Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?
This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European planning studies 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 363 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | European planning studies |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Skjeggedal, Terje Overvåg, Kjell Riseth, jan åge |
description | This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09654313_2015_1048187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3922184421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiR2LBJsWM7DzaAylMKhQVla00du0qV2MVOqPr3OGrZsGA10tWZq5mD0DnBE4JzfIWLlDNK6CTBhIeI5STPDtCIsLSIecHYIRoNTDxAx-jE-xXGJOE8HaHPEkwVz72K3hswpjbLqDbRzLqNWtZgolfbmw5CdOcU-OuotBKa6F59q8auW2W6yLpoBl3vQoOznZJdbc3NKTrS0Hh1tp9jNH98-Jg-x-Xb08v0rowlY6SLZYFVroFXNAdQWhd8wdMMGA2RXJAiJVkhVcUKrYDSKmcJr7hOWYIrzqoM6Bhd7nrXzn71yneirb1UTfhF2d4LkmWE8ZwmaUAv_qAr2zsTrgsUzzDJKE8CxXeUdNZ7p7RYu7oFtxUEi8G2-LUtBttibzvs3e72aqOta2FjXVOJDraNddqBkbUX9P-KHwZ-hcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757017352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</creator><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-4313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Area planning & development ; Case studies ; Environmental protection ; Land titles ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; local development ; Local government ; Management ; Mountains ; Municipalities ; nature protection ; Norway ; Planning ; Power ; Protected areas ; Rationality ; Studies</subject><ispartof>European planning studies, 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overvåg, Kjell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><title>European planning studies</title><description>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</description><subject>Area planning & development</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Land titles</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>local development</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>nature protection</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0965-4313</issn><issn>1469-5944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiR2LBJsWM7DzaAylMKhQVla00du0qV2MVOqPr3OGrZsGA10tWZq5mD0DnBE4JzfIWLlDNK6CTBhIeI5STPDtCIsLSIecHYIRoNTDxAx-jE-xXGJOE8HaHPEkwVz72K3hswpjbLqDbRzLqNWtZgolfbmw5CdOcU-OuotBKa6F59q8auW2W6yLpoBl3vQoOznZJdbc3NKTrS0Hh1tp9jNH98-Jg-x-Xb08v0rowlY6SLZYFVroFXNAdQWhd8wdMMGA2RXJAiJVkhVcUKrYDSKmcJr7hOWYIrzqoM6Bhd7nrXzn71yneirb1UTfhF2d4LkmWE8ZwmaUAv_qAr2zsTrgsUzzDJKE8CxXeUdNZ7p7RYu7oFtxUEi8G2-LUtBttibzvs3e72aqOta2FjXVOJDraNddqBkbUX9P-KHwZ-hcY</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Skjeggedal, Terje</creator><creator>Overvåg, Kjell</creator><creator>Riseth, jan åge</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</title><author>Skjeggedal, Terje ; Overvåg, Kjell ; Riseth, jan åge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c90e8fa5d38aaeff95b567a43a5dcb196179ced49fea33d8425d5f6420d54d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Area planning & development</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Land titles</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>local development</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>nature protection</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skjeggedal, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overvåg, Kjell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseth, jan åge</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skjeggedal, Terje</au><au>Overvåg, Kjell</au><au>Riseth, jan åge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?</atitle><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>344-363</pages><issn>0965-4313</issn><eissn>1469-5944</eissn><abstract>This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national-local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-4313 |
ispartof | European planning studies, 2016-02, Vol.24 (2), p.344-363 |
issn | 0965-4313 1469-5944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09654313_2015_1048187 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Area planning & development Case studies Environmental protection Land titles Land use Land use management Land use planning local development Local government Management Mountains Municipalities nature protection Norway Planning Power Protected areas Rationality Studies |
title | Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A01%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land-Use%20Planning%20in%20Norwegian%20Mountain%20Areas:%20Local%20Development%20or%20Nature%20Protection?&rft.jtitle=European%20planning%20studies&rft.au=Skjeggedal,%20Terje&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=344-363&rft.issn=0965-4313&rft.eissn=1469-5944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3922184421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757017352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |