Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal

Health services programmes and interventions require objective measures on coverage and quality to ensure that managers have the evidence to adopt and expand health interventions effectively and effciently. Over the past 15 years, the uThukela District Child Survival Project of South Africa achieved...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Southern African journal of epidemiology & infection 2010-01, Vol.25 (2), p.22-27
Hauptverfasser: Pillay, Julian D, Knight, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 2
container_start_page 22
container_title The Southern African journal of epidemiology & infection
container_volume 25
creator Pillay, Julian D
Knight, Stephen
description Health services programmes and interventions require objective measures on coverage and quality to ensure that managers have the evidence to adopt and expand health interventions effectively and effciently. Over the past 15 years, the uThukela District Child Survival Project of South Africa achieved this through regular two- to three-year project evaluations using cluster sampling. Results of these surveys have improved the ability of Child Survival Projects to identify priorities, defne objectives based on data, and measure progress towards these objectives. However, the inability to disaggregate information to composite Supervision Areas (SAs) was a limitation. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) was adopted as an improved method based on its ability to assess performance in disaggregated units within a study population and to reliably compare coverage and health status indicators for routine monitoring of child survival activities. This study assessed the feasibility and reliability of LQAS to evaluate the Child Survival Project and compare the results of a rapid manual analysis with a secondary electronic analysis of the same data. The accuracy of the manual analysis was comparable and provides evidence that LQAS and rapid manual analysis can be used to evaluate intervention programmes, particularly in settings of limited electronic technology and expertise.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10158782_2010_11441383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_10158782_2010_11441383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2063-1cb9378fa4b929080ccf4a95cda7fe2ac85046eb9690ab34d5611a07f88103ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRbMAiar0F5B_IMWO81xW5SkqQKLdsLEmjt24uHXxo1XEz5OodM1sRrp37pXmRNENwVOCS3xLMMnKokymCR4kkqaElvQiGg1GPDhX0cS5De6HEloleBT9rJzarZE2Hn0H0Mp3CJwLFnZcIAfbvR7srfCtaYw26w55g8QBdAAvkG8FCmjZhi-hAd0p563iHs1bpRv0EexB9Zfo3ZqN6GUj0csRPoMO8St40NfRpQTtxORvj6PVw_1y_hQv3h6f57NFzBOc05jwuqJFKSGtq6TqH-VcplBlvIFCigR4meE0F3WVVxhqmjZZTgjgQpYlwVQ0dBzlp15ujXNWSLa3agu2YwSzgRw7k2MDOXYm1wdnp6DaSWO3cDRWN8xDp42VAyLlGP2n4xcgQHlr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal</title><source>Sabinet Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pillay, Julian D ; Knight, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian D ; Knight, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Health services programmes and interventions require objective measures on coverage and quality to ensure that managers have the evidence to adopt and expand health interventions effectively and effciently. Over the past 15 years, the uThukela District Child Survival Project of South Africa achieved this through regular two- to three-year project evaluations using cluster sampling. Results of these surveys have improved the ability of Child Survival Projects to identify priorities, defne objectives based on data, and measure progress towards these objectives. However, the inability to disaggregate information to composite Supervision Areas (SAs) was a limitation. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) was adopted as an improved method based on its ability to assess performance in disaggregated units within a study population and to reliably compare coverage and health status indicators for routine monitoring of child survival activities. This study assessed the feasibility and reliability of LQAS to evaluate the Child Survival Project and compare the results of a rapid manual analysis with a secondary electronic analysis of the same data. The accuracy of the manual analysis was comparable and provides evidence that LQAS and rapid manual analysis can be used to evaluate intervention programmes, particularly in settings of limited electronic technology and expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-8782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cogent OA</publisher><ispartof>The Southern African journal of epidemiology &amp; infection, 2010-01, Vol.25 (2), p.22-27</ispartof><rights>Federation of Infectious Disease Societies of South Africa 2010</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2063-1cb9378fa4b929080ccf4a95cda7fe2ac85046eb9690ab34d5611a07f88103ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2063-1cb9378fa4b929080ccf4a95cda7fe2ac85046eb9690ab34d5611a07f88103ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27502,27924,27925,59143,59144</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal</title><title>The Southern African journal of epidemiology &amp; infection</title><description>Health services programmes and interventions require objective measures on coverage and quality to ensure that managers have the evidence to adopt and expand health interventions effectively and effciently. Over the past 15 years, the uThukela District Child Survival Project of South Africa achieved this through regular two- to three-year project evaluations using cluster sampling. Results of these surveys have improved the ability of Child Survival Projects to identify priorities, defne objectives based on data, and measure progress towards these objectives. However, the inability to disaggregate information to composite Supervision Areas (SAs) was a limitation. