Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates

This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard spec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251
Hauptverfasser: Brooks, Stephen J., Calver, Michael C., Dickman, Christopher R., Meathrel, Catherine E., Bradley, J. Stuart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 251
container_issue 3
container_start_page 247
container_title Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)
container_volume 3
creator Brooks, Stephen J.
Calver, Michael C.
Dickman, Christopher R.
Meathrel, Catherine E.
Bradley, J. Stuart
description This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_1996_11682338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42900640</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42900640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCI4B84pbFP4kTn9BoWX6klbjA2epxOoNXmXhwO4PyTjwkzoblyslyV31tq4qxN1JcS9GJd1LaxnSm3Kw111KaTmndPWE7pVtTtUaZp2y3mqrV9Zy9ILoXQtlGiB37_SEi8TDlBHRGH4bg-QVSgBziVOY8_0COE6bjUubjjDwOHPg54cIfgELnyEOmddZDjon4CXLGtNKU5361FAh9HOMxeBi3fZiDp_d8zz0QPhgXPlOYjoUj9DlcYooz8QumjIcEGeklezbASPjq73nFvn-8_Xbzubr7-unLzf6u8rVUuWpqwFqhqEFY4WXXNNCWaKwsghpk2xvo7UFL3elDC6Y51F2rlUBtvG2t9PqKvd32nlP8OSNldwrkcRxhwvIlJ5u2NiXRYjSb0adIlHBw5xROkBYnhVvLcY_luLUc91hOAV9v4D2VxP5RtbJCmFoUfb_pYRpiOsGvmMbeZVjGmIYEkw_k9H_e-AMMHqPD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15746119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1195-6860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-7626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Acrididae ; durée de manipulation ; Energy value ; Foraging ; grasshopper ; handling time ; Insect ecology ; Instars ; Lizards ; Male animals ; Mammals ; Mathematical constants ; predation ; Predators ; prey preference ; prédation ; préférence pour une proie ; sauterelle ; Species ; valeur énergétique</subject><ispartof>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 1996</rights><rights>ÉCOSCIENCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42900640$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42900640$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calver, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><title>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</title><description>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</description><subject>Acrididae</subject><subject>durée de manipulation</subject><subject>Energy value</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>grasshopper</subject><subject>handling time</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Instars</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mathematical constants</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prey preference</subject><subject>prédation</subject><subject>préférence pour une proie</subject><subject>sauterelle</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>valeur énergétique</subject><issn>1195-6860</issn><issn>2376-7626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCI4B84pbFP4kTn9BoWX6klbjA2epxOoNXmXhwO4PyTjwkzoblyslyV31tq4qxN1JcS9GJd1LaxnSm3Kw111KaTmndPWE7pVtTtUaZp2y3mqrV9Zy9ILoXQtlGiB37_SEi8TDlBHRGH4bg-QVSgBziVOY8_0COE6bjUubjjDwOHPg54cIfgELnyEOmddZDjon4CXLGtNKU5361FAh9HOMxeBi3fZiDp_d8zz0QPhgXPlOYjoUj9DlcYooz8QumjIcEGeklezbASPjq73nFvn-8_Xbzubr7-unLzf6u8rVUuWpqwFqhqEFY4WXXNNCWaKwsghpk2xvo7UFL3elDC6Y51F2rlUBtvG2t9PqKvd32nlP8OSNldwrkcRxhwvIlJ5u2NiXRYjSb0adIlHBw5xROkBYnhVvLcY_luLUc91hOAV9v4D2VxP5RtbJCmFoUfb_pYRpiOsGvmMbeZVjGmIYEkw_k9H_e-AMMHqPD</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Brooks, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Calver, Michael C.</creator><creator>Dickman, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creator><creator>Bradley, J. Stuart</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Université Laval</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</title><author>Brooks, Stephen J. ; Calver, Michael C. ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Meathrel, Catherine E. ; Bradley, J. Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-54ae42e04a090c1855a79969154a2f17d6ad9b31383b7a65b487320e36c9791c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acrididae</topic><topic>durée de manipulation</topic><topic>Energy value</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>grasshopper</topic><topic>handling time</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Instars</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mathematical constants</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prey preference</topic><topic>prédation</topic><topic>préférence pour une proie</topic><topic>sauterelle</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>valeur énergétique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calver, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meathrel, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, J. Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brooks, Stephen J.</au><au>Calver, Michael C.</au><au>Dickman, Christopher R.</au><au>Meathrel, Catherine E.</au><au>Bradley, J. Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>247-251</pages><issn>1195-6860</issn><eissn>2376-7626</eissn><abstract>This study tested the assumption that variation in the energy value of different instars of a hemimetabolous insect makes no ecologically significant difference to rates of energy gain by its vertebrate predators and found it to be supported. Three mammal species, four bird species and a lizard species were used as predators and one grasshopper species as prey. Although instars of both male and female grasshoppers differed significantly in energy values, the energy returns to their predators based on these exact values were qualitatively similar to those produced when a commonly-used constant energy value of 23 J/mg dry weight was substituted. Regressions of specific energy returns on those based on the 23 J/mg constant were highly significant, so energy returns based on the constant were good predictors of those based on specific energy values. Although significant intraspecific variations in energy values occur in Acrida conica and probably in other hemimetabolous insects as well, the 23 J/mg dry weight constant appears adequate for most predation studies.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1195-6860
ispartof Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (3), p.247-251
issn 1195-6860
2376-7626
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_1996_11682338
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Acrididae
durée de manipulation
Energy value
Foraging
grasshopper
handling time
Insect ecology
Instars
Lizards
Male animals
Mammals
Mathematical constants
predation
Predators
prey preference
prédation
préférence pour une proie
sauterelle
Species
valeur énergétique
title Does intraspecific variation in the energy value of a prey species to its predators matter in studies of ecological energetics? A case study using insectivorous vertebrates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20intraspecific%20variation%20in%20the%20energy%20value%20of%20a%20prey%20species%20to%20its%20predators%20matter%20in%20studies%20of%20ecological%20energetics?%20A%20case%20study%20using%20insectivorous%20vertebrates&rft.jtitle=%C3%89coscience%20(Sainte-Foy)&rft.au=Brooks,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=247-251&rft.issn=1195-6860&rft.eissn=2376-7626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/11956860.1996.11682338&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E42900640%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15746119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42900640&rfr_iscdi=true