Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?

This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Community, work & family work & family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326
Hauptverfasser: Korabik, Karen, Rhijn, Tricia van, Ayman, Roya, Lero, Donna S., Hammer, Leslie B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 3
container_start_page 307
container_title Community, work & family
container_volume 20
creator Korabik, Karen
Rhijn, Tricia van
Ayman, Roya
Lero, Donna S.
Hammer, Leslie B.
description This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwCUj-gKbYseO4XABVUJAqcYGz5W7W1DRxKjsI5e9xVbhy2jnMjHYeIdeczTnT7IYLpbRmYl4yruac15ozcUImXKpFIRSvTrPOnuJgOicXKX0yVjIt5YTACkODcUb3fTvCNvbBgx_GGbWhocMW6Xcfd4WznW9H6sOA0VnAW-oTtXQf0WHEAEhdH2n31Q5-sGnnwwfdYECXu2x7d0nOnG0TXv3eKXl_enxbPhfr19XL8mFdgKjqoajB8kqhA9mUdlGLCnSeVUrBa4ebUmMNXAF3qFEBk-BQMWiAuUZIqTSKKamOvRD7lPJvZh99Z-NoODMHUuaPlDmQMr-kcu7-mPMhz-hsntw2ZrBj20cXbQCfjPi_4gftLXGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-8803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>gender ; multitasking ; multitâches ; polychronicity ; role overload ; sexes ; surcharge des rôles ; Travaille familiale ; Work-family</subject><ispartof>Community, work &amp; family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhijn, Tricia van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayman, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lero, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><title>Community, work &amp; family</title><description>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</description><subject>gender</subject><subject>multitasking</subject><subject>multitâches</subject><subject>polychronicity</subject><subject>role overload</subject><subject>sexes</subject><subject>surcharge des rôles</subject><subject>Travaille familiale</subject><subject>Work-family</subject><issn>1366-8803</issn><issn>1469-3615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwCUj-gKbYseO4XABVUJAqcYGz5W7W1DRxKjsI5e9xVbhy2jnMjHYeIdeczTnT7IYLpbRmYl4yruac15ozcUImXKpFIRSvTrPOnuJgOicXKX0yVjIt5YTACkODcUb3fTvCNvbBgx_GGbWhocMW6Xcfd4WznW9H6sOA0VnAW-oTtXQf0WHEAEhdH2n31Q5-sGnnwwfdYECXu2x7d0nOnG0TXv3eKXl_enxbPhfr19XL8mFdgKjqoajB8kqhA9mUdlGLCnSeVUrBa4ebUmMNXAF3qFEBk-BQMWiAuUZIqTSKKamOvRD7lPJvZh99Z-NoODMHUuaPlDmQMr-kcu7-mPMhz-hsntw2ZrBj20cXbQCfjPi_4gftLXGo</recordid><startdate>20170527</startdate><enddate>20170527</enddate><creator>Korabik, Karen</creator><creator>Rhijn, Tricia van</creator><creator>Ayman, Roya</creator><creator>Lero, Donna S.</creator><creator>Hammer, Leslie B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170527</creationdate><title>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</title><author>Korabik, Karen ; Rhijn, Tricia van ; Ayman, Roya ; Lero, Donna S. ; Hammer, Leslie B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7ca156efc4d2a9735c868824317feb28e7c16c1fe8e6c04cfe60cdc0fd34468e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>gender</topic><topic>multitasking</topic><topic>multitâches</topic><topic>polychronicity</topic><topic>role overload</topic><topic>sexes</topic><topic>surcharge des rôles</topic><topic>Travaille familiale</topic><topic>Work-family</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korabik, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhijn, Tricia van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayman, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lero, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Community, work &amp; family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korabik, Karen</au><au>Rhijn, Tricia van</au><au>Ayman, Roya</au><au>Lero, Donna S.</au><au>Hammer, Leslie B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?</atitle><jtitle>Community, work &amp; family</jtitle><date>2017-05-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>307-326</pages><issn>1366-8803</issn><eissn>1469-3615</eissn><abstract>This study examined how polychronicity, or the preference to do several things concurrently, was related to work and family overload, work-family conflict, and outcomes in the work, family, and life domains (i.e. turnover intent, family, and life satisfaction). Using conservation of resources theory as a framework, polychronicity was conceptualized as a resource that could be used to reduce work and family overload. The participants were 553 employed parents from Canada and the US. Results indicated that polychronicity was related to lower work overload. Lower work overload was related to lower work interference with family conflict, lower turnover intent, and higher family and life satisfaction. We also examined gender differences and found that, although women scored significantly higher than men on family overload and family satisfaction, and significantly lower than men on life satisfaction, there was no mean gender difference on polychronicity. In addition, the path coefficients in the model were not significantly different for men and women.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-8803
ispartof Community, work & family, 2017-05, Vol.20 (3), p.307-326
issn 1366-8803
1469-3615
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects gender
multitasking
multitâches
polychronicity
role overload
sexes
surcharge des rôles
Travaille familiale
Work-family
title Gender, polychronicity, and the work-family interface: is a preference for multitasking beneficial?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender,%20polychronicity,%20and%20the%20work-family%20interface:%20is%20a%20preference%20for%20multitasking%20beneficial?&rft.jtitle=Community,%20work%20&%20family&rft.au=Korabik,%20Karen&rft.date=2017-05-27&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=307-326&rft.issn=1366-8803&rft.eissn=1469-3615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13668803.2016.1178103&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_13668803_2016_1178103%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true