U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?

A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of contemporary China 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150
1. Verfasser: Wuthnow, Joel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 115
container_start_page 133
container_title The Journal of contemporary China
container_volume 28
creator Wuthnow, Joel
description A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10670564_2018_1497916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166064139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd_ghDwsFPrlyZNGy86Nn_BVHDuHLI0wYw2nUnH2H9vx-bV0_cenvf94EHomkBKoIRbAryAnLM0A1KmhIlCEH6CBoRxkQgGcNrnnkn20Dm6iHEFAFwIGKDZIp2nePTmvKtVZ4KqXWxG2Hk8jk5h5Ss8-XZejSL-NHHd-mjiHR7jd7PFc6M3wXU7PHW1aRp1f4nOrKqjuTreIVo8PX5NXpLZx_PrZDxLNKVllyxJJXguNC0Jy6GqDFVQUGZBUK00yTJasFyUudWClargtqKQGU60NoWh2ZIO0c1hdx3an42JnVy1m-D7lzIjnANnhIqeyg-UDm2MwVi5Dq5RYScJyL04-SdO7sXJo7i-93DoOW_b0KhtG-pKdmpXt8EG5bWLkv4_8Qt9wHGL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166064139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><source>Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Wuthnow, Joel</creator><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><description>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-0564</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Anxiety ; Chinese languages ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; Dependency theory ; Intelligence ; International cooperation ; International organizations ; International relations-US ; Management ; Security ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of contemporary China, 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><title>The Journal of contemporary China</title><description>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1067-0564</issn><issn>1469-9400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd_ghDwsFPrlyZNGy86Nn_BVHDuHLI0wYw2nUnH2H9vx-bV0_cenvf94EHomkBKoIRbAryAnLM0A1KmhIlCEH6CBoRxkQgGcNrnnkn20Dm6iHEFAFwIGKDZIp2nePTmvKtVZ4KqXWxG2Hk8jk5h5Ss8-XZejSL-NHHd-mjiHR7jd7PFc6M3wXU7PHW1aRp1f4nOrKqjuTreIVo8PX5NXpLZx_PrZDxLNKVllyxJJXguNC0Jy6GqDFVQUGZBUK00yTJasFyUudWClargtqKQGU60NoWh2ZIO0c1hdx3an42JnVy1m-D7lzIjnANnhIqeyg-UDm2MwVi5Dq5RYScJyL04-SdO7sXJo7i-93DoOW_b0KhtG-pKdmpXt8EG5bWLkv4_8Qt9wHGL</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Wuthnow, Joel</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><author>Wuthnow, Joel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of contemporary China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wuthnow, Joel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of contemporary China</jtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>115</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>133-150</pages><issn>1067-0564</issn><eissn>1469-9400</eissn><abstract>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-0564
ispartof The Journal of contemporary China, 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150
issn 1067-0564
1469-9400
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10670564_2018_1497916
source Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Alliances
Anxiety
Chinese languages
Cooperation
Coordination
Dependency theory
Intelligence
International cooperation
International organizations
International relations-US
Management
Security
Values
title U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20'Minilateralism'%20in%20Asia%20and%20China's%20Responses:%20A%20New%20Security%20Dilemma?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20contemporary%20China&rft.au=Wuthnow,%20Joel&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=115&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=133-150&rft.issn=1067-0564&rft.eissn=1469-9400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2166064139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166064139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true