Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review

Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of general practice 2018-01, Vol.24 (1), p.202-210
Hauptverfasser: Berkhout, Christophe, Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna, Willefert-Bouche, Amy, Favre, Jonathan, Peremans, Lieve, Van Royen, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 1
container_start_page 202
container_title The European journal of general practice
container_volume 24
creator Berkhout, Christophe
Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Favre, Jonathan
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
description Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth ® pairing) probably enhance patients' knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13814788_2018_1491964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dbe9408b64e24bb6b96568f7c3931ace</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2091820917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-7a9f5f4f54b76367fbd5381d68e57d1e6c00aaecbcc77237b0226c6246a5f2ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwEUC-0UsW_4udXBCrikKlShyAszVxxruukrjYya722-N0txW9cLFH4ze_efIriveMrhit6ScmaiZ1Xa84ZfWKyYY1Sr4ozpmuWMkk5S9znTXlIjor3qR0R6lUmtHXxZmgTHChmvPi53rufNj5NENPwHeJ-JHcRz9APJAtQj9tLUQkCafJj5v0kezBLxWJIQxpRdYkHdKEA0zekog7j_u3xSsHfcJ3p_ui-H399dfV9_L2x7ebq_VtaSshp1JD4yonXSVbrYTSru2qbLhTNVa6Y6gspQBoW2u15kK3lHNlFZcKKsedExfFzZHbBbgzJ9MmgDcPjRA3BmK21aPpWmwkrVslkcu2VW2jKlU7bUUjGFjMrM9H1v3cDthZHKcI_TPo85fRb80m7Ixi-VcZzYDLEyCGPzOmyQw-Wex7GDHMyXDasHo5dJZWR6mNIaWI7mkNo2YJ1zyGa5ZwzSncPPfhX49PU49pZsGXo8CPLsQB9iH2nZng0IfoIozWJyP-v-Mvzkm1dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091820917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Berkhout, Christophe ; Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Van Royen, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe ; Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Van Royen, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth ® pairing) probably enhance patients' knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1381-4788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-1402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30132369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Audiovisual Aids ; Health Behavior ; Health Facilities ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; health promotion ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; patient education as topic ; Patient Education as Topic - methods ; Primary Health Care ; Primary healthcare ; Systematic Review ; waiting room</subject><ispartof>The European journal of general practice, 2018-01, Vol.24 (1), p.202-210</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2018 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-7a9f5f4f54b76367fbd5381d68e57d1e6c00aaecbcc77237b0226c6246a5f2ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-7a9f5f4f54b76367fbd5381d68e57d1e6c00aaecbcc77237b0226c6246a5f2ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1471-4894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104610/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104610/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27502,27924,27925,53791,53793,59143,59144</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favre, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peremans, Lieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Royen, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review</title><title>The European journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Eur J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth ® pairing) probably enhance patients' knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial.</description><subject>Audiovisual Aids</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>patient education as topic</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Primary healthcare</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>waiting room</subject><issn>1381-4788</issn><issn>1751-1402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwEUC-0UsW_4udXBCrikKlShyAszVxxruukrjYya722-N0txW9cLFH4ze_efIriveMrhit6ScmaiZ1Xa84ZfWKyYY1Sr4ozpmuWMkk5S9znTXlIjor3qR0R6lUmtHXxZmgTHChmvPi53rufNj5NENPwHeJ-JHcRz9APJAtQj9tLUQkCafJj5v0kezBLxWJIQxpRdYkHdKEA0zekog7j_u3xSsHfcJ3p_ui-H399dfV9_L2x7ebq_VtaSshp1JD4yonXSVbrYTSru2qbLhTNVa6Y6gspQBoW2u15kK3lHNlFZcKKsedExfFzZHbBbgzJ9MmgDcPjRA3BmK21aPpWmwkrVslkcu2VW2jKlU7bUUjGFjMrM9H1v3cDthZHKcI_TPo85fRb80m7Ixi-VcZzYDLEyCGPzOmyQw-Wex7GDHMyXDasHo5dJZWR6mNIaWI7mkNo2YJ1zyGa5ZwzSncPPfhX49PU49pZsGXo8CPLsQB9iH2nZng0IfoIozWJyP-v-Mvzkm1dQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Berkhout, Christophe</creator><creator>Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creator><creator>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creator><creator>Favre, Jonathan</creator><creator>Peremans, Lieve</creator><creator>Van Royen, Paul</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review</title><author>Berkhout, Christophe ; Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Van Royen, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-7a9f5f4f54b76367fbd5381d68e57d1e6c00aaecbcc77237b0226c6246a5f2ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Audiovisual Aids</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>patient education as topic</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Primary healthcare</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>waiting room</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favre, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peremans, Lieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Royen, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The European journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berkhout, Christophe</au><au>Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna</au><au>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</au><au>Favre, Jonathan</au><au>Peremans, Lieve</au><au>Van Royen, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>202-210</pages><issn>1381-4788</issn><eissn>1751-1402</eissn><abstract>Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth ® pairing) probably enhance patients' knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30132369</pmid><doi>10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1381-4788
ispartof The European journal of general practice, 2018-01, Vol.24 (1), p.202-210
issn 1381-4788
1751-1402
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13814788_2018_1491964
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Audiovisual Aids
Health Behavior
Health Facilities
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
health promotion
Health Promotion - methods
Humans
patient education as topic
Patient Education as Topic - methods
Primary Health Care
Primary healthcare
Systematic Review
waiting room
title Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings' waiting rooms. A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audiovisual%20aids%20in%20primary%20healthcare%20settings'%20waiting%20rooms.%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=Berkhout,%20Christophe&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=202-210&rft.issn=1381-4788&rft.eissn=1751-1402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2091820917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091820917&rft_id=info:pmid/30132369&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_dbe9408b64e24bb6b96568f7c3931ace&rfr_iscdi=true