What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality
This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 201...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of international trade & economic development 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | The journal of international trade & economic development |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Canh, Phuc Nguyen Schinckus, Christophe Dinh Thanh, Su |
description | This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638199_2020_1799428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474797334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43Zm2adpc6Rh-wcAbxctwliYuo2u2JN3ovzelE--8Cifnec5JXoRuUzJLSUXuCWd5lXI-y0gWr0rOaVadoUlKGU94UfBzNBmYZIAu0ZX3G0IIpYRMUPO1hoDBKRzWCtfOHJTz2Grs11DbI1bStnbbP-A51p2LjMPqYGrVSjVQY9tIbNqgvh0EY1sMbR1rH0zohhoavO-gMaG_RhcaGq9uTucUfT4_fSxek-X7y9tivkxkzouQAE11LTnLGE81qUHnJSszzRhUVEq6IrnSpVxJyirGqQYoeVSI0pVSRGYqn6K7ce7O2X2nfBAb27n4EC8yWtKSl3lOI1WMlHTWe6e02DmzBdeLlIghWPEbrBiCFadgo4dHb_i88X9WnBz7VVZE5HFETKut28LRuqYWAfrGOu2glVHL_9_yA3kZi_I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474797334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</creator><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Corruption ; Economic integration ; Foreign investment ; global evidence ; Informal economy ; institutions ; Openness ; Rule of law ; shadow economy</subject><ispartof>The journal of international trade & economic development, 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2344-6315 ; 0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinckus, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><title>The journal of international trade & economic development</title><description>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</description><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Economic integration</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>global evidence</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>institutions</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>shadow economy</subject><issn>0963-8199</issn><issn>1469-9559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43Zm2adpc6Rh-wcAbxctwliYuo2u2JN3ovzelE--8Cifnec5JXoRuUzJLSUXuCWd5lXI-y0gWr0rOaVadoUlKGU94UfBzNBmYZIAu0ZX3G0IIpYRMUPO1hoDBKRzWCtfOHJTz2Grs11DbI1bStnbbP-A51p2LjMPqYGrVSjVQY9tIbNqgvh0EY1sMbR1rH0zohhoavO-gMaG_RhcaGq9uTucUfT4_fSxek-X7y9tivkxkzouQAE11LTnLGE81qUHnJSszzRhUVEq6IrnSpVxJyirGqQYoeVSI0pVSRGYqn6K7ce7O2X2nfBAb27n4EC8yWtKSl3lOI1WMlHTWe6e02DmzBdeLlIghWPEbrBiCFadgo4dHb_i88X9WnBz7VVZE5HFETKut28LRuqYWAfrGOu2glVHL_9_yA3kZi_I</recordid><startdate>20210102</startdate><enddate>20210102</enddate><creator>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creator><creator>Schinckus, Christophe</creator><creator>Dinh Thanh, Su</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-6315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210102</creationdate><title>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</title><author>Canh, Phuc Nguyen ; Schinckus, Christophe ; Dinh Thanh, Su</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-a41fdc962691f0daf37672f66a84cc4b03ef7cbc468694faa79a410ef8ee0c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Economic integration</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>global evidence</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>institutions</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>shadow economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinckus, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinh Thanh, Su</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The journal of international trade & economic development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Canh, Phuc Nguyen</au><au>Schinckus, Christophe</au><au>Dinh Thanh, Su</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality</atitle><jtitle>The journal of international trade & economic development</jtitle><date>2021-01-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>47-67</pages><issn>0963-8199</issn><eissn>1469-9559</eissn><abstract>This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-6315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-5010</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-8199 |
ispartof | The journal of international trade & economic development, 2021-01, Vol.30 (1), p.47-67 |
issn | 0963-8199 1469-9559 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638199_2020_1799428 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Corruption Economic integration Foreign investment global evidence Informal economy institutions Openness Rule of law shadow economy |
title | What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A16%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20are%20the%20drivers%20of%20shadow%20economy?%20A%20further%20evidence%20of%20economic%20integration%20and%20institutional%20quality&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20international%20trade%20&%20economic%20development&rft.au=Canh,%20Phuc%20Nguyen&rft.date=2021-01-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=47-67&rft.issn=0963-8199&rft.eissn=1469-9559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474797334%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474797334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |