Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?
This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Community, work & family work & family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | Community, work & family |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Korabik, Karen Rhijn, Tricia van Ayman, Roya Lero, Donna S. Hammer, Leslie B. |
description | This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwCUj-gKbYseO4XABVUJAqcYGz5W7W1DRxKjsI5e9xVbhy2jnMjHYeIdeczTnT7IYLpbRmYl4yruac15ozcUImXKpFIRSvTrPOnuJgOicXKX0yVjIt5YTACkODcUb3fTvCNvbBgx_GGbWhocMW6Xcfd4WznW9H6sOA0VnAW-oTtXQf0WHEAEhdH2n31Q5-sGnnwwfdYECXu2x7d0nOnG0TXv3eKXl_enxbPhfr19XL8mFdgKjqoajB8kqhA9mUdlGLCnSeVUrBa4ebUmMNXAF3qFEBk-BQMWiAuUZIqTSKKamOvRD7lPJvZh99Z-NoODMHUuaPlDmQMr-kcu7-mPMhz-hsntw2ZrBj20cXbQCfjPi_4gftLXGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-8803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>gender ; multitasking ; multitâches ; polychronicity ; role overload ; sexes ; surcharge des rôles ; Travaille familiale ; Work-family</subject><ispartof>Community, work & family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhijn, Tricia van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayman, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lero, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><title>Community, work & family</title><description>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</description><subject>gender</subject><subject>multitasking</subject><subject>multitâches</subject><subject>polychronicity</subject><subject>role overload</subject><subject>sexes</subject><subject>surcharge des rôles</subject><subject>Travaille familiale</subject><subject>Work-family</subject><issn>1366-8803</issn><issn>1469-3615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwCUj-gKbYseO4XABVUJAqcYGz5W7W1DRxKjsI5e9xVbhy2jnMjHYeIdeczTnT7IYLpbRmYl4yruac15ozcUImXKpFIRSvTrPOnuJgOicXKX0yVjIt5YTACkODcUb3fTvCNvbBgx_GGbWhocMW6Xcfd4WznW9H6sOA0VnAW-oTtXQf0WHEAEhdH2n31Q5-sGnnwwfdYECXu2x7d0nOnG0TXv3eKXl_enxbPhfr19XL8mFdgKjqoajB8kqhA9mUdlGLCnSeVUrBa4ebUmMNXAF3qFEBk-BQMWiAuUZIqTSKKamOvRD7lPJvZh99Z-NoODMHUuaPlDmQMr-kcu7-mPMhz-hsntw2ZrBj20cXbQCfjPi_4gftLXGo</recordid><startdate>20170527</startdate><enddate>20170527</enddate><creator>Korabik, Karen</creator><creator>Rhijn, Tricia van</creator><creator>Ayman, Roya</creator><creator>Lero, Donna S.</creator><creator>Hammer, Leslie B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170527</creationdate><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><author>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>gender</topic><topic>multitasking</topic><topic>multitâches</topic><topic>polychronicity</topic><topic>role overload</topic><topic>sexes</topic><topic>surcharge des rôles</topic><topic>Travaille familiale</topic><topic>Work-family</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhijn, Tricia van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayman, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lero, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Community, work & family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korabik, Karen</au><au>Rhijn, Tricia van</au><au>Ayman, Roya</au><au>Lero, Donna S.</au><au>Hammer, Leslie B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</atitle><jtitle>Community, work & family</jtitle><date>2017-05-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>307-326</pages><issn>1366-8803</issn><eissn>1469-3615</eissn><abstract>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-8803 |
ispartof | Community, work & family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326 |
issn | 1366-8803 1469-3615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | gender multitasking multitâches polychronicity role overload sexes surcharge des rôles Travaille familiale Work-family |
title | Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender,%20polychronicity,%20and%20the%20work-family%20interface:%20is%20a%20preference%20for%20multitasking%20beneficial?&rft.jtitle=Community,%20work%20&%20family&rft.au=Korabik,%20Karen&rft.date=2017-05-27&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=307-326&rft.issn=1366-8803&rft.eissn=1469-3615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |