Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice

In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the learning sciences 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186
Hauptverfasser: Janssen, Fred, Westbroek, Hanna, Doyle, Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 1
container_start_page 176
container_title The Journal of the learning sciences
container_volume 24
creator Janssen, Fred
Westbroek, Hanna
Doyle, Walter
description In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2014_954751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1051944</ericid><jstor_id>43828554</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43828554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOD_-gULA686TJmkTb0TG_GLiQGXehSxNMbNbZpIp-_e2Vid44dUJvM97TniS5AhDHwOHUwwMOIW8nwGmfcFowfBW0sOMZGnBQWw37wZJW2Y32QthBgAMg-glz2OvdLRa1Tau0UNcldaEM3TtPlB06M69G3Tp3RxNXlREE-dfA7ILNPZ2oe2yNi30N_raZw6SnUrVwRx-z_3k6XL4OLhOR_dXN4OLUapJIWI6VUpXLMOUGjBFzkmFM9AaKkMKluOsyAipSiX4NAdeqlKZAjOucyHEVNEm3E9Our1L795WJkQ5cyu_aE5KnDPGKcE4ayjaUdq7ELyp5NLbufJriUG2DuWPQ9k6lJ3Dpnbc1Yy3elMZ3jYwFpT-5rMQnd8AlPCMM9bm511uF5Xzc_XhfF3KqNa185VXjcMgyb8_-ASpHYmv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655843112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLSBE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Change Strategies ; Curriculum Implementation ; Educational Change ; Educational Practices ; Educational Principles ; Educational Strategies ; Educational Theories ; Heuristics ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Innovation ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Praxis ; Reader Response ; REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43828554$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43828554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927,58019,58252</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1051944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbroek, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Curriculum Implementation</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Innovation</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Praxis</subject><subject>Reader Response</subject><subject>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOD_-gULA686TJmkTb0TG_GLiQGXehSxNMbNbZpIp-_e2Vid44dUJvM97TniS5AhDHwOHUwwMOIW8nwGmfcFowfBW0sOMZGnBQWw37wZJW2Y32QthBgAMg-glz2OvdLRa1Tau0UNcldaEM3TtPlB06M69G3Tp3RxNXlREE-dfA7ILNPZ2oe2yNi30N_raZw6SnUrVwRx-z_3k6XL4OLhOR_dXN4OLUapJIWI6VUpXLMOUGjBFzkmFM9AaKkMKluOsyAipSiX4NAdeqlKZAjOucyHEVNEm3E9Our1L795WJkQ5cyu_aE5KnDPGKcE4ayjaUdq7ELyp5NLbufJriUG2DuWPQ9k6lJ3Dpnbc1Yy3elMZ3jYwFpT-5rMQnd8AlPCMM9bm511uF5Xzc_XhfF3KqNa185VXjcMgyb8_-ASpHYmv</recordid><startdate>20150102</startdate><enddate>20150102</enddate><creator>Janssen, Fred</creator><creator>Westbroek, Hanna</creator><creator>Doyle, Walter</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150102</creationdate><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><author>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Curriculum Implementation</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Innovation</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Praxis</topic><topic>Reader Response</topic><topic>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbroek, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janssen, Fred</au><au>Westbroek, Hanna</au><au>Doyle, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1051944</ericid><atitle>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2015-01-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>176-186</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><coden>JLSBE3</coden><abstract>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10508406.2014.954751</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-8406
ispartof The Journal of the learning sciences, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186
issn 1050-8406
1532-7809
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2014_954751
source JSTOR
subjects Best Practices
Change Strategies
Curriculum Implementation
Educational Change
Educational Practices
Educational Principles
Educational Strategies
Educational Theories
Heuristics
Instructional Design
Instructional Innovation
Knowledge
Learning
Praxis
Reader Response
REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Theory Practice Relationship
title Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practicality%20Studies:%20How%20to%20Move%20From%20What%20Works%20in%20Principle%20to%20What%20Works%20in%20Practice&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Janssen,%20Fred&rft.date=2015-01-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=176-186&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft.coden=JLSBE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10508406.2014.954751&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43828554%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655843112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1051944&rft_jstor_id=43828554&rfr_iscdi=true