Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?
The main aim of the paper is to question the viability of measuring social innovation with the current state of knowledge on the one hand, and to make suggestions for better measurement of it on the other. To reach this aim, the literature on the traditional measures of technological innovation and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovation (Abingdon, England) England), 2020-07, Vol.33 (3), p.337-367 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 367 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Innovation (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Mihci, Hakan |
description | The main aim of the paper is to question the viability of measuring social innovation with the current state of knowledge on the one hand, and to make suggestions for better measurement of it on the other. To reach this aim, the literature on the traditional measures of technological innovation and the previous attempts of measuring social innovation is surveyed. Despite relatively narrow scope of the literature mainly originated from the very recent and pioneer experiments, one may argue that the first findings do not present a promising picture for future studies. Therefore, existing trials to measure social innovation have to be critically screened to ascertain problematic areas, and hence, to provide plausible solutions. The problems with social innovation metrics are not only limited with obtaining concrete and trustworthy results, but also extended to statistical, methodological and even conceptual spheres. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13511610_2019_1705149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2428992136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-db23d0b306d615bc8928238125018c13c404f69a77570373e60cbca228465483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQVjwvDWTf5ucVIrVQsFL7yGb3ZWU3aQmW6Xf3iytV0_zZnhvZvghdA94AVjiR6AcQOSOYFALqDAHpi7QDJhQpWRALrPOnnIyXaOblHYY50HFZoitUzG0Jh2i859FCtaZvnDeh28zuuALUwwupUm5YR-yqvv26RZddaZP7d25ztF29bpdvpebj7f18mVTWkrlWDY1oQ2uKRaNAF5bqYgkVALhGKQFahlmnVCmqniFaUVbgW1tDSGSCc4knaOH09p9DF-HNo16Fw7R54uaMCKVIkBFdvGTy8b8X2w7vY9uMPGoAeuJj_7joyc--swn555POee7EAfzE2Lf6NEc-xC7aLx1SdP_V_wCpUNpow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2428992136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mihci, Hakan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mihci, Hakan</creatorcontrib><description>The main aim of the paper is to question the viability of measuring social innovation with the current state of knowledge on the one hand, and to make suggestions for better measurement of it on the other. To reach this aim, the literature on the traditional measures of technological innovation and the previous attempts of measuring social innovation is surveyed. Despite relatively narrow scope of the literature mainly originated from the very recent and pioneer experiments, one may argue that the first findings do not present a promising picture for future studies. Therefore, existing trials to measure social innovation have to be critically screened to ascertain problematic areas, and hence, to provide plausible solutions. The problems with social innovation metrics are not only limited with obtaining concrete and trustworthy results, but also extended to statistical, methodological and even conceptual spheres.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-1610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Innovation ; innovation indicators ; Innovations ; Measurement ; Social innovation ; social innovation metrics ; Statistical methods ; Technological change ; technological innovation</subject><ispartof>Innovation (Abingdon, England), 2020-07, Vol.33 (3), p.337-367</ispartof><rights>2019 The European Association for the Advancement of the Social Sciences 2019</rights><rights>2019 The European Association for the Advancement of the Social Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-db23d0b306d615bc8928238125018c13c404f69a77570373e60cbca228465483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-db23d0b306d615bc8928238125018c13c404f69a77570373e60cbca228465483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3484-5346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mihci, Hakan</creatorcontrib><title>Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?</title><title>Innovation (Abingdon, England)</title><description>The main aim of the paper is to question the viability of measuring social innovation with the current state of knowledge on the one hand, and to make suggestions for better measurement of it on the other. To reach this aim, the literature on the traditional measures of technological innovation and the previous attempts of measuring social innovation is surveyed. Despite relatively narrow scope of the literature mainly originated from the very recent and pioneer experiments, one may argue that the first findings do not present a promising picture for future studies. Therefore, existing trials to measure social innovation have to be critically screened to ascertain problematic areas, and hence, to provide plausible solutions. The problems with social innovation metrics are not only limited with obtaining concrete and trustworthy results, but also extended to statistical, methodological and even conceptual spheres.</description><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>innovation indicators</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Social innovation</subject><subject>social innovation metrics</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>technological innovation</subject><issn>1351-1610</issn><issn>1469-8412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQVjwvDWTf5ucVIrVQsFL7yGb3ZWU3aQmW6Xf3iytV0_zZnhvZvghdA94AVjiR6AcQOSOYFALqDAHpi7QDJhQpWRALrPOnnIyXaOblHYY50HFZoitUzG0Jh2i859FCtaZvnDeh28zuuALUwwupUm5YR-yqvv26RZddaZP7d25ztF29bpdvpebj7f18mVTWkrlWDY1oQ2uKRaNAF5bqYgkVALhGKQFahlmnVCmqniFaUVbgW1tDSGSCc4knaOH09p9DF-HNo16Fw7R54uaMCKVIkBFdvGTy8b8X2w7vY9uMPGoAeuJj_7joyc--swn555POee7EAfzE2Lf6NEc-xC7aLx1SdP_V_wCpUNpow</recordid><startdate>20200702</startdate><enddate>20200702</enddate><creator>Mihci, Hakan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-5346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200702</creationdate><title>Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?</title><author>Mihci, Hakan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-db23d0b306d615bc8928238125018c13c404f69a77570373e60cbca228465483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>innovation indicators</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Social innovation</topic><topic>social innovation metrics</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>technological innovation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mihci, Hakan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Innovation (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mihci, Hakan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?</atitle><jtitle>Innovation (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><date>2020-07-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>337-367</pages><issn>1351-1610</issn><eissn>1469-8412</eissn><abstract>The main aim of the paper is to question the viability of measuring social innovation with the current state of knowledge on the one hand, and to make suggestions for better measurement of it on the other. To reach this aim, the literature on the traditional measures of technological innovation and the previous attempts of measuring social innovation is surveyed. Despite relatively narrow scope of the literature mainly originated from the very recent and pioneer experiments, one may argue that the first findings do not present a promising picture for future studies. Therefore, existing trials to measure social innovation have to be critically screened to ascertain problematic areas, and hence, to provide plausible solutions. The problems with social innovation metrics are not only limited with obtaining concrete and trustworthy results, but also extended to statistical, methodological and even conceptual spheres.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-5346</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1351-1610 |
ispartof | Innovation (Abingdon, England), 2020-07, Vol.33 (3), p.337-367 |
issn | 1351-1610 1469-8412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13511610_2019_1705149 |
source | Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Innovation innovation indicators Innovations Measurement Social innovation social innovation metrics Statistical methods Technological change technological innovation |
title | Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A08%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20measuring%20social%20innovation%20a%20mission%20impossible?&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Mihci,%20Hakan&rft.date=2020-07-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=337-367&rft.issn=1351-1610&rft.eissn=1469-8412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2428992136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2428992136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |