One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England

This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug and alcohol review 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66
1. Verfasser: Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 66
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Drug and alcohol review
container_volume 20
creator Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise
description This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09595230123311
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09595230123311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>DAR351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKevPucf6MxHkzaPY-5DGBs4ZY8hbW9sZ9eOJFP339uxIfggPl3uPed3uByE7ikZUJKSB6KEEowTyjin9AL1aCxFxLlkl6h3FKNOldfoxvsNIYQJwXpILxvA5b4pHBTYNAUOn9CEQ2SrD8A7E6pu83jnwOeuyjpP1WwgDyarAbe7ygTw3QmHEvCidaHEa_ABtxaPm7e6y7tFV9bUHu7Os49eJ-OX0SyaL6dPo-E8yplSNEqsSnKAmEKaWZul1BqpWFYImZhMSKaKQpmME244sSZnccqkKgCETOMsTWLeR4NTbu5a7x1YvXPV1riDpkQf69G_6-kAdgI-qxoO_7j14_CZiyMUnaDKB_j6gYx71zLhidDrxVTHYkJXi_VMrzp_evY3tnVbU4KpQ5kbB3rT7l3TNfLXf9_JAogE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creator><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><description>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-5236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09595230123311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>heroin treatment ; injectable methadone</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol review, 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66</ispartof><rights>2001 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2001</rights><rights>2001 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09595230123311$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09595230123311$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,61194,61375</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><title>Drug and alcohol review</title><description>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</description><subject>heroin treatment</subject><subject>injectable methadone</subject><issn>0959-5236</issn><issn>1465-3362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKevPucf6MxHkzaPY-5DGBs4ZY8hbW9sZ9eOJFP339uxIfggPl3uPed3uByE7ikZUJKSB6KEEowTyjin9AL1aCxFxLlkl6h3FKNOldfoxvsNIYQJwXpILxvA5b4pHBTYNAUOn9CEQ2SrD8A7E6pu83jnwOeuyjpP1WwgDyarAbe7ygTw3QmHEvCidaHEa_ABtxaPm7e6y7tFV9bUHu7Os49eJ-OX0SyaL6dPo-E8yplSNEqsSnKAmEKaWZul1BqpWFYImZhMSKaKQpmME244sSZnccqkKgCETOMsTWLeR4NTbu5a7x1YvXPV1riDpkQf69G_6-kAdgI-qxoO_7j14_CZiyMUnaDKB_j6gYx71zLhidDrxVTHYkJXi_VMrzp_evY3tnVbU4KpQ5kbB3rT7l3TNfLXf9_JAogE</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</title><author>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-7f97cee41e8bffb81fa692bd567ab5629dd9ab303a30fac248269dee5684b8743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>heroin treatment</topic><topic>injectable methadone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sell, Graham Segar, John Merrill, Louise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>57-66</pages><issn>0959-5236</issn><eissn>1465-3362</eissn><abstract>This study describes the demographics, drug-using history, current prescription, current illicit drug use, injecting practice and opinion of treatment of 125 patients prescribed injectable opiates at a clinic in the North West of England. The prescribing policy at the clinic has resulted in maintenance treatment with several opiate drugs, dominated by injectable methadone and injectable diamorphine (heroin). Injectable methadone (85.6% (107/125)) was more frequently prescribed than injectable diamorphine (12.8% (16/125)). Injectable heroin was desired by many who were prescribed injectable methadone, since it was the current drug of choicefor 50.4%of the sample (61/121). The patient cohort gave a history of risky drug use in the past, both with regard to immediate physical health and blood borne viruses. Current self-reported risk behaviour for blood-borne viruses was low. Twenty-five percent (29/121) of patients continued to use street heroin, of whom only four did so on a daily basis. This patient cohort has very low levels of daily illicit drug use; 40.5% (49/121) of patients currently used their femoral veins to inject, a practice which highlights the difficult riskbenefit analysis which is inherent in injectable prescribing. \[Sell L, Segar G, Merrill J. One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001:20:57-66]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/09595230123311</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-5236
ispartof Drug and alcohol review, 2001-03, Vol.20 (1), p.57-66
issn 0959-5236
1465-3362
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09595230123311
source Taylor & Francis; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects heroin treatment
injectable methadone
title One hundred and twenty-five patients prescribed injectable opiates in the North West of England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20and%20twenty-five%20patients%20prescribed%20injectable%20opiates%20in%20the%20North%20West%20of%20England&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20review&rft.au=Sell,%20Graham%20Segar,%20John%20Merrill,%20Louise&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=57-66&rft.issn=0959-5236&rft.eissn=1465-3362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09595230123311&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EDAR351%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true