What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality

This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 201...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of international trade & economic development 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67
Hauptverfasser: Canh, Phuc Nguyen, Schinckus, Christophe, Dinh Thanh, Su
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title The journal of international trade & economic development
container_volume 30
creator Canh, Phuc Nguyen
Schinckus, Christophe
Dinh Thanh, Su
description This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638199_2020_1799428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474797334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43Zm2adpc6Rh-wcAbxctwliYuo2u2JN3ovzelE--8Cifnec5JXoRuUzJLSUXuCWd5lXI-y0gWr0rOaVadoUlKGU94UfBzNBmYZIAu0ZX3G0IIpYRMUPO1hoDBKRzWCtfOHJTz2Grs11DbI1bStnbbP-A51p2LjMPqYGrVSjVQY9tIbNqgvh0EY1sMbR1rH0zohhoavO-gMaG_RhcaGq9uTucUfT4_fSxek-X7y9tivkxkzouQAE11LTnLGE81qUHnJSszzRhUVEq6IrnSpVxJyirGqQYoeVSI0pVSRGYqn6K7ce7O2X2nfBAb27n4EC8yWtKSl3lOI1WMlHTWe6e02DmzBdeLlIghWPEbrBiCFadgo4dHb_i88X9WnBz7VVZE5HFETKut28LRuqYWAfrGOu2glVHL_9_yA3kZi_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474797334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</creator><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Corruption ; Economic integration ; Foreign investment ; global evidence ; Informal economy ; institutions ; Openness ; Rule of law ; shadow economy</subject><ispartof>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development, 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2344-6315 ; 0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinckus, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><title>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</title><description>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</description><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Economic integration</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>global evidence</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>institutions</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>shadow economy</subject><issn>0963-8199</issn><issn>1469-9559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43Zm2adpc6Rh-wcAbxctwliYuo2u2JN3ovzelE--8Cifnec5JXoRuUzJLSUXuCWd5lXI-y0gWr0rOaVadoUlKGU94UfBzNBmYZIAu0ZX3G0IIpYRMUPO1hoDBKRzWCtfOHJTz2Grs11DbI1bStnbbP-A51p2LjMPqYGrVSjVQY9tIbNqgvh0EY1sMbR1rH0zohhoavO-gMaG_RhcaGq9uTucUfT4_fSxek-X7y9tivkxkzouQAE11LTnLGE81qUHnJSszzRhUVEq6IrnSpVxJyirGqQYoeVSI0pVSRGYqn6K7ce7O2X2nfBAb27n4EC8yWtKSl3lOI1WMlHTWe6e02DmzBdeLlIghWPEbrBiCFadgo4dHb_i88X9WnBz7VVZE5HFETKut28LRuqYWAfrGOu2glVHL_9_yA3kZi_I</recordid><startdate>20210102</startdate><enddate>20210102</enddate><creator>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creator><creator>Schinckus, Christophe</creator><creator>Dinh Thanh, Su</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-6315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210102</creationdate><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><author>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Economic integration</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>global evidence</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>institutions</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>shadow economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinckus, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</au><au>Schinckus, Christophe</au><au>Dinh Thanh, Su</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</atitle><jtitle>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</jtitle><date>2021-01-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>47-67</pages><issn>0963-8199</issn><eissn>1469-9559</eissn><abstract>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-6315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-8199
ispartof The journal of international trade & economic development, 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67
issn 0963-8199
1469-9559
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638199_2020_1799428
source Business Source Complete
subjects Corruption
Economic integration
Foreign investment
global evidence
Informal economy
institutions
Openness
Rule of law
shadow economy
title What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A16%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20are%20the%20drivers%20of%20shadow%20economy?%20A%20further%20evidence%20of%20economic%20integration%20and%20institutional%20quality&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20international%20trade%20&%20economic%20development&rft.au=Canh,%20Phuc%20Nguyen&rft.date=2021-01-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=47-67&rft.issn=0963-8199&rft.eissn=1469-9559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474797334%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474797334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true