Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study
The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of impro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 2014-01, Vol.20 (3), p.385-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Masi, Donato Cagno, Enrico Micheli, Guido J.L. |
description | The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of improving the understanding of the OSH interventions issue is particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since they experience worse OSH conditions, and have fewer physical, economic and organizational resources if compared to larger enterprises; thus, SMEs strongly need to focus their few resources in the decision-making process so as to select and put in place only the most proper interventions. This exploratory study is based on interviews with safety officers of 5 SMEs, and it gives an overview of the key features of the actual intervention process in SMEs and of the contextual factors making this actual intervention process similar or dissimilar to the ideal case. The results show how much qualitative and experience driven the actual intervention process is; they should be used to direct the future research towards an increasingly applicable one, to enable practitioners from SMEs to develop, implement and evaluate their OSH interventions in an "ideal" way. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2014_11077059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560581882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-80aee5cd5af71f84f281234a40755c0edba0df5f1b4e707a57a4dd6a643a1bda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFP2zAQx60JNDq2r4D8gsQDKXZixy5vVSmjEhOTuj1O1jW2pyDHDnbSrd-eZG3HIy8-ne73951-CF1QMqVEkpvxKTiT05xQNqWUCEH47AOa5IUosxktyAmajFA2UmfoU0rPhBRsVpYf0VnOqZwJxibo153ZGhfa2v--xqumdaYxvhs6DF7j5RZcD__ap_UDXvnOxO04Dz7h2uP1t2W6xXP8vXahu8bLv60LEboQd3jd9Xr3GZ1acMl8OdRz9PN--WPxkD0-fV0t5o9ZxZjoMknAGF5pDlZQK5nNJc0LBowIziti9AaIttzSDTOCCOACmNYllKwAutFQnKOr_b9tDC-9SZ1q6lQZ58Cb0CdFeUm4pFLmA1ru0SqGlKKxqo11A3GnKFGjMHVUq0a16qh2CF4cdvSbxuj_saPLAbg8AJAqcDaCr-r0xkkhSUnHC-Z7rvY2xAb-hOi06mA3uDuGineOeQVXU5Vc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560581882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Masi, Donato ; Cagno, Enrico ; Micheli, Guido J.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Masi, Donato ; Cagno, Enrico ; Micheli, Guido J.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of improving the understanding of the OSH interventions issue is particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since they experience worse OSH conditions, and have fewer physical, economic and organizational resources if compared to larger enterprises; thus, SMEs strongly need to focus their few resources in the decision-making process so as to select and put in place only the most proper interventions. This exploratory study is based on interviews with safety officers of 5 SMEs, and it gives an overview of the key features of the actual intervention process in SMEs and of the contextual factors making this actual intervention process similar or dissimilar to the ideal case. The results show how much qualitative and experience driven the actual intervention process is; they should be used to direct the future research towards an increasingly applicable one, to enable practitioners from SMEs to develop, implement and evaluate their OSH interventions in an "ideal" way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-3548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25189744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warszawa: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Communication ; Decision Support Techniques ; decision-making ; Ergonomics. Workplace layout ; Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology ; exploratory study ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Industry ; Leadership ; Medical sciences ; Occupational Health ; Occupational medicine ; Organizational Culture ; OSH interventions ; Pilot Projects ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; SMEs ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2014-01, Vol.20 (3), p.385-405</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-80aee5cd5af71f84f281234a40755c0edba0df5f1b4e707a57a4dd6a643a1bda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-80aee5cd5af71f84f281234a40755c0edba0df5f1b4e707a57a4dd6a643a1bda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28780612$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Masi, Donato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagno, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheli, Guido J.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study</title><title>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</title><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><description>The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of improving the understanding of the OSH interventions issue is particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since they experience worse OSH conditions, and have fewer physical, economic and organizational resources if compared to larger enterprises; thus, SMEs strongly need to focus their few resources in the decision-making process so as to select and put in place only the most proper interventions. This exploratory study is based on interviews with safety officers of 5 SMEs, and it gives an overview of the key features of the actual intervention process in SMEs and of the contextual factors making this actual intervention process similar or dissimilar to the ideal case. The results show how much qualitative and experience driven the actual intervention process is; they should be used to direct the future research towards an increasingly applicable one, to enable practitioners from SMEs to develop, implement and evaluate their OSH interventions in an "ideal" way.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>decision-making</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Workplace layout</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology</subject><subject>exploratory study</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>OSH interventions</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>SMEs</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1080-3548</issn><issn>2376-9130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFP2zAQx60JNDq2r4D8gsQDKXZixy5vVSmjEhOTuj1O1jW2pyDHDnbSrd-eZG3HIy8-ne73951-CF1QMqVEkpvxKTiT05xQNqWUCEH47AOa5IUosxktyAmajFA2UmfoU0rPhBRsVpYf0VnOqZwJxibo153ZGhfa2v--xqumdaYxvhs6DF7j5RZcD__ap_UDXvnOxO04Dz7h2uP1t2W6xXP8vXahu8bLv60LEboQd3jd9Xr3GZ1acMl8OdRz9PN--WPxkD0-fV0t5o9ZxZjoMknAGF5pDlZQK5nNJc0LBowIziti9AaIttzSDTOCCOACmNYllKwAutFQnKOr_b9tDC-9SZ1q6lQZ58Cb0CdFeUm4pFLmA1ru0SqGlKKxqo11A3GnKFGjMHVUq0a16qh2CF4cdvSbxuj_saPLAbg8AJAqcDaCr-r0xkkhSUnHC-Z7rvY2xAb-hOi06mA3uDuGineOeQVXU5Vc</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Masi, Donato</creator><creator>Cagno, Enrico</creator><creator>Micheli, Guido J.L.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>CIOP-PIB</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study</title><author>Masi, Donato ; Cagno, Enrico ; Micheli, Guido J.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-80aee5cd5af71f84f281234a40755c0edba0df5f1b4e707a57a4dd6a643a1bda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Workplace layout</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology</topic><topic>exploratory study</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>OSH interventions</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>SMEs</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Masi, Donato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagno, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheli, Guido J.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Masi, Donato</au><au>Cagno, Enrico</au><au>Micheli, Guido J.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>385-405</pages><issn>1080-3548</issn><eissn>2376-9130</eissn><abstract>The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of improving the understanding of the OSH interventions issue is particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since they experience worse OSH conditions, and have fewer physical, economic and organizational resources if compared to larger enterprises; thus, SMEs strongly need to focus their few resources in the decision-making process so as to select and put in place only the most proper interventions. This exploratory study is based on interviews with safety officers of 5 SMEs, and it gives an overview of the key features of the actual intervention process in SMEs and of the contextual factors making this actual intervention process similar or dissimilar to the ideal case. The results show how much qualitative and experience driven the actual intervention process is; they should be used to direct the future research towards an increasingly applicable one, to enable practitioners from SMEs to develop, implement and evaluate their OSH interventions in an "ideal" way.</abstract><cop>Warszawa</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>25189744</pmid><doi>10.1080/10803548.2014.11077059</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-3548 |
ispartof | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2014-01, Vol.20 (3), p.385-405 |
issn | 1080-3548 2376-9130 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2014_11077059 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Attitude Biological and medical sciences Communication Decision Support Techniques decision-making Ergonomics. Workplace layout Ergonomics. Workplace layout. Occupational psychology exploratory study Guidelines as Topic Humans Industry Leadership Medical sciences Occupational Health Occupational medicine Organizational Culture OSH interventions Pilot Projects Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine SMEs Time Factors |
title | Developing, Implementing and Evaluating OSH Interventions in SMEs: A Pilot, Exploratory Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing,%20Implementing%20and%20Evaluating%20OSH%20Interventions%20in%20SMEs:%20A%20Pilot,%20Exploratory%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20occupational%20safety%20and%20ergonomics&rft.au=Masi,%20Donato&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=385-405&rft.issn=1080-3548&rft.eissn=2376-9130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10803548.2014.11077059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560581882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560581882&rft_id=info:pmid/25189744&rfr_iscdi=true |