What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review

Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global public health 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671
Hauptverfasser: Guilfoyle, Regan, Morzycki, Alexander D., Saleh, Abdullah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 671
container_issue 5
container_start_page 662
container_title Global public health
container_volume 17
creator Guilfoyle, Regan
Morzycki, Alexander D.
Saleh, Abdullah
description Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2021_1892795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500384239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv00AQgFcIREvhJ4AsceGSsA_v6wRVxaNSpV5acVyN12PisrbDjk2Vf9-NknDgwFxmNPrmoY-xt4KvBXf8o7B1LYyXa8mlWAvnpfX6GTvf91fCcvP8VBfojL0ieuC8LmFesjOljPPamnN2_WMDczXAL6TqZ5oaSNUGIc2bCBmrLeR5xEybfksVLTEiUbekT9VlRTuacYC5j1XGPz0-vmYvOkiEb475gt1__XJ39X11c_vt-uryZhWVr-cVRus6IbVTrQFvtPZt6dgoHEfeAvcewIGMEVwrGuuBW9UIjrVseNtoqS7Yh8PebZ5-L0hzGHqKmBKMOC0UpOZcuVoqX9D3_6AP05LH8l2QRtfFgFWmUPpAxTwRZezCNvcD5F0QPOxdh5PrsHcdjq7L3Lvj9qUZsP07dZJbgM8HoB-7KQ_wOOXUhhl2acpdhjH2FNT_bzwB-EuNVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2654957736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><description>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33689576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>academic collaboration ; Collaboration ; Curricula ; Curriculum development ; Delivery of Health Care ; Developing Countries ; Funding ; Global Health ; Health care ; Health Facilities ; Health services ; Healthcare partnership ; Humans ; Income ; Medical education ; Organizations ; Partnerships ; Sustainability ; sustainable partnership ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Global public health, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,30999,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><title>Global public health</title><addtitle>Glob Public Health</addtitle><description>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</description><subject>academic collaboration</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Healthcare partnership</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable partnership</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1744-1692</issn><issn>1744-1706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv00AQgFcIREvhJ4AsceGSsA_v6wRVxaNSpV5acVyN12PisrbDjk2Vf9-NknDgwFxmNPrmoY-xt4KvBXf8o7B1LYyXa8mlWAvnpfX6GTvf91fCcvP8VBfojL0ieuC8LmFesjOljPPamnN2_WMDczXAL6TqZ5oaSNUGIc2bCBmrLeR5xEybfksVLTEiUbekT9VlRTuacYC5j1XGPz0-vmYvOkiEb475gt1__XJ39X11c_vt-uryZhWVr-cVRus6IbVTrQFvtPZt6dgoHEfeAvcewIGMEVwrGuuBW9UIjrVseNtoqS7Yh8PebZ5-L0hzGHqKmBKMOC0UpOZcuVoqX9D3_6AP05LH8l2QRtfFgFWmUPpAxTwRZezCNvcD5F0QPOxdh5PrsHcdjq7L3Lvj9qUZsP07dZJbgM8HoB-7KQ_wOOXUhhl2acpdhjH2FNT_bzwB-EuNVw</recordid><startdate>20220504</startdate><enddate>20220504</enddate><creator>Guilfoyle, Regan</creator><creator>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creator><creator>Saleh, Abdullah</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220504</creationdate><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><author>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>academic collaboration</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Healthcare partnership</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable partnership</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guilfoyle, Regan</au><au>Morzycki, Alexander D.</au><au>Saleh, Abdullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Global public health</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-05-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>662-671</pages><issn>1744-1692</issn><eissn>1744-1706</eissn><abstract>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>33689576</pmid><doi>10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-1692
ispartof Global public health, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671
issn 1744-1692
1744-1706
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2021_1892795
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects academic collaboration
Collaboration
Curricula
Curriculum development
Delivery of Health Care
Developing Countries
Funding
Global Health
Health care
Health Facilities
Health services
Healthcare partnership
Humans
Income
Medical education
Organizations
Partnerships
Sustainability
sustainable partnership
Systematic review
title What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20makes%20global%20healthcare%20partnerships%20successful?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Global%20public%20health&rft.au=Guilfoyle,%20Regan&rft.date=2022-05-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=662-671&rft.issn=1744-1692&rft.eissn=1744-1706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500384239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2654957736&rft_id=info:pmid/33689576&rfr_iscdi=true