B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia
Business process management (B.P.M.) is empirically linked to the performance of organisations. Different studies in the business process field have shown that an organisation can benefit from B.P.M. through better financial and nonfinancial performance, which can drive it to competitive advantage....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja 2017, Vol.30 (1), p.1237-1256 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1256 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1237 |
| container_title | Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Stojanović, Dragana Tomašević, Ivan Slović, Dragoslav Gošnik, Dušan Suklan, Jana Kavčič, Klemen |
| description | Business process management (B.P.M.) is empirically linked to the performance of organisations. Different studies in the business process field have shown that an organisation can benefit from B.P.M. through better financial and nonfinancial performance, which can drive it to competitive advantage. B.P.M. is also a concept which leads to better organised systems and can help companies in transition economies to perform better. The purpose of this paper is to compare B.P.M. practice in Slovenia and Serbia in order to formulate recommendations for companies in transition economies. The survey was carried out in 115 representatives of Slovene companies and 91 Serbian companies in the year 2014. The conclusions and recommendation for B.P.M. implementation in transition economies were drawn upon similarities in B.P.M. practice between Serbian and Slovenian companies. In addition, the differences in B.P.M. practice were analysed in order to identify the ways one country can learn from the experience of the other. The results from Slovenia and Serbia from 2014 are interesting for both countries from the perspective of how B.P.M. practice could be further developed in Slovenia and Serbia. The findings have significant managerial implications, as they will help managers to better understand the key factors for successful B.P.M. implementation transitional countries companies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1331677X_2017_1355256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1990819814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7ce52091d828e319d01b696876698d0f95d7e4364e1f373f32360ca27bd7a6aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5dioYf6JxQCfd41k-zmh09tRVtBUTkLfQu57CzmupecyZ6t_31zrProvMwwfL4zw3yr6jPQBqiiJ8A5CCl_N4yCbIB3HevEh2oBqlW1FqI9KHVh6j30qTrOeU1LKCFAsEV19725ba4b4gOZkg3ZTz4Ggi6GuPGYT8k6-jAR3Gx98s6OBP9tMXkMDkkcyHKMTxi8JTb0ZIlp5e1R9XGwY8bjl3xY_bo4vz_7WV_d_Lg8-3ZVu1bxqZYOO0Y19Iop5KB7CiuhhZJCaNXTQXe9xJaLFmHgkg-ccUGdZXLVSyus5YdVPc99SM7-MdvkNzY9m2i9mTs5OSylAc1BQeG_zPw2xccd5sms4y6FcqJhoDtOmWzZexRoTRVoBW2huplyKeaccHhbD9TsbTGvtpi9LebFlqL7Out8GGLa2L8xjb2Z7PMY01De73w2_P0R_wE_sJHB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195302742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Stojanović, Dragana ; Tomašević, Ivan ; Slović, Dragoslav ; Gošnik, Dušan ; Suklan, Jana ; Kavčič, Klemen</creator><creatorcontrib>Stojanović, Dragana ; Tomašević, Ivan ; Slović, Dragoslav ; Gošnik, Dušan ; Suklan, Jana ; Kavčič, Klemen</creatorcontrib><description>Business process management (B.P.M.) is empirically linked to the performance of organisations. Different studies in the business process field have shown that an organisation can benefit from B.P.M. through better financial and nonfinancial performance, which can drive it to competitive advantage. B.P.M. is also a concept which leads to better organised systems and can help companies in transition economies to perform better. The purpose of this paper is to compare B.P.M. practice in Slovenia and Serbia in order to formulate recommendations for companies in transition economies. The survey was carried out in 115 representatives of Slovene companies and 91 Serbian companies in the year 2014. The conclusions and recommendation for B.P.M. implementation in transition economies were drawn upon similarities in B.P.M. practice between Serbian and Slovenian companies. In addition, the differences in B.P.M. practice were analysed in order to identify the ways one country can learn from the experience of the other. The results from Slovenia and Serbia from 2014 are interesting for both countries from the perspective of how B.P.M. practice could be further developed in Slovenia and Serbia. The findings have significant managerial implications, as they will help managers to better understand the key factors for successful B.P.M. implementation transitional countries companies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1331-677X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pula: Routledge</publisher><subject>business process improvement ; Business process management ; Companies ; comparison study ; Competitive advantage ; Corporate management ; Economic theory ; Serbia ; Slovenia ; Transition economies ; transition economy</subject><ispartof>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 2017, Vol.30 (1), p.1237-1256</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7ce52091d828e319d01b696876698d0f95d7e4364e1f373f32360ca27bd7a6aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7ce52091d828e319d01b696876698d0f95d7e4364e1f373f32360ca27bd7a6aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27479,27900,27901,27902,59116,59117</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stojanović, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomašević, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slović, Dragoslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gošnik, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suklan, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavčič, Klemen</creatorcontrib><title>B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia</title><title>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</title><description>Business process management (B.P.M.) is empirically linked to the performance of organisations. Different studies in the business process field have shown that an organisation can benefit from B.P.M. through better financial and nonfinancial performance, which can drive it to competitive advantage. B.P.M. is also a concept which leads to better organised systems and can help companies in transition economies to perform better. The purpose of this paper is to compare B.P.M. practice in Slovenia and Serbia in order to formulate recommendations for companies in transition economies. The survey was carried out in 115 representatives of Slovene companies and 91 Serbian companies in the year 2014. The conclusions and recommendation for B.P.M. implementation in transition economies were drawn upon similarities in B.P.M. practice between Serbian and Slovenian companies. In addition, the differences in B.P.M. practice were analysed in order to identify the ways one country can learn from the experience of the other. The results from Slovenia and Serbia from 2014 are interesting for both countries from the perspective of how B.P.M. practice could be further developed in Slovenia and Serbia. The findings have significant managerial implications, as they will help managers to better understand the key factors for successful B.P.M. implementation transitional countries companies.</description><subject>business process improvement</subject><subject>Business process management</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>comparison study</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Corporate management</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Serbia</subject><subject>Slovenia</subject><subject>Transition economies</subject><subject>transition economy</subject><issn>1331-677X</issn><issn>1848-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5dioYf6JxQCfd41k-zmh09tRVtBUTkLfQu57CzmupecyZ6t_31zrProvMwwfL4zw3yr6jPQBqiiJ8A5CCl_N4yCbIB3HevEh2oBqlW1FqI9KHVh6j30qTrOeU1LKCFAsEV19725ba4b4gOZkg3ZTz4Ggi6GuPGYT8k6-jAR3Gx98s6OBP9tMXkMDkkcyHKMTxi8JTb0ZIlp5e1R9XGwY8bjl3xY_bo4vz_7WV_d_Lg8-3ZVu1bxqZYOO0Y19Iop5KB7CiuhhZJCaNXTQXe9xJaLFmHgkg-ccUGdZXLVSyus5YdVPc99SM7-MdvkNzY9m2i9mTs5OSylAc1BQeG_zPw2xccd5sms4y6FcqJhoDtOmWzZexRoTRVoBW2huplyKeaccHhbD9TsbTGvtpi9LebFlqL7Out8GGLa2L8xjb2Z7PMY01De73w2_P0R_wE_sJHB</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Stojanović, Dragana</creator><creator>Tomašević, Ivan</creator><creator>Slović, Dragoslav</creator><creator>Gošnik, Dušan</creator><creator>Suklan, Jana</creator><creator>Kavčič, Klemen</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor and Francis Group i Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli, Fakultet ekonomije i turizma Dr. Mijo Mirković</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia</title><author>Stojanović, Dragana ; Tomašević, Ivan ; Slović, Dragoslav ; Gošnik, Dušan ; Suklan, Jana ; Kavčič, Klemen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7ce52091d828e319d01b696876698d0f95d7e4364e1f373f32360ca27bd7a6aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>business process improvement</topic><topic>Business process management</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>comparison study</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Corporate management</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Serbia</topic><topic>Slovenia</topic><topic>Transition economies</topic><topic>transition economy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stojanović, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomašević, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slović, Dragoslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gošnik, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suklan, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavčič, Klemen</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stojanović, Dragana</au><au>Tomašević, Ivan</au><au>Slović, Dragoslav</au><au>Gošnik, Dušan</au><au>Suklan, Jana</au><au>Kavčič, Klemen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia</atitle><jtitle>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1237</spage><epage>1256</epage><pages>1237-1256</pages><issn>1331-677X</issn><eissn>1848-9664</eissn><abstract>Business process management (B.P.M.) is empirically linked to the performance of organisations. Different studies in the business process field have shown that an organisation can benefit from B.P.M. through better financial and nonfinancial performance, which can drive it to competitive advantage. B.P.M. is also a concept which leads to better organised systems and can help companies in transition economies to perform better. The purpose of this paper is to compare B.P.M. practice in Slovenia and Serbia in order to formulate recommendations for companies in transition economies. The survey was carried out in 115 representatives of Slovene companies and 91 Serbian companies in the year 2014. The conclusions and recommendation for B.P.M. implementation in transition economies were drawn upon similarities in B.P.M. practice between Serbian and Slovenian companies. In addition, the differences in B.P.M. practice were analysed in order to identify the ways one country can learn from the experience of the other. The results from Slovenia and Serbia from 2014 are interesting for both countries from the perspective of how B.P.M. practice could be further developed in Slovenia and Serbia. The findings have significant managerial implications, as they will help managers to better understand the key factors for successful B.P.M. implementation transitional countries companies.</abstract><cop>Pula</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1331-677X |
| ispartof | Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 2017, Vol.30 (1), p.1237-1256 |
| issn | 1331-677X 1848-9664 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1331677X_2017_1355256 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | business process improvement Business process management Companies comparison study Competitive advantage Corporate management Economic theory Serbia Slovenia Transition economies transition economy |
| title | B.P.M. in transition economies: joint empirical experience of Slovenia and Serbia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A53%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=B.P.M.%20in%20transition%20economies:%20joint%20empirical%20experience%20of%20Slovenia%20and%20Serbia&rft.jtitle=Economic%20research%20-%20Ekonomska%20istra%C5%BEivanja&rft.au=Stojanovi%C4%87,%20Dragana&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1237&rft.epage=1256&rft.pages=1237-1256&rft.issn=1331-677X&rft.eissn=1848-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1990819814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195302742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |