Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers
Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Design journal 2017-07, Vol.20 (sup1), p.S1471-S1484 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S1484 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | sup1 |
| container_start_page | S1471 |
| container_title | The Design journal |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Lee, Younjoon Joo, Jaewoo |
| description | Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Processing: Verbalizer vs Visualizer) between-subjects design. We obtained two findings from the data. First, the students using more design methods generated better outcomes than those using fewer design method. Secondly, verbal-oriented students generated better outcomes than visual-oriented students. Our obtained two findings will be discussed in the context of design process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14606925_2017_1352672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1936558559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-95ace16fcfcfb16dbb8c23aa8c0299bdd003b9149fc8d74a8d558ba54cfd13cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWLQfQVjwvDWPTTbxpNRXpSKC7TVkk2xN2W5qslupn96UtldnDjPD_ObBH4ArBEcIcniDCgaZwHSEISpHiFDMSnwCBqikLCeQ4dOUJybfQedgGOMSJiOYC8oG4HUWXbvIHmx0izZ7s92XNzHrfDZZrYPf2GPno1eN67a32dyGKqW_NsRsE7O5i_2hvARntWqiHR7iBZg9PX6OX_Lp-_NkfD_NNeG0ywVV2iJW6-QVYqaquMZEKa4hFqIyJj1XCVSIWnNTFoobSnmlaKFrg4g25AJc7_emB797Gzu59H1o00mJBGGJplQkiu4pHXyMwdZyHdxKha1EUO6Uk0fl5E45eVAuzd3t51xb-7BSPz40RnZq2_hQB9VqFyX5f8UfpQN1nA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936558559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Lee, Younjoon ; Joo, Jaewoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Younjoon ; Joo, Jaewoo</creatorcontrib><description>Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Processing: Verbalizer vs Visualizer) between-subjects design. We obtained two findings from the data. First, the students using more design methods generated better outcomes than those using fewer design method. Secondly, verbal-oriented students generated better outcomes than visual-oriented students. Our obtained two findings will be discussed in the context of design process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-6925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Design ; Design improvements ; Design methods ; design quality ; Design techniques ; Methods ; Quality ; Roads & highways ; Students ; style of processing ; verbal ; visual ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>The Design journal, 2017-07, Vol.20 (sup1), p.S1471-S1484</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-95ace16fcfcfb16dbb8c23aa8c0299bdd003b9149fc8d74a8d558ba54cfd13cd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Younjoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jaewoo</creatorcontrib><title>Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers</title><title>The Design journal</title><description>Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Processing: Verbalizer vs Visualizer) between-subjects design. We obtained two findings from the data. First, the students using more design methods generated better outcomes than those using fewer design method. Secondly, verbal-oriented students generated better outcomes than visual-oriented students. Our obtained two findings will be discussed in the context of design process.</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design improvements</subject><subject>Design methods</subject><subject>design quality</subject><subject>Design techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>style of processing</subject><subject>verbal</subject><subject>visual</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1460-6925</issn><issn>1756-3062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWLQfQVjwvDWPTTbxpNRXpSKC7TVkk2xN2W5qslupn96UtldnDjPD_ObBH4ArBEcIcniDCgaZwHSEISpHiFDMSnwCBqikLCeQ4dOUJybfQedgGOMSJiOYC8oG4HUWXbvIHmx0izZ7s92XNzHrfDZZrYPf2GPno1eN67a32dyGKqW_NsRsE7O5i_2hvARntWqiHR7iBZg9PX6OX_Lp-_NkfD_NNeG0ywVV2iJW6-QVYqaquMZEKa4hFqIyJj1XCVSIWnNTFoobSnmlaKFrg4g25AJc7_emB797Gzu59H1o00mJBGGJplQkiu4pHXyMwdZyHdxKha1EUO6Uk0fl5E45eVAuzd3t51xb-7BSPz40RnZq2_hQB9VqFyX5f8UfpQN1nA</recordid><startdate>20170728</startdate><enddate>20170728</enddate><creator>Lee, Younjoon</creator><creator>Joo, Jaewoo</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F29</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170728</creationdate><title>Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers</title><author>Lee, Younjoon ; Joo, Jaewoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-95ace16fcfcfb16dbb8c23aa8c0299bdd003b9149fc8d74a8d558ba54cfd13cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design improvements</topic><topic>Design methods</topic><topic>design quality</topic><topic>Design techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>style of processing</topic><topic>verbal</topic><topic>visual</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Younjoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jaewoo</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><jtitle>The Design journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Younjoon</au><au>Joo, Jaewoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers</atitle><jtitle>The Design journal</jtitle><date>2017-07-28</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>sup1</issue><spage>S1471</spage><epage>S1484</epage><pages>S1471-S1484</pages><issn>1460-6925</issn><eissn>1756-3062</eissn><abstract>Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Processing: Verbalizer vs Visualizer) between-subjects design. We obtained two findings from the data. First, the students using more design methods generated better outcomes than those using fewer design method. Secondly, verbal-oriented students generated better outcomes than visual-oriented students. Our obtained two findings will be discussed in the context of design process.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1460-6925 |
| ispartof | The Design journal, 2017-07, Vol.20 (sup1), p.S1471-S1484 |
| issn | 1460-6925 1756-3062 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14606925_2017_1352672 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| subjects | Design Design improvements Design methods design quality Design techniques Methods Quality Roads & highways Students style of processing verbal visual Visualization |
| title | Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Design%20Methods%20to%20Improve%20Design%20Quality:%20Verbalizers%20vs%20Visualizers&rft.jtitle=The%20Design%20journal&rft.au=Lee,%20Younjoon&rft.date=2017-07-28&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=sup1&rft.spage=S1471&rft.epage=S1484&rft.pages=S1471-S1484&rft.issn=1460-6925&rft.eissn=1756-3062&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1936558559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936558559&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |