Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice
In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the learning sciences 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | The Journal of the learning sciences |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Janssen, Fred Westbroek, Hanna Doyle, Walter |
description | In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2014_954751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1051944</ericid><jstor_id>43828554</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43828554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOD_-gULA686TJmkTb0TG_GLiQGXehSxNMbNbZpIp-_e2Vid44dUJvM97TniS5AhDHwOHUwwMOIW8nwGmfcFowfBW0sOMZGnBQWw37wZJW2Y32QthBgAMg-glz2OvdLRa1Tau0UNcldaEM3TtPlB06M69G3Tp3RxNXlREE-dfA7ILNPZ2oe2yNi30N_raZw6SnUrVwRx-z_3k6XL4OLhOR_dXN4OLUapJIWI6VUpXLMOUGjBFzkmFM9AaKkMKluOsyAipSiX4NAdeqlKZAjOucyHEVNEm3E9Our1L795WJkQ5cyu_aE5KnDPGKcE4ayjaUdq7ELyp5NLbufJriUG2DuWPQ9k6lJ3Dpnbc1Yy3elMZ3jYwFpT-5rMQnd8AlPCMM9bm511uF5Xzc_XhfF3KqNa185VXjcMgyb8_-ASpHYmv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655843112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLSBE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Change Strategies ; Curriculum Implementation ; Educational Change ; Educational Practices ; Educational Principles ; Educational Strategies ; Educational Theories ; Heuristics ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Innovation ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Praxis ; Reader Response ; REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43828554$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43828554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927,58019,58252</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1051944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbroek, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Curriculum Implementation</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Innovation</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Praxis</subject><subject>Reader Response</subject><subject>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOD_-gULA686TJmkTb0TG_GLiQGXehSxNMbNbZpIp-_e2Vid44dUJvM97TniS5AhDHwOHUwwMOIW8nwGmfcFowfBW0sOMZGnBQWw37wZJW2Y32QthBgAMg-glz2OvdLRa1Tau0UNcldaEM3TtPlB06M69G3Tp3RxNXlREE-dfA7ILNPZ2oe2yNi30N_raZw6SnUrVwRx-z_3k6XL4OLhOR_dXN4OLUapJIWI6VUpXLMOUGjBFzkmFM9AaKkMKluOsyAipSiX4NAdeqlKZAjOucyHEVNEm3E9Our1L795WJkQ5cyu_aE5KnDPGKcE4ayjaUdq7ELyp5NLbufJriUG2DuWPQ9k6lJ3Dpnbc1Yy3elMZ3jYwFpT-5rMQnd8AlPCMM9bm511uF5Xzc_XhfF3KqNa185VXjcMgyb8_-ASpHYmv</recordid><startdate>20150102</startdate><enddate>20150102</enddate><creator>Janssen, Fred</creator><creator>Westbroek, Hanna</creator><creator>Doyle, Walter</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150102</creationdate><title>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</title><author>Janssen, Fred ; Westbroek, Hanna ; Doyle, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-baacf52144e0e7683f120cc0fe3756127233fda98b608dadae7158c6999ba4233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Curriculum Implementation</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Innovation</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Praxis</topic><topic>Reader Response</topic><topic>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbroek, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janssen, Fred</au><au>Westbroek, Hanna</au><au>Doyle, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1051944</ericid><atitle>Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2015-01-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>176-186</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><coden>JLSBE3</coden><abstract>In his article "Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder," Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)-"principled know-how and know-why"-to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10508406.2014.954751</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-8406 |
ispartof | The Journal of the learning sciences, 2015-01, Vol.24 (1), p.176-186 |
issn | 1050-8406 1532-7809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2014_954751 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | Best Practices Change Strategies Curriculum Implementation Educational Change Educational Practices Educational Principles Educational Strategies Educational Theories Heuristics Instructional Design Instructional Innovation Knowledge Learning Praxis Reader Response REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS Teachers Teaching Methods Theory Practice Relationship |
title | Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practicality%20Studies:%20How%20to%20Move%20From%20What%20Works%20in%20Principle%20to%20What%20Works%20in%20Practice&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Janssen,%20Fred&rft.date=2015-01-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=176-186&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft.coden=JLSBE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10508406.2014.954751&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43828554%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655843112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1051944&rft_jstor_id=43828554&rfr_iscdi=true |