What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review
Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global public health 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 671 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 662 |
container_title | Global public health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Guilfoyle, Regan Morzycki, Alexander D. Saleh, Abdullah |
description | Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2021_1892795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500384239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv00AQgFcIREvhJ4AsceGSsA_v6wRVxaNSpV5acVyN12PisrbDjk2Vf9-NknDgwFxmNPrmoY-xt4KvBXf8o7B1LYyXa8mlWAvnpfX6GTvf91fCcvP8VBfojL0ieuC8LmFesjOljPPamnN2_WMDczXAL6TqZ5oaSNUGIc2bCBmrLeR5xEybfksVLTEiUbekT9VlRTuacYC5j1XGPz0-vmYvOkiEb475gt1__XJ39X11c_vt-uryZhWVr-cVRus6IbVTrQFvtPZt6dgoHEfeAvcewIGMEVwrGuuBW9UIjrVseNtoqS7Yh8PebZ5-L0hzGHqKmBKMOC0UpOZcuVoqX9D3_6AP05LH8l2QRtfFgFWmUPpAxTwRZezCNvcD5F0QPOxdh5PrsHcdjq7L3Lvj9qUZsP07dZJbgM8HoB-7KQ_wOOXUhhl2acpdhjH2FNT_bzwB-EuNVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2654957736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><description>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-1692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33689576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>academic collaboration ; Collaboration ; Curricula ; Curriculum development ; Delivery of Health Care ; Developing Countries ; Funding ; Global Health ; Health care ; Health Facilities ; Health services ; Healthcare partnership ; Humans ; Income ; Medical education ; Organizations ; Partnerships ; Sustainability ; sustainable partnership ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Global public health, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,30999,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><title>Global public health</title><addtitle>Glob Public Health</addtitle><description>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</description><subject>academic collaboration</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Healthcare partnership</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainable partnership</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1744-1692</issn><issn>1744-1706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv00AQgFcIREvhJ4AsceGSsA_v6wRVxaNSpV5acVyN12PisrbDjk2Vf9-NknDgwFxmNPrmoY-xt4KvBXf8o7B1LYyXa8mlWAvnpfX6GTvf91fCcvP8VBfojL0ieuC8LmFesjOljPPamnN2_WMDczXAL6TqZ5oaSNUGIc2bCBmrLeR5xEybfksVLTEiUbekT9VlRTuacYC5j1XGPz0-vmYvOkiEb475gt1__XJ39X11c_vt-uryZhWVr-cVRus6IbVTrQFvtPZt6dgoHEfeAvcewIGMEVwrGuuBW9UIjrVseNtoqS7Yh8PebZ5-L0hzGHqKmBKMOC0UpOZcuVoqX9D3_6AP05LH8l2QRtfFgFWmUPpAxTwRZezCNvcD5F0QPOxdh5PrsHcdjq7L3Lvj9qUZsP07dZJbgM8HoB-7KQ_wOOXUhhl2acpdhjH2FNT_bzwB-EuNVw</recordid><startdate>20220504</startdate><enddate>20220504</enddate><creator>Guilfoyle, Regan</creator><creator>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creator><creator>Saleh, Abdullah</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220504</creationdate><title>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</title><author>Guilfoyle, Regan ; Morzycki, Alexander D. ; Saleh, Abdullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ec78f12583d6a96559dc787c180e0da099aa8a2cca8d1b79a073b10e42b0db523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>academic collaboration</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Healthcare partnership</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainable partnership</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guilfoyle, Regan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morzycki, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guilfoyle, Regan</au><au>Morzycki, Alexander D.</au><au>Saleh, Abdullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Global public health</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-05-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>662-671</pages><issn>1744-1692</issn><eissn>1744-1706</eissn><abstract>Academic communities are increasingly involved in efforts to address the overwhelming burden of disease in low-middle income countries. There is, however, little research dedicated to understanding the best approach to creating a successful and sustainable global healthcare project. Our objective was to review the shared characteristics of successful healthcare partnerships between high- and low-middle income countries. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. Articles, describing collaborative, healthcare partnerships between a high- and low-middle income countries between 1910 and September 2018, were included. Twenty-six articles were included. The majority of collaborations were initiated by either the host institution or as a joint decision between institutions. The primary goal of these collaborations revolved around medical education/training and curriculum development. Two partnerships, after more than a decade of collaboration, had achieved a self-sustaining programme. Lack of funding was identified as a major barrier to sustainability. Successful global healthcare partnerships require true collaboration and equal participation of all partners. Funding should be secured prior to programme development in anticipation of a minimum 10-year project. A minimum list of guidelines has been proposed to improve the chances of both a successful and sustainable collaboration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>33689576</pmid><doi>10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-0014</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-1692 |
ispartof | Global public health, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.662-671 |
issn | 1744-1692 1744-1706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2021_1892795 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | academic collaboration Collaboration Curricula Curriculum development Delivery of Health Care Developing Countries Funding Global Health Health care Health Facilities Health services Healthcare partnership Humans Income Medical education Organizations Partnerships Sustainability sustainable partnership Systematic review |
title | What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20makes%20global%20healthcare%20partnerships%20successful?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Global%20public%20health&rft.au=Guilfoyle,%20Regan&rft.date=2022-05-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=662-671&rft.issn=1744-1692&rft.eissn=1744-1706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500384239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2654957736&rft_id=info:pmid/33689576&rfr_iscdi=true |