral Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Black Sea and the Lake Baikal. Between 2001 and 2015, the spatial pattern of ecological vulnerability in the study area was relatively stable. The Caspian Sea basin and protected landscape/seascape (category V) showed high ecological vulnerability, while the Black Sea basin and wilderness areas (category I
b
) showed low ecological vulnerability. Big Earth Data shows great vitality in PAs ecological vulnerability assessment. Strengthening international cooperation is an important means to break the bottleneck of ecological environment and resource endowment in these important international basins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-8947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-8955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2021.1962995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>assessment ; Assessments ; Basins ; Earth ; ecological vulnerability ; International cooperation ; International organizations ; Lakes ; Landscape protection ; Nature conservation ; Ocean basins ; Protected areas ; remote sensing ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Vulnerability ; Wilderness ; Wilderness areas</subject><ispartof>International journal of digital earth, 2021-11, Vol.14 (11), p.1624-1637</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The International Journal of Digital Earth is an Official Journal of the International Society for Digital Earth 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The International Journal of Digital Earth is an Official Journal of the International Society for Digital Earth</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a3be5d862d2d16932a523029b6ba3fb2b3b2fb2f84bb00c48888928768bca7223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a3be5d862d2d16932a523029b6ba3fb2b3b2fb2f84bb00c48888928768bca7223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6125-730X ; 0000-0002-0914-599X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jinlian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Tianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Zhenguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data</title><title>International journal of digital earth</title><description>The ecological vulnerability of global protected areas (PAs) is linked to the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We developed a novel degree of ecological vulnerability (DEV) index based on Big Earth Data to assess the ecological vulnerability of PAs. This is a transparent, repeatable, large-scale and rapid assessment method. We applied the method to case studies of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) PAs in the basins of the Aral Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Black Sea and the Lake Baikal. Between 2001 and 2015, the spatial pattern of ecological vulnerability in the study area was relatively stable. The Caspian Sea basin and protected landscape/seascape (category V) showed high ecological vulnerability, while the Black Sea basin and wilderness areas (category I
b
) showed low ecological vulnerability. Big Earth Data shows great vitality in PAs ecological vulnerability assessment. Strengthening international cooperation is an important means to break the bottleneck of ecological environment and resource endowment in these important international basins.</description><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>ecological vulnerability</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape protection</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Ocean basins</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable Development Goals</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Wilderness</subject><subject>Wilderness areas</subject><issn>1753-8947</issn><issn>1753-8955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1rGzEQFaWFum5-QkCQs119rLTSLW6aNoZACSRnMdJKjsxm5Upyi_995DjJsXOZYZj33sw8hM4pWVKiyDfaC6501y8ZYXRJtWRaiw9oduwvlBbi43vd9Z_Rl1K2hEjSdXyG7lal-FLitMH10WPv0pg20cGI_-7HyWewcYz1gFPAu5yqd9UPGLKHgu0B71-A3-MGX0Ouj_gHVPiKPgUYiz97zXP08PP6_upmcfv71_pqdbtwgvZ1Adx6MSjJBjZQqTkDwThh2koLPFhmuWUtBdVZS4jrVAvNVC-VddAzxudofeIdEmzNLscnyAeTIJqXRsob03aKbvQmcM8JdUFzJTrbSejVoLyUQJ1QgUDjujhxtRv_7H2pZpv2eWrrGyaaKiOifWuOxGnK5VRK9uFdlRJzdMK8OWGOTphXJxru8oSLU0j5Cf6lPA6mwmFMOWSYXCyG_5_iGdKXjsU</recordid><startdate>20211102</startdate><enddate>20211102</enddate><creator>Zheng, Yaomin</creator><creator>Wang, Shudong</creator><creator>Cao, Yue</creator><creator>Shi, Jinlian</creator><creator>Qu, Yi</creator><creator>Li, Liping</creator><creator>Zhao, Tianjie</creator><creator>Niu, Zhenguo</creator><creator>Yang, Rui</creator><creator>Gong, Peng</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-599X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211102</creationdate><title>Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data</title><author>Zheng, Yaomin ; Wang, Shudong ; Cao, Yue ; Shi, Jinlian ; Qu, Yi ; Li, Liping ; Zhao, Tianjie ; Niu, Zhenguo ; Yang, Rui ; Gong, Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-a3be5d862d2d16932a523029b6ba3fb2b3b2fb2f84bb00c48888928768bca7223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>ecological vulnerability</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape protection</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Ocean basins</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable Development Goals</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Wilderness</topic><topic>Wilderness areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jinlian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Tianjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Zhenguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of digital earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Yaomin</au><au>Wang, Shudong</au><au>Cao, Yue</au><au>Shi, Jinlian</au><au>Qu, Yi</au><au>Li, Liping</au><au>Zhao, Tianjie</au><au>Niu, Zhenguo</au><au>Yang, Rui</au><au>Gong, Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data</atitle><jtitle>International journal of digital earth</jtitle><date>2021-11-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1624</spage><epage>1637</epage><pages>1624-1637</pages><issn>1753-8947</issn><eissn>1753-8955</eissn><abstract>The ecological vulnerability of global protected areas (PAs) is linked to the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. We developed a novel degree of ecological vulnerability (DEV) index based on Big Earth Data to assess the ecological vulnerability of PAs. This is a transparent, repeatable, large-scale and rapid assessment method. We applied the method to case studies of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) PAs in the basins of the Aral Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Black Sea and the Lake Baikal. Between 2001 and 2015, the spatial pattern of ecological vulnerability in the study area was relatively stable. The Caspian Sea basin and protected landscape/seascape (category V) showed high ecological vulnerability, while the Black Sea basin and wilderness areas (category I
b
) showed low ecological vulnerability. Big Earth Data shows great vitality in PAs ecological vulnerability assessment. Strengthening international cooperation is an important means to break the bottleneck of ecological environment and resource endowment in these important international basins.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/17538947.2021.1962995</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-599X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1753-8947 |
| ispartof | International journal of digital earth, 2021-11, Vol.14 (11), p.1624-1637 |
| issn | 1753-8947 1753-8955 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17538947_2021_1962995 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | assessment Assessments Basins Earth ecological vulnerability International cooperation International organizations Lakes Landscape protection Nature conservation Ocean basins Protected areas remote sensing Sustainable development Sustainable Development Goals Vulnerability Wilderness Wilderness areas |
| title | Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A33%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20ecological%20vulnerability%20of%20protected%20areas%20by%20using%20Big%20Earth%20Data&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20digital%20earth&rft.au=Zheng,%20Yaomin&rft.date=2021-11-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1624&rft.epage=1637&rft.pages=1624-1637&rft.issn=1753-8947&rft.eissn=1753-8955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17538947.2021.1962995&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2592820544%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592820544&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f3e301cf93854b46a78d8e66a1c58f0a&rfr_iscdi=true |