Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis
Objectives Human error has been recognized as one of the top causes of most accidents in mines. This study aimed to identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in one o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 2023-10, Vol.29 (4), p.1423-1428 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1428 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1423 |
| container_title | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Taheri, Mohammad Reza Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher Asilian, Hasan Ahmadi, Omran Sogandi, Fatemeh |
| description | Objectives Human error has been recognized as one of the top causes of most accidents in mines. This study aimed to identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in one of the copper mines in Iran. First, all tasks were analyzed by hierarchical task analysis (HTA). Then cognitive errors were assessed using the CREAM. Results. With respect to the basic CREAM results in the operational units, including extraction, crushing and processing, human error probability (HEP) was obtained as 0.056, 0.0315 and 0.0177, respectively. Based on the results of the extended CREAM, the types of errors identified for all tasks in the three operational units were mainly associated with execution (53.4%), observation (40%), interpretation (5%) and planning (1.6%). Also, the cognitive errors were related to execution, monitoring, observation, communication, diagnosis, recording and planning, respectively. Conclusion. The results showed that human error is very high in the operational units of the mine. Therefore, immediate actions are needed to improve safety performance in the mine units, which determine the role of various factors in human errors and can provide the possibility of implementing more effective interventions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10803548.2022.2135259 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2022_2135259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2724239810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-ccda2d17b1529a094183097cec0257e5df8d648790a6b8c033221e0ce748a2e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QchON1OTl_nKzlKqFiqC6DqkmTdtZCapyUyl_94OrVs3727OvfAOIbecTTgr2cNwRJaWE2AAE-Aig0yekRGIIk8kF-ycjAYmGaBLchXjF2MilXk-Im7hdhg7u9addWu66VvtKIbgA7WOLoJ2d5Eav91ioK11GGkfB7DbIJ29z6evdKUjVtS7U9f4tbOd3SEN2Fi9so3t9lQ73eyjjdfkotZNxJtTjsnn0_xj9pIs354Xs-kyMSB5lxhTaah4seIZSM1kykvBZGHQMMgKzKq6rPK0LCTT-ao0TAgAjsxgkZYaEMSY3B93t8F_94cHVWujwabRDn0fFRSQgpAlZwc0O6Im-BgD1mobbKvDXnGmBm3qz68a_KqT30Pv8dizrvah1T8-NJXq9L7xoT54MzYq8f_ELzjygh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724239810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Taheri, Mohammad Reza ; Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher ; Asilian, Hasan ; Ahmadi, Omran ; Sogandi, Fatemeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Taheri, Mohammad Reza ; Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher ; Asilian, Hasan ; Ahmadi, Omran ; Sogandi, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Human error has been recognized as one of the top causes of most accidents in mines. This study aimed to identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in one of the copper mines in Iran. First, all tasks were analyzed by hierarchical task analysis (HTA). Then cognitive errors were assessed using the CREAM. Results. With respect to the basic CREAM results in the operational units, including extraction, crushing and processing, human error probability (HEP) was obtained as 0.056, 0.0315 and 0.0177, respectively. Based on the results of the extended CREAM, the types of errors identified for all tasks in the three operational units were mainly associated with execution (53.4%), observation (40%), interpretation (5%) and planning (1.6%). Also, the cognitive errors were related to execution, monitoring, observation, communication, diagnosis, recording and planning, respectively. Conclusion. The results showed that human error is very high in the operational units of the mine. Therefore, immediate actions are needed to improve safety performance in the mine units, which determine the role of various factors in human errors and can provide the possibility of implementing more effective interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-3548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2135259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>cognitive reliability and error analysis method ; human error ; miner ; performance reliability</subject><ispartof>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2023-10, Vol.29 (4), p.1423-1428</ispartof><rights>2022 Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-ccda2d17b1529a094183097cec0257e5df8d648790a6b8c033221e0ce748a2e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9454-0598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taheri, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asilian, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, Omran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogandi, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis</title><title>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</title><description>Objectives Human error has been recognized as one of the top causes of most accidents in mines. This study aimed to identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in one of the copper mines in Iran. First, all tasks were analyzed by hierarchical task analysis (HTA). Then cognitive errors were assessed using the CREAM. Results. With respect to the basic CREAM results in the operational units, including extraction, crushing and processing, human error probability (HEP) was obtained as 0.056, 0.0315 and 0.0177, respectively. Based on the results of the extended CREAM, the types of errors identified for all tasks in the three operational units were mainly associated with execution (53.4%), observation (40%), interpretation (5%) and planning (1.6%). Also, the cognitive errors were related to execution, monitoring, observation, communication, diagnosis, recording and planning, respectively. Conclusion. The results showed that human error is very high in the operational units of the mine. Therefore, immediate actions are needed to improve safety performance in the mine units, which determine the role of various factors in human errors and can provide the possibility of implementing more effective interventions.</description><subject>cognitive reliability and error analysis method</subject><subject>human error</subject><subject>miner</subject><subject>performance reliability</subject><issn>1080-3548</issn><issn>2376-9130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_QchON1OTl_nKzlKqFiqC6DqkmTdtZCapyUyl_94OrVs3727OvfAOIbecTTgr2cNwRJaWE2AAE-Aig0yekRGIIk8kF-ycjAYmGaBLchXjF2MilXk-Im7hdhg7u9addWu66VvtKIbgA7WOLoJ2d5Eav91ioK11GGkfB7DbIJ29z6evdKUjVtS7U9f4tbOd3SEN2Fi9so3t9lQ73eyjjdfkotZNxJtTjsnn0_xj9pIs354Xs-kyMSB5lxhTaah4seIZSM1kykvBZGHQMMgKzKq6rPK0LCTT-ao0TAgAjsxgkZYaEMSY3B93t8F_94cHVWujwabRDn0fFRSQgpAlZwc0O6Im-BgD1mobbKvDXnGmBm3qz68a_KqT30Pv8dizrvah1T8-NJXq9L7xoT54MzYq8f_ELzjygh4</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Taheri, Mohammad Reza</creator><creator>Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher</creator><creator>Asilian, Hasan</creator><creator>Ahmadi, Omran</creator><creator>Sogandi, Fatemeh</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis</title><author>Taheri, Mohammad Reza ; Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher ; Asilian, Hasan ; Ahmadi, Omran ; Sogandi, Fatemeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-ccda2d17b1529a094183097cec0257e5df8d648790a6b8c033221e0ce748a2e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>cognitive reliability and error analysis method</topic><topic>human error</topic><topic>miner</topic><topic>performance reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taheri, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asilian, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, Omran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogandi, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taheri, Mohammad Reza</au><au>Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher</au><au>Asilian, Hasan</au><au>Ahmadi, Omran</au><au>Sogandi, Fatemeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1423</spage><epage>1428</epage><pages>1423-1428</pages><issn>1080-3548</issn><eissn>2376-9130</eissn><abstract>Objectives Human error has been recognized as one of the top causes of most accidents in mines. This study aimed to identify and assess cognitive errors among copper miners using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Methods. This cross-sectional study was carried out in one of the copper mines in Iran. First, all tasks were analyzed by hierarchical task analysis (HTA). Then cognitive errors were assessed using the CREAM. Results. With respect to the basic CREAM results in the operational units, including extraction, crushing and processing, human error probability (HEP) was obtained as 0.056, 0.0315 and 0.0177, respectively. Based on the results of the extended CREAM, the types of errors identified for all tasks in the three operational units were mainly associated with execution (53.4%), observation (40%), interpretation (5%) and planning (1.6%). Also, the cognitive errors were related to execution, monitoring, observation, communication, diagnosis, recording and planning, respectively. Conclusion. The results showed that human error is very high in the operational units of the mine. Therefore, immediate actions are needed to improve safety performance in the mine units, which determine the role of various factors in human errors and can provide the possibility of implementing more effective interventions.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/10803548.2022.2135259</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0598</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1080-3548 |
| ispartof | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2023-10, Vol.29 (4), p.1423-1428 |
| issn | 1080-3548 2376-9130 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2022_2135259 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | cognitive reliability and error analysis method human error miner performance reliability |
| title | Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20human%20error%20in%20Iran's%20copper%20mines%20using%20the%20CREAM%20based%20on%20human%20cognitive%20reliability%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20occupational%20safety%20and%20ergonomics&rft.au=Taheri,%20Mohammad%20Reza&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1423&rft.epage=1428&rft.pages=1423-1428&rft.issn=1080-3548&rft.eissn=2376-9130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10803548.2022.2135259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724239810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724239810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |