Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK
Major projects, in sectors such as transport, energy, minerals and water, have long life cycles and can have significant local and regional environmental and socio-economic impacts. The impacts of the construction stage can be particularly damaging, if not managed well. Environmental Impact Assessme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Impact assessment and project appraisal 2021-03, Vol.39 (2), p.84-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Impact assessment and project appraisal |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Glasson, John Durning, Bridget Broderick, Martin Welch, Kellie |
description | Major projects, in sectors such as transport, energy, minerals and water, have long life cycles and can have significant local and regional environmental and socio-economic impacts. The impacts of the construction stage can be particularly damaging, if not managed well. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) seeks to anticipate such impacts, mitigate adverse and enhance positive impacts through design innovations and associated conditions. However, the approach is only as good as the implementation of such innovations and conditions. The issue of monitoring and auditing of actual, as against predicted, impacts is an Achilles heel in the planning and assessment process. Hinkley Point C (HPC) nuclear power station in the UK is currently one of the largest construction projects in Europe. A recent study of the live project provides a unique insight into the actual local impacts of the early construction years, and appropriate methods of assessment. It identifies KPIs, examines monitoring data, and audits findings against the predictions. The results show varying performance across key impact sectors. Explanations of differences are set out, together with recommendations for improving monitoring and auditing practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14615517.2020.1838237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14615517_2020_1838237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2502553517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7ab0408125c126a7594cd6dc4f83071c826737100025b61494790a6207872013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtqGzEQhpeSQoOTRygIept1dVzJdykmh5JToe61kLVaV8muxpW0NX6Svm61sXObK81I3zcD-qvqM8FzghX-SnhDhCByTjEtV4opyuSH6pRwSWrBG3Ey1U2pC_SpOk_JrzEhijPGxWn17wGCzxB92CATWmTG1uepyb8d6sGaHiWwHmpnIcDg7Svlwl8fIQwu5AL4YWtsTgi6V8uZ2O9RymbjUJFSjqPNHsL0fuvDS-_26Af4kNESPY62L3zpdy6in9lM4AX6dXdWfexMn9z58ZxVq-ur1fK2vn-6-b78dl9bpkSupVljjhWhwhLaGCkW3LZNa3mnGJbEKtpIJgnGmIp1Q_iCywU2DcVSSYoJm1VfDmO3Ef6MLmX9DGMMZaOmojiClV8rlDhQNkJK0XV6G_1g4l4TrKcU9FsKekpBH1Mo3uXB86GDOJgdxL7V2ex7iF00wfqk2fsj_gP0c44O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502553517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Glasson, John ; Durning, Bridget ; Broderick, Martin ; Welch, Kellie</creator><creatorcontrib>Glasson, John ; Durning, Bridget ; Broderick, Martin ; Welch, Kellie</creatorcontrib><description>Major projects, in sectors such as transport, energy, minerals and water, have long life cycles and can have significant local and regional environmental and socio-economic impacts. The impacts of the construction stage can be particularly damaging, if not managed well. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) seeks to anticipate such impacts, mitigate adverse and enhance positive impacts through design innovations and associated conditions. However, the approach is only as good as the implementation of such innovations and conditions. The issue of monitoring and auditing of actual, as against predicted, impacts is an Achilles heel in the planning and assessment process. Hinkley Point C (HPC) nuclear power station in the UK is currently one of the largest construction projects in Europe. A recent study of the live project provides a unique insight into the actual local impacts of the early construction years, and appropriate methods of assessment. It identifies KPIs, examines monitoring data, and audits findings against the predictions. The results show varying performance across key impact sectors. Explanations of differences are set out, together with recommendations for improving monitoring and auditing practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-5517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2020.1838237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Audits ; Construction industry ; Economic impact ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact assessment ; Hinkley Point C nuclear power station construction ; Impact damage ; Impact prediction ; Innovations ; Life cycles ; Minerals ; Monitoring ; Monitoring and auditing the impacts of major projects ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; Power ; Power plants ; Project engineering ; Regional development ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics</subject><ispartof>Impact assessment and project appraisal, 2021-03, Vol.39 (2), p.84-95</ispartof><rights>2020 IAIA 2020</rights><rights>2020 IAIA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7ab0408125c126a7594cd6dc4f83071c826737100025b61494790a6207872013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7ab0408125c126a7594cd6dc4f83071c826737100025b61494790a6207872013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glasson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Kellie</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK</title><title>Impact assessment and project appraisal</title><description>Major projects, in sectors such as transport, energy, minerals and water, have long life cycles and can have significant local and regional environmental and socio-economic impacts. The impacts of the construction stage can be particularly damaging, if not managed well. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) seeks to anticipate such impacts, mitigate adverse and enhance positive impacts through design innovations and associated conditions. However, the approach is only as good as the implementation of such innovations and conditions. The issue of monitoring and auditing of actual, as against predicted, impacts is an Achilles heel in the planning and assessment process. Hinkley Point C (HPC) nuclear power station in the UK is currently one of the largest construction projects in Europe. A recent study of the live project provides a unique insight into the actual local impacts of the early construction years, and appropriate methods of assessment. It identifies KPIs, examines monitoring data, and audits findings against the predictions. The results show varying performance across key impact sectors. Explanations of differences are set out, together with recommendations for improving monitoring and auditing practice.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Hinkley Point C nuclear power station construction</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Impact prediction</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring and auditing the impacts of major projects</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Project engineering</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><issn>1461-5517</issn><issn>1471-5465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtqGzEQhpeSQoOTRygIept1dVzJdykmh5JToe61kLVaV8muxpW0NX6Svm61sXObK81I3zcD-qvqM8FzghX-SnhDhCByTjEtV4opyuSH6pRwSWrBG3Ey1U2pC_SpOk_JrzEhijPGxWn17wGCzxB92CATWmTG1uepyb8d6sGaHiWwHmpnIcDg7Svlwl8fIQwu5AL4YWtsTgi6V8uZ2O9RymbjUJFSjqPNHsL0fuvDS-_26Af4kNESPY62L3zpdy6in9lM4AX6dXdWfexMn9z58ZxVq-ur1fK2vn-6-b78dl9bpkSupVljjhWhwhLaGCkW3LZNa3mnGJbEKtpIJgnGmIp1Q_iCywU2DcVSSYoJm1VfDmO3Ef6MLmX9DGMMZaOmojiClV8rlDhQNkJK0XV6G_1g4l4TrKcU9FsKekpBH1Mo3uXB86GDOJgdxL7V2ex7iF00wfqk2fsj_gP0c44O</recordid><startdate>20210304</startdate><enddate>20210304</enddate><creator>Glasson, John</creator><creator>Durning, Bridget</creator><creator>Broderick, Martin</creator><creator>Welch, Kellie</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210304</creationdate><title>Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK</title><author>Glasson, John ; Durning, Bridget ; Broderick, Martin ; Welch, Kellie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7ab0408125c126a7594cd6dc4f83071c826737100025b61494790a6207872013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Hinkley Point C nuclear power station construction</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Impact prediction</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring and auditing the impacts of major projects</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Project engineering</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glasson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Kellie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Impact assessment and project appraisal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glasson, John</au><au>Durning, Bridget</au><au>Broderick, Martin</au><au>Welch, Kellie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK</atitle><jtitle>Impact assessment and project appraisal</jtitle><date>2021-03-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>84-95</pages><issn>1461-5517</issn><eissn>1471-5465</eissn><abstract>Major projects, in sectors such as transport, energy, minerals and water, have long life cycles and can have significant local and regional environmental and socio-economic impacts. The impacts of the construction stage can be particularly damaging, if not managed well. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) seeks to anticipate such impacts, mitigate adverse and enhance positive impacts through design innovations and associated conditions. However, the approach is only as good as the implementation of such innovations and conditions. The issue of monitoring and auditing of actual, as against predicted, impacts is an Achilles heel in the planning and assessment process. Hinkley Point C (HPC) nuclear power station in the UK is currently one of the largest construction projects in Europe. A recent study of the live project provides a unique insight into the actual local impacts of the early construction years, and appropriate methods of assessment. It identifies KPIs, examines monitoring data, and audits findings against the predictions. The results show varying performance across key impact sectors. Explanations of differences are set out, together with recommendations for improving monitoring and auditing practice.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/14615517.2020.1838237</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-5517 |
ispartof | Impact assessment and project appraisal, 2021-03, Vol.39 (2), p.84-95 |
issn | 1461-5517 1471-5465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14615517_2020_1838237 |
source | PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Audits Construction industry Economic impact Environmental assessment Environmental impact assessment Hinkley Point C nuclear power station construction Impact damage Impact prediction Innovations Life cycles Minerals Monitoring Monitoring and auditing the impacts of major projects Nuclear energy Nuclear power plants Power Power plants Project engineering Regional development Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics |
title | Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20and%20auditing%20the%20local%20socio-economic%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20of%20the%20early%20stage%20construction%20of%20Hinkley%20Point%20C%20Nuclear%20Power%20Station,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Impact%20assessment%20and%20project%20appraisal&rft.au=Glasson,%20John&rft.date=2021-03-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=84-95&rft.issn=1461-5517&rft.eissn=1471-5465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14615517.2020.1838237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502553517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502553517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |