Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state

This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of international affairs 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514
1. Verfasser: Hundt, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 514
container_issue 5
container_start_page 499
container_title Australian journal of international affairs
container_volume 68
creator Hundt, David
description This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10357718.2014.886667
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10357718_2014_886667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210129043059</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1660014127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gYsBN27mNiffsxCRUm2x4EbBXTjNx23KzOSa5Cr992Ycu3EhXeUQnvflHJ6uew1kB0STMyBMKAV6RwnwndZSSvWkOwEuxcAY_f60zQ0ZVuZ596KUO0KA8lGcdO8ubFrSHG1vcyyx9HHpP6fsscfF9fXW987vMzrv2vDTT-kw-6Xi1JeK1b_sngWcin_19z3tvn28-Hp-OVx_-XR1_uF6sJKJOrhwg85Z50HzgCMVnGgRPJFOUkEkYNCec6YpUnXjGNdSMau4Yo6oMUBgp93brfeQ04-jL9XMsVg_Tbj4dCwGpGwXcaDqEahoJKNaPwIFMmo1woq--Qe9S8e8tJsNCMk51cDHRvGNsjmVkn0whxxnzPcGiFlNmQdTZjVlNlMtdrnF8hyrwX0sh2qKx2xvTVxC-vOd8t64FNcmxkA-YJRQaC5HwhkR6wbvt6oth79SnpypeD-lHDIuNhbD_rvMby1Qr-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564428149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Hundt, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7718</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-332X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2014.886667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Routledge</publisher><subject>Asians ; Business ; Business government relations ; Capitalism ; chaebol ; Conflict ; Conglomerate corporations ; developmental state ; Economic aspects ; Economic conditions ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Economic development ; Economic performance ; Elite ; Finance ; Financial crisis ; Foreign affairs ; Global economy ; Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009) ; Growth rates ; Indexes (Measures) ; International Cooperation ; Korea ; Leadership ; neo-liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Political economy ; Questioning ; Reorganization ; South Korea ; state-business relations ; strategic intent</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of international affairs, 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514</ispartof><rights>2014 Australian Institute of International Affairs 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27852,27853,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><title>Australian journal of international affairs</title><description>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business government relations</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>chaebol</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conglomerate corporations</subject><subject>developmental state</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>Elite</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial crisis</subject><subject>Foreign affairs</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009)</subject><subject>Growth rates</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>neo-liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Reorganization</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>state-business relations</subject><subject>strategic intent</subject><issn>1035-7718</issn><issn>1465-332X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gYsBN27mNiffsxCRUm2x4EbBXTjNx23KzOSa5Cr992Ycu3EhXeUQnvflHJ6uew1kB0STMyBMKAV6RwnwndZSSvWkOwEuxcAY_f60zQ0ZVuZ596KUO0KA8lGcdO8ubFrSHG1vcyyx9HHpP6fsscfF9fXW987vMzrv2vDTT-kw-6Xi1JeK1b_sngWcin_19z3tvn28-Hp-OVx_-XR1_uF6sJKJOrhwg85Z50HzgCMVnGgRPJFOUkEkYNCec6YpUnXjGNdSMau4Yo6oMUBgp93brfeQ04-jL9XMsVg_Tbj4dCwGpGwXcaDqEahoJKNaPwIFMmo1woq--Qe9S8e8tJsNCMk51cDHRvGNsjmVkn0whxxnzPcGiFlNmQdTZjVlNlMtdrnF8hyrwX0sh2qKx2xvTVxC-vOd8t64FNcmxkA-YJRQaC5HwhkR6wbvt6oth79SnpypeD-lHDIuNhbD_rvMby1Qr-8</recordid><startdate>20141020</startdate><enddate>20141020</enddate><creator>Hundt, David</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141020</creationdate><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><author>Hundt, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business government relations</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>chaebol</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conglomerate corporations</topic><topic>developmental state</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>Elite</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial crisis</topic><topic>Foreign affairs</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009)</topic><topic>Growth rates</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>neo-liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Reorganization</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>state-business relations</topic><topic>strategic intent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hundt, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle><date>2014-10-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>499-514</pages><issn>1035-7718</issn><eissn>1465-332X</eissn><abstract>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10357718.2014.886667</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1035-7718
ispartof Australian journal of international affairs, 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514
issn 1035-7718
1465-332X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10357718_2014_886667
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Asians
Business
Business government relations
Capitalism
chaebol
Conflict
Conglomerate corporations
developmental state
Economic aspects
Economic conditions
Economic Crises
Economic crisis
Economic development
Economic performance
Elite
Finance
Financial crisis
Foreign affairs
Global economy
Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009)
Growth rates
Indexes (Measures)
International Cooperation
Korea
Leadership
neo-liberalism
Neoliberalism
Political economy
Questioning
Reorganization
South Korea
state-business relations
strategic intent
title Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20crisis%20in%20Korea%20and%20the%20degraded%20developmental%20state&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Hundt,%20David&rft.date=2014-10-20&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=499-514&rft.issn=1035-7718&rft.eissn=1465-332X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357718.2014.886667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660014127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564428149&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210129043059&rfr_iscdi=true