Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study

Little research has been conducted considering how to improve the usability of voting systems for people with hidden barriers, including voters with dyslexia, non-native English voters, and voters with arthritis. This article explores usability issues for people with hidden barriers through a series...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of human-computer interaction 2016-02, Vol.32 (2), p.103-118
Hauptverfasser: Harley, Linda, Kline, Keith, Bell, Carrie, Baranak, Andrew, Michelson, Stuart, Farmer, Sarah, Fain, Brad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title International journal of human-computer interaction
container_volume 32
creator Harley, Linda
Kline, Keith
Bell, Carrie
Baranak, Andrew
Michelson, Stuart
Farmer, Sarah
Fain, Brad
description Little research has been conducted considering how to improve the usability of voting systems for people with hidden barriers, including voters with dyslexia, non-native English voters, and voters with arthritis. This article explores usability issues for people with hidden barriers through a series of interviews and usability tests of a web-based Voting Application. First, voters with and without dyslexia preferred using a Helvetica font over custom-designed dyslexia fonts called Lexia Readable and Open Dyslexic. Second, voters whose native language was English, Spanish, or Chinese preferred ballots in their native languages that were written in Plain Language style over ballots written in Traditional Language style. Third, voters with arthritis preferred a multicolumn ballot layout over a scroll ballot layout or multipage ballot layout because voters were able to see all candidates at a glance. Last, voters with arthritis preferred simpler user input devices, and therefore preferred a 2-button or 3-button input device over a 5-button input device. These results serve to inform designers on how to improve voting systems so that they are usable for voters with hidden barriers.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10447318.2015.1116759
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2015_1116759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3950208051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-26a22213bd0ca1e651fd4f4eb643cc9547a8cb62fa5435ba75426df4ac5579b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4soOKcfQQh48dKZ16b15JwvE4YKc3oMaZrOjLaZSYv025uyefHg6Xnh9_x5-EXROYITBFN4hSClnKB0giFiE4RQwll2EI0QIzgOLTwMfWDiATqOTrzfQAgxZGQUPd9pb9aNadZg5WVeafBu22Fa9r7VtQeldcNKOw8-TPsJ5qYodANupXMmLK_BFLyayrZg2XZFfxodlbLy-mxfx9Hq4f5tNo8XL49Ps-kiVoSjNsaJxBgjkhdQSaQThsqCllTnCSVKZYxymao8waVklLBcckZxUpRUKsZ4lhMyji53uVtnvzrtW1Ebr3RVyUbbzgvEM4I5S1MY0Is_6MZ2rgnfBSqhHPIEDYFsRylnvXe6FFtnaul6gaAYLItfy2KwLPaWw93N7s40wVQtv62rCtHKvrKudLJRxgvyf8QPKO-B4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764707613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Harley, Linda ; Kline, Keith ; Bell, Carrie ; Baranak, Andrew ; Michelson, Stuart ; Farmer, Sarah ; Fain, Brad</creator><creatorcontrib>Harley, Linda ; Kline, Keith ; Bell, Carrie ; Baranak, Andrew ; Michelson, Stuart ; Farmer, Sarah ; Fain, Brad</creatorcontrib><description>Little research has been conducted considering how to improve the usability of voting systems for people with hidden barriers, including voters with dyslexia, non-native English voters, and voters with arthritis. This article explores usability issues for people with hidden barriers through a series of interviews and usability tests of a web-based Voting Application. First, voters with and without dyslexia preferred using a Helvetica font over custom-designed dyslexia fonts called Lexia Readable and Open Dyslexic. Second, voters whose native language was English, Spanish, or Chinese preferred ballots in their native languages that were written in Plain Language style over ballots written in Traditional Language style. Third, voters with arthritis preferred a multicolumn ballot layout over a scroll ballot layout or multipage ballot layout because voters were able to see all candidates at a glance. Last, voters with arthritis preferred simpler user input devices, and therefore preferred a 2-button or 3-button input device over a 5-button input device. These results serve to inform designers on how to improve voting systems so that they are usable for voters with hidden barriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-7318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1044-7318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1116759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJHIEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norwood: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Barriers ; Dyslexia ; Fonts ; Human-computer interaction ; Input devices ; Layouts ; Online voting ; Pilots ; Usability ; Usability testing ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting machines ; Voting systems</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer interaction, 2016-02, Vol.32 (2), p.103-118</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-26a22213bd0ca1e651fd4f4eb643cc9547a8cb62fa5435ba75426df4ac5579b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-26a22213bd0ca1e651fd4f4eb643cc9547a8cb62fa5435ba75426df4ac5579b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harley, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranak, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelson, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fain, Brad</creatorcontrib><title>Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study</title><title>International journal of human-computer interaction</title><description>Little research has been conducted considering how to improve the usability of voting systems for people with hidden barriers, including voters with dyslexia, non-native English voters, and voters with arthritis. This article explores usability issues for people with hidden barriers through a series of interviews and usability tests of a web-based Voting Application. First, voters with and without dyslexia preferred using a Helvetica font over custom-designed dyslexia fonts called Lexia Readable and Open Dyslexic. Second, voters whose native language was English, Spanish, or Chinese preferred ballots in their native languages that were written in Plain Language style over ballots written in Traditional Language style. Third, voters with arthritis preferred a multicolumn ballot layout over a scroll ballot layout or multipage ballot layout because voters were able to see all candidates at a glance. Last, voters with arthritis preferred simpler user input devices, and therefore preferred a 2-button or 3-button input device over a 5-button input device. These results serve to inform designers on how to improve voting systems so that they are usable for voters with hidden barriers.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Fonts</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Input devices</subject><subject>Layouts</subject><subject>Online voting</subject><subject>Pilots</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Usability testing</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting machines</subject><subject>Voting systems</subject><issn>1044-7318</issn><issn>1532-7590</issn><issn>1044-7318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4soOKcfQQh48dKZ16b15JwvE4YKc3oMaZrOjLaZSYv025uyefHg6Xnh9_x5-EXROYITBFN4hSClnKB0giFiE4RQwll2EI0QIzgOLTwMfWDiATqOTrzfQAgxZGQUPd9pb9aNadZg5WVeafBu22Fa9r7VtQeldcNKOw8-TPsJ5qYodANupXMmLK_BFLyayrZg2XZFfxodlbLy-mxfx9Hq4f5tNo8XL49Ps-kiVoSjNsaJxBgjkhdQSaQThsqCllTnCSVKZYxymao8waVklLBcckZxUpRUKsZ4lhMyji53uVtnvzrtW1Ebr3RVyUbbzgvEM4I5S1MY0Is_6MZ2rgnfBSqhHPIEDYFsRylnvXe6FFtnaul6gaAYLItfy2KwLPaWw93N7s40wVQtv62rCtHKvrKudLJRxgvyf8QPKO-B4A</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Harley, Linda</creator><creator>Kline, Keith</creator><creator>Bell, Carrie</creator><creator>Baranak, Andrew</creator><creator>Michelson, Stuart</creator><creator>Farmer, Sarah</creator><creator>Fain, Brad</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study</title><author>Harley, Linda ; Kline, Keith ; Bell, Carrie ; Baranak, Andrew ; Michelson, Stuart ; Farmer, Sarah ; Fain, Brad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-26a22213bd0ca1e651fd4f4eb643cc9547a8cb62fa5435ba75426df4ac5579b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Fonts</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Input devices</topic><topic>Layouts</topic><topic>Online voting</topic><topic>Pilots</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Usability testing</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting machines</topic><topic>Voting systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harley, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranak, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelson, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fain, Brad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer interaction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harley, Linda</au><au>Kline, Keith</au><au>Bell, Carrie</au><au>Baranak, Andrew</au><au>Michelson, Stuart</au><au>Farmer, Sarah</au><au>Fain, Brad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer interaction</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>103-118</pages><issn>1044-7318</issn><eissn>1532-7590</eissn><eissn>1044-7318</eissn><coden>IJHIEC</coden><abstract>Little research has been conducted considering how to improve the usability of voting systems for people with hidden barriers, including voters with dyslexia, non-native English voters, and voters with arthritis. This article explores usability issues for people with hidden barriers through a series of interviews and usability tests of a web-based Voting Application. First, voters with and without dyslexia preferred using a Helvetica font over custom-designed dyslexia fonts called Lexia Readable and Open Dyslexic. Second, voters whose native language was English, Spanish, or Chinese preferred ballots in their native languages that were written in Plain Language style over ballots written in Traditional Language style. Third, voters with arthritis preferred a multicolumn ballot layout over a scroll ballot layout or multipage ballot layout because voters were able to see all candidates at a glance. Last, voters with arthritis preferred simpler user input devices, and therefore preferred a 2-button or 3-button input device over a 5-button input device. These results serve to inform designers on how to improve voting systems so that they are usable for voters with hidden barriers.</abstract><cop>Norwood</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/10447318.2015.1116759</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-7318
ispartof International journal of human-computer interaction, 2016-02, Vol.32 (2), p.103-118
issn 1044-7318
1532-7590
1044-7318
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2015_1116759
source Business Source Complete
subjects Arthritis
Barriers
Dyslexia
Fonts
Human-computer interaction
Input devices
Layouts
Online voting
Pilots
Usability
Usability testing
Voter behavior
Voters
Voting machines
Voting systems
title Designing Usable Voting Systems for Voters With Hidden Barriers: A Pilot Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20Usable%20Voting%20Systems%20for%20Voters%20With%20Hidden%20Barriers:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20interaction&rft.au=Harley,%20Linda&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=103-118&rft.issn=1044-7318&rft.eissn=1532-7590&rft.coden=IJHIEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10447318.2015.1116759&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3950208051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764707613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true