U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?
A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of contemporary China 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 150 |
---|---|
container_issue | 115 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | The Journal of contemporary China |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Wuthnow, Joel |
description | A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10670564_2018_1497916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166064139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd_ghDwsFPrlyZNGy86Nn_BVHDuHLI0wYw2nUnH2H9vx-bV0_cenvf94EHomkBKoIRbAryAnLM0A1KmhIlCEH6CBoRxkQgGcNrnnkn20Dm6iHEFAFwIGKDZIp2nePTmvKtVZ4KqXWxG2Hk8jk5h5Ss8-XZejSL-NHHd-mjiHR7jd7PFc6M3wXU7PHW1aRp1f4nOrKqjuTreIVo8PX5NXpLZx_PrZDxLNKVllyxJJXguNC0Jy6GqDFVQUGZBUK00yTJasFyUudWClargtqKQGU60NoWh2ZIO0c1hdx3an42JnVy1m-D7lzIjnANnhIqeyg-UDm2MwVi5Dq5RYScJyL04-SdO7sXJo7i-93DoOW_b0KhtG-pKdmpXt8EG5bWLkv4_8Qt9wHGL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166064139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><source>Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Wuthnow, Joel</creator><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><description>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-0564</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Anxiety ; Chinese languages ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; Dependency theory ; Intelligence ; International cooperation ; International organizations ; International relations-US ; Management ; Security ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of contemporary China, 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><title>The Journal of contemporary China</title><description>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1067-0564</issn><issn>1469-9400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd_ghDwsFPrlyZNGy86Nn_BVHDuHLI0wYw2nUnH2H9vx-bV0_cenvf94EHomkBKoIRbAryAnLM0A1KmhIlCEH6CBoRxkQgGcNrnnkn20Dm6iHEFAFwIGKDZIp2nePTmvKtVZ4KqXWxG2Hk8jk5h5Ss8-XZejSL-NHHd-mjiHR7jd7PFc6M3wXU7PHW1aRp1f4nOrKqjuTreIVo8PX5NXpLZx_PrZDxLNKVllyxJJXguNC0Jy6GqDFVQUGZBUK00yTJasFyUudWClargtqKQGU60NoWh2ZIO0c1hdx3an42JnVy1m-D7lzIjnANnhIqeyg-UDm2MwVi5Dq5RYScJyL04-SdO7sXJo7i-93DoOW_b0KhtG-pKdmpXt8EG5bWLkv4_8Qt9wHGL</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Wuthnow, Joel</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</title><author>Wuthnow, Joel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b1d9659c381450dde3a0734f093cac1223745985fc948a76fd302e61cce7e32b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wuthnow, Joel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of contemporary China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wuthnow, Joel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of contemporary China</jtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>115</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>133-150</pages><issn>1067-0564</issn><eissn>1469-9400</eissn><abstract>A key feature of Asia's evolving strategic landscape is U.S. efforts to promote policy coordination and interoperability among its allies and partners, through dialogues, exercises, intelligence-sharing agreements, and other means. Though useful in addressing practical issues and underscoring shared values, a concern is that these 'minilateral' activities could exacerbate Chinese fears of 'encirclement' and lead to strategic or economic counter-moves. However, this article suggests that a new 'security dilemma' in Asia is not likely. Although Chinese officials and analysts are apprehensive about U.S. bilateral alliance developments, they have largely discounted the emergence of an 'Asian NATO' under U.S. stewardship. This is due to perceived divergences between U.S. allies, many states' economic dependence on China, and U.S. self-restraint. This should open possibilities for greater minilateral cooperation under most conditions.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-0564 |
ispartof | The Journal of contemporary China, 2019-01, Vol.28 (115), p.133-150 |
issn | 1067-0564 1469-9400 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10670564_2018_1497916 |
source | Political Science Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Alliances Anxiety Chinese languages Cooperation Coordination Dependency theory Intelligence International cooperation International organizations International relations-US Management Security Values |
title | U.S. 'Minilateralism' in Asia and China's Responses: A New Security Dilemma? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20'Minilateralism'%20in%20Asia%20and%20China's%20Responses:%20A%20New%20Security%20Dilemma?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20contemporary%20China&rft.au=Wuthnow,%20Joel&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=115&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=133-150&rft.issn=1067-0564&rft.eissn=1469-9400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10670564.2018.1497916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2166064139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166064139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |