Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients

Cancer diagnosis and therapy is quickly moving from the traditional histology-based approaches to genomic stratification, providing a huge opportunity for radiogenomics, associating imaging features with genomic data. Genome sequencing is time consuming, expensive and invasive whereas F-FDG PET/CT i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer biology & therapy 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1067-1071
Hauptverfasser: Haghighat Jahromi, Amin, Chang, Geraldine, Kurzrock, Razelle, Hoh, Carl K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1071
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1067
container_title Cancer biology & therapy
container_volume 21
creator Haghighat Jahromi, Amin
Chang, Geraldine
Kurzrock, Razelle
Hoh, Carl K
description Cancer diagnosis and therapy is quickly moving from the traditional histology-based approaches to genomic stratification, providing a huge opportunity for radiogenomics, associating imaging features with genomic data. Genome sequencing is time consuming, expensive and invasive whereas F-FDG PET/CT is readily available, fast and noninvasive. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ) and the frequency of 11 common oncogenic anomalies determined by specific common genomic alterations in tissue biopsies from patients with cancer. We retrospectively studied 102 consecutive untreated patients with gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancer who underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging, shortly prior to molecular testing by a biopsy for genomic profiling that consisted of 11 common DNA alterations: (1) TP53, (2) DNA repair, (3) EGFR, (4) PI3K/AKT/MTOR (PAM) pathway including PTEN, PIK3CA, AKT, TSC, CCNB1, MTOR, FBXW2, and NF2, (5) MEK, (6) CYCLIN including CCND,CDK, CDKN, and RB, (7) WNT, (8) ALK, (9) MYC, (10) MET, and (11) FGF/FGFR. Higher SUV was associated with the presence of TP53 and PAM genomic anomalies (  .05). More importantly, SUV was positively correlated with total number of oncogenic anomalies (r = 0.27, = .005). We propose higher SUV as an indicator for total number of common oncogenic anomalies. This finding is a step forward in noninvasive stratification of cancer patients, in terms of the overall load of oncogenic anomalies, based on their SUV .
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15384047.2020.1834793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_15384047_2020_1834793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33131408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-5711a1643ef43f4bb381ffc5ebbf17f45a665e5e43957505ee1b968745605caa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCSAvYZHWju3EWaLSFqRKILVlG02cMQ3kUSUOr0_gq0lEy2quRvfcxSHkkrMxZ5pNuBJaMhmOfeZ3Ly1kGIkjMuRKKU-rMDjus9BeXxqQs6Z5ZcwP_SA6JQMhuOCS6SH5WTkoU6jT7BtT2u4cvCF9h7xFer3aPNMCPukNzUrKNZ1787sFfZqtJ9M1zRpqqrrGHFwHfmRuS90Wqasc5LRsiwRrWtmO79iqNNULlpmhUFYF5Bk2_aSB0nStHbgMS9eckxMLeYMX-zsim_lsPb33lo-Lh-nt0jPc59pTIefAAynQSmFlkgjNrTUKk8Ty0EoFQaBQoRSRChVTiDyJAh1KFTBlAMSIqL9dU1dNU6ONd3VWQP0Vcxb3buOD27h3G-_ddtzVH7drkwLTf-ogU_wC6PFzoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin ; Chang, Geraldine ; Kurzrock, Razelle ; Hoh, Carl K</creator><creatorcontrib>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin ; Chang, Geraldine ; Kurzrock, Razelle ; Hoh, Carl K</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer diagnosis and therapy is quickly moving from the traditional histology-based approaches to genomic stratification, providing a huge opportunity for radiogenomics, associating imaging features with genomic data. Genome sequencing is time consuming, expensive and invasive whereas F-FDG PET/CT is readily available, fast and noninvasive. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ) and the frequency of 11 common oncogenic anomalies determined by specific common genomic alterations in tissue biopsies from patients with cancer. We retrospectively studied 102 consecutive untreated patients with gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancer who underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging, shortly prior to molecular testing by a biopsy for genomic profiling that consisted of 11 common DNA alterations: (1) TP53, (2) DNA repair, (3) EGFR, (4) PI3K/AKT/MTOR (PAM) pathway including PTEN, PIK3CA, AKT, TSC, CCNB1, MTOR, FBXW2, and NF2, (5) MEK, (6) CYCLIN including CCND,CDK, CDKN, and RB, (7) WNT, (8) ALK, (9) MYC, (10) MET, and (11) FGF/FGFR. Higher SUV was associated with the presence of TP53 and PAM genomic anomalies ( &lt; .05), but not the other 9 gene groups ( &gt; .05). More importantly, SUV was positively correlated with total number of oncogenic anomalies (r = 0.27, = .005). We propose higher SUV as an indicator for total number of common oncogenic anomalies. This finding is a step forward in noninvasive stratification of cancer patients, in terms of the overall load of oncogenic anomalies, based on their SUV .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-8576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1834793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33131408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Cancer biology &amp; therapy, 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1067-1071</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-5711a1643ef43f4bb381ffc5ebbf17f45a665e5e43957505ee1b968745605caa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-5711a1643ef43f4bb381ffc5ebbf17f45a665e5e43957505ee1b968745605caa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4110-1214 ; 0000-0002-8263-903X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzrock, Razelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoh, Carl K</creatorcontrib><title>Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients</title><title>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</title><addtitle>Cancer Biol Ther</addtitle><description>Cancer diagnosis and therapy is quickly moving from the traditional histology-based approaches to genomic stratification, providing a huge opportunity for radiogenomics, associating imaging features with genomic data. Genome sequencing is time consuming, expensive and invasive whereas F-FDG PET/CT is readily available, fast and noninvasive. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ) and the frequency of 11 common oncogenic anomalies determined by specific common genomic alterations in tissue biopsies from patients with cancer. We retrospectively studied 102 consecutive untreated patients with gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancer who underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging, shortly prior to molecular testing by a biopsy for genomic profiling that consisted of 11 common DNA alterations: (1) TP53, (2) DNA repair, (3) EGFR, (4) PI3K/AKT/MTOR (PAM) pathway including PTEN, PIK3CA, AKT, TSC, CCNB1, MTOR, FBXW2, and NF2, (5) MEK, (6) CYCLIN including CCND,CDK, CDKN, and RB, (7) WNT, (8) ALK, (9) MYC, (10) MET, and (11) FGF/FGFR. Higher SUV was associated with the presence of TP53 and PAM genomic anomalies ( &lt; .05), but not the other 9 gene groups ( &gt; .05). More importantly, SUV was positively correlated with total number of oncogenic anomalies (r = 0.27, = .005). We propose higher SUV as an indicator for total number of common oncogenic anomalies. This finding is a step forward in noninvasive stratification of cancer patients, in terms of the overall load of oncogenic anomalies, based on their SUV .</description><issn>1538-4047</issn><issn>1555-8576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCSAvYZHWju3EWaLSFqRKILVlG02cMQ3kUSUOr0_gq0lEy2quRvfcxSHkkrMxZ5pNuBJaMhmOfeZ3Ly1kGIkjMuRKKU-rMDjus9BeXxqQs6Z5ZcwP_SA6JQMhuOCS6SH5WTkoU6jT7BtT2u4cvCF9h7xFer3aPNMCPukNzUrKNZ1787sFfZqtJ9M1zRpqqrrGHFwHfmRuS90Wqasc5LRsiwRrWtmO79iqNNULlpmhUFYF5Bk2_aSB0nStHbgMS9eckxMLeYMX-zsim_lsPb33lo-Lh-nt0jPc59pTIefAAynQSmFlkgjNrTUKk8Ty0EoFQaBQoRSRChVTiDyJAh1KFTBlAMSIqL9dU1dNU6ONd3VWQP0Vcxb3buOD27h3G-_ddtzVH7drkwLTf-ogU_wC6PFzoQ</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin</creator><creator>Chang, Geraldine</creator><creator>Kurzrock, Razelle</creator><creator>Hoh, Carl K</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4110-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-903X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients</title><author>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin ; Chang, Geraldine ; Kurzrock, Razelle ; Hoh, Carl K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1218-5711a1643ef43f4bb381ffc5ebbf17f45a665e5e43957505ee1b968745605caa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzrock, Razelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoh, Carl K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haghighat Jahromi, Amin</au><au>Chang, Geraldine</au><au>Kurzrock, Razelle</au><au>Hoh, Carl K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Biol Ther</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1067</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1067-1071</pages><issn>1538-4047</issn><eissn>1555-8576</eissn><abstract>Cancer diagnosis and therapy is quickly moving from the traditional histology-based approaches to genomic stratification, providing a huge opportunity for radiogenomics, associating imaging features with genomic data. Genome sequencing is time consuming, expensive and invasive whereas F-FDG PET/CT is readily available, fast and noninvasive. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ) and the frequency of 11 common oncogenic anomalies determined by specific common genomic alterations in tissue biopsies from patients with cancer. We retrospectively studied 102 consecutive untreated patients with gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancer who underwent F-FDG PET/CT imaging, shortly prior to molecular testing by a biopsy for genomic profiling that consisted of 11 common DNA alterations: (1) TP53, (2) DNA repair, (3) EGFR, (4) PI3K/AKT/MTOR (PAM) pathway including PTEN, PIK3CA, AKT, TSC, CCNB1, MTOR, FBXW2, and NF2, (5) MEK, (6) CYCLIN including CCND,CDK, CDKN, and RB, (7) WNT, (8) ALK, (9) MYC, (10) MET, and (11) FGF/FGFR. Higher SUV was associated with the presence of TP53 and PAM genomic anomalies ( &lt; .05), but not the other 9 gene groups ( &gt; .05). More importantly, SUV was positively correlated with total number of oncogenic anomalies (r = 0.27, = .005). We propose higher SUV as an indicator for total number of common oncogenic anomalies. This finding is a step forward in noninvasive stratification of cancer patients, in terms of the overall load of oncogenic anomalies, based on their SUV .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33131408</pmid><doi>10.1080/15384047.2020.1834793</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4110-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-903X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-4047
ispartof Cancer biology & therapy, 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1067-1071
issn 1538-4047
1555-8576
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_15384047_2020_1834793
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Standardized uptake value (SUV max ) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT is correlated with the total number of main oncogenic anomalies in cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardized%20uptake%20value%20(SUV%20max%20)%20in%2018%20F-FDG%20PET/CT%20is%20correlated%20with%20the%20total%20number%20of%20main%20oncogenic%20anomalies%20in%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20biology%20&%20therapy&rft.au=Haghighat%20Jahromi,%20Amin&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1067&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1067-1071&rft.issn=1538-4047&rft.eissn=1555-8576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15384047.2020.1834793&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33131408%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33131408&rfr_iscdi=true