"May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations
An introduction, even a short one, makes audiences more willing to listen to a speech, think more highly of the speaker, and understand a speech better than when no introduction is given. Two experiments at Delft University of Technology support this conclusion. Subjects viewed videotapes of profess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Technical communication quarterly 1998-07, Vol.7 (3), p.271-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | Technical communication quarterly |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Andeweg, Bas A. de Jong, Jaap C. Hoeken, Hans |
description | An introduction, even a short one, makes audiences more willing to listen to a speech, think more highly of the speaker, and understand a speech better than when no introduction is given. Two experiments at Delft University of Technology support this conclusion. Subjects viewed videotapes of professional presentations on the topic of Sick Building Syndrome. In one experiment, subjects rated the effectiveness of three introductory or "exordial"; techniques in gaining audience attention: an anecdote, an ethical appeal, and a "your problem"; approach. Results indicate that audiences do respond to exordial techniques, and in a predictable manner. In the second experiment, two speeches with anecdotal openers were tested against one without any introduction. The anecdotes led to significantly higher ratings of the presentation's comprehensibility and interest, as well as the speaker's credibility. The presence of an anecdote also resulted in higher retention scores. Oddly enough, the relevance of the anecdote did not seem to make a difference in the ratings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10572259809364631 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10572259809364631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ573250</ericid><sourcerecordid>33468789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3a46b92be5d76b219b7417883746b532046e0c0178b0b002a5a367fdd15db5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcfQPCh7MG3av40TauCyJg6mfgyn0Papiyja2aS6frtvaXDB4cYArnce36HmxME5xhdYZSia4wYJ4RlKcpoEicUHwQDzGIS8YSwQ6hhHoGAHAcnzi0RnCwmg2A-epVtOA0X8lOFrdnYUHqvGq9Ncz-6vQknW2NLLevQq2LR6I-NcqFu4FbGrqTXQBkL47VVDjDZge40OKpk7dTZ7h0G74-T-fg5mr09TccPs6igMfIRlXGSZyRXrORJTnCW8xjzNKUc-owSFCcKFQhaOcoRIpJJmvCqLDErc1aldBhc9r5ra7rNvFhpV6i6lo0yGycYjylnjIFw9Eu4hK82sJsgkBLNCEUgwr2osMY5qyqxtnolbSswEl3IYi9kYC56Rlld_OgnL4xTwjpL3o93eX0ZW5fCy7Y2trKyKbTbNxV-64G8-5ekf-_1DVGrm9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215439230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Andeweg, Bas A. ; de Jong, Jaap C. ; Hoeken, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Andeweg, Bas A. ; de Jong, Jaap C. ; Hoeken, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>An introduction, even a short one, makes audiences more willing to listen to a speech, think more highly of the speaker, and understand a speech better than when no introduction is given. Two experiments at Delft University of Technology support this conclusion. Subjects viewed videotapes of professional presentations on the topic of Sick Building Syndrome. In one experiment, subjects rated the effectiveness of three introductory or "exordial"; techniques in gaining audience attention: an anecdote, an ethical appeal, and a "your problem"; approach. Results indicate that audiences do respond to exordial techniques, and in a predictable manner. In the second experiment, two speeches with anecdotal openers were tested against one without any introduction. The anecdotes led to significantly higher ratings of the presentation's comprehensibility and interest, as well as the speaker's credibility. The presence of an anecdote also resulted in higher retention scores. Oddly enough, the relevance of the anecdote did not seem to make a difference in the ratings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-2252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10572259809364631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Attention ; Audience Response ; Audiences ; Communication Research ; Communication Skills ; Conferences ; Credibility ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Foreign Countries ; Information communication ; Introductions ; Listening comprehension ; Oral Presentations ; Professionalism ; Public speaking ; Research Needs ; Rhetorical Theory ; Sick building syndrome ; Speaking ; Speech ; Speech Communication</subject><ispartof>Technical communication quarterly, 1998-07, Vol.7 (3), p.271-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1998</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Teachers of Technical Writing Summer 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3a46b92be5d76b219b7417883746b532046e0c0178b0b002a5a367fdd15db5f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3a46b92be5d76b219b7417883746b532046e0c0178b0b002a5a367fdd15db5f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ573250$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andeweg, Bas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Jaap C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeken, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>"May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations</title><title>Technical communication quarterly</title><description>An introduction, even a short one, makes audiences more willing to listen to a speech, think more highly of the speaker, and understand a speech better than when no introduction is given. Two experiments at Delft University of Technology support this conclusion. Subjects viewed videotapes of professional presentations on the topic of Sick Building Syndrome. In one experiment, subjects rated the effectiveness of three introductory or "exordial"; techniques in gaining audience attention: an anecdote, an ethical appeal, and a "your problem"; approach. Results indicate that audiences do respond to exordial techniques, and in a predictable manner. In the second experiment, two speeches with anecdotal openers were tested against one without any introduction. The anecdotes led to significantly higher ratings of the presentation's comprehensibility and interest, as well as the speaker's credibility. The presence of an anecdote also resulted in higher retention scores. Oddly enough, the relevance of the anecdote did not seem to make a difference in the ratings.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audience Response</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Communication Research</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Information communication</subject><subject>Introductions</subject><subject>Listening comprehension</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Rhetorical Theory</subject><subject>Sick building syndrome</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><issn>1057-2252</issn><issn>1542-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcfQPCh7MG3av40TauCyJg6mfgyn0Papiyja2aS6frtvaXDB4cYArnce36HmxME5xhdYZSia4wYJ4RlKcpoEicUHwQDzGIS8YSwQ6hhHoGAHAcnzi0RnCwmg2A-epVtOA0X8lOFrdnYUHqvGq9Ncz-6vQknW2NLLevQq2LR6I-NcqFu4FbGrqTXQBkL47VVDjDZge40OKpk7dTZ7h0G74-T-fg5mr09TccPs6igMfIRlXGSZyRXrORJTnCW8xjzNKUc-owSFCcKFQhaOcoRIpJJmvCqLDErc1aldBhc9r5ra7rNvFhpV6i6lo0yGycYjylnjIFw9Eu4hK82sJsgkBLNCEUgwr2osMY5qyqxtnolbSswEl3IYi9kYC56Rlld_OgnL4xTwjpL3o93eX0ZW5fCy7Y2trKyKbTbNxV-64G8-5ekf-_1DVGrm9c</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Andeweg, Bas A.</creator><creator>de Jong, Jaap C.</creator><creator>Hoeken, Hans</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>"May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations</title><author>Andeweg, Bas A. ; de Jong, Jaap C. ; Hoeken, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3a46b92be5d76b219b7417883746b532046e0c0178b0b002a5a367fdd15db5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audience Response</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Communication Research</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Information communication</topic><topic>Introductions</topic><topic>Listening comprehension</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Rhetorical Theory</topic><topic>Sick building syndrome</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andeweg, Bas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Jaap C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeken, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Technical communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andeweg, Bas A.</au><au>de Jong, Jaap C.</au><au>Hoeken, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ573250</ericid><atitle>"May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations</atitle><jtitle>Technical communication quarterly</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>271-284</pages><issn>1057-2252</issn><eissn>1542-7625</eissn><abstract>An introduction, even a short one, makes audiences more willing to listen to a speech, think more highly of the speaker, and understand a speech better than when no introduction is given. Two experiments at Delft University of Technology support this conclusion. Subjects viewed videotapes of professional presentations on the topic of Sick Building Syndrome. In one experiment, subjects rated the effectiveness of three introductory or "exordial"; techniques in gaining audience attention: an anecdote, an ethical appeal, and a "your problem"; approach. Results indicate that audiences do respond to exordial techniques, and in a predictable manner. In the second experiment, two speeches with anecdotal openers were tested against one without any introduction. The anecdotes led to significantly higher ratings of the presentation's comprehensibility and interest, as well as the speaker's credibility. The presence of an anecdote also resulted in higher retention scores. Oddly enough, the relevance of the anecdote did not seem to make a difference in the ratings.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10572259809364631</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-2252 |
ispartof | Technical communication quarterly, 1998-07, Vol.7 (3), p.271-284 |
issn | 1057-2252 1542-7625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10572259809364631 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Attention Audience Response Audiences Communication Research Communication Skills Conferences Credibility Ethics Evaluation Experiments Foreign Countries Information communication Introductions Listening comprehension Oral Presentations Professionalism Public speaking Research Needs Rhetorical Theory Sick building syndrome Speaking Speech Speech Communication |
title | "May I have your attention?";: Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22May%20I%20have%20your%20attention?%22;:%20Exordial%20techniques%20in%20informative%20oral%20presentations&rft.jtitle=Technical%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Andeweg,%20Bas%20A.&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=271-284&rft.issn=1057-2252&rft.eissn=1542-7625&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10572259809364631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E33468789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215439230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ573250&rfr_iscdi=true |