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) was adopted as an improved method based on its ability to assess performance in disaggregated units within a study population and to reliably compare coverage and health status indicators for routine monitoring of child survival activities. This study assessed the feasibility and reliability of LQAS to evaluate the Child Survival Project and compare the results of a rapid manual analysis with a secondary electronic analysis of the same data. The accuracy of the manual analysis was comparable and provides evidence that LQAS and rapid manual analysis can be used to evaluate intervention programmes, particularly in settings of limited electronic technology and expertise.</description><issn>1015-8782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRbMAiar0F5B_IMWO81xW5SkqQKLdsLEmjt24uHXxo1XEz5OodM1sRrp37pXmRNENwVOCS3xLMMnKokymCR4kkqaElvQiGg1GPDhX0cS5De6HEloleBT9rJzarZE2Hn0H0Mp3CJwLFnZcIAfbvR7srfCtaYw26w55g8QBdAAvkG8FCmjZhi-hAd0p563iHs1bpRv0EexB9Zfo3ZqN6GUj0csRPoMO8St40NfRpQTtxORvj6PVw_1y_hQv3h6f57NFzBOc05jwuqJFKSGtq6TqH-VcplBlvIFCigR4meE0F3WVVxhqmjZZTgjgQpYlwVQ0dBzlp15ujXNWSLa3agu2YwSzgRw7k2MDOXYm1wdnp6DaSWO3cDRWN8xDp42VAyLlGP2n4xcgQHlr</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Pillay, Julian D</creator><creator>Knight, Stephen</creator><general>Cogent OA</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal</title><author>Pillay, Julian D ; Knight, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2063-1cb9378fa4b929080ccf4a95cda7fe2ac85046eb9690ab34d5611a07f88103ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Julian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Southern African journal of epidemiology &amp; infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pillay, Julian D</au><au>Knight, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal</atitle><jtitle>The Southern African journal of epidemiology &amp; infection</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>22-27</pages><issn>1015-8782</issn><abstract>Health services programmes and interventions require objective measures on coverage and quality to ensure that managers have the evidence to adopt and expand health interventions effectively and effciently. Over the past 15 years, the uThukela District Child Survival Project of South Africa achieved this through regular two- to three-year project evaluations using cluster sampling. Results of these surveys have improved the ability of Child Survival Projects to identify priorities, defne objectives based on data, and measure progress towards these objectives. However, the inability to disaggregate information to composite Supervision Areas (SAs) was a limitation. Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) was adopted as an improved method based on its ability to assess performance in disaggregated units within a study population and to reliably compare coverage and health status indicators for routine monitoring of child survival activities. This study assessed the feasibility and reliability of LQAS to evaluate the Child Survival Project and compare the results of a rapid manual analysis with a secondary electronic analysis of the same data. The accuracy of the manual analysis was comparable and provides evidence that LQAS and rapid manual analysis can be used to evaluate intervention programmes, particularly in settings of limited electronic technology and expertise.</abstract><pub>Cogent OA</pub><doi>10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1015-8782
ispartof The Southern African journal of epidemiology & infection, 2010-01, Vol.25 (2), p.22-27
issn 1015-8782
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10158782_2010_11441383
source Sabinet Open Access Journals; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Using lot quality assurance sampling methodology to evaluate the u Thukela District Child Survival Project of KwaZulu-Natal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20lot%20quality%20assurance%20sampling%20methodology%20to%20evaluate%20the%20u%20Thukela%20District%20Child%20Survival%20Project%20of%20KwaZulu-Natal&rft.jtitle=The%20Southern%20African%20journal%20of%20epidemiology%20&%20infection&rft.au=Pillay,%20Julian%20D&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=22-27&rft.issn=1015-8782&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10158782.2010.11441383&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_10158782_2010_11441383%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true