Unilateral spatial neglect

"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychological rehabilitation 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146
1. Verfasser: Ishiai, Sumio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
container_title Neuropsychological rehabilitation
container_volume 4
creator Ishiai, Sumio
description "Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, & Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis & Warrington, 1989).
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09602019408402272
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09602019408402272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57756250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFeu3I3em8nkAW6k-IKCG7sOt-mNjKQzNZki_fdOqTtxdRbn-87iCHGJcItg4Q6cBgnoFFgFUhp5JCaotKpAO3UsJvu-GgE8FWelfAKgBaUn4mrRtYkGzpSuy4aGdsyOPxKH4VycREqFL35zKhZPj--zl2r-9vw6e5hXQRocKmsaxqidqR27gMwko1HRUU3NKi4tQZBRhmY5diZikGhZg8EVGLaBuZ6Km8PuJvdfWy6DX7clcErUcb8tvjGm0bKBEcQDGHJfSuboN7ldU955BL9_wf95YXTuD07bxT6v6bvPaeUH2qU-x0xdaIuv_9d_AExZYSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57756250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Ishiai, Sumio</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><description>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, &amp; Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, &amp; Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis &amp; Warrington, 1989).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09602019408402272</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NREHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Neglect syndrome ; Neuropsychology</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09602019408402272$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09602019408402272$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><title>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</title><description>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, &amp; Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, &amp; Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis &amp; Warrington, 1989).</description><subject>Neglect syndrome</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><issn>0960-2011</issn><issn>1464-0694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFeu3I3em8nkAW6k-IKCG7sOt-mNjKQzNZki_fdOqTtxdRbn-87iCHGJcItg4Q6cBgnoFFgFUhp5JCaotKpAO3UsJvu-GgE8FWelfAKgBaUn4mrRtYkGzpSuy4aGdsyOPxKH4VycREqFL35zKhZPj--zl2r-9vw6e5hXQRocKmsaxqidqR27gMwko1HRUU3NKi4tQZBRhmY5diZikGhZg8EVGLaBuZ6Km8PuJvdfWy6DX7clcErUcb8tvjGm0bKBEcQDGHJfSuboN7ldU955BL9_wf95YXTuD07bxT6v6bvPaeUH2qU-x0xdaIuv_9d_AExZYSE</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Ishiai, Sumio</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><author>Ishiai, Sumio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Neglect syndrome</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishiai, Sumio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unilateral spatial neglect</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</jtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>143-146</pages><issn>0960-2011</issn><eissn>1464-0694</eissn><coden>NREHE3</coden><abstract>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, &amp; Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, &amp; Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis &amp; Warrington, 1989).</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09602019408402272</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-2011
ispartof Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146
issn 0960-2011
1464-0694
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09602019408402272
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Neglect syndrome
Neuropsychology
title Unilateral spatial neglect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral%20spatial%20neglect&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychological%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Ishiai,%20Sumio&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=143-146&rft.issn=0960-2011&rft.eissn=1464-0694&rft.coden=NREHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09602019408402272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57756250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57756250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true