One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England
This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintena...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug and alcohol review 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Drug and alcohol review |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise |
description | This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09595230123311 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09595230123311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>DAR351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKevPucf6MxHkzaPY-5DGBs4ZY8hbW9sZ9eOJFP339uxIfggPl3uPed3uByE7ikZUJKSB6KEEowTyjin9AL1aCxFxLlkl6h3FKNOldfoxvsNIYQJwXpILxvA5b4pHBTYNAUOn9CEQ2SrD8A7E6pu83jnwOeuyjpP1WwgDyarAbe7ygTw3QmHEvCidaHEa_ABtxaPm7e6y7tFV9bUHu7Os49eJ-OX0SyaL6dPo-E8yplSNEqsSnKAmEKaWZul1BqpWFYImZhMSKaKQpmME244sSZnccqkKgCETOMsTWLeR4NTbu5a7x1YvXPV1riDpkQf69G_6-kAdgI-qxoO_7j14_CZiyMUnaDKB_j6gYx71zLhidDrxVTHYkJXi_VMrzp_evY3tnVbU4KpQ5kbB3rT7l3TNfLXf9_JAogE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creator><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><description>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-5236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09595230123311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>heroin treatment ; injectable methadone</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol review, 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66</ispartof><rights>2001 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2001</rights><rights>2001 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09595230123311$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09595230123311$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,61194,61375</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><title>Drug and alcohol review</title><description>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</description><subject>heroin treatment</subject><subject>injectable methadone</subject><issn>0959-5236</issn><issn>1465-3362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKevPucf6MxHkzaPY-5DGBs4ZY8hbW9sZ9eOJFP339uxIfggPl3uPed3uByE7ikZUJKSB6KEEowTyjin9AL1aCxFxLlkl6h3FKNOldfoxvsNIYQJwXpILxvA5b4pHBTYNAUOn9CEQ2SrD8A7E6pu83jnwOeuyjpP1WwgDyarAbe7ygTw3QmHEvCidaHEa_ABtxaPm7e6y7tFV9bUHu7Os49eJ-OX0SyaL6dPo-E8yplSNEqsSnKAmEKaWZul1BqpWFYImZhMSKaKQpmME244sSZnccqkKgCETOMsTWLeR4NTbu5a7x1YvXPV1riDpkQf69G_6-kAdgI-qxoO_7j14_CZiyMUnaDKB_j6gYx71zLhidDrxVTHYkJXi_VMrzp_evY3tnVbU4KpQ5kbB3rT7l3TNfLXf9_JAogE</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><author>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>heroin treatment</topic><topic>injectable methadone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>57-66</pages><issn>0959-5236</issn><eissn>1465-3362</eissn><abstract>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/09595230123311</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-5236 |
ispartof | Drug and alcohol review, 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66 |
issn | 0959-5236 1465-3362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09595230123311 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | heroin treatment injectable methadone |
title | One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20and%20twenty-five%20patients%20prescribed%20injectable%20opiates%20in%20the%20North%20West%20of%20England&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20review&rft.au=Sell,%20Graham%20Segar,%20John%20Merrill,%20Louise&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=57-66&rft.issn=0959-5236&rft.eissn=1465-3362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09595230123311&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EDAR351%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |