Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates
This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard spec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 251 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Brooks, Stephen J. Calver, Michael C. Dickman, Christopher R. Meathrel, Catherine E. Bradley, J. Stuart |
description | This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_1996_11682338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42900640</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42900640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCI4B84pbFP4kTn9BoWX6klbjA2epxOoNXmXhwO4PyTjwkzoblyslyV31tq4qxN1JcS9GJd1LaxnSm3Kw111KaTmndPWE7pVtTtUaZp2y3mqrV9Zy9ILoXQtlGiB37_SEi8TDlBHRGH4bg-QVSgBziVOY8_0COE6bjUubjjDwOHPg54cIfgELnyEOmddZDjon4CXLGtNKU5361FAh9HOMxeBi3fZiDp_d8zz0QPhgXPlOYjoUj9DlcYooz8QumjIcEGeklezbASPjq73nFvn-8_Xbzubr7-unLzf6u8rVUuWpqwFqhqEFY4WXXNNCWaKwsghpk2xvo7UFL3elDC6Y51F2rlUBtvG2t9PqKvd32nlP8OSNldwrkcRxhwvIlJ5u2NiXRYjSb0adIlHBw5xROkBYnhVvLcY_luLUc91hOAV9v4D2VxP5RtbJCmFoUfb_pYRpiOsGvmMbeZVjGmIYEkw_k9H_e-AMMHqPD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15746119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1195-6860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-7626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Acrididae ; durée de manipulation ; Energy value ; Foraging ; grasshopper ; handling time ; Insect ecology ; Instars ; Lizards ; Male animals ; Mammals ; Mathematical constants ; predation ; Predators ; prey preference ; prédation ; préférence pour une proie ; sauterelle ; Species ; valeur énergétique</subject><ispartof>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 1996</rights><rights>ÉCOSCIENCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42900640$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42900640$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calver, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><title>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</title><description>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</description><subject>Acrididae</subject><subject>durée de manipulation</subject><subject>Energy value</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>grasshopper</subject><subject>handling time</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Instars</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mathematical constants</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prey preference</subject><subject>prédation</subject><subject>préférence pour une proie</subject><subject>sauterelle</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>valeur énergétique</subject><issn>1195-6860</issn><issn>2376-7626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCI4B84pbFP4kTn9BoWX6klbjA2epxOoNXmXhwO4PyTjwkzoblyslyV31tq4qxN1JcS9GJd1LaxnSm3Kw111KaTmndPWE7pVtTtUaZp2y3mqrV9Zy9ILoXQtlGiB37_SEi8TDlBHRGH4bg-QVSgBziVOY8_0COE6bjUubjjDwOHPg54cIfgELnyEOmddZDjon4CXLGtNKU5361FAh9HOMxeBi3fZiDp_d8zz0QPhgXPlOYjoUj9DlcYooz8QumjIcEGeklezbASPjq73nFvn-8_Xbzubr7-unLzf6u8rVUuWpqwFqhqEFY4WXXNNCWaKwsghpk2xvo7UFL3elDC6Y51F2rlUBtvG2t9PqKvd32nlP8OSNldwrkcRxhwvIlJ5u2NiXRYjSb0adIlHBw5xROkBYnhVvLcY_luLUc91hOAV9v4D2VxP5RtbJCmFoUfb_pYRpiOsGvmMbeZVjGmIYEkw_k9H_e-AMMHqPD</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Brooks, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Calver, Michael C.</creator><creator>Dickman, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creator><creator>Bradley, J. Stuart</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Université Laval</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><author>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acrididae</topic><topic>durée de manipulation</topic><topic>Energy value</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>grasshopper</topic><topic>handling time</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Instars</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mathematical constants</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prey preference</topic><topic>prédation</topic><topic>préférence pour une proie</topic><topic>sauterelle</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>valeur énergétique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calver, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brooks, Stephen J.</au><au>Calver, Michael C.</au><au>Dickman, Christopher R.</au><au>Meathrel, Catherine E.</au><au>Bradley, J. Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>247-251</pages><issn>1195-6860</issn><eissn>2376-7626</eissn><abstract>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1195-6860 |
ispartof | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251 |
issn | 1195-6860 2376-7626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_1996_11682338 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Acrididae durée de manipulation Energy value Foraging grasshopper handling time Insect ecology Instars Lizards Male animals Mammals Mathematical constants predation Predators prey preference prédation préférence pour une proie sauterelle Species valeur énergétique |
title | Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20intraspecific%20variation%20in%20the%20energy%20value%20of%20a%20prey%20species%20to%20its%20predators%20matter%20in%20studies%20of%20ecological%20energetics?%20A%20case%20study%20using%20insectivorous%20vertebrates&rft.jtitle=%C3%89coscience%20(Sainte-Foy)&rft.au=Brooks,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=247-251&rft.issn=1195-6860&rft.eissn=2376-7626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E42900640%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15746119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42900640&rfr_iscdi=true |