Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland

A recurring question among some crisis negotiators has revolved around the issue of retaining notes and any other forms of documentation and communication arising from the negotiation process. This article begins with a review of the facts of Brady v. Maryland. After discussing the legal questions r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of police crisis negotiations 2009-06, Vol.9 (2), p.164-168
Hauptverfasser:	Mijares, Tom C., Adam, Felix
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	evidence Negotiations perjury withholding
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	168
container_issue	2
container_start_page	164
container_title	Journal of police crisis negotiations
container_volume	9
creator	Mijares, Tom C. Adam, Felix
description	A recurring question among some crisis negotiators has revolved around the issue of retaining notes and any other forms of documentation and communication arising from the negotiation process. This article begins with a review of the facts of Brady v. Maryland. After discussing the legal questions raised and the decision of the court, the ramifications of the case are put into the context of crisis negotiations. The article concludes with recommendations about how negotiators can comply with the court's decision by using today's technology.
doi_str_mv	10.1080/15332580902865227
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_15332580902865227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_15332580902865227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-32d0be248f53554e4afad3976521a99f9ff22f94a7af02ad7d4f94479bf05f323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8Ayn22G5s1A2tKCAVsSiso0mckYLSGNnh0b8nVRGbCrGah-bMvZexSykmUlhxJY1SYKxwAuzUAORHbLTbZWCcPv7t7fSUnaX0KoS0FuyIzdZN_459Ezo-Dxh94th5vq5iU9bpmq_qlEKXOMWw4fOIfss_JvwR47Yd7s7ZCWGb6oufOmYvy9vnxX22erp7WNyssgqk6jMFXpQ1aEtGGaNrjYReuXzwKdE5ckQA5DTmSALQ514Pk85dScKQAjVmcv-3iiGlWFPxFpvNYKKQotjFLw7iD0y-Z5qOQtzgZ4itL3rctiFSxK5q0iFV9F_9QM7-JdXfwt9vv3Fk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland</title><source>HeinOnline</source><creator>Mijares, Tom C. ; Adam, Felix</creator><creatorcontrib>Mijares, Tom C. ; Adam, Felix</creatorcontrib><description>A recurring question among some crisis negotiators has revolved around the issue of retaining notes and any other forms of documentation and communication arising from the negotiation process. This article begins with a review of the facts of Brady v. Maryland. After discussing the legal questions raised and the decision of the court, the ramifications of the case are put into the context of crisis negotiations. The article concludes with recommendations about how negotiators can comply with the court's decision by using today's technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-2586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15332580902865227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>evidence ; Negotiations ; perjury ; withholding</subject><ispartof>Journal of police crisis negotiations, 2009-06, Vol.9 (2), p.164-168</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-32d0be248f53554e4afad3976521a99f9ff22f94a7af02ad7d4f94479bf05f323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mijares, Tom C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Felix</creatorcontrib><title>Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland</title><title>Journal of police crisis negotiations</title><description>A recurring question among some crisis negotiators has revolved around the issue of retaining notes and any other forms of documentation and communication arising from the negotiation process. This article begins with a review of the facts of Brady v. Maryland. After discussing the legal questions raised and the decision of the court, the ramifications of the case are put into the context of crisis negotiations. The article concludes with recommendations about how negotiators can comply with the court's decision by using today's technology.</description><subject>evidence</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>perjury</subject><subject>withholding</subject><issn>1533-2586</issn><issn>1533-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8Ayn22G5s1A2tKCAVsSiso0mckYLSGNnh0b8nVRGbCrGah-bMvZexSykmUlhxJY1SYKxwAuzUAORHbLTbZWCcPv7t7fSUnaX0KoS0FuyIzdZN_459Ezo-Dxh94th5vq5iU9bpmq_qlEKXOMWw4fOIfss_JvwR47Yd7s7ZCWGb6oufOmYvy9vnxX22erp7WNyssgqk6jMFXpQ1aEtGGaNrjYReuXzwKdE5ckQA5DTmSALQ514Pk85dScKQAjVmcv-3iiGlWFPxFpvNYKKQotjFLw7iD0y-Z5qOQtzgZ4itL3rctiFSxK5q0iFV9F_9QM7-JdXfwt9vv3Fk</recordid><startdate>20090625</startdate><enddate>20090625</enddate><creator>Mijares, Tom C.</creator><creator>Adam, Felix</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090625</creationdate><title>Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland</title><author>Mijares, Tom C. ; Adam, Felix</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-32d0be248f53554e4afad3976521a99f9ff22f94a7af02ad7d4f94479bf05f323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>evidence</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>perjury</topic><topic>withholding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mijares, Tom C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Felix</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of police crisis negotiations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mijares, Tom C.</au><au>Adam, Felix</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of police crisis negotiations</jtitle><date>2009-06-25</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>164-168</pages><issn>1533-2586</issn><eissn>1533-2594</eissn><abstract>A recurring question among some crisis negotiators has revolved around the issue of retaining notes and any other forms of documentation and communication arising from the negotiation process. This article begins with a review of the facts of Brady v. Maryland. After discussing the legal questions raised and the decision of the court, the ramifications of the case are put into the context of crisis negotiations. The article concludes with recommendations about how negotiators can comply with the court's decision by using today's technology.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/15332580902865227</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1533-2586
ispartof	Journal of police crisis negotiations, 2009-06, Vol.9 (2), p.164-168
issn	1533-2586 1533-2594
language	eng
recordid	cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_15332580902865227
source	HeinOnline
subjects	evidence Negotiations perjury withholding
title	Situation Boards and Scribes: Lessons from Brady v. Maryland
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Situation%20Boards%20and%20Scribes:%20Lessons%20from%20Brady%20v.%20Maryland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20police%20crisis%20negotiations&rft.au=Mijares,%20Tom%20C.&rft.date=2009-06-25&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=164-168&rft.issn=1533-2586&rft.eissn=1533-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15332580902865227&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_15332580902865227%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true