Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise
It was previously found that noise increased both performance on a primary tracking task and the detection of centrally located signals in a secondary multi-source monitoring task. The present experiment examines the effect of changing the distribution of signals across the monitoring display. When...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology 1970-02, Vol.22 (1), p.37-42 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Hockey, G. R. J. |
description | It was previously found that noise increased both performance on a primary tracking task and the detection of centrally located signals in a secondary multi-source monitoring task. The present experiment examines the effect of changing the distribution of signals across the monitoring display. When equal numbers are seen at all locations there is no differential effect of noise for central and peripheral locations. Such an effect only occurs when central signals are seen to have greater probability. This result points to the selectivity effect in noise being a function of task priorities and not of physical location. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14640747008401899 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14640747008401899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_14640747008401899</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1301821485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-43802e062a5b44b826ca4809e7e66197290cc9672ebf34eeaf7e5027e9e102f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9dSbxzwCbqT4goILFVwIIZPeKSnTyZhMlf57U8aFILq691zud-AcQs4ZzBhUcMlkIaGUJUAlgVVKHZAJSzoDzotDMgEQIsvz_PWYnMS4TpLlspqQtye36kxL--BrU7vWDTtquiWNvRlcurfepsV31ETa-xhd3SKtTcRIGx-o62zApBKALdrBfewNXEc77yKekqPGtBHPvueUvNzePM_vs8Xj3cP8epFZoWDIpKiAIxTc5LWUdcULa2QFCkssCqZKrsBaVZQc60ZIRNOUmAMvUSED3ggxJRejb0rxvsU46LXfhhQraiZSG5zJKk9fbPyyIQUJ2Og-uI0JO81A70vUv0pMzGxkolnhD9d_gKsRcF3qZ2M-fWiXejC71ocmmM66qMXf-Be6vYRy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301821485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><creator>Hockey, G. R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hockey, G. R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>It was previously found that noise increased both performance on a primary tracking task and the detection of centrally located signals in a secondary multi-source monitoring task. The present experiment examines the effect of changing the distribution of signals across the monitoring display. When equal numbers are seen at all locations there is no differential effect of noise for central and peripheral locations. Such an effect only occurs when central signals are seen to have greater probability. This result points to the selectivity effect in noise being a function of task priorities and not of physical location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-555X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14640747008401899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 1970-02, Vol.22 (1), p.37-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 1970</rights><rights>1970 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-43802e062a5b44b826ca4809e7e66197290cc9672ebf34eeaf7e5027e9e102f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-43802e062a5b44b826ca4809e7e66197290cc9672ebf34eeaf7e5027e9e102f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14640747008401899$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14640747008401899$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hockey, G. R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology</title><description>It was previously found that noise increased both performance on a primary tracking task and the detection of centrally located signals in a secondary multi-source monitoring task. The present experiment examines the effect of changing the distribution of signals across the monitoring display. When equal numbers are seen at all locations there is no differential effect of noise for central and peripheral locations. Such an effect only occurs when central signals are seen to have greater probability. This result points to the selectivity effect in noise being a function of task priorities and not of physical location.</description><issn>0033-555X</issn><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1970</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3A9dSbxzwCbqT4goILFVwIIZPeKSnTyZhMlf57U8aFILq691zud-AcQs4ZzBhUcMlkIaGUJUAlgVVKHZAJSzoDzotDMgEQIsvz_PWYnMS4TpLlspqQtye36kxL--BrU7vWDTtquiWNvRlcurfepsV31ETa-xhd3SKtTcRIGx-o62zApBKALdrBfewNXEc77yKekqPGtBHPvueUvNzePM_vs8Xj3cP8epFZoWDIpKiAIxTc5LWUdcULa2QFCkssCqZKrsBaVZQc60ZIRNOUmAMvUSED3ggxJRejb0rxvsU46LXfhhQraiZSG5zJKk9fbPyyIQUJ2Og-uI0JO81A70vUv0pMzGxkolnhD9d_gKsRcF3qZ2M-fWiXejC71ocmmM66qMXf-Be6vYRy</recordid><startdate>197002</startdate><enddate>197002</enddate><creator>Hockey, G. R. J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197002</creationdate><title>Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise</title><author>Hockey, G. R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-43802e062a5b44b826ca4809e7e66197290cc9672ebf34eeaf7e5027e9e102f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1970</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hockey, G. R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hockey, G. R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology</jtitle><date>1970-02</date><risdate>1970</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>37-42</pages><issn>0033-555X</issn><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>It was previously found that noise increased both performance on a primary tracking task and the detection of centrally located signals in a secondary multi-source monitoring task. The present experiment examines the effect of changing the distribution of signals across the monitoring display. When equal numbers are seen at all locations there is no differential effect of noise for central and peripheral locations. Such an effect only occurs when central signals are seen to have greater probability. This result points to the selectivity effect in noise being a function of task priorities and not of physical location.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14640747008401899</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-555X |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 1970-02, Vol.22 (1), p.37-42 |
issn | 0033-555X 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14640747008401899 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis Online |
title | Signal probability and spatial location as possible bases for increased selectivity in noise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A03%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Signal%20probability%20and%20spatial%20location%20as%20possible%20bases%20for%20increased%20selectivity%20in%20noise&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology&rft.au=Hockey,%20G.%20R.%20J.&rft.date=1970-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=37-42&rft.issn=0033-555X&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14640747008401899&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1301821485%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301821485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14640747008401899&rfr_iscdi=true |