From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade
The completion of the natural gas pipeline 'Power of Siberia' in 2019 creates new dynamics in Eurasian trade. Russia's deepening ties with China present it with the opportunity to change its relationship with the European Union from monopsony to monopoly, thus gaining bargaining lever...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Europe-Asia studies 2023-01, Vol.75 (1), p.28-46 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | Europe-Asia studies |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Sotiriou, Stylianos A. |
description | The completion of the natural gas pipeline 'Power of Siberia' in 2019 creates new dynamics in Eurasian trade. Russia's deepening ties with China present it with the opportunity to change its relationship with the European Union from monopsony to monopoly, thus gaining bargaining leverage. However, this argument goes both ways, being also applicable to Russo-Chinese affairs, with the European Union as the alternative option. The article concludes that Russia, while seriously strengthened by its developing energy relationship with China, will not endanger its status as a reliable supplier across Eurasia, since its nascent monopoly position depends on the existence of an alternative option. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09668136.2022.2134309 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09668136_2022_2134309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765873884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-edcfff3123e368f88d69938fbc7013027313745dfcc49f11177282cf7c18fce13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh44VVnPtom9UoZmwqTgc7rkKXJltElNWmR_ntbOm89N4fD-3HgAeAWoxlGHD2gIs85pvmMIEJmBNOUouIMTHCaZwlNCTsHk8GTDKZLcBXjAfWTZXQCDsvgj_DdO19H7zrY-PHwVfcIP9oYrbyPcF1rZ91uUOd76ySUEUr42citrWwclKVUjQ_QOtjsNVy0QfZJBxdOh10HN0GW-hpcGFlFfXPaU_C1XGzmr8lq_fI2f14liuS8SXSpjDEUE6ppzg3nZV4UlJutYghTRBjFlKVZaZRKC4MxZoxwogxTmBulMZ2Cu7G3Dv671bERB98G178UhOUZZ5TztHdlo0sFH2PQRtTBHmXoBEZiwCr-sIoBqzhh7XNPY84648NR_vhQlaKRXeWDCdIpGwX9v-IXPUV-GA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765873884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</creatorcontrib><description>The completion of the natural gas pipeline 'Power of Siberia' in 2019 creates new dynamics in Eurasian trade. Russia's deepening ties with China present it with the opportunity to change its relationship with the European Union from monopsony to monopoly, thus gaining bargaining leverage. However, this argument goes both ways, being also applicable to Russo-Chinese affairs, with the European Union as the alternative option. The article concludes that Russia, while seriously strengthened by its developing energy relationship with China, will not endanger its status as a reliable supplier across Eurasia, since its nascent monopoly position depends on the existence of an alternative option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-8136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2022.2134309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Energy ; Monopolies ; Monopsony ; Natural gas</subject><ispartof>Europe-Asia studies, 2023-01, Vol.75 (1), p.28-46</ispartof><rights>2022 University of Glasgow 2022</rights><rights>2022 University of Glasgow</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-edcfff3123e368f88d69938fbc7013027313745dfcc49f11177282cf7c18fce13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-edcfff3123e368f88d69938fbc7013027313745dfcc49f11177282cf7c18fce13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3517-0638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</creatorcontrib><title>From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade</title><title>Europe-Asia studies</title><description>The completion of the natural gas pipeline 'Power of Siberia' in 2019 creates new dynamics in Eurasian trade. Russia's deepening ties with China present it with the opportunity to change its relationship with the European Union from monopsony to monopoly, thus gaining bargaining leverage. However, this argument goes both ways, being also applicable to Russo-Chinese affairs, with the European Union as the alternative option. The article concludes that Russia, while seriously strengthened by its developing energy relationship with China, will not endanger its status as a reliable supplier across Eurasia, since its nascent monopoly position depends on the existence of an alternative option.</description><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Monopsony</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><issn>0966-8136</issn><issn>1465-3427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh44VVnPtom9UoZmwqTgc7rkKXJltElNWmR_ntbOm89N4fD-3HgAeAWoxlGHD2gIs85pvmMIEJmBNOUouIMTHCaZwlNCTsHk8GTDKZLcBXjAfWTZXQCDsvgj_DdO19H7zrY-PHwVfcIP9oYrbyPcF1rZ91uUOd76ySUEUr42citrWwclKVUjQ_QOtjsNVy0QfZJBxdOh10HN0GW-hpcGFlFfXPaU_C1XGzmr8lq_fI2f14liuS8SXSpjDEUE6ppzg3nZV4UlJutYghTRBjFlKVZaZRKC4MxZoxwogxTmBulMZ2Cu7G3Dv671bERB98G178UhOUZZ5TztHdlo0sFH2PQRtTBHmXoBEZiwCr-sIoBqzhh7XNPY84648NR_vhQlaKRXeWDCdIpGwX9v-IXPUV-GA</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-0638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade</title><author>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-edcfff3123e368f88d69938fbc7013027313745dfcc49f11177282cf7c18fce13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Monopsony</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sotiriou, Stylianos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade</atitle><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>28-46</pages><issn>0966-8136</issn><eissn>1465-3427</eissn><abstract>The completion of the natural gas pipeline 'Power of Siberia' in 2019 creates new dynamics in Eurasian trade. Russia's deepening ties with China present it with the opportunity to change its relationship with the European Union from monopsony to monopoly, thus gaining bargaining leverage. However, this argument goes both ways, being also applicable to Russo-Chinese affairs, with the European Union as the alternative option. The article concludes that Russia, while seriously strengthened by its developing energy relationship with China, will not endanger its status as a reliable supplier across Eurasia, since its nascent monopoly position depends on the existence of an alternative option.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09668136.2022.2134309</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-0638</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-8136 |
ispartof | Europe-Asia studies, 2023-01, Vol.75 (1), p.28-46 |
issn | 0966-8136 1465-3427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09668136_2022_2134309 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Energy Monopolies Monopsony Natural gas |
title | From Monopsony to Monopoly: Russia's Opening to China as a Stabilising Factor in the Eurasian Energy Trade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A44%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Monopsony%20to%20Monopoly:%20Russia's%20Opening%20to%20China%20as%20a%20Stabilising%20Factor%20in%20the%20Eurasian%20Energy%20Trade&rft.jtitle=Europe-Asia%20studies&rft.au=Sotiriou,%20Stylianos%20A.&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=28-46&rft.issn=0966-8136&rft.eissn=1465-3427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09668136.2022.2134309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765873884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765873884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |