Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes

Improving Indigenous students' literacy is a major priority area for the Australian Government, receiving significant funding to address below benchmark English literacy standardised test results. Despite this, recent benchmark tests suggest Indigenous students continue to achieve well below th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.37-60
Hauptverfasser: Gutierrez, Amanda, Lowe, Kevin, Guenther, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education
container_volume 49
creator Gutierrez, Amanda
Lowe, Kevin
Guenther, John
description Improving Indigenous students' literacy is a major priority area for the Australian Government, receiving significant funding to address below benchmark English literacy standardised test results. Despite this, recent benchmark tests suggest Indigenous students continue to achieve well below the national average. This systematic review discusses peer-reviewed and evidence-based publications that report on significant literacy programmes to investigate which aspects of literacy are their focus, which are identified as successful, conditions needed for success, barriers to success and measures of success. While most programs reported significant literacy improvements, all identified barriers to success and/or sustainability as outlined in this paper. This review also utilises the four resources literacy model and multiliteracies theories to map literacy gaps. When considering decades of literacy research, there were significant gaps in the represented literacy skills, with the dominant focus on codebreaking, and very few programs addressing critical literacies, multiliteracies or creativity skills. The review of the papers highlighted the need for consideration of ways to design balanced and place-based literacy programs; school-community literacy partnerships; access to training and resources for schools and communities around literacy and school/community research projects and agency for teacher and school leaders to be professional context-based decision-makers.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/1359866X.2019.1700214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1359866X_2019_1700214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1294805</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.228534</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2515562552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-35cf98f9b764d45bfcad7d6774feb6abf989c53dc9aa99efd925aca78476d5893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1L5TAUxYuMoKP-CUJg1n0maZM2rnTE8QPBjYIbCffl4xlpm2eSjrz_3tS-cXau7oXzO_dcTlEcE7wguMUnpGKi5fxpQTERC9JgTEm9U-yTmouSipr9yHtmygnaK37G-JoR3NB2v3i-GbRbmcGPEcU0ajMk1LlkAqgN8mNSvjcRuQGdjzEF6BycIkBxE5PpITmFgvnrzDvy9r9tHfwqQJ-Nh8WuhS6ao-08KB7_XD5cXJd391c3F-d3pao5T2XFlBWtFcuG17pmS6tAN5o3TW3NksMyi0KxSisBIISxWlAGCpq2brhmragOil_z3Rz9NpqY5Ksfw5AjJWWEMU4Zo5liM6WCjzEYK9fB9RA2kmA5NSn_NSmnJuW2yew7nn0mOPXlubwludsWs6z_nvXQuyTBuHWSLymto9SQQLrB-k_Fh5XU3k1pVUX4lqS0ZdUUcjYfmXF496HTMsGm88EGGJSLsvr-zw911J50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515562552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Gutierrez, Amanda ; Lowe, Kevin ; Guenther, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Amanda ; Lowe, Kevin ; Guenther, John</creatorcontrib><description>Improving Indigenous students' literacy is a major priority area for the Australian Government, receiving significant funding to address below benchmark English literacy standardised test results. Despite this, recent benchmark tests suggest Indigenous students continue to achieve well below the national average. This systematic review discusses peer-reviewed and evidence-based publications that report on significant literacy programmes to investigate which aspects of literacy are their focus, which are identified as successful, conditions needed for success, barriers to success and measures of success. While most programs reported significant literacy improvements, all identified barriers to success and/or sustainability as outlined in this paper. This review also utilises the four resources literacy model and multiliteracies theories to map literacy gaps. When considering decades of literacy research, there were significant gaps in the represented literacy skills, with the dominant focus on codebreaking, and very few programs addressing critical literacies, multiliteracies or creativity skills. The review of the papers highlighted the need for consideration of ways to design balanced and place-based literacy programs; school-community literacy partnerships; access to training and resources for schools and communities around literacy and school/community research projects and agency for teacher and school leaders to be professional context-based decision-makers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-866X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2945</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2019.1700214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Aboriginal students ; Aboriginal Voices Project ; Acceleration (Education) ; Art Education ; Barriers ; Benchmarking ; Bilingual Education ; Creativity ; Critical Literacy ; Decision Making ; Direct Instruction ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English ; English (Second Language) ; Foreign Countries ; Indigenous Populations ; Indigenous student literacies ; Instructional Leadership ; Language Tests ; Learning outcomes ; Literacy ; Literacy Education ; Literacy programs ; Multiple Literacies ; Native education ; Native students ; Parent Participation ; Primary secondary education ; Principals ; Program effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Reading Instruction ; Research Reports ; School Community Relationship ; Standardized Tests ; Student Improvement ; Success ; Systematic review ; Systematic reviews ; Teaching Methods ; Test Results ; Torres Strait Islander students</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education, 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.37-60</ispartof><rights>2019 Australian Teacher Education Association 2019</rights><rights>2019 Australian Teacher Education Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-35cf98f9b764d45bfcad7d6774feb6abf989c53dc9aa99efd925aca78476d5893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-35cf98f9b764d45bfcad7d6774feb6abf989c53dc9aa99efd925aca78476d5893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2982-6565 ; 0000-0002-4934-0546 ; 0000-0002-0080-1698</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1294805$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, John</creatorcontrib><title>Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education</title><description>Improving Indigenous students' literacy is a major priority area for the Australian Government, receiving significant funding to address below benchmark English literacy standardised test results. Despite this, recent benchmark tests suggest Indigenous students continue to achieve well below the national average. This systematic review discusses peer-reviewed and evidence-based publications that report on significant literacy programmes to investigate which aspects of literacy are their focus, which are identified as successful, conditions needed for success, barriers to success and measures of success. While most programs reported significant literacy improvements, all identified barriers to success and/or sustainability as outlined in this paper. This review also utilises the four resources literacy model and multiliteracies theories to map literacy gaps. When considering decades of literacy research, there were significant gaps in the represented literacy skills, with the dominant focus on codebreaking, and very few programs addressing critical literacies, multiliteracies or creativity skills. The review of the papers highlighted the need for consideration of ways to design balanced and place-based literacy programs; school-community literacy partnerships; access to training and resources for schools and communities around literacy and school/community research projects and agency for teacher and school leaders to be professional context-based decision-makers.</description><subject>Aboriginal students</subject><subject>Aboriginal Voices Project</subject><subject>Acceleration (Education)</subject><subject>Art Education</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bilingual Education</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Critical Literacy</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Direct Instruction</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Indigenous Populations</subject><subject>Indigenous student literacies</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Literacy programs</subject><subject>Multiple Literacies</subject><subject>Native education</subject><subject>Native students</subject><subject>Parent Participation</subject><subject>Primary secondary education</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Program effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>School Community Relationship</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic reviews</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Test Results</subject><subject>Torres Strait Islander students</subject><issn>1359-866X</issn><issn>1469-2945</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1L5TAUxYuMoKP-CUJg1n0maZM2rnTE8QPBjYIbCffl4xlpm2eSjrz_3tS-cXau7oXzO_dcTlEcE7wguMUnpGKi5fxpQTERC9JgTEm9U-yTmouSipr9yHtmygnaK37G-JoR3NB2v3i-GbRbmcGPEcU0ajMk1LlkAqgN8mNSvjcRuQGdjzEF6BycIkBxE5PpITmFgvnrzDvy9r9tHfwqQJ-Nh8WuhS6ao-08KB7_XD5cXJd391c3F-d3pao5T2XFlBWtFcuG17pmS6tAN5o3TW3NksMyi0KxSisBIISxWlAGCpq2brhmragOil_z3Rz9NpqY5Ksfw5AjJWWEMU4Zo5liM6WCjzEYK9fB9RA2kmA5NSn_NSmnJuW2yew7nn0mOPXlubwludsWs6z_nvXQuyTBuHWSLymto9SQQLrB-k_Fh5XU3k1pVUX4lqS0ZdUUcjYfmXF496HTMsGm88EGGJSLsvr-zw911J50</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Gutierrez, Amanda</creator><creator>Lowe, Kevin</creator><creator>Guenther, John</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-0546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-1698</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes</title><author>Gutierrez, Amanda ; Lowe, Kevin ; Guenther, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-35cf98f9b764d45bfcad7d6774feb6abf989c53dc9aa99efd925aca78476d5893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal students</topic><topic>Aboriginal Voices Project</topic><topic>Acceleration (Education)</topic><topic>Art Education</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bilingual Education</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Critical Literacy</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Direct Instruction</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Indigenous Populations</topic><topic>Indigenous student literacies</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Literacy programs</topic><topic>Multiple Literacies</topic><topic>Native education</topic><topic>Native students</topic><topic>Parent Participation</topic><topic>Primary secondary education</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Program effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>School Community Relationship</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic reviews</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Test Results</topic><topic>Torres Strait Islander students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutierrez, Amanda</au><au>Lowe, Kevin</au><au>Guenther, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1294805</ericid><atitle>Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>37-60</pages><issn>1359-866X</issn><eissn>1469-2945</eissn><abstract>Improving Indigenous students' literacy is a major priority area for the Australian Government, receiving significant funding to address below benchmark English literacy standardised test results. Despite this, recent benchmark tests suggest Indigenous students continue to achieve well below the national average. This systematic review discusses peer-reviewed and evidence-based publications that report on significant literacy programmes to investigate which aspects of literacy are their focus, which are identified as successful, conditions needed for success, barriers to success and measures of success. While most programs reported significant literacy improvements, all identified barriers to success and/or sustainability as outlined in this paper. This review also utilises the four resources literacy model and multiliteracies theories to map literacy gaps. When considering decades of literacy research, there were significant gaps in the represented literacy skills, with the dominant focus on codebreaking, and very few programs addressing critical literacies, multiliteracies or creativity skills. The review of the papers highlighted the need for consideration of ways to design balanced and place-based literacy programs; school-community literacy partnerships; access to training and resources for schools and communities around literacy and school/community research projects and agency for teacher and school leaders to be professional context-based decision-makers.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/1359866X.2019.1700214</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-6565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-0546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-1698</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-866X
ispartof Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education, 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.37-60
issn 1359-866X
1469-2945
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1359866X_2019_1700214
source Education Source
subjects Aboriginal students
Aboriginal Voices Project
Acceleration (Education)
Art Education
Barriers
Benchmarking
Bilingual Education
Creativity
Critical Literacy
Decision Making
Direct Instruction
Elementary Secondary Education
English
English (Second Language)
Foreign Countries
Indigenous Populations
Indigenous student literacies
Instructional Leadership
Language Tests
Learning outcomes
Literacy
Literacy Education
Literacy programs
Multiple Literacies
Native education
Native students
Parent Participation
Primary secondary education
Principals
Program effectiveness
Program Evaluation
Reading Instruction
Research Reports
School Community Relationship
Standardized Tests
Student Improvement
Success
Systematic review
Systematic reviews
Teaching Methods
Test Results
Torres Strait Islander students
title Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: a systematic review of literacy programmes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A25%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indigenous%20student%20literacy%20outcomes%20in%20Australia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20literacy%20programmes&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Gutierrez,%20Amanda&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=37-60&rft.issn=1359-866X&rft.eissn=1469-2945&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1700214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515562552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515562552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1294805&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.228534&rfr_iscdi=true