A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam

The back handspring is one of the most commonly performed skills on the balance beam in women's gymnastics. Despite this, quantitative research on the beam has often been overlooked. This study aimed to investigate the kinetic and kinematic variables during the performance of two back handsprin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sports biomechanics 2024-03, Vol.23 (3), p.301-313
Hauptverfasser: Ede, Carlie J., Yeadon, Maurice R., Hiley, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 313
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Sports biomechanics
container_volume 23
creator Ede, Carlie J.
Yeadon, Maurice R.
Hiley, Michael J.
description The back handspring is one of the most commonly performed skills on the balance beam in women's gymnastics. Despite this, quantitative research on the beam has often been overlooked. This study aimed to investigate the kinetic and kinematic variables during the performance of two back handspring techniques on the beam: the back handspring with two footed landing and the back handspring step-out. A modified balance beam was fixed to a force plate with an isolated mat for landing to allow analysis of the take-off and hand contact phases. Kinetic and kinematic data were recorded for twelve gymnasts performing both techniques. No statistically significant differences between techniques were found during take-off. However, average peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces (4.1 bodyweights ± 1.1 BW, and 0.7 BW ± 0.2 BW, respectively) were higher and time to peak force shorter during the hand contact phase for the two footed variant. A more vertical trajectory, along with a greater hand contact ground reaction force were found in comparison to the back handspring performed on the floor. These results highlight the need for more specific investigation to understand the factors which could contribute to reducing the load faced during balance beam performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2020_1849379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477264120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76e8e371a3c9364b0608515bb3a9f94a7b1bc61731c71f6ca19f22d6973a23983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOxSAQhonReH8ETRM3bqoMUCg7zYm3xMSNrgmloNW2HIHG-PZSz9GFC1czTL5_ZpgfoSPAZ4BrfA5McAoMzggmuVQzSYXcQLsgKlJyAL6Z88yUM7SD9mJ8xRhqIGwb7VDKSF0xsYvcZfHWjTZ1ptBj-50Pen4ZPyx16KIfC--K9GKL9OFL532y7Tcak12WfkpFo81b8ZJLcRm68TkWWTLzje71aHK0ejhAW0730R6u4z56ur56XNyW9w83d4vL-9IwBqkU3NaWCtDUSMpZgzmuK6iahmrpJNOigcZwEBSMAMeNBukIabkUVBMqa7qPTld9l8G_TzYmNXTR2D5vYv0UFWFCEM6A4Iye_EFf_RTGvJ0ikghcSUpkpqoVZYKPMVin8icHHT4VYDUboX6MULMRam1E1h2vu0_NYNtf1c_lM3CxArrR-TDoDx_6ViX92fvgQj5cFxX9f8YXyD2Vzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927059329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Ede, Carlie J. ; Yeadon, Maurice R. ; Hiley, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ede, Carlie J. ; Yeadon, Maurice R. ; Hiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>The back handspring is one of the most commonly performed skills on the balance beam in women's gymnastics. Despite this, quantitative research on the beam has often been overlooked. This study aimed to investigate the kinetic and kinematic variables during the performance of two back handspring techniques on the beam: the back handspring with two footed landing and the back handspring step-out. A modified balance beam was fixed to a force plate with an isolated mat for landing to allow analysis of the take-off and hand contact phases. Kinetic and kinematic data were recorded for twelve gymnasts performing both techniques. No statistically significant differences between techniques were found during take-off. However, average peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces (4.1 bodyweights ± 1.1 BW, and 0.7 BW ± 0.2 BW, respectively) were higher and time to peak force shorter during the hand contact phase for the two footed variant. A more vertical trajectory, along with a greater hand contact ground reaction force were found in comparison to the back handspring performed on the floor. These results highlight the need for more specific investigation to understand the factors which could contribute to reducing the load faced during balance beam performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-6116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33428547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; biomechanics ; Female ; Foot ; ground reaction forces ; Gymnastics ; Hand ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Lower Extremity ; Statistical analysis ; Upper Extremity</subject><ispartof>Sports biomechanics, 2024-03, Vol.23 (3), p.301-313</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76e8e371a3c9364b0608515bb3a9f94a7b1bc61731c71f6ca19f22d6973a23983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76e8e371a3c9364b0608515bb3a9f94a7b1bc61731c71f6ca19f22d6973a23983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8288-0800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33428547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ede, Carlie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeadon, Maurice R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam</title><title>Sports biomechanics</title><addtitle>Sports Biomech</addtitle><description>The back handspring is one of the most commonly performed skills on the balance beam in women's gymnastics. Despite this, quantitative research on the beam has often been overlooked. This study aimed to investigate the kinetic and kinematic variables during the performance of two back handspring techniques on the beam: the back handspring with two footed landing and the back handspring step-out. A modified balance beam was fixed to a force plate with an isolated mat for landing to allow analysis of the take-off and hand contact phases. Kinetic and kinematic data were recorded for twelve gymnasts performing both techniques. No statistically significant differences between techniques were found during take-off. However, average peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces (4.1 bodyweights ± 1.1 BW, and 0.7 BW ± 0.2 BW, respectively) were higher and time to peak force shorter during the hand contact phase for the two footed variant. A more vertical trajectory, along with a greater hand contact ground reaction force were found in comparison to the back handspring performed on the floor. These results highlight the need for more specific investigation to understand the factors which could contribute to reducing the load faced during balance beam performance.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>ground reaction forces</subject><subject>Gymnastics</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Lower Extremity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Upper Extremity</subject><issn>1476-3141</issn><issn>1752-6116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOxSAQhonReH8ETRM3bqoMUCg7zYm3xMSNrgmloNW2HIHG-PZSz9GFC1czTL5_ZpgfoSPAZ4BrfA5McAoMzggmuVQzSYXcQLsgKlJyAL6Z88yUM7SD9mJ8xRhqIGwb7VDKSF0xsYvcZfHWjTZ1ptBj-50Pen4ZPyx16KIfC--K9GKL9OFL532y7Tcak12WfkpFo81b8ZJLcRm68TkWWTLzje71aHK0ejhAW0730R6u4z56ur56XNyW9w83d4vL-9IwBqkU3NaWCtDUSMpZgzmuK6iahmrpJNOigcZwEBSMAMeNBukIabkUVBMqa7qPTld9l8G_TzYmNXTR2D5vYv0UFWFCEM6A4Iye_EFf_RTGvJ0ikghcSUpkpqoVZYKPMVin8icHHT4VYDUboX6MULMRam1E1h2vu0_NYNtf1c_lM3CxArrR-TDoDx_6ViX92fvgQj5cFxX9f8YXyD2Vzg</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Ede, Carlie J.</creator><creator>Yeadon, Maurice R.</creator><creator>Hiley, Michael J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8288-0800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam</title><author>Ede, Carlie J. ; Yeadon, Maurice R. ; Hiley, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76e8e371a3c9364b0608515bb3a9f94a7b1bc61731c71f6ca19f22d6973a23983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>ground reaction forces</topic><topic>Gymnastics</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Lower Extremity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Upper Extremity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ede, Carlie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeadon, Maurice R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sports biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ede, Carlie J.</au><au>Yeadon, Maurice R.</au><au>Hiley, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam</atitle><jtitle>Sports biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>Sports Biomech</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>301-313</pages><issn>1476-3141</issn><eissn>1752-6116</eissn><abstract>The back handspring is one of the most commonly performed skills on the balance beam in women's gymnastics. Despite this, quantitative research on the beam has often been overlooked. This study aimed to investigate the kinetic and kinematic variables during the performance of two back handspring techniques on the beam: the back handspring with two footed landing and the back handspring step-out. A modified balance beam was fixed to a force plate with an isolated mat for landing to allow analysis of the take-off and hand contact phases. Kinetic and kinematic data were recorded for twelve gymnasts performing both techniques. No statistically significant differences between techniques were found during take-off. However, average peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces (4.1 bodyweights ± 1.1 BW, and 0.7 BW ± 0.2 BW, respectively) were higher and time to peak force shorter during the hand contact phase for the two footed variant. A more vertical trajectory, along with a greater hand contact ground reaction force were found in comparison to the back handspring performed on the floor. These results highlight the need for more specific investigation to understand the factors which could contribute to reducing the load faced during balance beam performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>33428547</pmid><doi>10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8288-0800</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-3141
ispartof Sports biomechanics, 2024-03, Vol.23 (3), p.301-313
issn 1476-3141
1752-6116
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2020_1849379
source MEDLINE; Access via Taylor & Francis
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
biomechanics
Female
Foot
ground reaction forces
Gymnastics
Hand
Humans
Kinematics
Lower Extremity
Statistical analysis
Upper Extremity
title A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the two-footed and step-out back handsprings on the balance beam
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A38%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20kinetic%20and%20kinematic%20comparison%20of%20the%20two-footed%20and%20step-out%20back%20handsprings%20on%20the%20balance%20beam&rft.jtitle=Sports%20biomechanics&rft.au=Ede,%20Carlie%20J.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=301-313&rft.issn=1476-3141&rft.eissn=1752-6116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14763141.2020.1849379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477264120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927059329&rft_id=info:pmid/33428547&rfr_iscdi=true