The Foundations of a Research Agenda

What is the legacy of UN multidimensional peacekeeping for 'peacekept' states and, more specifically, what implications does the closure of peacekeeping operations have for the capacity of peacekept states to perform their core functions? Taken together, the essays in this forum shed light...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International peacekeeping (London, England) England), 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-76
1. Verfasser: Caplan, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title International peacekeeping (London, England)
container_volume 27
creator Caplan, Richard
description What is the legacy of UN multidimensional peacekeeping for 'peacekept' states and, more specifically, what implications does the closure of peacekeeping operations have for the capacity of peacekept states to perform their core functions? Taken together, the essays in this forum shed light on these important questions from a variety of perspectives. More broadly, they underline the importance of charting the vicissitudes of states that have been, but are no longer, host to multidimensional peacekeeping operations. It may then be possible to establish what responsibility these operations and their closure may bear for the trajectories (positive and negative) of these states in the years following UN peacekeeping withdrawal. While highlighting the importance of studying peacekeeping legacies, these essays also draw attention to the methodological difficulties of exploring these questions. The nature of such difficulties is manifold. This concluding essay will provide a brief overview of the principal challenges and suggest how they may be overcome - partially at least - with an eye towards laying the foundations for a feasible research agenda.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13533312.2019.1710376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13533312_2019_1710376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2352570637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6c13a24339dc360bf281af244158afa84f10ddebf9b9593911cc7e00d284fcf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPICzodetMZrO7uVmKVaEgSAVvIc0mdku7qckW6dub0nr1NAPz_f_Ax9gtwgihhgckQUTIRxxQjrBCoKo8YwOsCsollJ_naU9MfoAu2VWMKwCsCWnA7udLm039rmt03_ouZt5lOnu30epgltn4y6bLNbtweh3tzWkO2cf0aT55yWdvz6-T8Sw3RHWflwZJ84JINoZKWDheo3a8KFDU2um6cAhNYxdOLqSQJBGNqSxAw9PJOEFDdnfs3Qb_vbOxVyu_C116qTgJLiooqUqUOFIm-BiDdWob2o0Oe4WgDkLUnxB1EKJOQlLu8ZhrO-fDRv_4sG5Ur_drH1zQnWmjov8rfgE-dGSs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352570637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Foundations of a Research Agenda</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Caplan, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>What is the legacy of UN multidimensional peacekeeping for 'peacekept' states and, more specifically, what implications does the closure of peacekeeping operations have for the capacity of peacekept states to perform their core functions? Taken together, the essays in this forum shed light on these important questions from a variety of perspectives. More broadly, they underline the importance of charting the vicissitudes of states that have been, but are no longer, host to multidimensional peacekeeping operations. It may then be possible to establish what responsibility these operations and their closure may bear for the trajectories (positive and negative) of these states in the years following UN peacekeeping withdrawal. While highlighting the importance of studying peacekeeping legacies, these essays also draw attention to the methodological difficulties of exploring these questions. The nature of such difficulties is manifold. This concluding essay will provide a brief overview of the principal challenges and suggest how they may be overcome - partially at least - with an eye towards laying the foundations for a feasible research agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-906X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2019.1710376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Closure ; Criteria ; Evaluation ; Peacekeeping</subject><ispartof>International peacekeeping (London, England), 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-76</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6c13a24339dc360bf281af244158afa84f10ddebf9b9593911cc7e00d284fcf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6c13a24339dc360bf281af244158afa84f10ddebf9b9593911cc7e00d284fcf53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4117-597X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>The Foundations of a Research Agenda</title><title>International peacekeeping (London, England)</title><description>What is the legacy of UN multidimensional peacekeeping for 'peacekept' states and, more specifically, what implications does the closure of peacekeeping operations have for the capacity of peacekept states to perform their core functions? Taken together, the essays in this forum shed light on these important questions from a variety of perspectives. More broadly, they underline the importance of charting the vicissitudes of states that have been, but are no longer, host to multidimensional peacekeeping operations. It may then be possible to establish what responsibility these operations and their closure may bear for the trajectories (positive and negative) of these states in the years following UN peacekeeping withdrawal. While highlighting the importance of studying peacekeeping legacies, these essays also draw attention to the methodological difficulties of exploring these questions. The nature of such difficulties is manifold. This concluding essay will provide a brief overview of the principal challenges and suggest how they may be overcome - partially at least - with an eye towards laying the foundations for a feasible research agenda.</description><subject>Closure</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Peacekeeping</subject><issn>1353-3312</issn><issn>1743-906X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPICzodetMZrO7uVmKVaEgSAVvIc0mdku7qckW6dub0nr1NAPz_f_Ax9gtwgihhgckQUTIRxxQjrBCoKo8YwOsCsollJ_naU9MfoAu2VWMKwCsCWnA7udLm039rmt03_ouZt5lOnu30epgltn4y6bLNbtweh3tzWkO2cf0aT55yWdvz6-T8Sw3RHWflwZJ84JINoZKWDheo3a8KFDU2um6cAhNYxdOLqSQJBGNqSxAw9PJOEFDdnfs3Qb_vbOxVyu_C116qTgJLiooqUqUOFIm-BiDdWob2o0Oe4WgDkLUnxB1EKJOQlLu8ZhrO-fDRv_4sG5Ur_drH1zQnWmjov8rfgE-dGSs</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Caplan, Richard</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-597X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>The Foundations of a Research Agenda</title><author>Caplan, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6c13a24339dc360bf281af244158afa84f10ddebf9b9593911cc7e00d284fcf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Closure</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Peacekeeping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International peacekeeping (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caplan, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Foundations of a Research Agenda</atitle><jtitle>International peacekeeping (London, England)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>70-76</pages><issn>1353-3312</issn><eissn>1743-906X</eissn><abstract>What is the legacy of UN multidimensional peacekeeping for 'peacekept' states and, more specifically, what implications does the closure of peacekeeping operations have for the capacity of peacekept states to perform their core functions? Taken together, the essays in this forum shed light on these important questions from a variety of perspectives. More broadly, they underline the importance of charting the vicissitudes of states that have been, but are no longer, host to multidimensional peacekeeping operations. It may then be possible to establish what responsibility these operations and their closure may bear for the trajectories (positive and negative) of these states in the years following UN peacekeeping withdrawal. While highlighting the importance of studying peacekeeping legacies, these essays also draw attention to the methodological difficulties of exploring these questions. The nature of such difficulties is manifold. This concluding essay will provide a brief overview of the principal challenges and suggest how they may be overcome - partially at least - with an eye towards laying the foundations for a feasible research agenda.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13533312.2019.1710376</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-597X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-3312
ispartof International peacekeeping (London, England), 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-76
issn 1353-3312
1743-906X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13533312_2019_1710376
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Closure
Criteria
Evaluation
Peacekeeping
title The Foundations of a Research Agenda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Foundations%20of%20a%20Research%20Agenda&rft.jtitle=International%20peacekeeping%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Caplan,%20Richard&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=70-76&rft.issn=1353-3312&rft.eissn=1743-906X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13533312.2019.1710376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352570637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352570637&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true