Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state
This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian journal of international affairs 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 514 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | Australian journal of international affairs |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Hundt, David |
description | This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10357718.2014.886667 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10357718_2014_886667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210129043059</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1660014127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gYsBN27mNiffsxCRUm2x4EbBXTjNx23KzOSa5Cr992Ycu3EhXeUQnvflHJ6uew1kB0STMyBMKAV6RwnwndZSSvWkOwEuxcAY_f60zQ0ZVuZ596KUO0KA8lGcdO8ubFrSHG1vcyyx9HHpP6fsscfF9fXW987vMzrv2vDTT-kw-6Xi1JeK1b_sngWcin_19z3tvn28-Hp-OVx_-XR1_uF6sJKJOrhwg85Z50HzgCMVnGgRPJFOUkEkYNCec6YpUnXjGNdSMau4Yo6oMUBgp93brfeQ04-jL9XMsVg_Tbj4dCwGpGwXcaDqEahoJKNaPwIFMmo1woq--Qe9S8e8tJsNCMk51cDHRvGNsjmVkn0whxxnzPcGiFlNmQdTZjVlNlMtdrnF8hyrwX0sh2qKx2xvTVxC-vOd8t64FNcmxkA-YJRQaC5HwhkR6wbvt6oth79SnpypeD-lHDIuNhbD_rvMby1Qr-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564428149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Hundt, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7718</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-332X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2014.886667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Routledge</publisher><subject>Asians ; Business ; Business government relations ; Capitalism ; chaebol ; Conflict ; Conglomerate corporations ; developmental state ; Economic aspects ; Economic conditions ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Economic development ; Economic performance ; Elite ; Finance ; Financial crisis ; Foreign affairs ; Global economy ; Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009) ; Growth rates ; Indexes (Measures) ; International Cooperation ; Korea ; Leadership ; neo-liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Political economy ; Questioning ; Reorganization ; South Korea ; state-business relations ; strategic intent</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of international affairs, 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514</ispartof><rights>2014 Australian Institute of International Affairs 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27852,27853,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><title>Australian journal of international affairs</title><description>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business government relations</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>chaebol</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conglomerate corporations</subject><subject>developmental state</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>Elite</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial crisis</subject><subject>Foreign affairs</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009)</subject><subject>Growth rates</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>neo-liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Reorganization</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>state-business relations</subject><subject>strategic intent</subject><issn>1035-7718</issn><issn>1465-332X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gYsBN27mNiffsxCRUm2x4EbBXTjNx23KzOSa5Cr992Ycu3EhXeUQnvflHJ6uew1kB0STMyBMKAV6RwnwndZSSvWkOwEuxcAY_f60zQ0ZVuZ596KUO0KA8lGcdO8ubFrSHG1vcyyx9HHpP6fsscfF9fXW987vMzrv2vDTT-kw-6Xi1JeK1b_sngWcin_19z3tvn28-Hp-OVx_-XR1_uF6sJKJOrhwg85Z50HzgCMVnGgRPJFOUkEkYNCec6YpUnXjGNdSMau4Yo6oMUBgp93brfeQ04-jL9XMsVg_Tbj4dCwGpGwXcaDqEahoJKNaPwIFMmo1woq--Qe9S8e8tJsNCMk51cDHRvGNsjmVkn0whxxnzPcGiFlNmQdTZjVlNlMtdrnF8hyrwX0sh2qKx2xvTVxC-vOd8t64FNcmxkA-YJRQaC5HwhkR6wbvt6oth79SnpypeD-lHDIuNhbD_rvMby1Qr-8</recordid><startdate>20141020</startdate><enddate>20141020</enddate><creator>Hundt, David</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141020</creationdate><title>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</title><author>Hundt, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-dfbaddcde184fa9254085fe06d625061af8e44382a27bd348673c7473d079f1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business government relations</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>chaebol</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conglomerate corporations</topic><topic>developmental state</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>Elite</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial crisis</topic><topic>Foreign affairs</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009)</topic><topic>Growth rates</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>neo-liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Reorganization</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>state-business relations</topic><topic>strategic intent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hundt, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of international affairs</jtitle><date>2014-10-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>499-514</pages><issn>1035-7718</issn><eissn>1465-332X</eissn><abstract>This article analyses the Korean developmental state since the late 1990s, and argues that the state has continued to play a weighty role in the economy. The state guided industrial and financial restructuring after the Asian economic crisis, and intervened to stimulate the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis. In doing so, state elites have displayed a distinctive form of economic leadership that is largely consistent with the developmental state. Rather than focusing predominantly on performance-related indicators of state strength such as growth rates, this article analyses the deeper aspects of the developmental state, specifically its internal functions and its collaboration with business. The article brings politics back into analysis of the developmental state by questioning the assumption that strong economic performance is necessary for the maintenance of close ties between the state and chaebol. Instead, economic performance is better understood as a predictor of patterns of conflict and cooperation. Long-standing ties between the state and big business have endured two significant economic crises, even if the performance of the developmental state has been degraded compared to earlier decades.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10357718.2014.886667</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1035-7718 |
ispartof | Australian journal of international affairs, 2014-10, Vol.68 (5), p.499-514 |
issn | 1035-7718 1465-332X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10357718_2014_886667 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Asians Business Business government relations Capitalism chaebol Conflict Conglomerate corporations developmental state Economic aspects Economic conditions Economic Crises Economic crisis Economic development Economic performance Elite Finance Financial crisis Foreign affairs Global economy Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009) Growth rates Indexes (Measures) International Cooperation Korea Leadership neo-liberalism Neoliberalism Political economy Questioning Reorganization South Korea state-business relations strategic intent |
title | Economic crisis in Korea and the degraded developmental state |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20crisis%20in%20Korea%20and%20the%20degraded%20developmental%20state&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Hundt,%20David&rft.date=2014-10-20&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=499-514&rft.issn=1035-7718&rft.eissn=1465-332X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357718.2014.886667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660014127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564428149&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210129043059&rfr_iscdi=true |