Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea
A public struggle in South Korea around prosecution reform brings into focus a deeper battle between forces seeking to make the state more responsive to ordinary people and those aiming to preserve the status quo. Opponents of prosecution reform turned to a mode of politics that appropriated the sty...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical Asian studies 2021-04, Vol.53 (2), p.259-283 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Critical Asian studies |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Mobrand, Erik |
description | A public struggle in South Korea around prosecution reform brings into focus a deeper battle between forces seeking to make the state more responsive to ordinary people and those aiming to preserve the status quo. Opponents of prosecution reform turned to a mode of politics that appropriated the styles and symbols of democracy to justify the obstruction of reforms that would break down a key authoritarian legacy and source of entrenched privilege. They deployed multiple methods of "faking" democracy: assuming the mantle of anti-corruption champions, drawing on tropes from the anti-authoritarian opposition of the past, and normalizing marginal views. The politics of prosecution reform illuminates the mass struggle that defines South Korea's democracy and also points to a dangerous and subtle mode of politics that is increasingly visible around the world yet under-appreciated in most approaches to thinking about democracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14672715.2021.1890999 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14672715_2021_1890999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2531429799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-60aa2b2a15c7f875a55d26aa5c0117e3b2d9d704983e035c38a056f10a1e7f643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5AscU7xI47tG6jiJSqBBJytrWNTlzQudiLUf0-iliun3cPM7M6H0CUlM0oUuaZlJZmkYsYIozOqNNFaH6EJLSUrKsL58bhXshhFp-gs5zUhtFJCTdD9a4rZ2b4LscXJ-Zg2GNoadyuHt7EJXbAZR489fIX2E9duE20Cu8OhxW-x71b4OSYH5-jEQ5PdxWFO0cf93fv8sVi8PDzNbxeF5Vx1wzMAbMmACiu9kgKEqFkFICyhVDq-ZLWuJSm14o5wYbkCIipPCVAnfVXyKbra525T_O5d7sw69qkdThomOC2ZlloPKrFX2aFcHlqZbQobSDtDiRmRmT9kZkRmDsgG383eF9oRBPzE1NSmg10Tk0_Q2pAN_z_iFyFMcZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531429799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mobrand, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Mobrand, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>A public struggle in South Korea around prosecution reform brings into focus a deeper battle between forces seeking to make the state more responsive to ordinary people and those aiming to preserve the status quo. Opponents of prosecution reform turned to a mode of politics that appropriated the styles and symbols of democracy to justify the obstruction of reforms that would break down a key authoritarian legacy and source of entrenched privilege. They deployed multiple methods of "faking" democracy: assuming the mantle of anti-corruption champions, drawing on tropes from the anti-authoritarian opposition of the past, and normalizing marginal views. The politics of prosecution reform illuminates the mass struggle that defines South Korea's democracy and also points to a dangerous and subtle mode of politics that is increasingly visible around the world yet under-appreciated in most approaches to thinking about democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6033</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2021.1890999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Candlelight Movement ; Corruption ; Democracy ; flag rallies ; Politics ; prosecution reform ; Prosecutions ; Reforms ; South Korea</subject><ispartof>Critical Asian studies, 2021-04, Vol.53 (2), p.259-283</ispartof><rights>2021 BCAS, Inc. 2021</rights><rights>2021 BCAS, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-60aa2b2a15c7f875a55d26aa5c0117e3b2d9d704983e035c38a056f10a1e7f643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-60aa2b2a15c7f875a55d26aa5c0117e3b2d9d704983e035c38a056f10a1e7f643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9953-412X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mobrand, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea</title><title>Critical Asian studies</title><description>A public struggle in South Korea around prosecution reform brings into focus a deeper battle between forces seeking to make the state more responsive to ordinary people and those aiming to preserve the status quo. Opponents of prosecution reform turned to a mode of politics that appropriated the styles and symbols of democracy to justify the obstruction of reforms that would break down a key authoritarian legacy and source of entrenched privilege. They deployed multiple methods of "faking" democracy: assuming the mantle of anti-corruption champions, drawing on tropes from the anti-authoritarian opposition of the past, and normalizing marginal views. The politics of prosecution reform illuminates the mass struggle that defines South Korea's democracy and also points to a dangerous and subtle mode of politics that is increasingly visible around the world yet under-appreciated in most approaches to thinking about democracy.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Candlelight Movement</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>flag rallies</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>prosecution reform</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><issn>1467-2715</issn><issn>1472-6033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwE5AscU7xI47tG6jiJSqBBJytrWNTlzQudiLUf0-iliun3cPM7M6H0CUlM0oUuaZlJZmkYsYIozOqNNFaH6EJLSUrKsL58bhXshhFp-gs5zUhtFJCTdD9a4rZ2b4LscXJ-Zg2GNoadyuHt7EJXbAZR489fIX2E9duE20Cu8OhxW-x71b4OSYH5-jEQ5PdxWFO0cf93fv8sVi8PDzNbxeF5Vx1wzMAbMmACiu9kgKEqFkFICyhVDq-ZLWuJSm14o5wYbkCIipPCVAnfVXyKbra525T_O5d7sw69qkdThomOC2ZlloPKrFX2aFcHlqZbQobSDtDiRmRmT9kZkRmDsgG383eF9oRBPzE1NSmg10Tk0_Q2pAN_z_iFyFMcZk</recordid><startdate>20210403</startdate><enddate>20210403</enddate><creator>Mobrand, Erik</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9953-412X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210403</creationdate><title>Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea</title><author>Mobrand, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-60aa2b2a15c7f875a55d26aa5c0117e3b2d9d704983e035c38a056f10a1e7f643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Candlelight Movement</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>flag rallies</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>prosecution reform</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mobrand, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Critical Asian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mobrand, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Critical Asian studies</jtitle><date>2021-04-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>259-283</pages><issn>1467-2715</issn><eissn>1472-6033</eissn><abstract>A public struggle in South Korea around prosecution reform brings into focus a deeper battle between forces seeking to make the state more responsive to ordinary people and those aiming to preserve the status quo. Opponents of prosecution reform turned to a mode of politics that appropriated the styles and symbols of democracy to justify the obstruction of reforms that would break down a key authoritarian legacy and source of entrenched privilege. They deployed multiple methods of "faking" democracy: assuming the mantle of anti-corruption champions, drawing on tropes from the anti-authoritarian opposition of the past, and normalizing marginal views. The politics of prosecution reform illuminates the mass struggle that defines South Korea's democracy and also points to a dangerous and subtle mode of politics that is increasingly visible around the world yet under-appreciated in most approaches to thinking about democracy.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14672715.2021.1890999</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9953-412X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2715 |
ispartof | Critical Asian studies, 2021-04, Vol.53 (2), p.259-283 |
issn | 1467-2715 1472-6033 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14672715_2021_1890999 |
source | Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Authoritarianism Candlelight Movement Corruption Democracy flag rallies Politics prosecution reform Prosecutions Reforms South Korea |
title | Prosecution reform and the politics of faking democracy in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A35%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prosecution%20reform%20and%20the%20politics%20of%20faking%20democracy%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Critical%20Asian%20studies&rft.au=Mobrand,%20Erik&rft.date=2021-04-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=259-283&rft.issn=1467-2715&rft.eissn=1472-6033&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14672715.2021.1890999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2531429799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531429799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |