Unilateral spatial neglect
"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychological rehabilitation 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Neuropsychological rehabilitation |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Ishiai, Sumio |
description | "Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, & Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis & Warrington, 1989). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09602019408402272 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09602019408402272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57756250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFeu3I3em8nkAW6k-IKCG7sOt-mNjKQzNZki_fdOqTtxdRbn-87iCHGJcItg4Q6cBgnoFFgFUhp5JCaotKpAO3UsJvu-GgE8FWelfAKgBaUn4mrRtYkGzpSuy4aGdsyOPxKH4VycREqFL35zKhZPj--zl2r-9vw6e5hXQRocKmsaxqidqR27gMwko1HRUU3NKi4tQZBRhmY5diZikGhZg8EVGLaBuZ6Km8PuJvdfWy6DX7clcErUcb8tvjGm0bKBEcQDGHJfSuboN7ldU955BL9_wf95YXTuD07bxT6v6bvPaeUH2qU-x0xdaIuv_9d_AExZYSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57756250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Ishiai, Sumio</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><description>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, & Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis & Warrington, 1989).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09602019408402272</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NREHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Neglect syndrome ; Neuropsychology</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09602019408402272$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09602019408402272$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><title>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</title><description>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, & Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis & Warrington, 1989).</description><subject>Neglect syndrome</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><issn>0960-2011</issn><issn>1464-0694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QFeu3I3em8nkAW6k-IKCG7sOt-mNjKQzNZki_fdOqTtxdRbn-87iCHGJcItg4Q6cBgnoFFgFUhp5JCaotKpAO3UsJvu-GgE8FWelfAKgBaUn4mrRtYkGzpSuy4aGdsyOPxKH4VycREqFL35zKhZPj--zl2r-9vw6e5hXQRocKmsaxqidqR27gMwko1HRUU3NKi4tQZBRhmY5diZikGhZg8EVGLaBuZ6Km8PuJvdfWy6DX7clcErUcb8tvjGm0bKBEcQDGHJfSuboN7ldU955BL9_wf95YXTuD07bxT6v6bvPaeUH2qU-x0xdaIuv_9d_AExZYSE</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Ishiai, Sumio</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Unilateral spatial neglect</title><author>Ishiai, Sumio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-875e1f69739e9c1eea2f74f9a3a5dfb8a0c2f2c5bc1e7f1c218e6071d07e8cee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Neglect syndrome</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishiai, Sumio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishiai, Sumio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unilateral spatial neglect</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</jtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>143-146</pages><issn>0960-2011</issn><eissn>1464-0694</eissn><coden>NREHE3</coden><abstract>"Unilateral spatial neglect" or "hemispatial neglect" is a commonly used term for expressing the failure of brain damaged patients to attend to and explore stimuli presented in the space contralateral to their lesion (Heilman, Bowers, Valenstein, & Watson, 1987). Because unilateral spatial neglect is observed under conditions where movements of the eyes and head are permitted, trunk-hemispace, determined by the sagittal midplane of the body, is treated as the most important conceptual space for neglect (Heilman et al., 1987). However, the neglected space is not the unilateral half of space or hemispace. It is more accurate to state that there is a gradient in spatial locations subject to neglect: In left unilateral spatial neglect, the more a stimulus is located to the left, the more frequently it is neglected (Kinsbourne, 1987). There is no constant boundary between the neglected and non-neglected spaces for individual patients. We found that neglect patients could explore more to the left in the line cancellation task when motivated by numbering (Ishiai et al., 1990). Neglected space is also reported to be affected by demand on selective attention (Rapcsak, Verfaellie, Fleet, & Heilman, 1989) and by information implicit in stimulus configurations (Kartsounis & Warrington, 1989).</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09602019408402272</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-2011 |
ispartof | Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 1994-06, Vol.4 (2), p.143-146 |
issn | 0960-2011 1464-0694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09602019408402272 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Neglect syndrome Neuropsychology |
title | Unilateral spatial neglect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral%20spatial%20neglect&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychological%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Ishiai,%20Sumio&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=143-146&rft.issn=0960-2011&rft.eissn=1464-0694&rft.coden=NREHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09602019408402272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57756250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57756250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |