Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy

In the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, Spinoza offers the reader an exemplar of human nature. However, Spinoza does not conceive of human nature as a universal in which each human being participates, simply by virtue of being human. Rather, each human being is conceived as singular. Thriving ind...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethics and education 2020-04, Vol.15 (2), p.200-212
1. Verfasser: Gatens, Moira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 200
container_title Ethics and education
container_volume 15
creator Gatens, Moira
description In the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, Spinoza offers the reader an exemplar of human nature. However, Spinoza does not conceive of human nature as a universal in which each human being participates, simply by virtue of being human. Rather, each human being is conceived as singular. Thriving individual lives assume thriving communities composed of (somewhat) like-minded and (somewhat) like-embodied individuals. The model, or exemplar, then, may be considered to play the role of an enabling fiction in his educational and moral philosophy. The approach taken here is to explore Spinoza's notions of singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in relation to the distinctive human capacity to educate the senses and the passions and to cultivate reason, and thereby to flourish. The final section of the paper reads the education of Victor Frankenstein's 'monster' through the lens of Spinoza's philosophy of affect.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17449642.2020.1731660
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17449642_2020_1731660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1248815</ericid><sourcerecordid>2382590904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-6988b3a65757bb669952dd425c658490a75f576f30797f12571f573b61bdcd543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKw0AUHUTBWv2EQsCFG1Pn_dhVSn1RcFFdD5OXnZJk4kyKxq83IbVLV_fc87gXDgAzBOcISniHBKWKUzzHEPeUIIhzeAImAx8rzuDpEVN8Di5C2EFIOaZ0AhYbW3_sS-Nt291GwVb2D5s6i_LvvGpGIrJ1tGls7X7MTYiarS1dcM22uwRnhSlDfnWYU_D-sHpbPsXr18fn5f06TgmUbcyVlAkxnAkmkoRzpRjOMopZypmkChrBCiZ4QaBQokCYCdTvJOEoydKMUTIF1-PdxrvPfR5avXN7X_cvNSYSMwUVHFxsdKXeheDzQjfeVsZ3GkE9lKX_ytJDWfpQVp-bjbnc2_SYWb0gTKVErNcXo27rwvnKfDlfZro1Xel84U2d2qDJ_y9-AVRteGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382590904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Gatens, Moira</creator><creatorcontrib>Gatens, Moira</creatorcontrib><description>In the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, Spinoza offers the reader an exemplar of human nature. However, Spinoza does not conceive of human nature as a universal in which each human being participates, simply by virtue of being human. Rather, each human being is conceived as singular. Thriving individual lives assume thriving communities composed of (somewhat) like-minded and (somewhat) like-embodied individuals. The model, or exemplar, then, may be considered to play the role of an enabling fiction in his educational and moral philosophy. The approach taken here is to explore Spinoza's notions of singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in relation to the distinctive human capacity to educate the senses and the passions and to cultivate reason, and thereby to flourish. The final section of the paper reads the education of Victor Frankenstein's 'monster' through the lens of Spinoza's philosophy of affect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-9650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2020.1731660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>affect theory ; Authors ; Educational Philosophy ; Ethics ; exemplarity ; Frankenstein ; Moral Values ; Novels ; Philosophy ; singularity ; Spinoza and education ; Spinoza, Benedictus de (1632-1677) ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Ethics and education, 2020-04, Vol.15 (2), p.200-212</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-6988b3a65757bb669952dd425c658490a75f576f30797f12571f573b61bdcd543</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9952-4813</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1248815$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gatens, Moira</creatorcontrib><title>Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy</title><title>Ethics and education</title><description>In the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, Spinoza offers the reader an exemplar of human nature. However, Spinoza does not conceive of human nature as a universal in which each human being participates, simply by virtue of being human. Rather, each human being is conceived as singular. Thriving individual lives assume thriving communities composed of (somewhat) like-minded and (somewhat) like-embodied individuals. The model, or exemplar, then, may be considered to play the role of an enabling fiction in his educational and moral philosophy. The approach taken here is to explore Spinoza's notions of singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in relation to the distinctive human capacity to educate the senses and the passions and to cultivate reason, and thereby to flourish. The final section of the paper reads the education of Victor Frankenstein's 'monster' through the lens of Spinoza's philosophy of affect.</description><subject>affect theory</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>exemplarity</subject><subject>Frankenstein</subject><subject>Moral Values</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>singularity</subject><subject>Spinoza and education</subject><subject>Spinoza, Benedictus de (1632-1677)</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1744-9642</issn><issn>1744-9650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKw0AUHUTBWv2EQsCFG1Pn_dhVSn1RcFFdD5OXnZJk4kyKxq83IbVLV_fc87gXDgAzBOcISniHBKWKUzzHEPeUIIhzeAImAx8rzuDpEVN8Di5C2EFIOaZ0AhYbW3_sS-Nt291GwVb2D5s6i_LvvGpGIrJ1tGls7X7MTYiarS1dcM22uwRnhSlDfnWYU_D-sHpbPsXr18fn5f06TgmUbcyVlAkxnAkmkoRzpRjOMopZypmkChrBCiZ4QaBQokCYCdTvJOEoydKMUTIF1-PdxrvPfR5avXN7X_cvNSYSMwUVHFxsdKXeheDzQjfeVsZ3GkE9lKX_ytJDWfpQVp-bjbnc2_SYWb0gTKVErNcXo27rwvnKfDlfZro1Xel84U2d2qDJ_y9-AVRteGw</recordid><startdate>20200402</startdate><enddate>20200402</enddate><creator>Gatens, Moira</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-4813</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200402</creationdate><title>Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy</title><author>Gatens, Moira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-6988b3a65757bb669952dd425c658490a75f576f30797f12571f573b61bdcd543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>affect theory</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>exemplarity</topic><topic>Frankenstein</topic><topic>Moral Values</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>singularity</topic><topic>Spinoza and education</topic><topic>Spinoza, Benedictus de (1632-1677)</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gatens, Moira</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ethics and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gatens, Moira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1248815</ericid><atitle>Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy</atitle><jtitle>Ethics and education</jtitle><date>2020-04-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>200</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>200-212</pages><issn>1744-9642</issn><eissn>1744-9650</eissn><abstract>In the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, Spinoza offers the reader an exemplar of human nature. However, Spinoza does not conceive of human nature as a universal in which each human being participates, simply by virtue of being human. Rather, each human being is conceived as singular. Thriving individual lives assume thriving communities composed of (somewhat) like-minded and (somewhat) like-embodied individuals. The model, or exemplar, then, may be considered to play the role of an enabling fiction in his educational and moral philosophy. The approach taken here is to explore Spinoza's notions of singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in relation to the distinctive human capacity to educate the senses and the passions and to cultivate reason, and thereby to flourish. The final section of the paper reads the education of Victor Frankenstein's 'monster' through the lens of Spinoza's philosophy of affect.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17449642.2020.1731660</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-4813</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9642
ispartof Ethics and education, 2020-04, Vol.15 (2), p.200-212
issn 1744-9642
1744-9650
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17449642_2020_1731660
source Education Source
subjects affect theory
Authors
Educational Philosophy
Ethics
exemplarity
Frankenstein
Moral Values
Novels
Philosophy
singularity
Spinoza and education
Spinoza, Benedictus de (1632-1677)
Teaching Methods
title Singularity, similarity, and exemplarity in Spinoza's philosophy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Singularity,%20similarity,%20and%20exemplarity%20in%20Spinoza's%20philosophy&rft.jtitle=Ethics%20and%20education&rft.au=Gatens,%20Moira&rft.date=2020-04-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=200-212&rft.issn=1744-9642&rft.eissn=1744-9650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17449642.2020.1731660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2382590904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382590904&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1248815&rfr_iscdi=true