Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?

This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European planning studies 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363
Hauptverfasser: Skjeggedal, Terje, Overvåg, Kjell, Riseth, jan åge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 363
container_issue 2
container_start_page 344
container_title European planning studies
container_volume 24
creator Skjeggedal, Terje
Overvåg, Kjell
Riseth, jan åge
description This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09654313_2015_1048187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3922184421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiR2LBJsWM7DzaAylMKhQVla00du0qV2MVOqPr3OGrZsGA10tWZq5mD0DnBE4JzfIWLlDNK6CTBhIeI5STPDtCIsLSIecHYIRoNTDxAx-jE-xXGJOE8HaHPEkwVz72K3hswpjbLqDbRzLqNWtZgolfbmw5CdOcU-OuotBKa6F59q8auW2W6yLpoBl3vQoOznZJdbc3NKTrS0Hh1tp9jNH98-Jg-x-Xb08v0rowlY6SLZYFVroFXNAdQWhd8wdMMGA2RXJAiJVkhVcUKrYDSKmcJr7hOWYIrzqoM6Bhd7nrXzn71yneirb1UTfhF2d4LkmWE8ZwmaUAv_qAr2zsTrgsUzzDJKE8CxXeUdNZ7p7RYu7oFtxUEi8G2-LUtBttibzvs3e72aqOta2FjXVOJDraNddqBkbUX9P-KHwZ-hcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757017352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</creator><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-4313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Area planning &amp; development ; Case studies ; Environmental protection ; Land titles ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; local development ; Local government ; Management ; Mountains ; Municipalities ; nature protection ; Norway ; Planning ; Power ; Protected areas ; Rationality ; Studies</subject><ispartof>European planning studies, 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overvåg, Kjell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><title>European planning studies</title><description>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</description><subject>Area planning &amp; development</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Land titles</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>local development</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>nature protection</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0965-4313</issn><issn>1469-5944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiR2LBJsWM7DzaAylMKhQVla00du0qV2MVOqPr3OGrZsGA10tWZq5mD0DnBE4JzfIWLlDNK6CTBhIeI5STPDtCIsLSIecHYIRoNTDxAx-jE-xXGJOE8HaHPEkwVz72K3hswpjbLqDbRzLqNWtZgolfbmw5CdOcU-OuotBKa6F59q8auW2W6yLpoBl3vQoOznZJdbc3NKTrS0Hh1tp9jNH98-Jg-x-Xb08v0rowlY6SLZYFVroFXNAdQWhd8wdMMGA2RXJAiJVkhVcUKrYDSKmcJr7hOWYIrzqoM6Bhd7nrXzn71yneirb1UTfhF2d4LkmWE8ZwmaUAv_qAr2zsTrgsUzzDJKE8CxXeUdNZ7p7RYu7oFtxUEi8G2-LUtBttibzvs3e72aqOta2FjXVOJDraNddqBkbUX9P-KHwZ-hcY</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Skjeggedal, Terje</creator><creator>Overvåg, Kjell</creator><creator>Riseth, jan åge</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><author>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Area planning &amp; development</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Land titles</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>local development</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>nature protection</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overvåg, Kjell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skjeggedal, Terje</au><au>Overvåg, Kjell</au><au>Riseth, jan åge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</atitle><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>344-363</pages><issn>0965-4313</issn><eissn>1469-5944</eissn><abstract>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-4313
ispartof European planning studies, 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363
issn 0965-4313
1469-5944
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09654313_2015_1048187
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete
subjects Area planning & development
Case studies
Environmental protection
Land titles
Land use
Land use management
Land use planning
local development
Local government
Management
Mountains
Municipalities
nature protection
Norway
Planning
Power
Protected areas
Rationality
Studies
title Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A01%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land-Use%20Planning%20in%20Norwegian%20Mountain%20Areas:%20Local%20Development%20or%20Nature%20Protection?&rft.jtitle=European%20planning%20studies&rft.au=Skjeggedal,%20Terje&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=344-363&rft.issn=0965-4313&rft.eissn=1469-5944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3922184421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757017352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true