China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations
This article studies the stance of China on free trade-related intellectual property in the context of the China-Japan-Korea (CJK) free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. It analyses the intellectual property provisions in FTAs and discusses the consistent stance of China on intellectual property i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia Pacific law review 2016-01, Vol.24 (1), p.36-59 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Asia Pacific law review |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Zhang, Guangliang |
description | This article studies the stance of China on free trade-related intellectual property in the context of the China-Japan-Korea (CJK) free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. It analyses the intellectual property provisions in FTAs and discusses the consistent stance of China on intellectual property in FTAs by reviewing the intellectual property provisions under existing FTAs involving China. The article then examines into major factors that influence China's stance on intellectual property: its stage of economic development, innovation capacity and level of intellectual property enforcement; and explores China's stance on intellectual property from the perspective of the CJK FTA negotiations and beyond. It finds that though China expressly stands against the TRIPS-plus standards for intellectual property enforcement, its attitude towards intellectual property issues in FTA negotiations is fairly flexible. It further argues that with intellectual property becoming increasingly important for its innovation-driven economy and with higher standards of intellectual property enforcement being incorporated in such influential FTA as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), China's stance on intellectual property in future FTA negotiations will eventually change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10192577.2016.1201261 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10192577_2016_1201261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4285489031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-228a761c5421c1ba7664b58737ae43ef8b517f60b9256d2bb28fbd79713915ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEuXxCUiWWLBK8TixnbACVbyR2JS15SRjSJXaxXaBip_HtGXLZh6aO3dGJ8tOgI6BVvQcKNSMSzlmFMQYUmQCdrIRVJLnVVmWu6lOmpxxLvezgxBmlNJa1HyUfU_eeqvPAglR2xaJs8R4RBK97jD3OOiIHeltxGHANi71QBbeLdDH1QXR5KPHzzQl8Q1J65LqKxJn1u3aOH_QC23zR-dRk5vpFbH46mKvY-9sOMr2jB4CHm_zYfZycz2d3OVPz7f3k6unvC1qEXPGKi0FtLxk0EKTalE2vJKF1FgWaKqGgzSCNgmC6FjTsMo0nawlFDVw7IrD7HTjmz5_X2KIauaW3qaTCioOggteyKTiG1XrXQgejVr4fq79SgFVv5zVH2f1y1ltOae9y81eb43zc_3p_NCpqFeD88YnqH1Qxf8WP0EIhBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1851656537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Zhang, Guangliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guangliang</creatorcontrib><description>This article studies the stance of China on free trade-related intellectual property in the context of the China-Japan-Korea (CJK) free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. It analyses the intellectual property provisions in FTAs and discusses the consistent stance of China on intellectual property in FTAs by reviewing the intellectual property provisions under existing FTAs involving China. The article then examines into major factors that influence China's stance on intellectual property: its stage of economic development, innovation capacity and level of intellectual property enforcement; and explores China's stance on intellectual property from the perspective of the CJK FTA negotiations and beyond. It finds that though China expressly stands against the TRIPS-plus standards for intellectual property enforcement, its attitude towards intellectual property issues in FTA negotiations is fairly flexible. It further argues that with intellectual property becoming increasingly important for its innovation-driven economy and with higher standards of intellectual property enforcement being incorporated in such influential FTA as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), China's stance on intellectual property in future FTA negotiations will eventually change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-2557</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10192577.2016.1201261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hong Kong: Routledge</publisher><subject>Developing countries ; Economic development ; Enforcement ; Free trade ; Free trade agreement ; Intellectual property ; intellectual property enforcement ; LDCs ; Most favored nation clause ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Property rights ; Provisions ; Public health ; Trade agreements ; trade negotiations ; Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement ; TRIPS agreement ; TRIPS-plus</subject><ispartof>Asia Pacific law review, 2016-01, Vol.24 (1), p.36-59</ispartof><rights>2016 School of Law, City University of Hong Kong 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-228a761c5421c1ba7664b58737ae43ef8b517f60b9256d2bb28fbd79713915ed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guangliang</creatorcontrib><title>China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations</title><title>Asia Pacific law review</title><description>This article studies the stance of China on free trade-related intellectual property in the context of the China-Japan-Korea (CJK) free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. It analyses the intellectual property provisions in FTAs and discusses the consistent stance of China on intellectual property in FTAs by reviewing the intellectual property provisions under existing FTAs involving China. The article then examines into major factors that influence China's stance on intellectual property: its stage of economic development, innovation capacity and level of intellectual property enforcement; and explores China's stance on intellectual property from the perspective of the CJK FTA negotiations and beyond. It finds that though China expressly stands against the TRIPS-plus standards for intellectual property enforcement, its attitude towards intellectual property issues in FTA negotiations is fairly flexible. It further argues that with intellectual property becoming increasingly important for its innovation-driven economy and with higher standards of intellectual property enforcement being incorporated in such influential FTA as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), China's stance on intellectual property in future FTA negotiations will eventually change.</description><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>Free trade agreement</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>intellectual property enforcement</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Most favored nation clause</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Trade agreements</subject><subject>trade negotiations</subject><subject>Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement</subject><subject>TRIPS agreement</subject><subject>TRIPS-plus</subject><issn>1019-2557</issn><issn>1875-8444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEuXxCUiWWLBK8TixnbACVbyR2JS15SRjSJXaxXaBip_HtGXLZh6aO3dGJ8tOgI6BVvQcKNSMSzlmFMQYUmQCdrIRVJLnVVmWu6lOmpxxLvezgxBmlNJa1HyUfU_eeqvPAglR2xaJs8R4RBK97jD3OOiIHeltxGHANi71QBbeLdDH1QXR5KPHzzQl8Q1J65LqKxJn1u3aOH_QC23zR-dRk5vpFbH46mKvY-9sOMr2jB4CHm_zYfZycz2d3OVPz7f3k6unvC1qEXPGKi0FtLxk0EKTalE2vJKF1FgWaKqGgzSCNgmC6FjTsMo0nawlFDVw7IrD7HTjmz5_X2KIauaW3qaTCioOggteyKTiG1XrXQgejVr4fq79SgFVv5zVH2f1y1ltOae9y81eb43zc_3p_NCpqFeD88YnqH1Qxf8WP0EIhBI</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Guangliang</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations</title><author>Zhang, Guangliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-228a761c5421c1ba7664b58737ae43ef8b517f60b9256d2bb28fbd79713915ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>Free trade agreement</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>intellectual property enforcement</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Most favored nation clause</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Trade agreements</topic><topic>trade negotiations</topic><topic>Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement</topic><topic>TRIPS agreement</topic><topic>TRIPS-plus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guangliang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asia Pacific law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Guangliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations</atitle><jtitle>Asia Pacific law review</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>36-59</pages><issn>1019-2557</issn><eissn>1875-8444</eissn><abstract>This article studies the stance of China on free trade-related intellectual property in the context of the China-Japan-Korea (CJK) free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. It analyses the intellectual property provisions in FTAs and discusses the consistent stance of China on intellectual property in FTAs by reviewing the intellectual property provisions under existing FTAs involving China. The article then examines into major factors that influence China's stance on intellectual property: its stage of economic development, innovation capacity and level of intellectual property enforcement; and explores China's stance on intellectual property from the perspective of the CJK FTA negotiations and beyond. It finds that though China expressly stands against the TRIPS-plus standards for intellectual property enforcement, its attitude towards intellectual property issues in FTA negotiations is fairly flexible. It further argues that with intellectual property becoming increasingly important for its innovation-driven economy and with higher standards of intellectual property enforcement being incorporated in such influential FTA as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), China's stance on intellectual property in future FTA negotiations will eventually change.</abstract><cop>Hong Kong</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10192577.2016.1201261</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1019-2557 |
ispartof | Asia Pacific law review, 2016-01, Vol.24 (1), p.36-59 |
issn | 1019-2557 1875-8444 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10192577_2016_1201261 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Developing countries Economic development Enforcement Free trade Free trade agreement Intellectual property intellectual property enforcement LDCs Most favored nation clause Pharmaceutical industry Property rights Provisions Public health Trade agreements trade negotiations Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement TRIPS agreement TRIPS-plus |
title | China's stance on free trade-related intellectual property: a view in the context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA negotiations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China's%20stance%20on%20free%20trade-related%20intellectual%20property:%20a%20view%20in%20the%20context%20of%20the%20China-Japan-Korea%20FTA%20negotiations&rft.jtitle=Asia%20Pacific%20law%20review&rft.au=Zhang,%20Guangliang&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=36-59&rft.issn=1019-2557&rft.eissn=1875-8444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10192577.2016.1201261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4285489031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1851656537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |