Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace
A presentation is given refuting the arguments presented in an earlier article that guidelines dealing with sexism and racism are a new form of censorship. It is suggested that the guidelines, never meant for fiction, have created an awareness of the lack of variety and balance in both fiction and t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of literacy research 1979-03, Vol.11 (1), p.73-77 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 77 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | Journal of literacy research |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Johnson, Carole Schulte Greenbaum, Gloria R. |
| description | A presentation is given refuting the arguments presented in an earlier article that guidelines dealing with sexism and racism are a new form of censorship. It is suggested that the guidelines, never meant for fiction, have created an awareness of the lack of variety and balance in both fiction and textbooks. One function of the guidelines is to develop a consensus of what is meant when sexist and/or racist qualities are attributed to material. Since textbooks are not freely chosen by students, it is appropriate that sexism/racism be included as part of the criteria for selection. Educational materials should affirm and encourage all children to probe and develop to their fullest potential. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10862967909547309 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10862967909547309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_10862967909547309</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1080_10862967909547309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2429-ca5d6126cf585a0165847d3fc72d7ed4bd339b5a0387610ab4d214b125ae141f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG-5eeqayWdzUcriFxYEdcFbSJN02aW2S1KV_nsj601wDjMD7_sMw4vQOZAFkJJc5iaplkoTLbhiRB-gGQjBi5Izcpj3rBfZ8HaMTlLaklyC8Bm6qmLoL0b8Mtre2-gTrrovOyW8SsFf4wo_h1034XHAj5t-ncahx9mI6-EzdNaFU3TU2i6Fs985R6vbm9flfVE_3T0sq7pwlFNdOCu8BCpdK0phCUhRcuVZ6xT1KnjeeMZ0kxVWKgnENtxT4A1QYQNwaNkcwf6ui0NKMbRmFzfvNk4GiPkJwPwJIDOLPZPsOpjt8BH7_OI_wDdk61kB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Johnson, Carole Schulte ; Greenbaum, Gloria R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole Schulte ; Greenbaum, Gloria R.</creatorcontrib><description>A presentation is given refuting the arguments presented in an earlier article that guidelines dealing with sexism and racism are a new form of censorship. It is suggested that the guidelines, never meant for fiction, have created an awareness of the lack of variety and balance in both fiction and textbooks. One function of the guidelines is to develop a consensus of what is meant when sexist and/or racist qualities are attributed to material. Since textbooks are not freely chosen by students, it is appropriate that sexism/racism be included as part of the criteria for selection. Educational materials should affirm and encourage all children to probe and develop to their fullest potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-296X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-8430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10862967909547309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of literacy research, 1979-03, Vol.11 (1), p.73-77</ispartof><rights>1979 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2429-ca5d6126cf585a0165847d3fc72d7ed4bd339b5a0387610ab4d214b125ae141f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2429-ca5d6126cf585a0165847d3fc72d7ed4bd339b5a0387610ab4d214b125ae141f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole Schulte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenbaum, Gloria R.</creatorcontrib><title>Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace</title><title>Journal of literacy research</title><description>A presentation is given refuting the arguments presented in an earlier article that guidelines dealing with sexism and racism are a new form of censorship. It is suggested that the guidelines, never meant for fiction, have created an awareness of the lack of variety and balance in both fiction and textbooks. One function of the guidelines is to develop a consensus of what is meant when sexist and/or racist qualities are attributed to material. Since textbooks are not freely chosen by students, it is appropriate that sexism/racism be included as part of the criteria for selection. Educational materials should affirm and encourage all children to probe and develop to their fullest potential.</description><issn>1086-296X</issn><issn>0022-4111</issn><issn>1554-8430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG-5eeqayWdzUcriFxYEdcFbSJN02aW2S1KV_nsj601wDjMD7_sMw4vQOZAFkJJc5iaplkoTLbhiRB-gGQjBi5Izcpj3rBfZ8HaMTlLaklyC8Bm6qmLoL0b8Mtre2-gTrrovOyW8SsFf4wo_h1034XHAj5t-ncahx9mI6-EzdNaFU3TU2i6Fs985R6vbm9flfVE_3T0sq7pwlFNdOCu8BCpdK0phCUhRcuVZ6xT1KnjeeMZ0kxVWKgnENtxT4A1QYQNwaNkcwf6ui0NKMbRmFzfvNk4GiPkJwPwJIDOLPZPsOpjt8BH7_OI_wDdk61kB</recordid><startdate>197903</startdate><enddate>197903</enddate><creator>Johnson, Carole Schulte</creator><creator>Greenbaum, Gloria R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197903</creationdate><title>Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace</title><author>Johnson, Carole Schulte ; Greenbaum, Gloria R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2429-ca5d6126cf585a0165847d3fc72d7ed4bd339b5a0387610ab4d214b125ae141f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole Schulte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenbaum, Gloria R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of literacy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Carole Schulte</au><au>Greenbaum, Gloria R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace</atitle><jtitle>Journal of literacy research</jtitle><date>1979-03</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>73-77</pages><issn>1086-296X</issn><issn>0022-4111</issn><eissn>1554-8430</eissn><abstract>A presentation is given refuting the arguments presented in an earlier article that guidelines dealing with sexism and racism are a new form of censorship. It is suggested that the guidelines, never meant for fiction, have created an awareness of the lack of variety and balance in both fiction and textbooks. One function of the guidelines is to develop a consensus of what is meant when sexist and/or racist qualities are attributed to material. Since textbooks are not freely chosen by students, it is appropriate that sexism/racism be included as part of the criteria for selection. Educational materials should affirm and encourage all children to probe and develop to their fullest potential.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1080/10862967909547309</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1086-296X |
| ispartof | Journal of literacy research, 1979-03, Vol.11 (1), p.73-77 |
| issn | 1086-296X 0022-4111 1554-8430 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10862967909547309 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | Aren't Standards Always Used? A Reply to Kingston and Lovelace |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aren't%20Standards%20Always%20Used?%20A%20Reply%20to%20Kingston%20and%20Lovelace&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20literacy%20research&rft.au=Johnson,%20Carole%20Schulte&rft.date=1979-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=73-77&rft.issn=1086-296X&rft.eissn=1554-8430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10862967909547309&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1080_10862967909547309%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_10862967909547309&rfr_iscdi=true |