Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity
The purpose of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of an opto-electronic sensor system (Velowin) compared to a linear velocity transducer (T-Force System) considered as the gold standard. Mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) generated in the Smith machine bar placed on the sh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sports biomechanics 2021-03, Vol.20 (2), p.150-164 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 164 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 150 |
| container_title | Sports biomechanics |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Peña García-Orea, Guillermo Belando-Pedreño, Noelia Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón |
| description | The purpose of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of an opto-electronic sensor system (Velowin) compared to a linear velocity transducer (T-Force System) considered as the gold standard. Mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) generated in the Smith machine bar placed on the shoulders in counter-movement jump exercise (CMJ) were analysed. The study was conducted with a sample of 21 men with experience in resistance training. Five measurements were analysed for CMJ exercise in concentric phase using a progressive loading increase. Three jumps were made per load with a 3-4 min recovery between loads. The analysis of the variance confirmed that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the execution velocity between Velowin and T-Force with each of the loads. The reliability analysis showed, with each of the loads, high values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.95-0.99) and a 'substantial' Lin´s concordance coefficient in MV (CCC ≥0.96) and between 'substantial' (CCC = 0.98) and 'almost perfect' (CCC = 0.99) in PV. These results confirm the reliability and validity of the Velowin device is reliable for measuring the execution velocity in loaded CMJ exercise. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2018_1526316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2484698627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e8b97e3d3d7305d6f7718851444173136a1e46b3820793f018ab4d34ed0ebc523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhStG4zz0J2gqceOmWi5QULXTTNQxmcSNuiUU3HLoVEHLY8b-99LTPS5cuOFx-c7hwmmaV0A2QAbyDrgUDDhsKIFhAz2tO_GkOQfZ004AiKd1XZnuAJ01FyltSSWB8ufNGSOcSirG8yb90IuzOrvg2zC3uo67HDpc0OQYvDOt8ynHsqLP7Rxim2-xXVGnEvGhVkX36H7eZrStCcVnjGu4O55ty7pr8Tea8uB_h0swLu9fNM9mvSR8eZovm--fPn67uu5uvn7-cvXhpjNs5LnDYRolMsusZKS3YpYShqEHzjlIBkxoQC4mNlAiRzbXx-mJW8bREpxMT9ll8_bou4vhV8GU1eqSwWXRHkNJigJjnEnKoaJv_kG3oURfu1OUD1yMg6CyUv2RMjGkFHFWu-hWHfcKiDqkoh5TUYdU1CmVqnt9ci_Tivav6jGGCrw_As7XP171fYiLVVnvlxDnqL1xSbH_3_EHINmcoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484698627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo ; Belando-Pedreño, Noelia ; Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés ; Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel ; Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</creator><creatorcontrib>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo ; Belando-Pedreño, Noelia ; Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés ; Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel ; Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of an opto-electronic sensor system (Velowin) compared to a linear velocity transducer (T-Force System) considered as the gold standard. Mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) generated in the Smith machine bar placed on the shoulders in counter-movement jump exercise (CMJ) were analysed. The study was conducted with a sample of 21 men with experience in resistance training. Five measurements were analysed for CMJ exercise in concentric phase using a progressive loading increase. Three jumps were made per load with a 3-4 min recovery between loads. The analysis of the variance confirmed that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the execution velocity between Velowin and T-Force with each of the loads. The reliability analysis showed, with each of the loads, high values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.95-0.99) and a 'substantial' Lin´s concordance coefficient in MV (CCC ≥0.96) and between 'substantial' (CCC = 0.98) and 'almost perfect' (CCC = 0.99) in PV. These results confirm the reliability and validity of the Velowin device is reliable for measuring the execution velocity in loaded CMJ exercise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-6116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30427269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electronics ; evaluation ; Exercise Test - instrumentation ; Humans ; kinematic ; Lower Extremity - physiology ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Optical Devices ; Physical training ; Plyometric Exercise ; reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resistance Training - instrumentation ; Resistance Training - methods ; Strength ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Transducers ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Sports biomechanics, 2021-03, Vol.20 (2), p.150-164</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e8b97e3d3d7305d6f7718851444173136a1e46b3820793f018ab4d34ed0ebc523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e8b97e3d3d7305d6f7718851444173136a1e46b3820793f018ab4d34ed0ebc523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0698-0479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,59646,60435</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30427269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belando-Pedreño, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity</title><title>Sports biomechanics</title><addtitle>Sports Biomech</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of an opto-electronic sensor system (Velowin) compared to a linear velocity transducer (T-Force System) considered as the gold standard. Mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) generated in the Smith machine bar placed on the shoulders in counter-movement jump exercise (CMJ) were analysed. The study was conducted with a sample of 21 men with experience in resistance training. Five measurements were analysed for CMJ exercise in concentric phase using a progressive loading increase. Three jumps were made per load with a 3-4 min recovery between loads. The analysis of the variance confirmed that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the execution velocity between Velowin and T-Force with each of the loads. The reliability analysis showed, with each of the loads, high values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.95-0.99) and a 'substantial' Lin´s concordance coefficient in MV (CCC ≥0.96) and between 'substantial' (CCC = 0.98) and 'almost perfect' (CCC = 0.99) in PV. These results confirm the reliability and validity of the Velowin device is reliable for measuring the execution velocity in loaded CMJ exercise.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise Test - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>kinematic</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Plyometric Exercise</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resistance Training - instrumentation</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1476-3141</issn><issn>1752-6116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhStG4zz0J2gqceOmWi5QULXTTNQxmcSNuiUU3HLoVEHLY8b-99LTPS5cuOFx-c7hwmmaV0A2QAbyDrgUDDhsKIFhAz2tO_GkOQfZ004AiKd1XZnuAJ01FyltSSWB8ufNGSOcSirG8yb90IuzOrvg2zC3uo67HDpc0OQYvDOt8ynHsqLP7Rxim2-xXVGnEvGhVkX36H7eZrStCcVnjGu4O55ty7pr8Tea8uB_h0swLu9fNM9mvSR8eZovm--fPn67uu5uvn7-cvXhpjNs5LnDYRolMsusZKS3YpYShqEHzjlIBkxoQC4mNlAiRzbXx-mJW8bREpxMT9ll8_bou4vhV8GU1eqSwWXRHkNJigJjnEnKoaJv_kG3oURfu1OUD1yMg6CyUv2RMjGkFHFWu-hWHfcKiDqkoh5TUYdU1CmVqnt9ci_Tivav6jGGCrw_As7XP171fYiLVVnvlxDnqL1xSbH_3_EHINmcoA</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo</creator><creator>Belando-Pedreño, Noelia</creator><creator>Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés</creator><creator>Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel</creator><creator>Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-0479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity</title><author>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo ; Belando-Pedreño, Noelia ; Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés ; Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel ; Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e8b97e3d3d7305d6f7718851444173136a1e46b3820793f018ab4d34ed0ebc523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise Test - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>kinematic</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Plyometric Exercise</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resistance Training - instrumentation</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belando-Pedreño, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sports biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peña García-Orea, Guillermo</au><au>Belando-Pedreño, Noelia</au><au>Merino-Barrero, Juan Andrés</au><au>Jiménez-Ruiz, Abel</au><au>Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity</atitle><jtitle>Sports biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>Sports Biomech</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>150-164</pages><issn>1476-3141</issn><eissn>1752-6116</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to analyse the reliability and validity of an opto-electronic sensor system (Velowin) compared to a linear velocity transducer (T-Force System) considered as the gold standard. Mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) generated in the Smith machine bar placed on the shoulders in counter-movement jump exercise (CMJ) were analysed. The study was conducted with a sample of 21 men with experience in resistance training. Five measurements were analysed for CMJ exercise in concentric phase using a progressive loading increase. Three jumps were made per load with a 3-4 min recovery between loads. The analysis of the variance confirmed that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the execution velocity between Velowin and T-Force with each of the loads. The reliability analysis showed, with each of the loads, high values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.95-0.99) and a 'substantial' Lin´s concordance coefficient in MV (CCC ≥0.96) and between 'substantial' (CCC = 0.98) and 'almost perfect' (CCC = 0.99) in PV. These results confirm the reliability and validity of the Velowin device is reliable for measuring the execution velocity in loaded CMJ exercise.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>30427269</pmid><doi>10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-0479</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1476-3141 |
| ispartof | Sports biomechanics, 2021-03, Vol.20 (2), p.150-164 |
| issn | 1476-3141 1752-6116 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2018_1526316 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Athletic Performance - physiology Biomechanical Phenomena Electronics evaluation Exercise Test - instrumentation Humans kinematic Lower Extremity - physiology Male Muscle Strength Optical Devices Physical training Plyometric Exercise reliability Reproducibility of Results Resistance Training - instrumentation Resistance Training - methods Strength Task Performance and Analysis Transducers Velocity |
| title | Validation of an opto-electronic instrument for the measurement of weighted countermovement jump execution velocity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20an%20opto-electronic%20instrument%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20weighted%20countermovement%20jump%20execution%20velocity&rft.jtitle=Sports%20biomechanics&rft.au=Pe%C3%B1a%20Garc%C3%ADa-Orea,%20Guillermo&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=150-164&rft.issn=1476-3141&rft.eissn=1752-6116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14763141.2018.1526316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2484698627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484698627&rft_id=info:pmid/30427269&rfr_iscdi=true |