Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination
This study analyses the impact of cultural composition on regional attractiveness from the perspective of international migrant sorting behaviour on a European regional NUTS1 level. We use an attitudinal survey to quantify cultural distances between natives and immigrants in the region concerned, an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Spatial economic analysis 2016-04, Vol.11 (2), p.176-200 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 200 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 176 |
| container_title | Spatial economic analysis |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Wang, Zhiling De Graaff, Thomas Nijkamp, Peter |
| description | This study analyses the impact of cultural composition on regional attractiveness from the perspective of international migrant sorting behaviour on a European regional NUTS1 level. We use an attitudinal survey to quantify cultural distances between natives and immigrants in the region concerned, and estimate the migrants' varying preferences for both cultural diversity and cultural distance. To account for regional unobserved heterogeneity, our econometric analysis employs artificial instrumental variables, as developed by Bayer et al., [2004a. An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market. NBER no. 10865]. The main conclusions are twofold. On the one hand, cultural diversity increases regional attractiveness. On the other hand, average cultural distance greatly weakens regional attractiveness. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17421772.2016.1102956 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17421772_2016_1102956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4044813511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a11adb0793260b247b755387974dc1cec45e80e941907e07d61bddfd2c1e1f5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDWT_ZjNTWn9gooXBW8hu8lqynZTk6zSf2-WVvHkaV7emXmHeQg5BzoDWtFLwJwBIpsxCuUMgDJelAdkMvopYEUPfzWyY3Li_YrSgnGOE_I6H7owONklC_OpnTdhm8heJX9sH2Tf6ET6ZP5uTVQLHbRbm172wSe2TR7Nm5PB2D52fIj-qE_JUSs7r8_2dUpebm-e5_fp8unuYX69TJs85yGVAFLVFHnGSlqzHGssiqxCjrlqoNFNXuiKap4Dp6gpqhJqpVrFGtDQFiqbkotd7sbZjyHeFys7uD6eFPH1ErGKyXGq2E01znrvdCs2zqyl2wqgYoQofiCKEaLYQ4x7V7s907fWreWXdZ0SQW4761oXuRgvsv8jvgF8KHjh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786778326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wang, Zhiling ; De Graaff, Thomas ; Nijkamp, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiling ; De Graaff, Thomas ; Nijkamp, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses the impact of cultural composition on regional attractiveness from the perspective of international migrant sorting behaviour on a European regional NUTS1 level. We use an attitudinal survey to quantify cultural distances between natives and immigrants in the region concerned, and estimate the migrants' varying preferences for both cultural diversity and cultural distance. To account for regional unobserved heterogeneity, our econometric analysis employs artificial instrumental variables, as developed by Bayer et al., [2004a. An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market. NBER no. 10865]. The main conclusions are twofold. On the one hand, cultural diversity increases regional attractiveness. On the other hand, average cultural distance greatly weakens regional attractiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2016.1102956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Glasgow: Routledge</publisher><subject>Behavioral decision theory ; cultural distance ; cultural diversity ; Culture ; destination choice ; Econometrics ; Immigration ; Keywords: Migration ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Noncitizens ; sorting ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Spatial economic analysis, 2016-04, Vol.11 (2), p.176-200</ispartof><rights>2016 Regional Studies Association 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a11adb0793260b247b755387974dc1cec45e80e941907e07d61bddfd2c1e1f5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a11adb0793260b247b755387974dc1cec45e80e941907e07d61bddfd2c1e1f5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Graaff, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkamp, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination</title><title>Spatial economic analysis</title><description>This study analyses the impact of cultural composition on regional attractiveness from the perspective of international migrant sorting behaviour on a European regional NUTS1 level. We use an attitudinal survey to quantify cultural distances between natives and immigrants in the region concerned, and estimate the migrants' varying preferences for both cultural diversity and cultural distance. To account for regional unobserved heterogeneity, our econometric analysis employs artificial instrumental variables, as developed by Bayer et al., [2004a. An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market. NBER no. 10865]. The main conclusions are twofold. On the one hand, cultural diversity increases regional attractiveness. On the other hand, average cultural distance greatly weakens regional attractiveness.</description><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>cultural distance</subject><subject>cultural diversity</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>destination choice</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Keywords: Migration</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>sorting</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1742-1772</issn><issn>1742-1780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDWT_ZjNTWn9gooXBW8hu8lqynZTk6zSf2-WVvHkaV7emXmHeQg5BzoDWtFLwJwBIpsxCuUMgDJelAdkMvopYEUPfzWyY3Li_YrSgnGOE_I6H7owONklC_OpnTdhm8heJX9sH2Tf6ET6ZP5uTVQLHbRbm172wSe2TR7Nm5PB2D52fIj-qE_JUSs7r8_2dUpebm-e5_fp8unuYX69TJs85yGVAFLVFHnGSlqzHGssiqxCjrlqoNFNXuiKap4Dp6gpqhJqpVrFGtDQFiqbkotd7sbZjyHeFys7uD6eFPH1ErGKyXGq2E01znrvdCs2zqyl2wqgYoQofiCKEaLYQ4x7V7s907fWreWXdZ0SQW4761oXuRgvsv8jvgF8KHjh</recordid><startdate>20160402</startdate><enddate>20160402</enddate><creator>Wang, Zhiling</creator><creator>De Graaff, Thomas</creator><creator>Nijkamp, Peter</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160402</creationdate><title>Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination</title><author>Wang, Zhiling ; De Graaff, Thomas ; Nijkamp, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-a11adb0793260b247b755387974dc1cec45e80e941907e07d61bddfd2c1e1f5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>cultural distance</topic><topic>cultural diversity</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>destination choice</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Keywords: Migration</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>sorting</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Graaff, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkamp, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Spatial economic analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Zhiling</au><au>De Graaff, Thomas</au><au>Nijkamp, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination</atitle><jtitle>Spatial economic analysis</jtitle><date>2016-04-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>176-200</pages><issn>1742-1772</issn><eissn>1742-1780</eissn><abstract>This study analyses the impact of cultural composition on regional attractiveness from the perspective of international migrant sorting behaviour on a European regional NUTS1 level. We use an attitudinal survey to quantify cultural distances between natives and immigrants in the region concerned, and estimate the migrants' varying preferences for both cultural diversity and cultural distance. To account for regional unobserved heterogeneity, our econometric analysis employs artificial instrumental variables, as developed by Bayer et al., [2004a. An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market. NBER no. 10865]. The main conclusions are twofold. On the one hand, cultural diversity increases regional attractiveness. On the other hand, average cultural distance greatly weakens regional attractiveness.</abstract><cop>Glasgow</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17421772.2016.1102956</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1742-1772 |
| ispartof | Spatial economic analysis, 2016-04, Vol.11 (2), p.176-200 |
| issn | 1742-1772 1742-1780 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_17421772_2016_1102956 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Behavioral decision theory cultural distance cultural diversity Culture destination choice Econometrics Immigration Keywords: Migration Multiculturalism & pluralism Noncitizens sorting Studies |
| title | Cultural Diversity and Cultural Distance as Choice Determinants of Migration Destination |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Diversity%20and%20Cultural%20Distance%20as%20Choice%20Determinants%20of%20Migration%20Destination&rft.jtitle=Spatial%20economic%20analysis&rft.au=Wang,%20Zhiling&rft.date=2016-04-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=176-200&rft.issn=1742-1772&rft.eissn=1742-1780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17421772.2016.1102956&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4044813511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786778326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |