The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue
This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of sport science 2017-07, Vol.17 (6), p.681-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | European journal of sport science |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cayot, Trent E. Lauver, Jakob D. Scheuermann, Barry W. |
description | This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects completed standing biceps curls to fatigue at 70% 1RM utilizing a randomized exercise mode. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded muscle activation of the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae. BWS resistance load was measured using a force transducer. Standing maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the elbow flexors recorded at 90° were used to determine the isometric force decrement and rate of fatigue (ROF) during exercise. sEMG and resistance load data were divided into 25% contraction duration bins throughout the concentric phase. BWS resulted in a 67.7 ± 7.4% decline in resistance load throughout the concentric phase (p ≤ 0.05). As a result, BB elicited higher mean resistance loads (31.4 ± 4.0 kg) and biceps brachii sEMG (84.7 ± 27.8% maximal voluntary isometric contractions, MVIC) compared with BWS (20.4 ± 3.4 kg, 63.4 ± 21.6% MVIC). No difference in rectus abdominis or erector spinae sEMG was detected between exercise modes. Isometric force decrement was greater during BWS (−21.7 ± 7.0 kg) compared with BB (−14.9 ± 4.7 kg); however, BB (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg/set) resulted in a steeper decline in ROF compared with BWS (−1.7 ± 0.6 kg/set). The variable resistance loading and greater isometric force decrement observed suggest that select BWS exercises may resemble variable resistance exercise more than previously considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17461391_2017_1298670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877526426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4214-927730098c7f0ff7abe6c68417b2a3fa852feb27630ff4e728bca18fa6ac10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EolD4CaCMLCm2k9jOgoCKT1VioCuyHPfcBiVxsRNK_z0ObRkRk093z71nPQidETwiWOBLwlNGkpyMKCZ8RGguGMd76IhkCYs5zfF-qAMT99AAHXv_jgOZUnGIBlRQwXNMjtDbdAGR0l0LERgDuvWRNVFhZ-sVlPNFG_nOL6HxpW0i-AKnSw9RqOvO66rfbMtP1fZT1cx-ul2lXGRCb97BCTowqvJwun2HaHp_Nx0_xpOXh6fxzSTWKSVpnFPOE4xzobnBxnBVANNMpIQXVCVGiYwaKChnSZimwKkotCLCKKY0wToZootN7NLZjw58K-vSa6gq1YDtvCSC84yylLKAZhtUO-u9AyOXrqyVW0uCZS9W7sTKXqzcig1759sTXVHD7HdrZzIAVxtgVVaw_l-qvHt-Hd_eY4KzNARcbwLKxlhXq5V11Uy2al1ZZ5xqgnmZ_P3JbwQImmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877526426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cayot, Trent E. ; Lauver, Jakob D. ; Scheuermann, Barry W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cayot, Trent E. ; Lauver, Jakob D. ; Scheuermann, Barry W.</creatorcontrib><description>This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects completed standing biceps curls to fatigue at 70% 1RM utilizing a randomized exercise mode. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded muscle activation of the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae. BWS resistance load was measured using a force transducer. Standing maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the elbow flexors recorded at 90° were used to determine the isometric force decrement and rate of fatigue (ROF) during exercise. sEMG and resistance load data were divided into 25% contraction duration bins throughout the concentric phase. BWS resulted in a 67.7 ± 7.4% decline in resistance load throughout the concentric phase (p ≤ 0.05). As a result, BB elicited higher mean resistance loads (31.4 ± 4.0 kg) and biceps brachii sEMG (84.7 ± 27.8% maximal voluntary isometric contractions, MVIC) compared with BWS (20.4 ± 3.4 kg, 63.4 ± 21.6% MVIC). No difference in rectus abdominis or erector spinae sEMG was detected between exercise modes. Isometric force decrement was greater during BWS (−21.7 ± 7.0 kg) compared with BB (−14.9 ± 4.7 kg); however, BB (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg/set) resulted in a steeper decline in ROF compared with BWS (−1.7 ± 0.6 kg/set). The variable resistance loading and greater isometric force decrement observed suggest that select BWS exercises may resemble variable resistance exercise more than previously considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28287901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Arm ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Weight ; Electromyography ; Exercise - physiology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction ; Male ; Muscle Fatigue - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Resistance exercise ; Resistance Training ; surface electromyography ; variable resistance exercise ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of sport science, 2017-07, Vol.17 (6), p.681-689</ispartof><rights>2017 European College of Sport Science 2017</rights><rights>European College of Sport Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4214-927730098c7f0ff7abe6c68417b2a3fa852feb27630ff4e728bca18fa6ac10c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4214-927730098c7f0ff7abe6c68417b2a3fa852feb27630ff4e728bca18fa6ac10c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28287901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cayot, Trent E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauver, Jakob D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Barry W.</creatorcontrib><title>The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue</title><title>European journal of sport science</title><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><description>This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects completed standing biceps curls to fatigue at 70% 1RM utilizing a randomized exercise mode. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded muscle activation of the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae. BWS resistance load was measured using a force transducer. Standing maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the elbow flexors recorded at 90° were used to determine the isometric force decrement and rate of fatigue (ROF) during exercise. sEMG and resistance load data were divided into 25% contraction duration bins throughout the concentric phase. BWS resulted in a 67.7 ± 7.4% decline in resistance load throughout the concentric phase (p ≤ 0.05). As a result, BB elicited higher mean resistance loads (31.4 ± 4.0 kg) and biceps brachii sEMG (84.7 ± 27.8% maximal voluntary isometric contractions, MVIC) compared with BWS (20.4 ± 3.4 kg, 63.4 ± 21.6% MVIC). No difference in rectus abdominis or erector spinae sEMG was detected between exercise modes. Isometric force decrement was greater during BWS (−21.7 ± 7.0 kg) compared with BB (−14.9 ± 4.7 kg); however, BB (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg/set) resulted in a steeper decline in ROF compared with BWS (−1.7 ± 0.6 kg/set). The variable resistance loading and greater isometric force decrement observed suggest that select BWS exercises may resemble variable resistance exercise more than previously considered.</description><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Resistance exercise</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>surface electromyography</subject><subject>variable resistance exercise</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1746-1391</issn><issn>1536-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EolD4CaCMLCm2k9jOgoCKT1VioCuyHPfcBiVxsRNK_z0ObRkRk093z71nPQidETwiWOBLwlNGkpyMKCZ8RGguGMd76IhkCYs5zfF-qAMT99AAHXv_jgOZUnGIBlRQwXNMjtDbdAGR0l0LERgDuvWRNVFhZ-sVlPNFG_nOL6HxpW0i-AKnSw9RqOvO66rfbMtP1fZT1cx-ul2lXGRCb97BCTowqvJwun2HaHp_Nx0_xpOXh6fxzSTWKSVpnFPOE4xzobnBxnBVANNMpIQXVCVGiYwaKChnSZimwKkotCLCKKY0wToZootN7NLZjw58K-vSa6gq1YDtvCSC84yylLKAZhtUO-u9AyOXrqyVW0uCZS9W7sTKXqzcig1759sTXVHD7HdrZzIAVxtgVVaw_l-qvHt-Hd_eY4KzNARcbwLKxlhXq5V11Uy2al1ZZ5xqgnmZ_P3JbwQImmA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Cayot, Trent E.</creator><creator>Lauver, Jakob D.</creator><creator>Scheuermann, Barry W.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue</title><author>Cayot, Trent E. ; Lauver, Jakob D. ; Scheuermann, Barry W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4214-927730098c7f0ff7abe6c68417b2a3fa852feb27630ff4e728bca18fa6ac10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Resistance exercise</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>surface electromyography</topic><topic>variable resistance exercise</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cayot, Trent E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauver, Jakob D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Barry W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cayot, Trent E.</au><au>Lauver, Jakob D.</au><au>Scheuermann, Barry W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue</atitle><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>681-689</pages><issn>1746-1391</issn><eissn>1536-7290</eissn><abstract>This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects completed standing biceps curls to fatigue at 70% 1RM utilizing a randomized exercise mode. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded muscle activation of the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae. BWS resistance load was measured using a force transducer. Standing maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the elbow flexors recorded at 90° were used to determine the isometric force decrement and rate of fatigue (ROF) during exercise. sEMG and resistance load data were divided into 25% contraction duration bins throughout the concentric phase. BWS resulted in a 67.7 ± 7.4% decline in resistance load throughout the concentric phase (p ≤ 0.05). As a result, BB elicited higher mean resistance loads (31.4 ± 4.0 kg) and biceps brachii sEMG (84.7 ± 27.8% maximal voluntary isometric contractions, MVIC) compared with BWS (20.4 ± 3.4 kg, 63.4 ± 21.6% MVIC). No difference in rectus abdominis or erector spinae sEMG was detected between exercise modes. Isometric force decrement was greater during BWS (−21.7 ± 7.0 kg) compared with BB (−14.9 ± 4.7 kg); however, BB (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg/set) resulted in a steeper decline in ROF compared with BWS (−1.7 ± 0.6 kg/set). The variable resistance loading and greater isometric force decrement observed suggest that select BWS exercises may resemble variable resistance exercise more than previously considered.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>28287901</pmid><doi>10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-1391 |
ispartof | European journal of sport science, 2017-07, Vol.17 (6), p.681-689 |
issn | 1746-1391 1536-7290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17461391_2017_1298670 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Arm Biomechanical Phenomena Body Weight Electromyography Exercise - physiology Humans Isometric Contraction Male Muscle Fatigue - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Resistance exercise Resistance Training surface electromyography variable resistance exercise Young Adult |
title | The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A30%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20acute%20effects%20of%20bodyweight%20suspension%20exercise%20on%20muscle%20activation%20and%20muscular%20fatigue&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20sport%20science&rft.au=Cayot,%20Trent%20E.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=681-689&rft.issn=1746-1391&rft.eissn=1536-7290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877526426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877526426&rft_id=info:pmid/28287901&rfr_iscdi=true |